Connect with us

Business

More than 1,000 flights cancelled as US air traffic cuts enter second day

Published

on

More than 1,000 flights cancelled as US air traffic cuts enter second day


Getty Images long line of people with suitcases waiting for a security checkpoint in airportGetty Images

Travellers wait in a long line at a security checkpoint at Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport on 6 November

More than 1,400 flights to, from, or within the US were cancelled on Saturday after airlines were told this week to cut traffic during the federal government shutdown.

Nearly 6,000 flights were also delayed, down from over 7,000 delays on Friday, according to flight tracker FlightAware.

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) announced earlier in the week that it would be reducing air travel capacity by up to10% at 40 of the nation’s busiest airports as air traffic controllers, who are working without pay during the shutdown, report fatigue.

Republicans and Democrats remain divided over how to end the impasse in Congress as the shutdown, which began 1 October, continues.

Saturday marked the 39th day of the longest shutdown in history as Republicans and Democrats still have not agreed on a funding resolution to reopen the government.

Senators are in Washington over the weekend for bipartisan negotitations aimed at ending the shutdown, which is beginning to be felt by more and more Americans amid cuts to food aid payments and the flight disruptions.

In a statement on Saturday, American Airlines urged “leaders in Washington, D.C., to reach an immediate resolution to end the shutdown”.

New Jersey’s Newark Liberty International Airport was experiencing some of the longest wait times. As of Saturday afternoon, arrivals to the airport were delayed by an average of more than four hours, while departures from the airport were delayed by an average of 1.5 hours, according to the FAA.

The airports with the most cancelled flights on Saturday, both to and from the location, were Charlotte/Douglas International, Newark Liberty International, and Chicago O’Hare International, according to FlightAware.

Departures to John F Kennedy International, Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International, and La Guardia were delayed by nearly three hours, over 2.5 hours, and about an hour, respectively, the FAA reported as of Saturday afternoon.

With the Thanksgiving holiday approaching on 27 November, it’s one of the busiest travel seasons of the year in the US.

It’s not just commercial flights that have been affected. Restrictions on private jets are also in place, Secretary Duffy said in a Saturday post on X.

“We’ve reduced their volume at high traffic airports — instead having private jets utilize smaller airports or airfields so busy controllers can focus on commercial aviation,” Duffy wrote. “That’s only fair.”

And things will likely get worse in the coming days as the FAA increases the percentage of cancelled flights.

On Thursday, the agency announced that the flight reductions would be gradual, starting at 4% of flights on Friday before rising to 6% by 11 November, 8% by 13 November, and the full 10% by 14 November.

The FAA said the cuts were necessary to maintain safety as air traffic controllers have been overworked during the shutdown.

As essential workers, the controllers are required to continue working without pay, and as a result, many have called out sick or taken on second jobs to afford necessities, unions say.

Watch: “Devastating” – Airline travellers react to flight reductions

The controllers are just some of the 1.4 million federal workers who have either been working without pay or been put on forced during the shutdown.

Another factor impacting air travel is that most of the Transportation Security Agency (TSA) 64,000 agents are also not being paid while the shutdown is in place.

During the previous government shutdown, under US President Donald Trump in 2018, it was found that up to 10% of TSA staff chose to stay at home rather than work for free.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Child benefit: HMRC to review thousands of suspended payments

Published

on

Child benefit: HMRC to review thousands of suspended payments


Eimear DevlinBBC Money Box reporter

Eve Craven Eve Craven wearing sunglasses looking into the camera with sun shining on the water in the backgroundEve Craven

Eve Craven had her child benefit halted after she went on a five-day trip to New York with her son

The UK’s tax body is reviewing its decisions to strip child benefit from about 23,500 claimants after it used travel data to conclude they had left the country permanently.

Normally the benefit runs out after eight weeks living outside the UK, but many people affected complained that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) had stopped their money after they went on holiday for just a short time.

The move came after MPs on the Treasury Select Committee demanded answers from the tax authority.

HMRC has apologised for any errors and says anyone who thinks their benefits have been stopped incorrectly should contact them.

In September, the government began a crackdown on child benefit fraud which it believes could save £350m over five years.

The new system allows HMRC records to be compared with Home Office international travel data, and the tax authority had used this data to stop payments to thousands of families.

But it is now reviewing all of the cases following a growing number of complaints from people affected who said they had been on holiday, and had returned to the UK after a short time.

Eve Craven went on a five-day break with her son to New York. She told the BBC’s Money Box programme that about 18 months after the trip she received a letter saying the child benefit for her son had been stopped.

The letter cited her trip to the US, saying it had no record of her return.

“It gave me a month basically to give them all the requested information to prove that I’d come back to the UK,” she said.

“It’s just a very big ask for something that they’ve messed up on, and they should have been able to sort out themselves.”

Eve’s child benefit has now been reinstated with missing payments backdated.

The issue was first identified in Northern Ireland, where some families had flown out of the UK from Belfast, but then returned to Dublin – which is in the EU – before driving home over the border.

UK and Irish citizens can travel freely into each other’s countries under the Common Travel Area arrangement.

There are no routine passport checks when travelling through the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland, meaning the UK government has no data to show that someone may have returned to Northern Ireland.

It is not clear how many errors have been made in total, or how.

HMRC told Money Box it would be reviewing all past cases “using PAYE data and where continued UK employment is found, will be reinstating payments and making any back payments necessary”.

It is aiming to complete its review by the end of next week.

MPs on the Treasury Select Committee are also now investigating.

Additional reporting by Nick Edser



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Compensation For Delay In Flat Possession Not Taxable Under Section 50C, Rules Mumbai ITAT

Published

on

Compensation For Delay In Flat Possession Not Taxable Under Section 50C, Rules Mumbai ITAT


Last Updated:

Mumbai ITAT rules compensation for flat delivery delays is not taxable under Section 50C. Experts say this offers relief to taxpayers facing project delays.

Section 50C Can’t Apply Without Actual Property Transfer, Rules Mumbai ITAT

Section 50C Can’t Apply Without Actual Property Transfer, Rules Mumbai ITAT

In a significant ruling, the Mumbai bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) has held that compensation received for delay in construction or delivery of a flat cannot be taxed under Section 50C of the Income Tax Act. The tribunal clarified that such compensation is distinct from sale consideration and does not attract stamp valuation provisions.

The tribunal also emphasised that the delay compensation is essentially a form of interest paid by the builder for the inconvenience caused to the homebuyer due to delayed possession. As such, it is taxable under ‘Income from Other Sources’, in line with provisions applicable to interest income, and is subject to tax at the individual’s slab rate.

Commenting on the ruling, Anita Basrur, Partner at Sudit K. Parekh & Co. LLP, said the decision “clearly brings out that sale consideration and compensation are different.” She explained that Section 50C applies only when the sale consideration for a transfer of immovable property is lower than the stamp duty value. “In this case, the transfer involved a flat received in exchange for land, and the additional compensation was purely compensatory — not a sale consideration,” Basrur noted.

She added that the judgment offers timely relief for taxpayers amid rising cases of project delays and associated compensation payments. “With delays in projects and compensation becoming common, this decision will give the desired relief to purchasers and help settle several pending disputes,” she said.

CA Akshay Jain, Direct Tax Partner at NPV & Associates LLP, echoed similar views, clarifying the tax treatment of such payments. “Since there is no transfer of any capital asset at the time of receiving compensation for delayed possession, it cannot be taxed under capital gains,” he said. Jain added that such payments are “taxable under the head ‘income from other sources’,” not as capital receipts.

On the applicability of Section 50C to extinguishment of development rights, Jain explained that the section requires an actual transfer of land or building. “In case of extinguishment of development rights, there is no transfer of immovable property, so Section 50C cannot be invoked,” he said, citing the Mumbai ITAT’s ruling in Suvarna Chandrakant Bhojane vs ITO that supported this interpretation.

Varun Yadav

Varun Yadav

Varun Yadav is a Sub Editor at News18 Business Digital. He writes articles on markets, personal finance, technology, and more. He completed his post-graduation diploma in English Journalism from the Indian Inst…Read More

Varun Yadav is a Sub Editor at News18 Business Digital. He writes articles on markets, personal finance, technology, and more. He completed his post-graduation diploma in English Journalism from the Indian Inst… Read More

Follow News18 on Google. Join the fun, play QIK games on News18. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trendsstock updatestax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. To Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated.
News business tax Compensation For Delay In Flat Possession Not Taxable Under Section 50C, Rules Mumbai ITAT
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Read More



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Shona Robison may ‘potentially revisit’ Scottish taxes in response to UK Budget

Published

on

Shona Robison may ‘potentially revisit’ Scottish taxes in response to UK Budget



Scotland’s Finance Secretary says she may have to “potentially revisit” her tax plans amid reports the Chancellor will increase income tax in the Budget this month.

Shona Robison said the Scottish Government had a “very limited” set of levers to respond if Rachel Reeves makes the tax decision on November 26.

The Fraser of Allander Institute has estimated a 2p income tax hike in the UK Budget could cut Scotland’s funding by £1 billion because of the way the fiscal framework operates.

Ms Robison has requested an urgent meeting with the Chancellor, saying Ms Reeves should ditch her fiscal rules and instead deliver investment “to grow the economy and support people with the cost of living”.

Speaking to BBC Scotland’s Sunday Show, Ms Robison said the fiscal framework does not take account of changes to national insurance – another levy the Chancellor is reportedly considering changing.

The fiscal framework governs the public money coming to the Scottish Government, but Ms Robison said the system is now in “uncharted territory” as it did not envisage simultaneous changes to both income tax and national insurance.

Ms Robison was asked if she would raise Scottish income tax rates in response to any income tax increase in the Chancellor’s Budget.

She said: “I’m not going to set out here today what our plans for income tax are when we don’t know what we’re going to face on the 26th…

“If we end up in this scenario, then the levers available to us are very limited.

“Unless there is flexibility given to us through the fiscal framework – which would be my first ask, that we need to have that flexibility.

“Because we don’t want to raise taxes, we had already set out in the tax strategy that we want to see that stability till the end of the Parliament.

“But in the event of unforeseen exceptional circumstances, clearly we would have to potentially revisit that.”

Under the devolution settlement, the Scottish Government has powers to adjust income tax rates north of the border.

An HM Treasury spokesperson said earlier: “Our record funding settlement for Scotland will mean over 20% more funding per head than the rest of the UK.

“We have also confirmed £8.3 billion in funding for GB Energy-Nuclear and GB Energy in Aberdeen, up to £750 million for a new supercomputer at Edinburgh University, and are investing £452 million over four years for City and Growth Deals across Scotland.

“This investment is all possible because our fiscal rules are non-negotiable, they are the basis of the stability which underpins growth.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending