Business
The global wealthy are lining up for Trump’s $1 million Gold Card after price cut

U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office at the White House on September 19, 2025 in Washington, DC. Trump signed two executive orders, establishing the “Trump Gold Card” and introducing a $100,000 fee for H-1B visas.
Andrew Harnik | Getty Images News | Getty Images
A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.
By slashing the price of the Gold Card from $5 million to $1 million, President Donald Trump has created one of the most coveted deals in the global visa market, with demand already surging among the world’s wealthy, according to immigration attorneys.
Last week, Trump signed an executive order announcing the official launch of the Gold Card, which will cost $1 million and grant residency in “record time,” he said. When he first announced the Gold Card in February, the price was $5 million. While the Gold Card website also touts a future $5 million Platinum Card, with added tax benefits, the Platinum Card wasn’t in the executive order and wasn’t mentioned in the press event.
With its new discounted price and promise of speedy approvals, the Gold Card has instantly become one of the most sought after “golden visas” in the world, with a price below many other countries. Singapore’s investment visa program, for instance, costs nearly $8 million, while New Zealand’s new program is just under $3 million. Even Samoa is more expensive, requiring a $1.4 million investment.
“The Gold Card is almost too cheap,” said Reaz Jafri of international law firm Withers. “You get access to the U.S. education system, health-care system, banking system and financial markets, all for $1 million. It’s a pittance for many of these families. I think they should have kept it at $5 million to make it special.”
The global wealthy are ready to write the checks. Jafri said he was speaking at a family office conference in Singapore this week and was approached by three families — two based in China and one based in India — who immediately expressed interest in buying a Gold Card. He said he expects his firm alone will help process “hundreds” of applications once the program is off the ground and proven.
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said the government plans to issue 80,000 Gold Cards. Together with potential Platinum Card and the new H-1B fees, which were raised to $100,000, he said the programs are expected to raise $100 billion in federal revenue.
The Gold Card still faces obstacles. Despite the announcement at the White House last Friday, there is no way to apply for the visa yet. The website announcing the Gold Card that went live in June asks for basic information from potential applicants, including their name and country of residence. So far, people who registered on the site said they haven’t received any updates.
The program is also likely to be challenged in the courts and potentially by Congress. Because immigration law is set by Congress, the president created the Gold Card through several legal workarounds, including using the existing EB-1 and EB-2 programs as the infrastructure or basis for the Gold Card. The $1 million fee is officially labeled an “unrestricted gift” to the government rather than an official fee change.
The tentative legal status may also give the overseas wealthy pause at first, according to immigration attorneys. Many applicants will likely wait to see the first Gold Cards awarded and granted before spending the $1 million. And some may wait even longer.
“These things always take a little bit of time to ramp up,” said Dominic Volek group head of private clients at Henley & Partners. “People don’t want to be the first one to try it. The majority of our clients like to see the program up and running for three to six months and see the outcomes before they commit.”
Volek said he’s already had a number of inquiries from clients and expects the program to attract at least 5,000 to 10,000 applications a year.
“From a price point perspective, it’s definitely more attractive at $1 million instead of $5 million,” Volek said. “And if it’s as quick as they say, it becomes even more attractive.”
The Gold Card also comes at an opportune moment in the global visa market. As geopolitical uncertainty, wars and political tensions rise across the world, the ultra-wealthy are buying alternative citizenships and residencies for a “Plan B” or hedge against their home countries.
An estimated 142,000 millionaires are expected to relocate to another country in 2025, according to a report from New World Wealth and Henley & Partners. The U.S. is one of the top destinations, with 7,500 millionaires expected to move to the U.S. this year, ranking only second to the United Arab Emirates, according to the report. Most of the millionaires coming to America are from Asia, the U.K. and Latin America.
Demand for the Gold Card is likely to come mainly from China and India, according to immigration advisors. Yet applicants from those countries may be disappointed. The EB-1 and EB-2 programs (which form the basis for the Gold Card) already have large backlogs of applicants from China and India, stretching for years. If Gold Card buyers are allowed to skip to the front of the line because of their $1 million donation, the applicants who have been waiting could file lawsuits. At the same time, Gold Card buyers won’t be willing to spend $1 million if they’re forced to wait years for approval.
Dramatically expanding the number of visas available through the EB-1 and EB-2 programs would also likely require approval from Congress, advisors said.
“India and China are actually excluded in a way from the Gold Card,” Volek said. “The EB-1 and EB-2 routes already have significant backlogs for China and India. So immediate access to the Gold Card may not actually work if you’re born in one of those two countries.”
The Gold Card also has some downsides compared with other golden visa programs around the world. The $1 million donation isn’t refundable, while visas in other countries are structured as investments that could generate returns. And unlike most other countries, the U.S. taxes its citizens and residents on their worldwide income, even if it’s earned overseas.
The Platinum Card is designed to partially avoid the taxation issue in exchange for a higher price. According to the White House, the Platinum Card would allow holders to remain in the U.S. for 270 days a year without paying taxes on their overseas income. Currently, overseas nationals are subject to worldwide tax if they are in the U.S. for 183 days during a three-year period using a complex IRS day-counting formula known as the “substantial presence” test.
Some advisors say the Platinum Card will be a tougher sell than the Gold Card, since it doesn’t lead to a green card or citizenship and has limited benefits for the ultra-rich who already spend time in the U.S.
“It will not sell well,” said David Lesperance, of Lesperance Associates. “Few will consider it worth $5 million just to spend an additional 91 days in the U.S.”
Others say the Gold and Platinum cards will appeal to different types of overseas rich. The Platinum Card may be appealing to the ultra-wealthy — say, billionaires from Asia or the Middle East — who want to be in the U.S. but want to shield their companies and income from U.S. taxes. Jafri said he’s already received inquiries about the Platinum Card from four Brazilian family offices.
The Gold Card is more fitting for the sons and daughters of the overseas rich who want to go to college in the U.S. and become more competitive in the U.S. job market after graduating.
“A lot of the kids of these overseas billionaires don’t want to run the family business and want to be architects or doctors or engineers and have regular jobs,” Jafri said. “Or maybe they want to create a startup in America. The Gold Card is very attractive for that group.”
Given the relatively low price of the Gold and Platinum cards, Jafri said the White House should consider eventually issuing a Black Card.
“They could charge $20 million or $25 million and exempt the buyers from the estate tax,” he said. “That would be a game changer. I bet 1,000 people would do it and they would bring all their assets to the U.S.”
Business
Trade talks: India, EU wrap up 14th round of FTA negotiations; push on to seal deal by December – The Times of India

India and the 27-nation European Union (EU) have concluded the 14th round of negotiations for a proposed free trade agreement (FTA) in Brussels, as both sides look to resolve outstanding issues and move closer to signing the deal by the end of the year, PTI reported citing an official.The five-day round, which began on October 6, focused on narrowing gaps across key areas of trade in goods and services. Indian negotiators were later joined by Commerce Secretary Rajesh Agrawal in the final days to provide additional momentum to the talks.During his visit, Agrawal held discussions with Sabine Weyand, Director General for Trade at the European Commission, as both sides worked to accelerate progress on the long-pending trade pact.Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal recently said he was hopeful that the two sides would be able to sign the agreement soon. Goyal is also expected to travel to Brussels to meet his EU counterpart Maros Sefcovic for a high-level review of the progress made so far.Both India and the EU have set an ambitious target to conclude the negotiations by December, officials familiar with the matter said, PTI reported.Negotiations for a comprehensive trade pact between India and the EU were relaunched in June 2022 after a hiatus of more than eight years. The process had been suspended in 2013 due to significant differences over market access and tariff liberalisation.The EU has sought deeper tariff cuts in sectors such as automobiles and medical devices, alongside reductions in duties on products including wine, spirits, meat, and poultry. It has also pressed for a stronger intellectual property framework as part of the agreement.For India, the proposed pact holds potential to make key export categories such as ready-made garments, pharmaceuticals, steel, petroleum products, and electrical machinery more competitive in the European market.The India-EU trade pact talks span 23 policy chapters covering areas such as trade in goods and services, investment protection, sanitary and phytosanitary standards, technical barriers to trade, rules of origin, customs procedures, competition, trade defence, government procurement, dispute resolution, geographical indications, and sustainable development.India’s bilateral trade in goods with the EU stood at $136.53 billion in 2024–25, comprising exports worth $75.85 billion and imports valued at $60.68 billion — making the bloc India’s largest trading partner for goods.The EU accounts for nearly 17 per cent of India’s total exports, while India represents around 9 per cent of the bloc’s overall exports to global markets. Bilateral trade in services between the two partners was estimated at $51.45 billion in 2023.
Business
Telcos network costs rise: Gap between expenditure and revenue exceeds Rs 10,000 crore; COAI flags rising network investment burden – The Times of India

The gap between telecom operators’ network expenditure and revenue continues to widen, prompting industry body COAI to defend calls for higher mobile tariffs, citing the increasing financial burden of network deployment on service providers.Speaking at the India Mobile Congress, Cellular Operators Association of India (COAI) Director General, SP Kochhar, told PTI that while the government has provided significant support to telecom operators through policies such as the right of way (RoW), several authorities continue to levy exorbitant charges for laying network elements.“Earlier, the gap until 2024 for infrastructure development and revenue received from tariffs was around Rs 10,000 crore. Now it has started increasing even further. Our cost of rolling out networks should be reduced by a reduction in the price of spectrum, levies etc. The Centre has come out with a very good ROW policy. It is a different matter that many people have not yet fallen in line and are still charging extremely high,” Kochhar said.He also defended the recent cut in data packs for entry-level tariff plans by select operators, stressing that the move was necessary given competitive pressures.Kochhar pointed out that competition among the four telecom operators remains intense, and there has been no significant trend suggesting that consumers are shifting towards low-cost data options.“There is a need to find ways to make high network users pay more for the data. Seventy per cent of the traffic which flows on our networks is by 4 to 5 LTGs (large traffic generators like YouTube, Netflix, Facebook etc). They pay zero. Nobody will blame OTT but they will blame the network. Our demand to the government is that they [LTGs] should contribute to the development of networks,” Kochhar said.He added that the investments made by Indian telecom operators are intended for the benefit of domestic consumers and are not meant to serve as a medium for profit for international players who do not bear any cost.
Business
Indias Real Estate Equity Inflows Jump 48 Pc In Q3 2025: Report

NEW DELHI: Equity investments in India’s real estate sector jumped 48 per cent year-on-year to $3.8 billion in the July-September period (Q3), a report said on Friday. This growth in inflow was primarily fuelled by capital deployment into land or development sites and built-up office and retail assets, according to the report by real estate consulting firm CBRE South Asia.
In the first nine months of 2025, the equity investments increased by 14 per cent on-year to $10.2 billion — from $8.9 billion in the same period last year.
The report highlighted that land or development sites and built-up office and retail assets accounted for more than 90 per cent of the total capital inflows during Q3 2025.
On the category of investors, developers remained the primary drivers of capital deployment, contributing 45 per cent of the total equity inflows, followed by Institutional investors with a 33 per cent share.
CBRE reported that Mumbai attracted the highest investments at 32 per cent, followed by Pune at around 18 per cent and Bengaluru at nearly 16 per cent.
Anshuman Magazine, Chairman and CEO – India, South-East Asia, Middle East and Africa, CBRE, said that the healthy inflow of domestic capital demonstrates the sector’s resilience and depth.
“In the upcoming quarters, greenfield developments are likely to continue witnessing a robust momentum, with a healthy spread across residential, office, mixed-use, data centres, and I&L sectors,” he added.
In addition to global institutional investors, Indian sponsors accounted for a significant part of the total inflows.
“India’s ability to combine strong domestic capital with global institutional participation will remain a key differentiator in 2026 and beyond,” added Gaurav Kumar, Managing Director, Capital Markets and Land, CBRE India.
CBRE forecasts a strong finish for the investment activity in 2025, fuelled by capital deployment into built-up office and retail assets.
For the office sector, the limited availability of investible core assets for acquisition indicate that opportunistic bets are likely to continue gaining traction, the report noted.
-
Tech6 days ago
I’ve Tested Countless Mesh Systems. Here Are the Routers I Recommend
-
Tech1 week ago
Amazon Prime Big Deal Days Is Next Week, but We Already Found 40 Early Deals
-
Tech1 week ago
All Hail the Surprisingly Versatile Packing Cube! These Are Our Favorites
-
Tech6 days ago
Jony Ive Says He Wants His OpenAI Devices to ‘Make Us Happy’
-
Tech1 week ago
AI in an ‘industrial bubble’ but will benefit society: Bezos
-
Tech1 week ago
Amazon is overhauling its devices to take on Apple in the AI era
-
Business7 days ago
Investors are packing up; Pakistan must ask why | The Express Tribune
-
Tech1 week ago
Combat Dry Indoor Winter Air With a New Humidifier