Connect with us

Sports

What’s new in the Premier League: War on holding, new goalkeeper rule, RefCam, more

Published

on

What’s new in the Premier League: War on holding, new goalkeeper rule, RefCam, more


The 2025-26 Premier League season kicks off on Friday when champions Liverpool host AFC Bournemouth.

As ever, the new campaign comes with some law changes and a series of initiatives. Here’s what you need to look out for.

The war on holding on corners and set pieces

Throughout the second half of last season, players holding an opponent inside the penalty area seemed to be on the increase — and now it will be an area of focus for referees in 2025-26.

The question, of course, is whether this will be clamped down on for a few weeks and then forgotten about.

Whenever an initiative like this comes around, there can tend to be accusation that referees are being over-zealous. It then gets scaled back, and we end up back where we started.

But there’s an admission that referees have too often allowed extreme holding, and a line needs to be drawn.

Referees are also going to be encouraged not to offer repeated warnings, and instead penalise the offence. That means we should not keep seeing corners delayed while a referee speaks to players (though this would happen initially), as they have been told to run the play and give the penalty.

What will the referee and the VAR be looking for? It’s contact which impedes an opponent’s movement, as simply holding of a shirt isn’t an offence — there must be an impact.

The considerations:

– Sustained holding. If the holding is fleeting, there may be no impact on the opponent

– Impact on an opponent’s ability to play or challenge for the ball

– A clear non-footballing action where the offending player has no interest in playing the ball

– Mutual holding by both players usually will not be penalised

There’s also going to be a focus on simulation, so we may see more cautions for this across the season. And that includes when, foe example, a player who is pushed in the chest goes down holding their face

Players with head injuries will now not be asked if they want treatment, in an attempt to tackle this kind of time-wasting but also for player welfare. The physio will automatically be called on, and the player must leave the field for a minimum of 30 seconds.

Goalkeeper holding the ball for too long = corner

We know the situation. A shot comes in or a corner is floated over, and the goalkeeper first flops on the ground for 10 seconds, or longer. Then he stands up, surveys his options, and looks around. Maybe then he’ll release the ball, only after some 30 seconds have been lost. Spread that across a game, and it can have a real effect on a match.

It’s been a bugbear of supporters for quite a while. Most often used by away teams trying to protect a lead in a difficult match, it has evolved somewhat to become part of a team’s tactics simply to frustrate the opposition.

Premier League 2025-26 mega-preview
Kit ranking: Every new jersey released so far

The old law, which said a keeper should release within six seconds or be penalised with a free kick, hadn’t been applied for many years. Now the keeper will get eight seconds, but with a clear punishment process thereafter.

Once a goalkeeper has control of the ball, they will have those eight seconds to release the ball once they are in a position to do so unhindered. The referee will raise his arm to indicate there are five seconds left, and then bringing it down on each second so the countdown is clear. If the ball hasn’t been released, a corner will be awarded.

If an opponent deliberately gets in the way of the goalkeeper, the count will stop and a free kick will be awarded.

The intention isn’t to try to catch a goalkeeper out, or to be unnecessarily strict. There will still be a little leeway for them to settle themselves, but referees are expected to clamp down if a line is crossed. And that will especially be the case when a goalkeeper lands on the ball and doesn’t get up quickly.

Fans will be skeptical it won’t just go the same way as the old law, the difference being there is now the hand signal which the referee is bound to. Let’s see if supporters start a five-second countdown when the referee raises his arm.

Trials were held throughout the 2024-25 season in Premier League 2 (academies) and in Maltese and Italian football. Across over 400 games only three corners were awarded — 3 in England and 0 in Malta. In Italy, a different trial was held which led to the award of a throw, which was penalized once.

After the IFAB then approved the change to the law earlier this year, it’s was adopted in the professional game in South America, in the CONMEBOL Libertadores and CONMEBOL Sudamericana — its version of the UEFA Champions League and UEFA Europa League. In the first 160 fixtures, only two corners were awarded.

It then featured at the Club World Cup in the summer, with two corners given against the goalkeeper over the 62 matches. Al Hilal goalkeeper Yassine Bounou was the first to be penalised in injury time of a 1-1 draw against Real Madrid, holding onto the ball for too long after saving a header from Gonzalo García.

Pierluigi Collina, FIFA’s head of referees, said after the Club World Cup: “It was very successful; the tempo of the match was improved. We had no time lost by goalkeepers keeping the ball between their hands for a very long time — as happened quite often in matches before.

“The purpose was not to give corner kicks, but to prevent the eight seconds rule from being ignored. The purpose was 100% achieved.”

What about VAR?

The Premier League will continue to apply a high threshold on VAR interventions, underpinned by “referee’s call,” with 83% in support of it in the Premier League’s football stakeholder survey of coaches, captains, ex-players and supporters.

VAR errors last season fell to 18 (from 31 in 2023-24) though fan perception probably doesn’t match that.

Semi-automated offside technology (SAOT) will be in place from round one, which should help to reduce delays. Last season, the average VAR delay per match fell from 64 seconds to 39 seconds.

The SAOT replays will now be showed on the big screens inside grounds, along with disallowed goals.

Last season Nottingham Forest striker Taiwo Awoniyi suffered an injury when an offside flag was delayed. But we won’t see any automated offside flags, which FIFA brought in for the Club World Cup when the technology calculated a player was more than 10cm offside.

The Premier League will discuss with FIFA how successful it was, but for now we will still see some instances of a player being well offside but the flag staying down until the end of the move.

Handball penalties

Last season the Premier League only saw nine penalties awarded for handball — by far the lowest number across the top leagues in Europe.

The stakeholder survey found 78% in favour of this approach, with only 3% saying there should be a stricter application in England. So referees will continue to apply the same philosophy.

Key points:

– A justifiable position of the arm of a player’s action

– If the arm is being used to support the body when falling

– If the player kicks or heads the ball and it hits their own arm

– If the ball deflects off a player and there is a clear change of trajectory

– Kicked against the player by a teammate

– Proximity

The double-touch penalty

Julián Álvarez was “incredulous” after his penalty kick was disallowed in Atlético Madrid‘s Champions League round-of-16 defeat to Real Madrid in March. The Argentina international had accidentally touched the ball twice when taking the kick, with the VAR stepping in to cancel the goal. Atlético boss Diego Simeone still hasn’t got over it.

In June, the IFAB announced a “clarification” to law, after it had been lobbied by UEFA.

As is often the case, it takes a high-profile incident to force change. After all, no one remembers Aleksandar Mitrovic‘s disallowed penalty for Fulham against Newcastle United in January 2023, do they? The circumstances were the same, with the Serbia international scoring a penalty via touching the ball twice after slipping in his run-up.

Yet within weeks of the controversial Álvarez incident, the law has been rewritten.

Referees the world over have also treated any double touch on a penalty as an offence, even if accidental. Now the IFAB says that’s never really been the true intention, and it should only apply to a deliberate second touch, like the ball coming off the post, and not the ball being kicked against the standing foot.

So from now on, in the rare case that the VAR identifies such an offence and the ball goes into the net, it will be a retake. If the player misses (or deliberate plays the ball a second time, for instance after a rebound off the post), the referee should give a free kick to the opposition (or it stays as a miss in a shootout).

And we got our first taste of the law change at in Women’s Euro 2025 final last month. England‘s Beth Mead stepped up to take first penalty of the shootout. She slipped as she was about to kick the ball, but it still looped into the net. However, while Mead celebrated the VAR checked for a possible double-touch and it had to be retaken (Mead missed).

Collina explained: “We thought that this should have been clarified because the double touch was intended to be related to something done deliberately. We decided it was better to clarify by adding two separate scenarios one when it’s still deliberate and the other one when it is accidental.

“I think in this way the spirit of the game and the spirit of the Laws of the Game are respected.”

Ref-worn body cameras

Get ready for a whole new view of the game: as the referee sees it. We saw RefCam at the Club World Cup, and now it’s going to be coming to the Premier League. RefCam will be trialled in the early weeks of the season, and if successful is likely to be rolled out across the campaign.

Refs will wear a camera fixed to their headsets, with the footage immediately available to the competition broadcasters.

But don’t get any ideas about pressing a button and switching to “RefCam.” Live footage cannot be shown, except before the game in the tunnel or during the coin toss.

It’s described more as an entertainment add-on. We can expect to see goals from the referee’s perspective, but we won’t see what happens at the VAR pitchside monitor.

After the Club World Cup, the IFAB approved the extension of the trial of referee-worn cameras to both domestic and international competitions worldwide. So it’s going to be coming to the Premier League, but not in the first couple of gameweeks.

“The outcome of using the RefCam here at the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 went beyond our expectations,” Collina said. “We thought it would have been an interesting experience for TV viewers and we’ve received great comments.

“We had the possibility to see what the referee sees on the field of play. This was not only for entertainment purposes, but also for coaching the referees and to explain why something was not seen on the field of play.”

No controversial or confrontational moments will be shown, however, and the Premier League will tread carefully with its use. FIFA did eventually show some red cards at the Club World Cup, including for Manchester City‘s Rico Lewis against Wydad AC, but that seems unlikely to happen here, for now.

Referees to announce VAR decisions

We saw this in FA Cup and Carabao Cup games in the second half of last season, and now it’s ready for full roll out in the Premier League.

Stuart Attwell was the first referee to step up, with a goal for Tottenham Hotspur striker Dominic Solanke ruled out for offside during their Carabao Cup semifinal first-leg tie vs Liverpool.

Referees will announce the outcome of a VAR review (or a lengthy check) over the stadium public addresses system and to TV viewers, which we’ve seen in several competitions — first tried at the 2023 Women’s World Cup.

However, the audio of the conversation between referee and VAR will remain behind the cloak of secrecy.

It remains to be seen how much this really will add. It will probably be good for complex situations, or off the ball incidents.

But there have been learnings from its use in the first half of the year. Factual offside decisions, which are usually very obvious, will not require the referee to announce them.

Only captains can speak to the referee

The Premier League chose not to adopt this last season, but after seeing it in operation in other competitions now believe it’s a useful tool for participant behaviour.

Normal interactions between players and the referee are still allowed, but the referee may invite the captain over to explain decisions which in the past may have involved players running at referees.

When the captain is the goalkeeper, a nominated outfield player would speak to the referee.

It’s supposed to prevent a referee from being crowded by players. While this might be easier to apply in short competitions like the Club World Cup and Gold Cup, it has proved to be more challenging in a 380-game domestic seasons.

The dropped ball

A more simple change, which covers the ball hitting the referee.

In the old wording of the law, if the ball hit the ref, then the dropped ball would go to the team who were last in possession of the ball. Now, it’s about who would take possession.

Usually, this is a pass between teammates so there will be no difference. But if it’s very clear that the play of the ball was going to the opposition, then the opposition gets the dropped ball.

In most cases we are likely to see the referee err on the side of caution and give the dropped ball to the team who made the pass, as it would need to be beyond doubt a change of possession was going to take place.

No red card for coaches who touch the ball when in play

In the Champions League in the 2024-25 season, Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta grabbed the ball before it had gone out of play in a match at Internazionale. A direct free kick was awarded and Arteta was booked, but by the Laws of the Game he should have been sent off. But most leagues have been dealing with this with a caution, as a red card was seen as too harsh for such a minor infringement.

And here’s the change: If a coach picks the ball up while it’s in play, and it was no more than an attempt to get play moving again, it will be no sanction (not even a caution) and an indirect free kick.

But trying to stop the opponent from restarting play will remain a red-card offence.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

State Department lists major sporting events in addition to World Cup, Olympics exempt from Trump’s visa ban

Published

on

State Department lists major sporting events in addition to World Cup, Olympics exempt from Trump’s visa ban


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Trump administration has revealed various “major sporting events” in addition to the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympic Games in which athletes and coaches will be exempt from a broad visa ban on nearly 40 countries, allowing them to travel to the U.S. to compete.

In a cable sent Wednesday to all U.S. embassies and consulates, the State Department said athletes, coaches and support staff for the World Cup, the Olympics and events endorsed or run by a lengthy list of collegiate and professional sporting leagues and associations would be excluded from the full and partial travel bans subject to citizens of 39 countries and the Palestinian Authority.

But foreign spectators, media and corporate sponsors who wish to attend the events would still be impacted by the ban unless they qualify for another exemption.

TRUMP TOUTS 2026 WORLD CUP DRAW SUCCESS, CLAIMS MASSIVE VIEWERSHIP

The Trump administration has revealed the “major sporting events” in addition to the 2026 World Cup and the 2028 Olympic Games in which athletes and coaches will be exempt from a broad visa ban. (Brad Smith/ISI Photos/ISI Photos via Getty Images)

“Only a small subset of travelers for the World Cup, Olympics and Paralympics, and other major sporting events will qualify for the exception,” the message said.

The federal government has issued several immigration and travel bans as well as other visa restrictions as part of President Donald Trump’s efforts to curb immigration, although the administration still wants athletes, coaches and fans to be able to attend major sporting events in the U.S.

Trump’s proclamation last month banning the issuance of visas to the 39 countries and the Palestinian Authority had included an exception for athletes and staff competing in some sporting events such as the World Cup and the Olympics, and a decision on the other sporting events that would be covered would be made by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

WORLD CUP FANS BANNED FROM US TRAVEL MAY BE UNABLE TO ROOT FOR TEAMS IN PERSON

Donald Trump puts on medal

Foreign spectators, media and corporate sponsors who wish to attend the events would still be impacted by the ban unless they qualify for another exemption. (Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

The events covered, according to the cable, include all competitions and qualifying events for the Olympic Games, Paralympic Games, Pan American Games and Parapan American Games; events hosted, sanctioned or recognized by a U.S. National Governing Body; all competitions and qualifying events for the Special Olympics; and official events and competitions hosted or endorsed by FIFA or its confederations.

Official events and competitions hosted by the International Military Sports Council, the International University Sports Federation and the National Collegiate Athletic Association as well as those hosted or endorsed by U.S. professional sports leagues such as the National Football League, the National Basketball Association and Women’s National Basketball Association, Major League Baseball and Little League, National Hockey League, Professional Women’s Hockey League, NASCAR, Formula 1, the Professional Golf Association, Ladies Professional Golf Association, LIV Golf, Major League Rugby, Major League Soccer, World Wrestling Entertainment, Ultimate Fighting Championship and All Elite Wrestling are also covered under the exemption.

Other events and leagues could be added to the list in the future, the cable said.

Trump and Rubio during oil meeting

Other events and leagues could be added to the list in the future. (Saul Loeb / AFP via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Under the new visa restrictions, a full travel ban covers citizens of Afghanistan, Burkina Faso, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Laos, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Niger, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen and individuals holding Palestinian Authority–issued passports.

A partial ban applies to citizens of Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Burundi, Cuba, Dominica, Gabon, Gambia, Ivory Coast, Malawi, Mauritania, Senegal, Tanzania, Tonga, Togo, Venezuela, Zambia and Zimbabwe.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Dodgers sign star outfielder Kyle Tucker to $240M contract: reports

Published

on

Dodgers sign star outfielder Kyle Tucker to 0M contract: reports


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Former Chicago Cubs and Houston Astros star outfielder Kyle Tucker has agreed to a $240 million, four-year contract with the Los Angeles Dodgers, per multiple reports. 

Tucker’s $60 million average annual value would be the second-highest in baseball history, not factoring discounting, behind Shohei Ohtani’s $70 million in his 10-year deal with the Dodgers that runs through 2033.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Kyle Tucker #30 of the Houston Astros runs to third base during the first inning against the Cleveland Guardians at Progressive Field on September 28, 2024, in Cleveland, Ohio.  (Nick Cammett/Diamond Images via Getty Images)

When healthy, Tucker is among the best all-around players in the majors. But the outfielder has played in just 214 regular-season games over the past two years.

CUBS, ALEX BREGMAN AGREE TO 5-YEAR DEAL: REPORTS

Kyle Tucker celebrates homer

Jeremy Pena #3, Kyle Tucker #30, and Alex Bregman #2 of the Houston Astros celebrate after Tucker hit a home run in the third inning against the Philadelphia Phillies in Game One of the 2022 World Series at Minute Maid Park on October 28, 2022, in Houston, Texas.  (Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images)

He batted .266 with 22 homers and 73 RBIs with the Chicago Cubs last season. He was acquired in a blockbuster trade with Houston in December 2024 that moved slugging prospect Cam Smith to the Astros.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Kyle Tucker

Kyle Tucker #30 of the Chicago Cubs swings the bat in the third inning during game five of the National League Division Series against the Milwaukee Brewers at American Family Field on October 11, 2025 in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.  (Brandon Sloter/Chicago Cubs/Getty Images)

Tucker was slowed by a pair of injuries in his lone season with the Cubs. He sustained a small fracture in his right hand on an awkward slide against Cincinnati on June 1. He also strained his left calf against Atlanta on Sept. 2.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

‘Head coach’ vs ‘manager’: Why job title matters for Chelsea, Man United

Published

on

‘Head coach’ vs ‘manager’: Why job title matters for Chelsea, Man United


Who would be a football manager? Well, as it turns out, in the Premier League the answer is an increasing number of head coaches.

The difference between the job titles of “manager” and “head coach” may seem mere semantics at first glance, but events at Manchester United and Chelsea this month point to deeper structural problems that many clubs are now grappling with.

Both Ruben Amorim and Enzo Maresca chose to go public with frustrations they deemed as unnecessary interference from the infrastructure around them.

Maresca went first. In mid-December, after a routine 2-0 home win over Everton, which should have calmed the mood around Stamford Bridge, Maresca opted instead to ignite a fire by declaring the buildup “the worst 48 hours” of his tenure due to “a lack of support.”

Why did Man United, Chelsea, Madrid all sack managers? It’s about culture
How Man United chose Carrick as head coach: A no-fuss, loyal, safe option
Real Madrid fired Xabi Alonso after 233 days. Where did it all go wrong?

His working relationship with senior figures at the club quickly eroded, and Chelsea parted company with Maresca just 19 days later. We will never know for certain, but perhaps Amorim, increasingly disgruntled at United, was inspired by those events in west London.

The following day, Amorim hinted at internal issues at a prematch news conference before facing Leeds United and, after that game, launched a full-scale assault on his bosses, insisting he joined United to “be the manager, not the head coach.” Amorim was sacked the following morning.

Chelsea have since doubled down on their existing head coach model by appointing Liam Rosenior as Maresca’s successor, not least because of his experience working for the club’s owners, BlueCo, at their sister team, Strasbourg of France’s Ligue 1.

United’s next move seems less certain after they installed Michael Carrick as an interim boss before making a permanent appointment in the summer.

The club still appears stuck at a crossroads created by legendary manager Sir Alex Ferguson’s departure in 2013, just as Arsenal were when Arsène Wenger left in 2018. They were the two most prominent exponents of the old model, which dictated that control comes at all costs for a manager. But what balance works best in 2026?


What’s the difference between ‘head coach’ and ‘manager’?

play

2:02

Rosenior: I’m accountable for my players mistakes

Chelsea boss Liam Rosenior refused to criticise Robert Sánchez after errors in the 3-2 Carabao Cup semifinal defeat to Arsenal.

This isn’t a new problem. Ferguson and Wenger once sat on stage together at a League Managers’ Association meeting, opining on how the preeminence they enjoyed was founded on controlling all aspects of their respective clubs. They were becoming increasingly isolated cases.

“The manager is the most important man at the club,” Wenger said. “If not, why do you sack the manager if it doesn’t go well?”

“Very good,” said Ferguson, sitting alongside him, smiling.

Ferguson later praised then-Premier League bosses Alan Curbishley and Kevin Keegan for leaving their posts on “a point of principle,” specifically that West Ham and Newcastle United, respectively, were letting players leave against the wishes of their managers. That was in 2008.

The intervening 18 years have seen the power balance shift steadily away from autonomous managerial figures toward head coaches, who are expected to work within a structure which divides responsibilities, including scouting, recruitment, medical determinations and data analysis among several others. A manager is a visionary to whom everyone must answer. A head coach is more of a prominent cog within a larger machine.

In one clear example of the transformation in thinking, Arsenal appointed nine new department heads around the time of Wenger’s departure in 2018 and trebled the number of operations staff in three years.

Top Premier League clubs routinely arrive at away games with two team buses — the expanded support staff no longer fit onto one bus with the playing squad. Club doctors Stephen Lewis (Chelsea) and Zaf Iqbal (Arsenal) were even listed on the official teamsheet for Wednesday’s Carabao Cup semifinal first-leg clash at Stamford Bridge.

Where the boundaries are drawn for each member of this infrastructure is where the tension usually lies for a head coach.

Today, there are only five Premier League clubs employing someone whose official job title is ‘manager’: Arsenal, Everton, Manchester City, Crystal Palace and Leeds.

One of those is Mikel Arteta, but he is a unique case. He was appointed as Arsenal head coach in December 2019 — following Unai Emery’s unsuccessful attempt to operate within the club’s post-Wenger model — but then “promoted” to manager in September 2020 after winning the FA Cup a month earlier in a Covid-delayed season.

Arteta revealed last week that the plan to promote him was actually hatched before his Wembley triumph.

“It was in my house,” he said. “They came to me and started to propose the idea of what they thought and the way they wanted to structure the club. That was after probably five, six months in the job.

“They believed that and [I said] ‘this is where I think I can help, this is my vision, this is what I would do, this is how I see this project.’ I presented it, and from there we started all together to start to add value to those ideas.

“I didn’t demand it. I didn’t ask for it, and they believed it was the right thing to do. When you have a leader, which is ownership in this case — Stan [Kroenke] and Josh [Kroenke, representing owners Kroenke Sports Enterprises] — and Josh that is very close to us with clear alignment to all of us what he wants to do, how he wants to create that space for everybody, I think it is very easy to work like this.

“At the end, it is about the relationships and the people that we have from great teams with very different qualities. Sometimes, I have been more on certain things; when there is somebody who is much better than me on that, I let them do it. For me, the title doesn’t really reflect the way we operate daily.”

Although KSE is an American company, well-placed sources within football point to the increase in U.S. ownership — now 22 of the top 44 clubs comprising England’s top two leagues — as a contributing factor. They want their clubs to retain a stable, long-term identity of their own, impervious to the idiosyncrasies of the man in the dugout.

The modern-day trend certainly appears to be clubs seeking to establish an identity based on principles set by their own sporting infrastructure, rather than the shorter-term whims of a manager or head coach who is just passing through. The League Managers’ Association published data last year suggesting the average tenure of a sacked manager is 1.42 years.

But there are signs head coaches are pushing back against this transient existence. Amorim and Maresca took internal tensions public while Tottenham Hotspur captain Cristian Romero broke ranks with an Instagram post that suggested the Spurs hierarchy “only show up when things are going well, to tell a few lies.”

It doesn’t help advocates of the head coach model that Arsenal under Arteta lead the Premier League from Pep Guardiola’s Manchester City and Aston Villa, who named Emery as head coach but whose influence is widely acknowledged to extend far beyond the limitations that title would suggest.


Finding the right fit

play

1:25

Was the Man United job ‘too big’ for Ruben Amorim?

Julien Laurens explains what went wrong for Ruben Amorim at Manchester United after being sacked following 14 months at the club.

Supporters have protested against Chelsea’s BlueCo owners, who completed their takeover in 2022 and whose methods have frustrated head coaches of high pedigree before Maresca, including Thomas Tuchel and Mauricio Pochettino.

The appointment of Rosenior has emboldened critics, suggesting the owners want a “yes man” as head coach, willing to acquiesce to the specialists who operate separately to his immediate coaching staff.

Predictably, Rosenior pushed back on any such notion when speaking at his first Chelsea news conference.

“Being a head coach, you talk about football systems and tactics,” he said. “[But] that’s 10% of the job. The job is to create spirit, energy, a culture. It doesn’t matter if you’re called a head coach, manager or anything else. The job is the same. My job is to have a team that runs, fights for each other, that plays with spirit and quality. That’s what I’m going to focus on.”

Whatever the rights and wrongs of Chelsea’s strategy — which includes employing five sporting directors, an independent medical team whose advice on player load must be followed and regular technical feedback sessions for the head coach after every game — they know exactly what they want.

Multiple sources told ESPN that BlueCo had quickly identified Rosenior as a leading candidate among a small pool of options, ruling out higher-profile names almost immediately. The belief in their model is resolute and clear.

If anything, control has been tightened. Maresca brought six staff with him from Leicester City. Rosenior has three from Strasbourg — assistant Justin Walker, first-team coach Kalifa Cissé and analyst Ben Warner — while Calum McFarlane was promoted from Chelsea’s under-21s and goalkeeper coach Ben Roberts remains in post. Set-piece coach Bernardo Cueva was appointed independently from Maresca and stayed on. All six of Maresca’s staff left.

There seems to be less clarity at United. Even caretaker boss Darren Fletcher admitting that he called Ferguson for “his blessing” before accepting the temporary position smacked of a club still struggling to emerge from the shadow of its past. They didn’t appoint a director of football and technical director until 2021, and Amorim was the first man in the club’s history to be appointed “head coach” rather than “manager.”

However, club sources have told ESPN that director of football Jason Wilcox sees recruitment falling within his sphere of influence and has said publicly that he can’t help but “interfere” in what the head coach is doing. It is, at least from the outside, a confused picture.

Carrick has brought in two staff members for his five-month stint: ex-England No. 2 Steve Holland and Jonathan Woodgate, who worked under Carrick at Middlesbrough.


‘Manager’ is a title that’s earned

Recruitment is invariably a point of friction. Club sources told ESPN that Maresca wanted a center back last summer after Levi Colwill got injured but was told to find internal solutions.

Conversely, ESPN sources say Arteta fought hard and won a battle to sign Mikel Merino from Real Sociedad in 2024 despite others involved in recruitment casting doubt over his ability and transfer fee.

Tottenham are grappling with their own approach, appointing Fabio Paratici as co-sporting director alongside Johan Lange in October, only for Spurs to confirm on Wednesday that the former will leave next month to join Fiorentina.

Gone are the days when the chief scout — and wider scouting staff that followed — operated as close allies of the manager. Some head coaches now insist on bringing their own trusted recruitment staff, often as part of their initial appointment, because they want specialists who share their way of seeing the game. This guarantees the coach a voice early in the scouting process and keeps them closely involved in the club’s strategic thinking and player selection.

Sources working in recruitment say that even though power has gradually shifted away from the manager or head coach, cases where players are signed without that individual’s involvement remain extremely rare, to the point of being almost unheard of in a top-five league environment.

However, the level of power can change over time. If a sporting director signs off on a run of mediocre transfers, a head coach may use that to push for greater influence over recruitment. Equally, when a head coach is flavour of the month with successful results, some will take the opportunity to gain a greater say in squad building.

What matters initially are the job description and the powers laid out in the contract. Perhaps the conclusion is that head coaches who want to become managers have to go to great lengths to earn it.

Arsenal recognised they needed a cultural overhaul and believed in Arteta to deliver it. Guardiola earned it before he arrived as City’s whole football structure was tailored to lure him to the club. Emery has improved Villa to such a dramatic extent that the case for greater influence was almost impossible to ignore.

Maresca and Amorim chanced their arm and failed. They almost certainly won’t be the last.

Information from ESPN’s Rob Dawson and Tor-Kristian Karlsen contributed to this report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending