Connect with us

Business

The vaccine and public health debate at the center of CDC upheaval, explained

Published

on

The vaccine and public health debate at the center of CDC upheaval, explained


The exterior of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) main campus in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., Aug. 27, 2025.

Alyssa Pointer | Reuters

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is facing a leadership upheaval — and at the center of the shakeup is concern about the agency’s approach to vaccines and U.S. public health.

The White House on Thursday said President Donald Trump had fired CDC Director Susan Monarez after she refused to resign. Lawyers for Monarez said she was “targeted” for “protecting the public over serving a political agenda.”

Meanwhile, four other top health officials at the CDC announced Wednesday they were quitting the agency. That includes Demetre Daskalakis, director of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, who said he could no longer serve because of the “weaponizing of public health.”

Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Chief Medical Officer Debra Houry, former National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Director Demetre Daskalakis, and former National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Director Daniel Jernigan hold flowers and react after they appeared during a protest, a day after the White House fired CDC director Susan Monarez and several top officials resigned, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., Aug. 28, 2025.

Alyssa Pointer | Reuters

The loss of those respected leaders and efforts to oust Monarez follow a string of measures by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – a prominent vaccine skeptic – to overhaul federal health agencies and change immunization policy in the U.S. That includes mass firings, gutting a key government vaccine panel, canceling studies on mRNA shot technology and hiring those with like-minded views.

Kennedy has a long track record of making misleading and false statements about the safety of vaccine shots, but in his current role, he wields enormous power over the agencies that regulate the immunizations and determine both who can get them and which ones insurance plans should cover.

Dr. Georges Benjamin, executive director of the American Public Health Association, said the leadership overhaul at the CDC represents Kennedy’s “failed leadership and reckless mismanagement,” adding that he has a “blatant disregard for science and evidence-based public health.” 

The agency is also reeling from funding cuts and an Aug. 8 attack by a gunman at its headquarters in Atlanta.

Some health policy experts said the leadership exodus could further erode the public’s trust in an agency that is responsible for detecting disease outbreaks and guiding state and local health departments when needed.

“This has to be seen on top of a raft of ways that CDC has been weakened and undermined, maybe irreversibly,” Lawrence Gostin, professor of public health law at Georgetown University, told CNBC. 

“Throughout all of those years, CDC has been independent and the jewel in the crown of American science. That’s literally all crumbling as we speak,” he said. “This is almost the definition of politics undermining science.”

Top official highlights vaccine concerns

Daskalakis was among the officials to explicitly highlight concerns with the views held by Kennedy and his staff, which he said challenged his ability to continue in his role at the agency.

“I am unable to serve in an environment that treats CDC as a tool to generate policies and materials that do not reflect scientific reality and are designed to hurt rather than to improve the public’s health,” Daskalakis said in his resignation letter, which was posted on X.

He said the CDC’s recent changes to the adult and children’s immunization schedule “threaten the lives of the youngest Americans and pregnant people.”

High-ranking members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), dressed in uniform, salute former CDC Chief Medical Officer Debra Houry, former National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Director Demetre Daskalakis, and former National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Director Daniel Jernigan, a day after the White House fired CDC Director Susan Monarez and several top officials resigned, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., Aug. 28, 2025.

Alyssa Pointer | Reuters

In May, Kennedy said the CDC removed Covid vaccines from the list of shots recommended for healthy pregnant women and children. An updated guidance days later said shots “may” be given to those groups.

Daskalakis said the data analyses that supported the change have “never been shared with the CDC despite my respectful requests to HHS and other leadership.” He also said HHS circulated a “frequently asked questions” document written to support Kennedy’s decision without input from CDC subject matter experts, and that it cited studies “that did not support the conclusions that were attributed to these authors.”

On Wednesday, the Food and Drug Administration approved the latest round of Covid vaccines only for those at higher risk of serious illness, marking another shift in policy around those shots since the pandemic began.

Shares of Covid vaccine makers dipped on Thursday. Moderna’s stock fell more than 3%, while shares of Pfizer fell around 2%. 

Those companies and other drugmakers have been bracing for changes to vaccine and public health policy since Trump first named Kennedy as his pick to lead HHS in November. The CDC’s leadership shakeup only adds to the uncertainty in the pharmaceutical industry, which is also grappling with Trump’s drug pricing policies. 

Kennedy tried to distance himself from his previous views about vaccines and other health policies during his Senate confirmation hearings back in January, claiming that he isn’t “anti-vaccine” and would not make it “difficult or discourage people from taking” routine shots for measles and polio.

But some of Kennedy’s recent efforts appear to reflect his vaccine-critical views. For example, Kennedy in August argued that mRNA vaccines – the technology used in Covid shots – are ineffective and advocated for the development of other jabs that use other “safer” platforms.

Years of research support the effectiveness of mRNA Covid vaccines, and the technology is now approved for use in shots against respiratory syncytial virus.

Threat to public health 

Former National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Director Demetre Daskalakis, next to former National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Director Daniel Jernigan, speaks to the media during a protest, a day after the White House fired CDC director Susan Monarez and several top officials resigned, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., Aug. 28, 2025.

Alyssa Pointer | Reuters

As changes roll through the CDC, concerns over a threat to public health and protocol are growing.

Daskalakis slammed the means by which HHS and other CDC leadership have communicated major policy changes. For example, Kennedy announced he was firing the entirety of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices – a panel of vaccine advisors to the CDC – through an X post and op-ed “rather than direct communication with these valuable experts,” Daskalakis said. 

He said he believed there would be an opportunity to brief Kennedy on key topics such as measles, avian influenza and the approach to the respiratory virus season. But Daskalakis said seven months into the new administration, no CDC subject matter expert from his center had briefed Kennedy. 

“I am not sure who the Secretary is listening to, but it is quite certainly not to us,” he said. “Unvetted and conflicted outside organizations seem to be the sources HHS use over the gold standard science of CDC and other reputable sources.”

Former Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Chief Medical Officer Debra Houry, followed by former National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases Director Demetre Daskalakis, and former National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Director Daniel Jernigan, reacts during a protest, a day after the White House fired CDC director Susan Monarez and several top officials resigned, in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., Aug. 28, 2025.

Alyssa Pointer | Reuters

Dr. Debra Houry, who also resigned Wednesday from her post as the CDC’s chief medical officer, similarly said that senior leaders “never were able to brief the Secretary” on any of the issues the agency deals with.

“The CDC scientists are top notch and excellent,” she told MSNBC in an interview. “What we would actually have preferred was to have more interactions with the secretary.”

Houry added that “over the past few months, things at the CDC have been really difficult when it comes to having science and data driven decisions.”

As longtime experts leave the CDC, the threat of infectious diseases is growing. While measles cases are ticking up in the U.S. again, bird flu is spreading in cattle. The first human case of the flesh-eating parasite “New World screwworm” has been detected in the country.

The departures could “make our public health less assured,” Benjamin of the American Public Health Association said.

Susan Monarez, U.S. President Donald Trump’s nominee to be director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, testifies before a Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions Committee confirmation hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 25, 2025.

Kevin Mohatt | Reuters

He said the leadership disruption also raises concerns about the nation’s ability to detect and respond to an emerging infectious disease spreading because the CDC is the “glue that holds” individual doctors and state and local health departments together.

“I am worried that we won’t know in time, and that we’ll be chasing that disease for far longer than we should,” Benjamin said. 

Benjamin said he has “little confidence” that the Trump administration will find someone “highly competent” with relevant experience to replace Monarez. 

“It obviously all has enormous implications for the health and well being of the public, and enormous implications around the finances of our nation,” he said. “Prevention and wellness saves us money, and public health is the best buy.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Two ships hit near Strait of Hormuz as fears grow of oil price rises

Published

on

Two ships hit near Strait of Hormuz as fears grow of oil price rises



International shipping is said to have come to a standstill at the strait’s entrance, with fears of disruption already pushing up global oil prices.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Khamenei dead, Middle East on edge: What will be the implications of Trump’s ‘Epic fury’ on stock markets, gold & oil? – The Times of India

Published

on

Khamenei dead, Middle East on edge: What will be the implications of Trump’s ‘Epic fury’ on stock markets, gold & oil? – The Times of India


Experience shows markets often come to view geopolitical disruptions as temporary. (AI image)

The global markets are in for a phase of enhanced turmoil and uncertainty! The ongoing tensions in the Middle East after US and Israel’s strikes on Iran and Ali Khamenei’s death may have investors running for cover – looking for an asset class that is safer.During the night of February 27–28, the United States and Israel carried out joint aerial strikes on Iran as part of “Operation Epic Fury.” Statements by President Trump openly referring to regime change suggest that the confrontation could evolve into a prolonged campaign rather than remain a limited exchange, say market analysts at Franklin Templeton Institute.What does the situation mean for stock markets, energy markets (oil), gold and other asset classes? Here’s what Franklin Templeton Institute analysts have to say:From a market perspective, the key uncertainty is whether the conflict remains confined to direct military engagement or expands into disruptions affecting energy supplies and logistics networks, which would sustain a higher and more persistent risk premium.At the centre of the ongoing uncertainty from a global market and trade perspective is the Strait of Hormuz. While a complete blockade would carry severe consequences for Iran itself, the country has the capability to disrupt maritime traffic through tactics such as vessel harassment, seizures, drone activity, cyber operations, or the use of proxy forces.

Strait of Hormuz

Strait of Hormuz

The most immediate economic impact is expected in energy markets, where crude oil and natural gas prices are likely to move higher, they say. Such actions, feel analysts, will keep geopolitical risk premiums at high levels. In 2024, approximately 20 million barrels per day moved through the Strait of Hormuz, which is around one-fifth of global petroleum liquids consumption. Even a limited interference – which can be caused by delays, rerouting, or isolated seizure – can push prices higher through increased risk perception well before any actual shortages emerge.Liquefied natural gas should not be overlooked in this context. Qatar has the world’s third-largest LNG export capacity, and roughly one-fifth of global LNG shipments pass through the Strait of Hormuz, largely consisting of Qatari exports. As a result, shipping risks in the region affect gas markets as significantly as oil markets.Also Read | US-Israel strikes on Iran: How will India be hit by Strait of Hormuz closure? ExplainedShipping expenses have already begun to rise, with insurance costs acting as a major driver. Insurers have started issuing cancellation notices and revising war-risk premiums for voyages in the Gulf region. Some routes have reportedly seen premium increases of up to about 50%, while earlier periods of tension recorded rises exceeding 60% on important trade corridors. These developments effectively tighten supply conditions even when production levels remain unchanged.The possibility of the conflict spreading across the region is increasing. Franklin Templeton Institute analysts are of the view that across global financial markets, the immediate response to such shocks is usually driven by adjustments in risk perception rather than by underlying economic changes. “The initial market reaction for this type of event would typically see Treasury yields move lower and equities lower—mostly a risk-premium repricing. Impacts on activity/earnings may be delayed and uneven. The US dollar reaction is not guaranteed; gold tends to benefit while bitcoin has been trading like a risk asset (i.e., down with equities), reinforcing that it’s not typically a reliable hedge/diversifier in geopolitical drawdowns,” say Franklin Templeton Institute analysts.However, they note that experience shows markets often come to view geopolitical disruptions as temporary. Initial spikes in risk premiums are frequently followed by the realization that the overall effect on corporate profitability is limited. The duration of the conflict, developments in shipping and insurance costs, and the eventual resolution will be more important than the initial headlines.“We would not yet label this a clean buy-the-dip setup—duration, shipping/insurance mechanics, and the endgame matter more than the first headline,” they say.From an investment perspective, the near-term outlook favours sectors linked to energy markets, as well as companies benefiting from higher shipping and insurance costs, along with defence-related industries, the analysts say. At the same time, caution is warranted toward emerging markets that depend heavily on energy imports and toward cyclical sectors sensitive to fuel and logistics costs, including airlines and certain industrial segments.“For protection, we prefer oil upside/volatility structures and selective gold exposure over broad equity shorts—the path will be driven more by shipping/insurance reality than by the new cycle,” they conclude.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

US-Israel-Iran War: Strait Of Hormuz, A Global Oil Transit Chokepoint, Hit? Will It Impact India?

Published

on

US-Israel-Iran War: Strait Of Hormuz, A Global Oil Transit Chokepoint, Hit? Will It Impact India?


Last Updated:

US-Israel-Iran War And Strait Of Hormuz: How has the conflict impacted the traffic in the global oil shipping lane? What does it mean for India and the world? News18 explains

Two traditional dhows sail by a large container ship in the Strait of Hormuz. (AP)

Two traditional dhows sail by a large container ship in the Strait of Hormuz. (AP)

The Strait of Hormuz is currently the focus of a severe global crisis. Following joint Israeli-United States strikes on Iran on February 28, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has reportedly closed the waterway to all maritime traffic.

Where is it? How was the conflict impacted the traffic? What does it mean for India and the world? News18 explains

Where is the Strait of Hormuz?

It is a narrow, strategically vital waterway in the Middle East that serves as the only sea passage from the Persian Gulf to the open ocean.

It links the Persian Gulf (to the west) with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea (to the southeast).

Bordering Countries

North Coast: Iran

South Coast: The Musandam Peninsula (an exclave of Oman) and the United Arab Emirates

It is about 21 to 33 miles (33–54 km) wide at its narrowest point. Due to the narrowness, ships must use two-mile-wide lanes (one inbound, one outbound) separated by a two-mile buffer zone to prevent collisions.

Major islands within or near the strait include Qeshm, Hormuz, Larak, and Hengam, most of which are controlled by Iran.

Key Oil Shipping Lane: Why the Strait of Hormuz matters

The Strait of Hormuz is the world’s most critical oil chokepoint. It connects the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman and the Arabian Sea. It is approximately 21 miles (33 km) wide at its narrowest point.

It handles approximately 20% of global oil consumption (around 20 million barrels per day) and 20-25% of the world’s liquefied natural gas (LNG), primarily from Qatar. Over 80% of the oil passing through the strait is destined for Asia, with China, India, Japan, and South Korea being the primary importers.

Alternative routes are limited and cannot fully compensate for a total closure of the strait.

Saudi Arabia can divert up to 5 million barrels per day via its East-West Pipeline to the Red Sea. The UAE operates the Habshan-Fujairah pipeline, which can carry roughly 1.5 million barrels per day directly to the Gulf of Oman. Iraq has a pipeline through Turkey, but it primarily handles crude from northern fields.

How has the US-Israel-Iran conflict hit the Strait Of Hormuz?

While Iran has not issued a formal legal confirmation of a total blockade, vessels in the region are receiving VHF radio transmissions from the IRGC stating that “no ship is allowed to pass”.

The U.S. has surged naval assets to the region, including the USS Gerald R. Ford and the USS Abraham Lincoln, in what is described as the largest deployment since 2003.

The impact

Forecasts for Brent crude have already been hiked toward $100 per barrel due to supply chain risks.

At least three Pakistani ships operated by the Pakistan National Shipping Corporation were reportedly stopped by Iran on March 1.

Ship traffic has plummeted, with many tankers staying in port or turning back, though some continue to transit at their own risk.

Attack reported

A Palau-flagged oil tanker, Skylight, was reportedly attacked while transiting through the Strait of Hormuz near the coast of Oman, amid escalating tensions in the region. According to reports circulating on social media, the vessel was struck while passing through the strategic waterway, triggering a fire onboard. Visuals shared online show thick plumes of black smoke rising from the tanker, with flames visible near the deck. Initial reports claim that four sailors were injured in the attack. The entire crew has since been evacuated from the vessel. The extent of the damage to the tanker remains unclear

What does it mean for India?

India is facing a high-stakes energy and economic crisis due to the reported closure of the Strait of Hormuz by Iran. India is the world’s third-largest oil consumer and is uniquely vulnerable because its dependence on this specific route has actually increased in early 2026, say experts.

Approximately 50% of India’s total crude oil imports (around 2.6 million barrels per day) pass through the Strait. This volume primarily comes from Iraq, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait.

India is even more vulnerable in terms of LPG (Cooking Gas), as it imports almost 100% of its LPG through this chokepoint. A sustained closure would immediately threaten the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana and domestic household energy.

About 60% of India’s Liquefied Natural Gas imports, mainly from Qatar and the UAE, transit the Strait. Every $1 increase in the price of oil adds roughly $2 billion to India’s annual import bill.

Rising fuel costs are expected to spike domestic inflation, potentially forcing the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to keep interest rates high. The increased demand for dollars to pay for costlier oil is also putting downward pressure on the Indian Rupee (INR), according to analysts.

Beyond energy, over 13% of India’s non-oil exports (worth $47.6 billion) to Gulf nations are at risk due to shipping disruptions.

India has enough crude oil in its Strategic Petroleum Reserves (SPR) and commercial stocks to last about 10–15 days, plus another 7–10 days of finished fuel inventories. While India had recently reduced its intake of Russian oil, officials have indicated they may pivot back to Moscow if Middle Eastern supplies remain blocked, though transit from Russia takes nearly 30 days compared to 5 days from the Gulf, according to reports.

The Ministry of External Affairs has activated contingency plans for the possible evacuation of the 9–10 million Indians living in the Gulf region through Operation Sindhu-II.

External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar is currently engaging in “shuttle diplomacy,” calling for restraint from both Iran and Israel while emphasizing the respect of sovereignty and territorial integrity.

With Agency Inputs

News explainers US-Israel-Iran War: Strait Of Hormuz, A Global Oil Transit Chokepoint, Hit? Will It Impact India?
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Read More





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending