Business
‘We’re trying to shame them’: Upstart activist investors target America’s underperforming banks
Misha Zaitzeff and Vik Ghei, founders of HoldCo Asset Management, at their Fort Lauderdale, Florida, offices.
Courtesy: HoldCo
American banks have found an unlikely pair of adversaries in Vik Ghei and Misha Zaitzeff.
Since July, the nine-person hedge fund they run from Fort Lauderdale, Florida, called HoldCo, has challenged lenders with more than $200 billion in combined assets, demanding that they take swift action or face public campaigns to overthrow their boards and fire their CEOs.
The fund notched a victory this month after Comerica, under pressure from HoldCo, agreed to sell itself to rival Fifth Third for $10.9 billion in the biggest bank merger of the year. HoldCo has since announced activist campaigns against two smaller regional lenders, Boston-based Eastern Bank and Billings, Montana-based First Interstate.
A fourth bank is now in their sights, CNBC has learned exclusively: HoldCo plans to launch a proxy battle against Columbia Bank, a lender with $70 billion in assets and 350 branches across Western states, unless it can strike a deal with management.
HoldCo, with $2.6 billion in assets, is bringing back activism to an industry that has largely been insulated from it since the 2008 financial crisis. The demise of bank-specific hedge funds in the post-crisis years and regulatory resistance to mergers meant that underperforming CEOs faced little discipline from the markets until now, according to Ghei and Zaitzeff.
Regional banks have struggled to regain their footing after the 2023 crisis that consumed Silicon Valley Bank and First Republic, leaving them exposed to activists seeking undervalued targets. At the same time, mergers are now viewed as more likely to be approved by regulators in the Trump administration, giving activists like HoldCo a clear exit strategy.
Coming from a hedge fund that few outside of banking circles had heard of, HoldCo’s moves have garnered admiration in some corners of Wall Street, while making them a pariah in others.
Ghei and Zaitzeff say HoldCo has been banned from attending a banking conference held next month outside Miami by Piper Sandler, an investment bank known for advising regionals on mergers. A spokesman for Piper Sandler didn’t immediately have a comment.
The millennial upstarts now find themselves key players in a larger story of industry consolidation. While retail banking is dominated by three giants, JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America and Wells Fargo, the country has more than 4,400 banks, and a long-expected merger wave began this year.
Bad incentives
The HoldCo thesis on regional banks is simple: Many are undervalued because their CEOs have put their own interests above that of shareholders, Ghei and Zaitzeff told CNBC in interviews over the past month.
That’s because the CEOs earn millions of dollars more in annual compensation if they grow by acquiring other banks, even if the deals prove disastrous for shareholders, according to the investors. Bank boards mostly operate as rubber stamps for such deals, they say, because directors are often hand-picked by the CEOs themselves.
“We’re trying to shame them into doing the right thing,” Ghei, 43, told CNBC. “At some of the banks we own, the CEOs have doubled compensation while their stocks have dramatically underperformed, or even fallen.”
On top of that, some of the investment bankers and research analysts that cater to small and medium banks are complicit, because their firms earn fees from mergers, and shareholders are usually silent because they risk losing management access if they challenge bank leaders, said the HoldCo founders.
“We feel that the way to rectify this is to publicly shame banks and aggressively pursue things like proxy battles,” Ghei said. “CEOs should be fired, and the boards should be fired, because they rolled the dice and lost; there should be consequences.”
Regional banks face pressure to bulk up through mergers to compete with super regionals and megabanks, which have far larger budgets for technology and compliance, according to industry consultants who requested anonymity to speak candidly. Poorly-managed firms are more the exception than the rule, they said.
As a group, regional banks have trailed both larger peers and broader stock indexes in recent years, partly because of the hangover from the 2023 tumult. The S&P Regional Banking ETF is still 14% below its 2021 peak, and shares of regional lenders tumbled again this month on concern over a trio of defaults tied to alleged corporate fraud.
In April, after bank stocks plunged in the selloff sparked by President Donald Trump’s so-called “Liberation Day” tariff policies, HoldCo began loading up on shares of beaten-up regionals, including Columbia, Citizens Financial and KeyCorp.
Those bets kickstarted their recent round of activism and raised their profile: HoldCo “is quickly becoming a household name in both the regional banking space and the world of activism,” analyst Don Bilson wrote in an October 21 research note.
The firm’s rise has rattled executives across the U.S. regional banking landscape; several banks have quietly started reviewing their capital plans in anticipation of possible activist scrutiny, according to the industry advisors who spoke to CNBC.
HoldCo said it now owns more than $1 billion in regional bank shares.
‘Best job in the world’
Over steak dinners, Zoom meetings and phone calls, Ghei and Zaitzeff began private discussions with a succession of bank CEOs in recent months, hoping to persuade them to commit to their shareholder-friendly actions.
When that approach has failed, they’ve gone public, releasing their presentations online and in the pages of the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg News.
It’s a playbook more familiar to other sectors including technology, media and health care, where hedge funds far larger than HoldCo have attempted to sway management with public campaigns.
“I wish I could say there’s more nuance involved,” Ghei said. “But you actually need to put the CEO’s job at risk and make this very legitimate case that you can defeat them.”
HoldCo’s campaign against Columbia Bank is one of the firm’s largest bets yet. Its position is worth roughly $150 million and makes up about 1.9% of the company’s voting shares.
In a 71-page presentation, the activist said that while CEO Clint Stein quadrupled Columbia Bank’s assets through two acquisitions since taking over in 2020, the bank’s shares have fallen 36% during his tenure.
At the same time, Stein’s most recent pay package rose 80% to $6.3 million from his 2021 compensation, the year he began announcing the takeovers.
Columbia Bank declined to comment for this article.
“Being a bank CEO is the best job in the world,” Ghei said. “You have incredible job security because shareholders never show their face and the board feels like they work for you. Everyone’s happy to meet you, and you have a bunch of investment bankers who want to make fees off of you.”
Stein and his chief operating officer flew to Fort Lauderdale in August to meet the activists at a steakhouse two blocks from HoldCo’s offices on bustling Las Olas Boulevard, according to Ghei and Zaitzeff.
Their meal was amicable enough, but the tone changed afterward when it became clear that HoldCo would pursue a proxy battle unless a deal was struck, meaning they would aim to replace directors with their own picks, with the ultimate goal of replacing Stein, according to the HoldCo duo.
In late September, the HoldCo founders delivered their presentation to board members, slide by slide, over a Zoom call.
HoldCo wants Columbia to swear off from doing more acquisitions, instead using excess cash to buy back their own cheap stock for five years, after which they should explore selling themselves to a larger bank.
“They are honestly accomplished people, but not in banking,” Ghei said of the Columbia directors. “I don’t think they understood how bad the transactions they did were.”
‘Don’t take it personally’
The HoldCo partners said they developed their appetite for confrontation in the rough-and-tumble world of distressed debt.
Ghei, a former Goldman Sachs analyst covering financial firms, had figured out a way to make money picking through the remains of banks that had collapsed in the 2008 financial crisis.
Then an analyst at Owl Creek, a hedge fund that specialized in the debt of failed companies, Ghei realized that bonds from the parent company of Washington Mutual were trading at deep discounts because everybody assumed that they wouldn’t be repaid.
But they were ultimately repaid at full price, plus interest, making hundreds of millions of dollars for Owl Creek, according to an American Banker profile of Ghei from 2013.
Ghei would repeat that trade at another Manhattan hedge fund, Tricadia, where he met Zaitzeff, a Brown University computer science graduate who ran models of new financial instruments called subprime collateralized debt obligations.
Tricadia made millions by both creating subprime CDOs and then separately betting that other CDOs would fail, similar to trades from Goldman Sachs and others chronicled in the Michael Lewis book “The Big Short.”
The men immediately hit it off, and in 2011 started their own firm out of “crummy offices” in New York’s Financial District, says Ghei. They called it HoldCo because of their early trades acquiring the debt of 70 holding companies whose banking subsidiaries had failed in the crisis.
Ghei and Zaitzeff say they would spend most of their waking hours over the next 14 years together, angering their wives with their singular focus on batting around ideas for investments until they came to consensus.
“We’re friends, first and foremost,” Zaitzeff, 42, said. “We spend a lot of time debating investments, but we don’t take it personally.”
They believed the bonds of dead banks had value because of assets like tax refunds on corporate ledgers. But the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, which took over the failed banks’ subsidiaries, believed it was entitled to the assets, not HoldCo.
So HoldCo battled the FDIC in bankruptcy courts around the country, winning enough of the time on the strength of their arguments to develop a reputation as scrappy fighters.
By 2013, the pair had raised their first institutional funds from an endowment; word of mouth then spread, and they eventually garnered investment from about 20 universities, hospitals and family offices in a series of ever-larger funds.
One battle after another
Their go-anywhere investment style led them to buy the distressed debt of a New Orleans-based lender named First NBC Bank in 2016; the bank had been established a decade earlier to help the city rebuild after Hurricane Katrina.
After realizing that First NBC would soon be undercapitalized, HoldCo shorted the lender and published letters revealing their concerns. The bank’s auditor resigned and the institution was seized by the FDIC. In 2023, the former First NBC CEO Ashton Ryan was sentenced to 14 years in prison for bank fraud.
It was experiences like that led Ghei and Zaitzeff to their dim view of bank management. By proving to themselves that they could identify situations where the market wasn’t functioning like it should, the HoldCo partners had the conviction to take on regional banks this year.
First NBC Bank Chief Executive Ashton Ryan, center.
Source: Nasdaq
Banks didn’t understand the scope of HoldCo’s ambitions at first, the partners said.
“People were surprisingly nice to us after Comerica,” Zaitzeff said. “When we went after Comerica, they viewed it as us going after a bigger bank. But a lot of regional banks view Eastern and First Interstate as much more like them.”
Bank CEOs may believe that if they don’t engage with HoldCo, they can avoid activist campaigns, Zaitzeff said. The activists believe that’s why they were blacklisted from a recent banking conference.
But the hedge fund has purchased almost 5% of the shares of Bank United, a Miami Lakes, Florida-based lender with $35.5 billion in assets, without speaking to management, according to the pair.
HoldCo plans to wage a proxy battle unless they can come to an agreement with management over increasing shareholder returns. Bank United didn’t immediately return messages seeking comment.
On Tuesday, after publication of this story, Bank United shares rose 4.9% and Columbia Bank rose 2.9% in midday trading, the two biggest risers of the more than 140 banks in the S&P Regional Banking ETF.
The investors, convinced of the righteousness of their position, say they also plan to publish regular dispatches about banks destroying shareholder value, even when they don’t hold a stake in the firm.
“The problem is that for so many years there’s been no accountability, and the world has gone insane,” Ghei said. “We’re trying to call out bad decisions and incent them into doing the right thing.”
— CNBC’s Gabriel Cortes contributed to this report.
Business
Frontier Airlines replaces CEO Barry Biffle with carrier’s president
Barry Biffle, president and chief executive officer Frontier Airlines, prior to a Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy, and Consumer Rights hearing in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, Sept. 30, 2025.
Kent Nishimura | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Frontier Group Holdings, the parent company of budget airline Frontier, replaced its nearly decade-long CEO, Barry Biffle, with the carrier’s president, the company said Monday.
James Dempsey is taking over as interim CEO effective immediately.
“Jimmy has been an invaluable member of Frontier’s senior leadership team for more than 10 years and has played an instrumental role in the company’s evolution and growth during that time,” Board Chair Bill Franke said in a news release. “We believe Jimmy is uniquely qualified to guide our airline into the future.”
Biffle and Frontier declined to comment. Frontier said Biffle would stay on in an “advisory capacity” until the end of the year.
Biffle had been Frontier’s chief executive since March 2016 and has a more than three-decade career in airlines, including at the country’s longtime top budget carrier, Spirit, which is currently in its second bankruptcy in less than a year.
Frontier lost $190 million in the first nine months of the year, compared with net income of $31 million a year earlier.
Frontier had been in talks to merge with Spirit several times since early 2022, but none have solidified thus far.
Smaller budget airlines like Frontier have struggled to produce steady profits in the wake of the pandemic, as higher labor and other costs, as well as consumer tastes shifting to international travel and higher-end seats, and an oversupply of domestic capacity, hurt financial results.
Biffle led some of Frontier’s initiatives in recent months to cater to customers seeking more space on board.
Frontier’s shares are down nearly 19% so far this year, while the NYSE Arca Airline Index, which tracks mostly U.S. airlines, is up more than 6%.
Business
RBI Holds 879.6 Tonnes Of Gold As Prices Surge Amid Global Uncertainty
New Delhi: The Reserve Bank of India, as on March 31 this year, held 879.58 metric tonnes of gold as compared to 822.10 metric tonnes as on March 31, 2024, reflecting an increase of 57.48 metric tonnes, the Parliament was informed on Monday.
These gold holdings contribute to strengthening confidence in the Indian rupee and the overall external stability of the economy, Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary told the Lok Sabha in a reply to a question.
To questions about the surge in gold and silver prices in the domestic market, he said that domestic prices of precious metals like gold and silver are primarily determined by their prevailing international prices (in US dollar terms), the exchange rate of the Indian rupee against the US dollar and applicable tariffs.
The recent surge in prices is largely attributable to heightened geopolitical tensions and uncertainty over global growth, which have boosted safe-haven demand, including substantial gold purchases by central banks and major institutions worldwide.
The minister said that the recent rally in gold prices may have differential effects across states or population groups, depending upon the degree of socio-cultural and economic reliance on these precious metals.
“They serve a dual role — not only as a consumption item but also as an investment avenue, as they are considered safe assets for hedging against uncertainties,” he said.
Thus, an increase in the price of gold or silver positively influences household wealth, as the notional value of existing gold or silver holdings appreciates, he added. Chaudhary further stated that the prices of precious metals are determined by the market, and the government is not involved in the price fixation.
However, the government, as a relief measure for consumers, lowered customs duty on gold imports from 15 to 6 per cent in July 2024.
The government introduced measures such as the Gold Monetisation Scheme (GMS), Gold exchange‑traded funds (ETFs) and Sovereign Gold Bond Scheme to reduce the demand for physical gold and to mobilise idle domestic gold, so that part of the demand is met from local stocks rather than fresh imports, thereby reducing external vulnerability and price pressures.
“The RBI and government regulation of bullion imports through nominated agencies, banks and refineries improve traceability, reduce grey‑market channels and help domestic prices more smoothly track global benchmarks rather than react to shortages or speculative spikes,” the minister said.
Business
Mercosur hurdle: French objections and farm protests freeze EU trade deal; Brussels faces credibility test – The Times of India
France’s last-minute opposition and mounting farmer protests are threatening to derail the European Union’s long-delayed free-trade agreement with South America’s Mercosur bloc, raising fresh doubts over whether the pact can be signed this year, AP reported.Angry European farmers, fearing cheaper agricultural imports and tougher competition, have taken to the streets in Brussels just as EU negotiators were hoping to close a deal that has taken nearly 25 years to negotiate. The agreement involves the 27-country EU and five Mercosur nations — Brazil, Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Bolivia — and would gradually remove duties on most goods traded between the two blocs over 15 years.The accord, agreed in principle a year ago, still needs approval from all EU member states and the European Parliament. EU officials had planned for European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President António Costa to sign the deal in Brazil on December 20, but growing resistance now threatens that timeline.French Prime Minister Sébastien Lecornu said on Sunday that the current deal was “unacceptable” and that the “conditions have not been met” for EU leaders to authorise its signing this week, effectively seeking a delay that could push the decision to 2026 or later. While acknowledging steps taken by the European Commission to protect farmers and tighten food safety checks, Lecornu said France remained unconvinced.Poland, Austria, the Netherlands and France fear Mercosur exporters could undercut EU farmers who operate under stricter labour, environmental and sanitary rules, including pesticide restrictions, analysts told AP. France has been pressing for “mirror clauses” that would require Mercosur producers to meet the same standards — demands that have not been fully accepted.Alicia Gracia-Herrero, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based Bruegel Institute, said the standoff exposed limits to the EU’s political unity and global influence. “If we cannot get this done even with (US President Donald) Trump’s pressure, what can you expect from the EU?” she said, warning that further delays could undermine Brussels’ credibility in talks with partners such as Indonesia and India.The deal comes at a sensitive time for the EU, which has been seeking to diversify trade ties after Trump imposed tariffs of 15% on most EU imports earlier this year, AP reported. Brussels sees the Mercosur pact as a strategic counterweight to aggressive trade tactics by both the US and China.European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill said the bloc is pushing to conclude the agreement by year-end, arguing it would strengthen the EU’s geopolitical standing. “We’re talking about bringing together two of the world’s biggest trading blocs,” he said, citing cooperation on climate, economic security and reform of the global rules-based order.Agriculture remains central to the dispute. The EU exported 235.4 billion euros ($272 billion) worth of agricultural goods in 2024, and critics warn the deal could hurt local dairy and beef producers and cause environmental damage. Supporters counter that it would save businesses about $4.26 billion in duties annually and open markets for products ranging from French wine to German pharmaceuticals and Brazilian minerals.To calm opposition, the European Commission has proposed safeguards, including mechanisms allowing farmers to trigger investigations if Mercosur imports are priced at least 10% below EU products, tighter border inspections for banned pesticides, and reforms to distribute agricultural subsidies more equitably.These measures, however, have failed to ease French concerns or quell farmer anger. Agricultural unions are again planning demonstrations in Brussels as EU leaders meet later this week, underlining the political risks surrounding a deal that was once seen as a cornerstone of the bloc’s trade strategy.
-
Politics1 week agoThailand launches air strikes against Cambodian military: army
-
Fashion1 week agoGermany’s LuxExperience appoints Francis Belin as new CEO of Mytheresa
-
Politics1 week agoZelenskiy says Ukraine’s peace talks with US constructive but not easy
-
Politics5 days agoTrump launches gold card programme for expedited visas with a $1m price tag
-
Tech6 days agoJennifer Lewis ScD ’91: “Can we make tissues that are made from you, for you?”
-
Business5 days agoRivian turns to AI, autonomy to woo investors as EV sales stall
-
Entertainment1 week agoToo big to fail? IndiGo crisis exposes risks in Indian aviation
-
Tech5 days agoGoogle DeepMind partners with UK government to deliver AI | Computer Weekly
