Tech
The More I Use Open Earbuds, the More Useful They Become. These Are the Best of the Best
Honorable Mentions
Open earbuds are becoming the hot trend in wireless audio, meaning there are plenty of good options that don’t make our top list. Here are some other pairs worth considering.
Acefast Acefit Pro for $60-$125: Acefast’s Acefit Pro are more stylish than the cheaper Acefit Air above, most notably in their snazzy transparent case that shows battery life in slick LEDs when you open or close it. Otherwise, the sound quality isn’t notably better than the Air, and the buds themselves are bulkier, so they don’t fit my ears as well. These are still a solid pair of wrap-around open buds, especially since the price seems to be dropping, often available well below their $125 launch price. If you can get them for $70 or less, they’re a sweet deal.
Earfun Clip for $50-$70: These affordable clip-style buds seem to have it all. You’ll get a snappy design in a compact case, a comfy fit, accessible push-button controls, and extras like multipoint pairing and a headphones finder. The package feels a step or two above the asking price, save for the sound quality. The basic performance is fine for podcasts and light listening, but leaves a lot of meat on the bone for instrumental timbres and detail, keeping this pair off our top list. Even so, at their lowest sale price of around $50, these are a good buy for basic use.
JLab Epic Open Sport for $115: JLab’s Epic Open Sport don’t have standout audio quality or a slimline design, but their mix of a comfy and stable fit and great usability makes them worth a look. Their combination of real buttons and touch pads provides convenient and customizable control on the go, still a rarity in this genre. I wish they had better call quality, and their lack of instrumental body or detail makes music rather dull, but they get the job done without breaking the bank.
Shokz OpenDots One for $200: Shokz’s first try at clip-on open earbuds is a solid if pricey effort. You’ll get great battery life, a slick and sporty design that borrows from the Bose Ultra and Soundcore Aeroclip, and the ability to swap either bud for left or right (if that’s something you’re into). At this price, I was hoping for a more polished sound, better call quality, and more versatile controls, but features like a wireless charging case add good value. If you like the style and don’t mind paying up for swappable buds, they’re worth considering.
Other Open Earbuds We’ve Tested
Soundpeats Clip1 for $70-$90: Soundpeats is one of my favorite budget brands, offering surprisingly good sound fidelity at great prices. The Clip1 are a decent effort, but the “crispy” topside misses the mark for me, leaving my favorite tunes and podcasts sounding clear, but oddly forward and inaccurate. The design looks a little cheap (especially the case), and the controls are relegated to an awkward touchpad behind your ears. I do appreciate the Clip1’s heap of features, including additions many pricier open earbuds lack, like auto-pause. They’re a real stretch at $90, but sale pricing of around $60-70 could make them more enticing.
Shokz OpenFit Pro Wireless Earbuds for $250: Shokz expands its open earbuds portfolio with a new wraparound pair that, like the Lolliclip, aims to add noise cancellation to the open-ear mix. If you’re thinking that keeping your ears open while silencing the exterior world is an ambitious quest, you’re not wrong. Results for our reviewer were both underwhelming and uncomfortable, including some pressure with noise canceling engaged. Otherwise, the OpenFit Pro offer clear and remarkably full sound in an accessible design, but the price makes them a tough sell.
Skullcandy Push 720 for $150: I’m not quite sure what Skullcandy was aiming for in the Push 720, but they mostly miss the mark for me. The hybrid pouch/charging case adds nothing notable in its pouchiness besides being harder to pocket. The semi-open fit is more intrusive than my favorite pairs, and the buds pinch my ears over time. The sound is clear enough, but there’s an edge to the upper register that doesn’t quite jive with my ears, and surprisingly little bass. There are some cool features here, and I do like the push-button controls, but in this highly competitive segment, you can do better.
Earfun OpenJump for $80: Earfun’s OpenJump offer accessible sound and impressive waterproofing in one of the most comfortable wrap-around designs I’ve put on. It’s hard to beat their price, but they fall into one of the biggest pitfalls of open earbuds right now: awkward controls with hit-or-miss response, especially on the move. They’re still a decent value on a good sale, but only if you don’t mind fumbling with the controls.
Edifier Lolliclip for $130: Edifier’s Lolliclip offer a hybrid open/semi-open design, with an AirPods-style tip looped to a backside battery. The fit feels more intrusive than my favorite open earbuds and creates too much wind resistance for biking. They’re comfy enough for short-term wear and let you swap either bud for left or right. Edifier adds plenty of other extras, from multipoint pairing to health features, but the Lolliclip’s marquee option, noise canceling, does more harm than good in most scenarios.
Tech
The Backward Logic of Chickenpox Parties
Anyone who has had chickenpox shares one distinct memory: the relentless, all-consuming itch.
Ciara DiVita was only 3 years old when she caught the virus, but she remembers it well—along with the oven mitts she was made to wear to stop herself scratching. She also recalls being taken to hang out with her cousin while covered in blisters, in the hopes of deliberately infecting them.
DiVita, now 30, was actually the second in the chain, having been taken by her parents to catch chickenpox from an infectious friend. “I imagine the chain continued and my cousin gave it to someone else at a chickenpox play date,” she says.
A lot has changed over the past three decades, most notably the development of a chickenpox vaccine, meaning the virus is no longer the childhood rite of passage it once was.
Thanks to the vaccine’s success, children today are much less likely to be exposed to the infection at school or on the playground.
Chickenpox parties are also largely considered a relic of the past—a strategy many Gen X and millennial children were subjected to before vaccines became routine. But much like the virus itself—latent, opportunistic—they haven’t disappeared entirely.
Before a vaccine existed, chickenpox, which is caused by the varicella-zoster virus, felt unavoidable. In temperate countries like the UK and the US, around 90 percent of children caught the virus before adolescence (in tropical countries the average age of infection is higher).
It’s nothing to do with chickens. The splotchy, scratchy, highly contagious disease is possibly named after the French word for chickpea, pois chiche, according to one theory, because the round bumps caused by the virus resemble their size and shape. While most infant cases are mild, adolescents and adults are more likely to develop severe complications.
This is where the idea of “getting it over and done with” emerged from, according to Maureen Tierney, associate dean of clinical research and public health at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska.
“You were trying to have your child get the disease when they were at the greatest chance of not having complications,” Tierney says, explaining that, generally speaking, the older the patient, the more severe the infection can be.
While varicella-zoster is usually a mild, self-limiting disease in children, it can be much more severe—and sometimes life-threatening—in adults.
“I had an otherwise healthy adult patient who died of chickenpox pneumonia when I was first practicing,” Tierney says. “You never forget those scenarios.”
The virus spreads rapidly through respiratory droplets and contact with fluid from its characteristic blisters, meaning if one child contracts it, siblings and classmates are likely to be next, if unvaccinated.
Before the existence of social media, the idea that children should deliberately infect each other spread just as rapidly around communities—in conversations in the school yard, church groups, and pediatric waiting rooms—leading to the popularity of so-called chickenpox parties.
Parents swapped advice about oatmeal baths and calamine lotion and arranged to bring children together when one was thought to be infectious—despite the practice never being an official medical recommendation.
“They thought, well, if it’s going to happen to my kid anyway, it might as well happen in a controlled environment,” says Monica Abdelnour, a pediatric infectious disease specialist at Phoenix Children’s Hospital. “The families were ready to encounter this infection, deal with it, and then move on.”
While the majority of children who develop chickenpox feel well again within a week or two, around three in every 1,000 infected experience a severe complication such as pneumonia, serious bacterial skin infections, encephalitis (inflammation of the brain), or meningitis.
Tech
A Danish Couple’s Maverick African Research Finds Its Moment in RFK Jr.’s Vaccine Policy
In 1996, Guinea-Bissau seemed like an ideal research post for budding pediatrician Lone Graff Stensballe. Her supervisor, a fellow Dane named Peter Aaby, had spent nearly two decades collecting data on 100,000 people living in the mud brick homes of the West African country’s capital.
Aaby and his partner, Christine Stabell Benn, believed that the years of research in the impoverished country had yielded a major discovery about vaccines—and what they described as “non-specific effects”: The measles and tuberculosis vaccines, which were derived from live, weakened viruses and bacteria, they said, boosted child survival beyond protecting against those particular pathogens.
But, the scientists said, shots made from deactivated whole germs, or pieces of them, such as the diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis (DTP) shot, caused more deaths—especially in little girls—than getting no vaccine at all.
The World Health Organization repeatedly and inconclusively examined these astonishing findings. They tended to elicit shrugs from other global health researchers, who found Aaby’s research techniques unusual and his results generally impossible to replicate.
Then came Donald Trump, Covid, and the administrative reign of anti-vaccine advocate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Suddenly, Aaby and Benn weren’t just sending up distant smoke signals from a far corner of the planet. They were confidently voicing their views and policy prescriptions online and in medical journals. The “framework” for “testing, approving, and regulating vaccines needs to be updated to accommodate non-specific effects,” their team wrote in a 2023 review.
And the Trump administration has taken notice.
“They became more strident in saying that their findings were real and that the world needed to do something about it,” said Kathryn Edwards, a Vanderbilt University vaccinologist who has been aware of Aaby’s work since the 1990s. “And they became more aligned with RFK.”
Kennedy, as secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, cited one of Aaby’s papers to justify slashing $2.6 billion in US support for Gavi, a global alliance of vaccination initiatives. The cut could result in 1.2 million preventable deaths over five years in the world’s poorest countries, the nonprofit agency has estimated. Kennedy has frozen $600 million in current Gavi funding over largely debunked vaccine safety claims.
Kennedy described the 2017 paper as a “landmark study” by “five highly regarded mainstream vaccine experts” that found that girls who received a diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis, or DTP, shot were 10 times more likely to die from all causes than unvaccinated children.
In fact, the study was far too small to confidently make such assertions, as Benn acknowledged. In a study of historical data that included 535 girls, four of those vaccinated against DTP in a three-month period of infancy died of unrelated causes, while one unvaccinated girl died during that period. A follow-up published by the same group in 2022 found that the DTP shot by itself had no effect on mortality. Critics say the 2017 study, rather than being a landmark, exemplified the troubling shortfalls they perceive in the Danish team’s research.
As Aaby and Benn’s US profile has risen, scientists in Denmark have set upon the work of their compatriots. In news and journal articles published over the past 18 months, Danish statisticians and infectious disease experts have said the duo’s methods were unorthodox, even shoddy, and were structured to support preconceived views. A national scientific board is investigating their work.
Stensballe, who worked with Aaby and Benn for 20 years, has been among those voicing doubts.
“It took years to see what I see clearly today, that there is a strange concerning pattern in their work,” Stensballe said in a phone interview from Copenhagen, where she treats children at Rigshospitalet, the city’s largest teaching hospital. She said their work is full of confirmation bias—favoring interpretations that fit their hypotheses.
Tech
Gartner: How AI will transform managed network services | Computer Weekly
In 2024, nearly all the service providers Gartner profiled in its Magic Quadrant for global WAN services report and the Magic Quadrant for managed network services report said they had started leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) in several ways to support the operation of enterprise networks. Areas of usage include AI for IT operations (AIOps), generative AI (GenAI) as a network assistant, enhanced service delivery, and AI in secure access service edge (SASE) and network security.
AIOps has emerged as a foundational capability in managed networking. Leading service providers, such as HCLTech, Microland and NTT Data, have begun to integrate AIOps capabilities and network automation for service onboarding and customer experience improvements. Also, service providers are deploying AI and/or machine learning (ML) to monitor network health, detect anomalies and automate routine tasks in network operations centres (NOCs).
The goal is to shift from reactive troubleshooting to proactive assurance. For example, if latency on a wide-area network (WAN) link starts spiking intermittently, a machine learning model might recognise the pattern as a precursor to link failure and alert engineers or trigger failover before a major outage occurs.
One such service provider is Tata Communications, which has invested in AI-based fault diagnosis using AI/ML for 85% accuracy, while AI-driven telemetry predicts and addresses issues for proactive network monitoring.
Also, many network equipment suppliers now embed AI features to support service providers for network monitoring.
GenAI as a network assistant
Over the past year, Gartner has seen a great deal of interest from managed network service (MNS) providers in applying GenAI to IT operations, including network management. The vision is to provide a network AI assistant that can interact with the provider’s operations teams via a natural language chat interface, help troubleshoot issues, document networks and even implement changes by generating configurations from intent.
One example is HCLTech, which is focusing on leveraging GenAI integrations with software-defined wide-area networking (SD-WAN) to deliver complete automation for lifecycle operations. It is building a supplier-focused GenAI large language model (LLM) as part of its service delivery platform (SDP).
Enhanced service delivery
AI is also leveraged in customer-facing aspects of MNS. Service providers are increasingly using AI to improve support and transparency for clients. This includes AI-powered customer service bots, service portals, and AI-generated reports or insights.
For example, many MNS providers profiled in the Gartner Magic Quadrant for managed network services report use bots, which are increasingly enhanced with AI capabilities, to automate repetitive tasks. Some have thousands of bots as part of their network automation codebases.
AI in SASE and network security
AI and ML are proving just as critical in the security side of MNS as they are in performance management. In fact, many service providers (for example, XTIUM and Microland) pitch AI-powered enhancements of their network security offerings, where the platform uses advanced analytics, AI and GenAI to strengthen and simplify management of local area network (LAN), WAN and cloud security.
For SASE and network security, AI can be used for automated anomaly detection. Here, the system quarantines a suspicious device or triggers multifactor authentication for a user behaving abnormally.
In policy optimisation, AI can recommend tightening or adjusting security policies, based on observed usage. For example, it can suggest zero-trust rules for an application, based on the context – location, time, company departments and so on.
Some advanced service providers, such as HCLTech, are exploring LLMs to assist security analysts – for example, summarising multistep attacks, or even writing firewall rules based on high-level descriptions of a threat.
Also, many SASE platform suppliers emphasise their AI/ML capabilities. For example, Versa Networks touts AI/ML-powered unified SASE that blends SD-WAN and cloud security, using ML to continuously adapt to network conditions and security threats. Similarly, Cato Networks highlights that it leverages AI/ML across its cloud-native SASE service to provide “reliable, accurate network security”, applying advanced data science to threat prevention and smart traffic management.
AI in MNS in 2028 and beyond
The integration of AI in MNS will increasingly enhance operational efficiency and enable more informed decision-making, ensuring that networks are robust and agile enough to adapt to changing demands and traffic patterns. Looking ahead three to five years from now, significant transformation in MNS is expected due to extensive use of AI – traditional, generative and agentic – and automation.
Widespread NOC assistants
The current rapid pace of development suggests that, by 2028, GenAI will have become a mature, trusted assistant in network operations. The experimental and nascent deployments of 2023 to 2024 will give way to robust network AI assistants embedded in MNS workflows.
These assistants will interface through natural language (text or voice) and be integrated with monitoring and ticketing systems. They will be able to answer complex queries about the network, draft change plans, and summarise incidents and problems.
Essentially, if 2023 was the introductory year for network AI assistants (see What is a network AI assistant?), by 2028, they will become a standard capability for NOCs to boost productivity.
The models behind the AI assistants are expected to be more specialised in network engineering and fine-tuned with each provider’s historical data, making them more accurate and context-aware than current tools are.
The best providers will leverage proprietary models – or at least proprietary fine-tuning – that become part of their intellectual property. For example, a provider can use a model trained on years of network event management data, which is exceptionally good at diagnosing telecoms network issues or in network security design efficacy. This will be a differentiator versus others that are using off-the-shelf network AI assistants.
By 2028, agentic AI will likely manifest as automated “Tier 0” responders in NOCs. These are AI agents capable of perceiving network incidents, understanding intent, making autonomous decisions, and executing actions for handling specific tasks and incident types end-to-end without human intervention.
By 2028, it is likely that many service providers will have enabled fully automated remediation for known issues. For example, if a branch SD-WAN router goes offline, the AI agent can perceive the incident, decide on a sequence of fixes – restart a virtual instance, fail over to backup, and so on – and execute them. It will alert a human only if those fail.
Another example could be the detection of a known bug, such as a memory leak in a firewall causing a slowdown. The AI agent, after perceiving the issue, will decide on a temporary configuration workaround or initiate a software patch, and execute these actions.
This goes beyond today’s static scripts by adding autonomous decision-making and action. The agent can verify if the issue truly matches a known pattern, using machine learning, and check if conditions are safe to execute the fix now, using policy – for example, it will reboot after business hours only if it is critical.
Fully autonomous networks will likely remain out of reach until well after 2028. But we expect that, by 2028, such self-healing actions will be accepted for narrow scopes, as service providers will have gained trust in AI for these repetitive tasks, thanks to long training and previous successful outcomes.
Nevertheless, the complexity of coordinating across domains means humans will still handle high-level decision-making. But for routine faults and performance tweaks, automated agents could become the norm, improving service reliability.
This article is based on an excerpt of Gartner’s AI will transform managed network services in the next three years report, by Gartner senior director analyst Gaspar Valdivia.
-
Entertainment5 days agoConan O’Brien hat tricks as Oscar host
-
Tech1 week agoCould Contact-Tracing Apps Help With the Hantavirus? Not Really
-
Fashion5 days agoItaly’s Zegna Group’s Q1 growth boosted by strong organic performance
-
Sports1 week agoBobby Cox, legendary Atlanta Braves manager who led 1995 World Series champions, dead at 84
-
Entertainment1 week agoMartin Short: Facing tragedy with joy
-
Entertainment1 week agoTom Brady gets back at Kevin Hart during Netflix roast
-
Entertainment1 week agoMartha Stewart: How to make an omelet
-
Sports1 week agoJacob Fatu unleashes vicious assault on Roman Reigns after World Heavyweight Championship loss at WWE Backlash
