Connect with us

Sports

What’s new in the Premier League: War on holding, new goalkeeper rule, RefCam, more

Published

on

What’s new in the Premier League: War on holding, new goalkeeper rule, RefCam, more


The 2025-26 Premier League season kicks off on Friday when champions Liverpool host AFC Bournemouth.

As ever, the new campaign comes with some law changes and a series of initiatives. Here’s what you need to look out for.

The war on holding on corners and set pieces

Throughout the second half of last season, players holding an opponent inside the penalty area seemed to be on the increase — and now it will be an area of focus for referees in 2025-26.

The question, of course, is whether this will be clamped down on for a few weeks and then forgotten about.

Whenever an initiative like this comes around, there can tend to be accusation that referees are being over-zealous. It then gets scaled back, and we end up back where we started.

But there’s an admission that referees have too often allowed extreme holding, and a line needs to be drawn.

Referees are also going to be encouraged not to offer repeated warnings, and instead penalise the offence. That means we should not keep seeing corners delayed while a referee speaks to players (though this would happen initially), as they have been told to run the play and give the penalty.

What will the referee and the VAR be looking for? It’s contact which impedes an opponent’s movement, as simply holding of a shirt isn’t an offence — there must be an impact.

The considerations:

– Sustained holding. If the holding is fleeting, there may be no impact on the opponent

– Impact on an opponent’s ability to play or challenge for the ball

– A clear non-footballing action where the offending player has no interest in playing the ball

– Mutual holding by both players usually will not be penalised

There’s also going to be a focus on simulation, so we may see more cautions for this across the season. And that includes when, foe example, a player who is pushed in the chest goes down holding their face

Players with head injuries will now not be asked if they want treatment, in an attempt to tackle this kind of time-wasting but also for player welfare. The physio will automatically be called on, and the player must leave the field for a minimum of 30 seconds.

Goalkeeper holding the ball for too long = corner

We know the situation. A shot comes in or a corner is floated over, and the goalkeeper first flops on the ground for 10 seconds, or longer. Then he stands up, surveys his options, and looks around. Maybe then he’ll release the ball, only after some 30 seconds have been lost. Spread that across a game, and it can have a real effect on a match.

It’s been a bugbear of supporters for quite a while. Most often used by away teams trying to protect a lead in a difficult match, it has evolved somewhat to become part of a team’s tactics simply to frustrate the opposition.

Premier League 2025-26 mega-preview
Kit ranking: Every new jersey released so far

The old law, which said a keeper should release within six seconds or be penalised with a free kick, hadn’t been applied for many years. Now the keeper will get eight seconds, but with a clear punishment process thereafter.

Once a goalkeeper has control of the ball, they will have those eight seconds to release the ball once they are in a position to do so unhindered. The referee will raise his arm to indicate there are five seconds left, and then bringing it down on each second so the countdown is clear. If the ball hasn’t been released, a corner will be awarded.

If an opponent deliberately gets in the way of the goalkeeper, the count will stop and a free kick will be awarded.

The intention isn’t to try to catch a goalkeeper out, or to be unnecessarily strict. There will still be a little leeway for them to settle themselves, but referees are expected to clamp down if a line is crossed. And that will especially be the case when a goalkeeper lands on the ball and doesn’t get up quickly.

Fans will be skeptical it won’t just go the same way as the old law, the difference being there is now the hand signal which the referee is bound to. Let’s see if supporters start a five-second countdown when the referee raises his arm.

Trials were held throughout the 2024-25 season in Premier League 2 (academies) and in Maltese and Italian football. Across over 400 games only three corners were awarded — 3 in England and 0 in Malta. In Italy, a different trial was held which led to the award of a throw, which was penalized once.

After the IFAB then approved the change to the law earlier this year, it’s was adopted in the professional game in South America, in the CONMEBOL Libertadores and CONMEBOL Sudamericana — its version of the UEFA Champions League and UEFA Europa League. In the first 160 fixtures, only two corners were awarded.

It then featured at the Club World Cup in the summer, with two corners given against the goalkeeper over the 62 matches. Al Hilal goalkeeper Yassine Bounou was the first to be penalised in injury time of a 1-1 draw against Real Madrid, holding onto the ball for too long after saving a header from Gonzalo García.

Pierluigi Collina, FIFA’s head of referees, said after the Club World Cup: “It was very successful; the tempo of the match was improved. We had no time lost by goalkeepers keeping the ball between their hands for a very long time — as happened quite often in matches before.

“The purpose was not to give corner kicks, but to prevent the eight seconds rule from being ignored. The purpose was 100% achieved.”

What about VAR?

The Premier League will continue to apply a high threshold on VAR interventions, underpinned by “referee’s call,” with 83% in support of it in the Premier League’s football stakeholder survey of coaches, captains, ex-players and supporters.

VAR errors last season fell to 18 (from 31 in 2023-24) though fan perception probably doesn’t match that.

Semi-automated offside technology (SAOT) will be in place from round one, which should help to reduce delays. Last season, the average VAR delay per match fell from 64 seconds to 39 seconds.

The SAOT replays will now be showed on the big screens inside grounds, along with disallowed goals.

Last season Nottingham Forest striker Taiwo Awoniyi suffered an injury when an offside flag was delayed. But we won’t see any automated offside flags, which FIFA brought in for the Club World Cup when the technology calculated a player was more than 10cm offside.

The Premier League will discuss with FIFA how successful it was, but for now we will still see some instances of a player being well offside but the flag staying down until the end of the move.

Handball penalties

Last season the Premier League only saw nine penalties awarded for handball — by far the lowest number across the top leagues in Europe.

The stakeholder survey found 78% in favour of this approach, with only 3% saying there should be a stricter application in England. So referees will continue to apply the same philosophy.

Key points:

– A justifiable position of the arm of a player’s action

– If the arm is being used to support the body when falling

– If the player kicks or heads the ball and it hits their own arm

– If the ball deflects off a player and there is a clear change of trajectory

– Kicked against the player by a teammate

– Proximity

The double-touch penalty

Julián Álvarez was “incredulous” after his penalty kick was disallowed in Atlético Madrid‘s Champions League round-of-16 defeat to Real Madrid in March. The Argentina international had accidentally touched the ball twice when taking the kick, with the VAR stepping in to cancel the goal. Atlético boss Diego Simeone still hasn’t got over it.

In June, the IFAB announced a “clarification” to law, after it had been lobbied by UEFA.

As is often the case, it takes a high-profile incident to force change. After all, no one remembers Aleksandar Mitrovic‘s disallowed penalty for Fulham against Newcastle United in January 2023, do they? The circumstances were the same, with the Serbia international scoring a penalty via touching the ball twice after slipping in his run-up.

Yet within weeks of the controversial Álvarez incident, the law has been rewritten.

Referees the world over have also treated any double touch on a penalty as an offence, even if accidental. Now the IFAB says that’s never really been the true intention, and it should only apply to a deliberate second touch, like the ball coming off the post, and not the ball being kicked against the standing foot.

So from now on, in the rare case that the VAR identifies such an offence and the ball goes into the net, it will be a retake. If the player misses (or deliberate plays the ball a second time, for instance after a rebound off the post), the referee should give a free kick to the opposition (or it stays as a miss in a shootout).

And we got our first taste of the law change at in Women’s Euro 2025 final last month. England‘s Beth Mead stepped up to take first penalty of the shootout. She slipped as she was about to kick the ball, but it still looped into the net. However, while Mead celebrated the VAR checked for a possible double-touch and it had to be retaken (Mead missed).

Collina explained: “We thought that this should have been clarified because the double touch was intended to be related to something done deliberately. We decided it was better to clarify by adding two separate scenarios one when it’s still deliberate and the other one when it is accidental.

“I think in this way the spirit of the game and the spirit of the Laws of the Game are respected.”

Ref-worn body cameras

Get ready for a whole new view of the game: as the referee sees it. We saw RefCam at the Club World Cup, and now it’s going to be coming to the Premier League. RefCam will be trialled in the early weeks of the season, and if successful is likely to be rolled out across the campaign.

Refs will wear a camera fixed to their headsets, with the footage immediately available to the competition broadcasters.

But don’t get any ideas about pressing a button and switching to “RefCam.” Live footage cannot be shown, except before the game in the tunnel or during the coin toss.

It’s described more as an entertainment add-on. We can expect to see goals from the referee’s perspective, but we won’t see what happens at the VAR pitchside monitor.

After the Club World Cup, the IFAB approved the extension of the trial of referee-worn cameras to both domestic and international competitions worldwide. So it’s going to be coming to the Premier League, but not in the first couple of gameweeks.

“The outcome of using the RefCam here at the FIFA Club World Cup 2025 went beyond our expectations,” Collina said. “We thought it would have been an interesting experience for TV viewers and we’ve received great comments.

“We had the possibility to see what the referee sees on the field of play. This was not only for entertainment purposes, but also for coaching the referees and to explain why something was not seen on the field of play.”

No controversial or confrontational moments will be shown, however, and the Premier League will tread carefully with its use. FIFA did eventually show some red cards at the Club World Cup, including for Manchester City‘s Rico Lewis against Wydad AC, but that seems unlikely to happen here, for now.

Referees to announce VAR decisions

We saw this in FA Cup and Carabao Cup games in the second half of last season, and now it’s ready for full roll out in the Premier League.

Stuart Attwell was the first referee to step up, with a goal for Tottenham Hotspur striker Dominic Solanke ruled out for offside during their Carabao Cup semifinal first-leg tie vs Liverpool.

Referees will announce the outcome of a VAR review (or a lengthy check) over the stadium public addresses system and to TV viewers, which we’ve seen in several competitions — first tried at the 2023 Women’s World Cup.

However, the audio of the conversation between referee and VAR will remain behind the cloak of secrecy.

It remains to be seen how much this really will add. It will probably be good for complex situations, or off the ball incidents.

But there have been learnings from its use in the first half of the year. Factual offside decisions, which are usually very obvious, will not require the referee to announce them.

Only captains can speak to the referee

The Premier League chose not to adopt this last season, but after seeing it in operation in other competitions now believe it’s a useful tool for participant behaviour.

Normal interactions between players and the referee are still allowed, but the referee may invite the captain over to explain decisions which in the past may have involved players running at referees.

When the captain is the goalkeeper, a nominated outfield player would speak to the referee.

It’s supposed to prevent a referee from being crowded by players. While this might be easier to apply in short competitions like the Club World Cup and Gold Cup, it has proved to be more challenging in a 380-game domestic seasons.

The dropped ball

A more simple change, which covers the ball hitting the referee.

In the old wording of the law, if the ball hit the ref, then the dropped ball would go to the team who were last in possession of the ball. Now, it’s about who would take possession.

Usually, this is a pass between teammates so there will be no difference. But if it’s very clear that the play of the ball was going to the opposition, then the opposition gets the dropped ball.

In most cases we are likely to see the referee err on the side of caution and give the dropped ball to the team who made the pass, as it would need to be beyond doubt a change of possession was going to take place.

No red card for coaches who touch the ball when in play

In the Champions League in the 2024-25 season, Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta grabbed the ball before it had gone out of play in a match at Internazionale. A direct free kick was awarded and Arteta was booked, but by the Laws of the Game he should have been sent off. But most leagues have been dealing with this with a caution, as a red card was seen as too harsh for such a minor infringement.

And here’s the change: If a coach picks the ball up while it’s in play, and it was no more than an attempt to get play moving again, it will be no sanction (not even a caution) and an indirect free kick.

But trying to stop the opponent from restarting play will remain a red-card offence.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Travis Kelce calls for Shedeur Sanders to start for Browns amid controversy: ‘Give the people what they want’

Published

on

Travis Kelce calls for Shedeur Sanders to start for Browns amid controversy: ‘Give the people what they want’


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Travis Kelce has spoken out about the ongoing controversy over Shedeur Sanders‘ role with the Cleveland Browns.

During his “New Heights” podcast this week, the Kansas City Chiefs star said he believes the Browns should start Sanders, who is third on the team’s depth chart behind veteran Joe Flacco and fellow rookie Dillon Gabriel. 

Travis Kelce spoke about Shedeur Sanders’ role with the Browns on the latest episode of the “New Heights” podcast, which aired before the official start of the NFL season. (Imagn)

“Give the people what they want, in terms of the Browns fans. Start Shedeur. … Put him in coach,” Kelce said. “Give the people what they want. The world wants to see him go out there, and not only play, but have success. At this point, guys are rooting for him. This isn’t anything against Dillon. This isn’t anything against Joe. I’m just saying the excitement is there for [Sanders] to go out there. He’s going to put eyes on the screen. He’s going to bring people to the game. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“I would love to f—ing see it, man.” 

On the contrary, Kelce’s brother and co-host, Jason Kelce, defended the team naming Joe Flacco as the starter. 

“[Browns head coach Kevin] Stefanski and the Browns are trying to do the thing that they feel gives them the best chance to win football games,” Jason said. “If the Browns and Kevin Stefanski felt their best option and the most confident option they had to win games was Shedeur Sanders, they would be playing him.” 

Still, Jason conceded that he “wants” to see Sanders play. 

“What do I want? I want to see Shedeur Sanders,” Jason said. 

Jason also rejected the “conspiracies” surrounding the situation as to why Sanders is as low on the depth chart as he is. 

Criticism and conspiracy theories directed at the Browns reemerged after the team’s preseason finale on Saturday. 

Sanders entered the game in the third quarter and completed three of six passes for 14 yards, while taking five sacks for a combined loss of 41 yards against the Los Angeles Rams. He netted minus-27 yards for Cleveland before being pulled from the game on the final drive and replaced by veteran Tyler Huntley. 

Huntley led the Browns’ offense on a game-winning field goal drive, and the Browns won 19-17.

It was a far cry from Sanders’ first preseason game against the Carolina Panthers Aug. 8, when he threw for two touchdowns and was praised by fans and sports stars, including LeBron James and Dawn Staley. 

However, many fans and pundits were quick to defend Sanders for his rough outing on Saturday and blamed the Browns’ coaching for putting Sanders in a position where he had to rely on backup teammates while also calling questionable plays. 

EX-NBA PLAYER MAKES SHEDEUR SANDERS-LEBRON JAMES COMPARISON AFTER QB’S PRESEASON DEBUT

Jason Kelce broadcasting NFL game

Jason Kelce on the ESPN postseason countdown set during the 2025 Pro Bowl Games at Camping World Stadium Feb. 2, 2025.  (Kirby Lee/Imagn Images)

Former NFL quarterback Derek Carr questioned why Sanders wasn’t left in the game to finish the final drive. 

“I need to understand why we don’t get to see Shedeur Sanders run this 2-minute drill? Wouldn’t you want to see your young QB operate in this situation? Get him more reps for the future? I didn’t see the whole game so maybe he already showed enough? Help me understand this…” Carr wrote on X. 

Sports talk show host Skip Bayless posted a 16-minute rant in defense of Sanders on X, while condemning the Browns for their handling of the quarterback. 

“They sabotaged it. They rigged it against him today, putting him in with third- and fourth-stringers, fifth-stringers. You got no shot at quarterback,” Bayless said. 

Other users on social media leveled similar criticisms at the Browns, with some speculating that the obstacles being put in front of the quarterback are intentional. 

Prior to that game, NFL Hall of Famer Eric Dickerson stoked conspiracy theories related to Sanders in a recent interview, claiming that NFL teams were “told not to” draft Sanders to “make an example” of the quarterback when he fell to the fifth round of the NFL Draft in April. 

“I tell you this much, what I heard from someone that’s in the NFL [is] that the NFL told [teams], ‘Don’t draft him, do not draft him,'” Dickerson said in a recent interview on the “Roggin and Rodney” show on AM 570 LA Sports. 

“‘We’re going to make an example out of him.’ And this came from a very good source, a very good source. They were going to have him not get drafted to basically show you, ‘This is what happens when you do this.’ I mean, look, the NFL’s got all kinds of power. They do all kinds of stuff.” 

Sanders’ slide out of the first round shocked many, including President Donald Trump, who condemned the league’s owners for passing on the quarterback in a Truth Social post.

ESPN host Stephen A. Smith revealed a text message from an associate who compared the situation to Colin Kaepernick being out of the NFL since 2016, suggesting “collusion.” 

“‘This is a bad look for the NFL. This feels like Kaepernick-level collusion,'” Smith said of the content of the text, adding the situation goes beyond “talent evaluation.” 

“All the hard work the NFL League Office puts in to eradicate these kinds of perceptions, only to turn around and watch as the OWNERS look like they’re colluding, messing up everything. What has been done to Shedeur will outshine everything else in this draft. We’ll never believe this is about just talent evaluation again.” 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Shedeur Sanders on the sideline vs Eagles

Cleveland Browns quarterback Shedeur Sanders against the Philadelphia Eagles during a game at Lincoln Financial Field. (Kyle Ross/Imagn Images)

Sanders was eventually taken by the Browns on the third and final day of the draft with the 144th pick. The quarterback was initially considered a possible contender for the first overall pick early in the draft process after finishing his final season at Colorado. 

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.





Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Mike Vrabel is back to try to help the Patriots recapture their glory days

Published

on



Read more



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Pakistan to participate in Pro League, confirms FIH

Published

on

Pakistan to participate in Pro League, confirms FIH


Pakistan hockey players celebrate after defeating Japan in the FIH Nations Cup in Kuala Lumpur on June 16, 2025. — X/@HokitaMY

Pakistan men’s hockey team has accepted an invitation to compete in the Pro League 2025–26 season, the International Hockey Federation (FIH) confirmed on Thursday.

The Green Shirts were formally invited by the apex body to participate in the “League of the Best” after Hockey New Zealand withdrew from the nine-team tournament despite winning the FIH Nations Cup earlier this year in Malaysia.

The PHF was initially given a deadline of August 12 to confirm its national men’s team’s participation, but the federation sought an extension until August 20 as it was awaiting financial support from the government.

The federation was subsequently issued Rs250m for the event on Wednesday, leading to it confirming its men’s team’s participation the next day.

“The International Hockey Federation (FIH) can confirm that the Pakistan men’s hockey team, nicknamed the Green Shirts, have accepted the invitation to participate in the upcoming 2025-26 season of the FIH Hockey Pro League,” the apex body said in a statement.

Pakistan will join arch-rivals India, alongside Argentina, Australia, Belgium, England, Germany, Netherlands, and Spain in the upcoming seventh edition of the tournament, replacing Ireland, who were relegated after finishing last in the previous season.

The Green Shirts’ participation in the tournament meant that they would also square off against traditional rivals India, who narrowly escaped relegation last season as they finished just above bottom-ranked Ireland.

FIH President Tayyab Ikram expressed his delight over Pakistan’s addition to the Pro League, stating it would be a major boost for the team with a rich history and would bolster the tournament’s viewership.

“Great to see Pakistan back in elite competition — this is a truly impactful milestone for world hockey,” Ikram said in an FIH-released statement.

“Their return marks not only the comeback of a team with such a rich and storied history, but also an exciting boost to the visibility and reach of the FIH Hockey Pro League. I can already anticipate an enhanced visibility of the Pro League with Pakistan’s participation.

“Congratulations to the Pakistan men’s team for qualifying through the FIH Hockey Nations Cup and earning their place in the ‘League of the Best’ for the very first time. This achievement is a strong example of how creating more opportunities at every level of our sport fosters growth and provides a natural pathway to the very top.”

For the unversed, Pakistan were set to participate in the inaugural edition of the FIH Pro League in 2019 but pulled out their first three games scheduled against Argentina, Australia and New Zealand, citing ‘inevitable circumstances’, which resulted in them being suspended from the tournament’s remainder.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending