Connect with us

Tech

UK prosecution of alleged Chinese spies was ‘shambolic’ says Parliamentary committee | Computer Weekly

Published

on

UK prosecution of alleged Chinese spies was ‘shambolic’ says Parliamentary committee | Computer Weekly


The UK’s failed attempt to bring a prosecution against two alleged Chinese spies was “shambolic”, “beset by confusion” and suffered from “systemic failures”, a cross-party group of MPs and peers has concluded.

The high-profile espionage case against Christopher Cash and Christopher Berry collapsed in 2024, when the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) decided there was not sufficient evidence to show that China was a threat to UK national security at the time of the alleged offences.

The CPS abandoned the case despite witness statements from the UK government deputy national security adviser (DNSA), who described China as “the biggest state-based threat to the UK’s economic security” and pointed to state-linked cyber attacks against government and commercial targets, according to the MPs’ report.

The chief prosecution witness in the case, DNSA Matthew Collins, wrote in witness statements that “China’s espionage operations threaten the UK’s economic prosperity and resilience, and the integrity of democratic institutions”, and that China was behind “malicious cyber activity … targeting democratic institutions and Parliamentarians as part of large-scale espionage campaigns”.

The two accused – Cash, a former Parliamentary researcher, and Berry, a teacher – were charged in April 2020 for spying offences under the Official Secrets Act 1911. They were accused of passing information about UK politics, MPs and UK government policy to a Chinese intelligence agent, before subsequently being acquitted after the government dropped the case.

According to a report published today by the Joint Committee on the National Security Strategy (JCNSS), it was “not immediately obvious” that the director of public prosecutions lacked the evidence to show that China was a threat to national security at the time of the alleged offences, given the strength of Collins’ witness statements.

According to the report, prosecutors raised questions about the case against Cash and Berry following a court ruling after the conviction in May 2025 of a Bulgarian spy ring working for the Russian state, led by . The ruling addressed the meaning of the word “enemy” under the Official Secrets Act 1911.

The Court of Appeal found that there was “no reason why the term ‘an enemy’ should not include a country which represents a current threat to the UK”. It went on to say that a jury would be well placed to assess the evidence and facts.

The director of public prosecutions, Stephen Parkinson, told the committee, however, that the Roussev judgment meant prosecutors needed to demonstrate that the “totality of threats posed by China” when the alleged offences took place “made China a threat to national security”.  

Parkinson went on to tell Parliamentarians that prosecutors had been unable to secure evidence that China posed “an active” and “current” threat to UK national security at the time of the alleged offences.

The committee said that events in the case “raised eyebrows”, particularly following a decision to drop the prosecution two days after a meeting between the UK’s national security adviser (NSA), Jonathan Powell, and other officials to “discuss the management of the UK’s bilateral relationship with China”.

The committee said it did not find evidence of a coordinated high-level effort to collapse the prosecution or any deliberate efforts to obstruct it. But it did find evidence of a process “beset by confusion and misaligned expectations”.

Constitutional safeguards designed to protect the independence of criminal proceedings instead “catalysed a crisis of public confidence and fuelled allegations of conspiracy at the highest level of government”, the Parliamentarians found.

Matt Western MP, chair of the joint committee, which has made recommendations to improve the handling of future cases, said he hoped the committee’s investigation would draw a line under the case.

“As the global security environment worsens, sensitive national security cases will arise more frequently. The government must show the public that it is confident in standing up to adversaries when required. Failing to do so will corrode public trust in our institutions,” he added.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Russia Wants This Mega Missile to Intimidate the West, but It Keeps Crashing

Published

on

Russia Wants This Mega Missile to Intimidate the West, but It Keeps Crashing


A Russian intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) fired from an underground silo on the country’s southern steppe Friday on a scheduled test to deliver a dummy warhead to a remote impact zone nearly 4,000 miles away. The missile didn’t even make it 4,000 feet.

Russia’s military has been silent on the accident, but the missile’s crash was seen and heard for miles around the Dombarovsky air base in Orenburg Oblast near the Russian-Kazakh border.

A video posted by the Russian blog site MilitaryRussia.ru on Telegram and widely shared on other social media platforms showed the missile veering off course immediately after launch before cartwheeling upside down, losing power, and then crashing a short distance from the launch site. The missile ejected a component before it hit the ground, perhaps as part of a payload salvage sequence, according to Pavel Podvig, a senior researcher at the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research in Geneva.

The crash was accompanied by a fireball and a noxious reddish-brown cloud, the telltale sign of a toxic mix of hydrazine and nitrogen tetroxide used to fuel Russia’s most powerful ICBMs. Satellite images taken since Friday show a crater and burn scar near the missile silo.

Analysts say the circumstances of the launch suggest it was likely a test of Russia’s RS-28 Sarmat missile, a weapon designed to reach targets more than 11,000 miles (18,000 kilometers) away, making it the world’s longest-range missile.

An Unusable Weapon

The Sarmat missile is Russia’s next-generation heavy-duty ICBM, capable of carrying a payload of up to 10 large nuclear warheads, a combination of warheads and countermeasures, or hypersonic boost-glide vehicles, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. Simply put, the Sarmat is a doomsday weapon designed for use in an all-out nuclear war between Russia and the United States.

Therefore, it’s no wonder Russian officials like to talk up Sarmat’s capabilities. Russian president Vladimir Putin has called Sarmat a “truly unique weapon” that will “provide food for thought for those who, in the heat of frenzied aggressive rhetoric, try to threaten our country.” Dmitry Rogozin, then the head of Russia’s space agency, called the Sarmat missile a “superweapon” after its first test flight in 2022.

So far, what’s unique about the Sarmat missile is its propensity for failure. The missile’s first full-scale test flight in 2022 apparently went well, but the program has suffered a string of consecutive failures since then, most notably a catastrophic explosion last year that destroyed the Sarmat missile’s underground silo in northern Russia.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Bryan Johnson Has Discovered Shrooms, and He Really Wants You to Know It

Published

on

Bryan Johnson Has Discovered Shrooms, and He Really Wants You to Know It


“Come watch me trip balls,” declared Bryan Johnson, the “Don’t Die” longevity entrepreneur, on X a couple of days before he livestreamed himself consuming a high dose of psychedelic mushrooms at a psilocybin center in Oregon on Sunday.

It marked the second act of his stunty new investigation into whether using psilocybin can improve almost 250 wellness biomarkers, including various measures of brain connectivity, cortisol levels, and testosterone.

“There’s a potential for psychedelics to play a more important role in all of our lives, and wouldn’t it be amazing if it was also a longevity therapy,” Johnson proclaimed on the stream. Prior to consuming the shrooms Sunday—which has been legal at licensed facilities in Oregon since 2023—Johnson measured his brain activity with a $50,000 helmet produced by Kernel, a neuroimaging company founded by the 48-year-old. He also took saliva samples and temperature readings. (After his November trip, he shared a lot of information about the state of his erections, but more on that later.)

Then he drank more than five grams of powdered mushrooms mixed with lemon juice, for extra potency. Johnson grimaced, and a bizarre new era of live celebrity psychedelic exhibitionism was born—one that is arguably counter to the introspective nature of the drug. The five-and-a-half-hour livestream, which has been viewed more than 1.1 million times, also featured Johnson’s 20-year-old son Talmage, whose blood he has injected in his efforts to stay young, journalist Ashlee Vance, a DJ set from Grimes, and Salesforce CEO Mark Benioff. YouTuber MrBeast, while pictured on a cartoonish poster advertising the event, did not show up, which most extremely high people would probably count as a blessing.

Observers noted that livestreaming an intense psychedelic trip might not be beneficial, since it can lead to fragmented attention and performance stress. Johnson appeared to acknowledge this before taking the mushrooms, saying, “I guess the biggest question is, can I not go off the rails?”

“Having the whole world being able to watch you may not facilitate the best outcome,” says Rayyan Zafar, a postdoctoral fellow at the Centre for Psychedelic Research and Neuropsychopharmacology at Imperial College London. “Bryan’s setup speaks more to ego enrichment than ego dissolution and is characteristic of many of his pseudoscientific pursuits. These sorts of experiences are often best held with an introspective and internal focus.” (Ego death, where one’s sense of self dissolves, is an experience some people seek when taking various psychedelics.) Jamie Wheal, the author of Recapture the Rapture: Rethinking God, Sex, and Death in a World That’s Lost Its Mind, was more brutal in his assessment, telling WIRED the project is “a circus of self-indulgence” and an exercise in “digital narcissism.” He asked: “Is this the psychedelic renaissance that all the supposed freedom fighters and prisoners of conscience have been stumping for?” (Asked if he would like to respond to critiques of his methods, Johnson told WIRED: “Whoever said this, I wish them well.”)

But while someone tripping balls on camera might seem performative and not particularly riveting—at one point Johnson plays with a slinky after declaring “everything is alive”—his broadcast could also help reduce stigma around drug use. “I think it’s fine and good to show people what the experience [of taking psychedelics] looks like, to demystify it to some extent, to show that it can be beneficial,” said journalist and psychedelics industry consultant Hamilton Morris on the livestream; Morris hosted the Vice show Hamilton’s Pharmacopoeia, which depicted him doing drugs on camera.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

HBO Max’s ‘Mad Men’ Vomit Scene Proves ‘Remastered’ Doesn’t Mean ‘Better’

Published

on

HBO Max’s ‘Mad Men’ Vomit Scene Proves ‘Remastered’ Doesn’t Mean ‘Better’


But the problem goes beyond a change of aspect ratio. Remastering shows that were originally shot with more primitive technology sometimes goes horribly awry, like an I Love Lucy clip that went viral last year showing a pair of once-blurry background actors brought into so much focus that they now looked like surreal Picasso sketches.

I visited the set of Frasier in the late ’90s, as the TV industry was preparing for the shift from standard to hi-def. As I admired the decor of Dr. Crane’s living room, one of the acclaimed sitcom’s producers lamented that all of it would look much shabbier in HD than in the more visually forgiving SD format, and worried that they’d have to go to the expense of rebuilding all of their standing sets. Frasier, Lucy, and so many others were created without a thought to how they might one day look in a format that didn’t exist at the time.

While countless classic movies have been successfully remastered for HD or 4K, they’re also stand-alone projects, where real care and attention can be given to each frame. Seinfeld and I Love Lucy both made 180 episodes. The Simpsons made 429 episodes in standard-def. Doing quality control with that amount of product is very difficult, which is how so many of these mistakes get made. (In the case of The Simpsons, Disney+ eventually introduced an option to watch the first 20 seasons in their original aspect ratio.) Every now and then you get a situation like The Wire, whose creator David Simon insisted on being involved in the process of changing the gritty urban drama’s image quality and aspect ratio, but it’s rare.

This specific Mad Men error is an odd one, since the show was always presented in HD widescreen. But the first four seasons were shot on film, so perhaps in the remastering process, someone inadvertently used an alternate take of the vomit scene where the crew members hadn’t been digitally erased. A source close to the process said that Lionsgate gave HBO Max “incorrect files” and that the proper versions will be uploaded ASAP.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending