Connect with us

Politics

Trump vows to stand firm ahead of Putin summit

Published

on

Trump vows to stand firm ahead of Putin summit



US President Donald Trump declared Thursday that he would not be intimidated by Russian leader Vladimir Putin ahead of a high-stakes summit, stressing that Ukraine would be part of any agreement concerning its future.

Putin is set to arrive in Alaska on Friday at Trump’s invitation, marking his first visit to a Western nation since ordering the 2022 invasion of Ukraine a war that has claimed tens of thousands of lives.

With Russia making battlefield advances, the Kremlin confirmed the two leaders would meet one-on-one, fueling concerns among European leaders that Putin might pressure Trump into accepting a settlement on Kyiv’s terms.

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump said, “I am president, and he’s not going to mess around with me.”

“I’ll know within the first few minutes whether we’re going to have a good meeting or a bad one,” Trump continued. “If it’s bad, it’ll be over quickly. If it’s good, we could see peace in the near future.” He estimated the summit had a one-in-four chance of failing.

Trump has previously expressed admiration for Putin and faced backlash after the 2018 Helsinki summit, where he appeared to side with the Russian leader over US intelligence assessments regarding Moscow’s election interference.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not invited to the Alaska meeting, has criticized it as a reward for Putin and rejected Trump’s calls to cede territory.

Trump promised not to finalize any deal with Putin alone, and said he hoped to hold a three-way summit with Zelensky, possibly immediately afterwards in Alaska.

“The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that’s going to be a meeting where they make a deal.

And I don’t want to use the word ‘divvy’ things up. But you know, to a certain extent, it’s not a bad term,” Trump told Fox News Radio.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters any future deal needed also to ensure “security guarantees” for Ukraine.

But Trump has previously backed Russia’s stance in ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine.

– Shifting Trump tone –
Trump had boasted that he could end the war within 24 hours of returning to the White House in January.

But his calls to Putin — and intense pressure on Zelensky to accept concessions — have failed to move the Russian leader and Trump has warned of “very severe consequences” if Putin keeps snubbing his overtures.

The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1930 GMT) Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, a major US military installation in Alaska that has been crucial in monitoring Russia.

Zelensky met in London with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who vowed solidarity, a day after receiving support in Berlin.

Germany’s Chancellor Friedrich Merz urged Putin on Friday to seize the “opportunity” of a ceasefire.

“The goal must be a summit also attended by President Zelensky” where “a ceasefire must be agreed”, he said in a statement, adding that Trump “can now take a major step toward peace”.

Russia has made major gains on the ground ahead of the summit.

Ukraine on Thursday issued a mandatory evacuation of families with children from the eastern town of Druzhkivka and four nearby villages near an area where Russia made a swift breakthrough.

Mixed views on diplomacy

Diplomacy since Russia’s invasion has largely failed to secure agreements beyond swaps of prisoners.

Russia said Thursday it had returned 84 prisoners to Ukraine in exchange for an equal number of Russian POWs.

The war has proved divisive in the United States, with a Pew Research Center poll finding that 59 percent of Americans lacked confidence in Trump’s wisdom on the issue.

Anchorage, nestled under mountains, bore few indications it was the center of global attention except for signs denouncing Putin put up on downtown streets, where people gave mixed opinions of the summit.

“I think it’s a travesty to invite a war criminal like Putin to the United States. My primary concern is that he’s going to negotiate away everything and it’s not going to be possible to have a peaceful solution,” said Jay Ahuja, 62, a retiree from North Carolina.

But Kimberly Brown, a 63-year-old retiree from Ohio, said Alaska was a “perfect place” for the summit.

“I just think that Trump is the best person to negotiate world peace.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Russia expels British diplomat it accuses of spying

Published

on

Russia expels British diplomat it accuses of spying


General view of the Russia and Great Britain flags outside  Vitality Stadium, Bournemouth in Britain on March 17, 2018. — Reuters
General view of the Russia and Great Britain flags outside  Vitality Stadium, Bournemouth in Britain on March 17, 2018. — Reuters

Russia on Thursday expelled a British diplomat who it said was an undeclared officer in Britain’s intelligence services, and warned London that Moscow would not tolerate such espionage activities on its territory.

The FSB, the main successor to the Soviet-era KGB, named the British diplomat, a second secretary at the Moscow embassy, and said he was working undercover for Britain’s spy service. Russian media carried pictures of the diplomat.

Russia said he has been given two weeks to leave Russia. Britain’s Foreign Office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Russia’s foreign ministry summoned Britain’s charge d’affaires in Russia, Danae Dholakia, to issue a formal protest about the situation.

“It was again stressed that Moscow would not tolerate the activities of undeclared British intelligence officers in Russia,” the foreign ministry said in a statement.

“A warning was also issued that if London escalates the situation, the Russian side will give a decisive ‘mirror’ response,” it said.

Protesters at the foreign ministry chanted anti-British slogans in front of the British diplomatic car carrying the charge d’affaires.

Amid the war in Ukraine, Russia and the West have repeatedly accused each other of unfurling espionage campaigns of an intensity not seen since the depths of the Cold War.

Russia says that the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Britain’s Secret Intelligence Service, known as MI6, and France’s DGSE have all stepped up attempts to steal secrets, recruit Russians, and sow discord inside Russia.

Western European spy chiefs say that the FSB, Russia’s SVR foreign intelligence service and the GRU military intelligence service have mounted major cyber attacks and sabotage campaigns across the Western world, something Moscow denies.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump says killings in Iran subsiding as experts warn on military intervention

Published

on

Trump says killings in Iran subsiding as experts warn on military intervention


US President Donald Trump looks on as he signs executive orders and proclamations in the Oval Office at the White House, in Washington, DC on May 5, 2025. — Reuters
US President Donald Trump looks on as he signs executive orders and proclamations in the Oval Office at the White House, in Washington, DC on May 5, 2025. — Reuters
  • Trump says “we are going to watch” process in Iran.
  • Gulf Arab countries concerned about US strikes.
  • Trump aides reviewing a range of options, says source.

US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that killings in Iran’s crackdown on nationwide protests were subsiding and he believed there was no plan for large-scale executions of protesters, as analysts and diplomats warned of possible risks from a US military intervention.

Trump’s comments during an Oval Office event come as fears have escalated in the Middle East that the United States could launch strikes on Iran, following the US president’s repeated threats to intervene on behalf of protesters. He did not rule out possible US military intervention, however.

Some experts and regional diplomats warn that military intervention could backfire by smothering protests, fueling an intensified crackdown on those who participated and triggering retaliatory Iranian missile attacks on US bases in the Middle East.

In a more extreme scenario, several said, US strikes might hasten the government’s collapse, possibly unleashing chaos across the nation of 90 million, encouraging insurgencies by minority Kurdish and Baluch separatists and leaving Iran’s nuclear and missile programs unsecured.

Still, several US intelligence assessments earlier this week concluded that while the protests posed a serious challenge, the government did not appear close to collapsing, according to four knowledgeable sources.

“We have restive ethnic minorities. We have loose undeclared fissile materials. We have dispersed missile stocks with no command and control, and we have had for over a decade refugee flows … and significant atrocities are happening,” said Behnam Ben Taleblu, an analyst with the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies. “All the fears that would come with regime change would be expedited.”

Meanwhile, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said “there is no plan” by Iran to hang people, when asked about the anti-government protests in the Middle Eastern nation.

“There is no plan for hanging at all,” the foreign minister told Fox News in an interview on the “Special Report with Bret Baier” show. “Hanging is out of the question,” he said.

The protests appear to be the biggest domestic challenge Iran’s clerical establishment has faced since it took power in the 1979 Islamic Revolution, with massive crowds demanding the government’s ouster and clashing with security forces.

An Iranian official has said more than 2,000 people have died since the protests erupted on December 28. A rights group put the number of deaths at more than 2,600. Many experts believe the toll is much higher.

The White House and the Iranian delegation to the United Nations did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Trump on Wednesday said “very important sources on the other side” had reported that killings in Iran’s crackdown were subsiding, and that he believed there was currently no plan for large-scale executions.

He did not rule out potential US military action, saying “we are going to watch what the process is” before noting the US administration received a “very good statement” from Iran.

Concern in the Middle East

Gulf Arab governments “are freaking out” over possible US strikes, said a regional diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity. “In every conversation they are having with the Americans and Iranians, (the Gulf governments) have been asking them to calm down.”

Trump’s earlier warnings of intervention assumed fresh weight on Wednesday as the US began withdrawing some personnel in the region after a senior Iranian official said neighboring countries had been told that American bases would be struck in retaliation.

Not everyone expressed concern over possible US strikes.

Abdullah Mohtadi, the leader of the Komala Party of Iranian Kurdistan, a leading Kurdish party that advocates a secular democracy, dismissed the threat of separatism and said only significant US strikes can halt widespread killings of protesters by the security forces.

“The chaos is already there. The most important thing is to stop the massacre of people,” said Mohtadi, who lives in exile in London, adding that he believes opposition groups could work together to replace the theocratic government with democratic rule.

Trump, who ordered strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites in June during a 12-day war between Israel and Iran, has declined to reveal what action he would take.

One source said that Trump aides have been reviewing a range of options, including limited strikes on symbolic military targets.

Some experts said that with his repeated vows to act, Trump may have left himself little choice but to intervene should the security forces pursue their harsh crackdown.

Otherwise, they said, he risks losing credibility.

The key question, said Taleblu, is what targets would be hit.

“The nature of the target can impact the next round of protests or dampen them altogether if the population senses that Washington’s strikes are merely symbolic … and will have no meaningful impact on the security forces,” he said.

Trump could have a greater impact by interrupting Iran’s cash flows and waging cyber-attacks, giving the protests more time to play out, said Jon Alterman of the Center for Strategic and International Studies think tank.

“A military action would make everyone expect an instant result or complain it wasn’t working,” he said.

Trump has been intent on keeping up pressure on Iran after strikes on its nuclear sites in June, a White House official said. His campaign against Tehran, including both actions and the latest rhetoric, is also intended to show US adversaries that he is not shy about using US military might, the official said, citing the attack on Venezuela that toppled the country’s authoritarian leader Nicolas Maduro in early January.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Iran rejects reports of protesters’ executions

Published

on

Iran rejects reports of protesters’ executions


Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi adjusts glasses during a press conference following talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Moscow, Russia, December 17, 2025. — Reuters
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi adjusts glasses during a press conference following talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Moscow, Russia, December 17, 2025. — Reuters

WASHINGTON: Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Wednesday that “there is no plan” by Iran to hang people, when asked about the anti-government protests in the Middle Eastern nation.

“There is no plan for hanging at all,” the foreign minister told Fox News in an interview on the Special Report with Bret Baier show. “Hanging is out of the question,” he said.

According to the Norway-based Iran Human Rights Society, hangings are common in Iranian prisons.

In an interview with CBS News on Tuesday, US President Donald Trump said he would take “very strong action” if Iran started hanging protesters, but did not elaborate on his comments. “If they hang them, you’re going to see some things,” Trump said.

Trump said on Wednesday that he was told that killings in the Iranian government’s crackdown on the protests were subsiding and that he believed there was currently no plan for large-scale executions.

Trump has been weighing a response to the situation in Iran, which is seeing its biggest anti-government protests in years.

Iran had a 12-day war with US ally Israel last year and its nuclear facilities were bombed by the US military in June. Trump has been piling pressure on Iran’s leaders, including threatening military action.

The protests posed one of the gravest tests of clerical rule in the country since the Islamic Revolution in 1979, as they evolved from complaints about dire economic hardships to defiant calls for the fall of the deeply entrenched clerical establishment.

The US-based HRANA rights group said it had so far verified the deaths of 2,403 protesters and 147 government-affiliated individuals. HRANA reported 18,137 arrests so far.

Iran’s government blames foreign sanctions for economic difficulties and alleges that its foreign enemies are interfering in domestic affairs.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending