Business
De minimis: How US shoppers will be hit as the tariff exemption ends

Osmond Chia & Laura BlaseyBusiness reporters in Singapore & Washington DC

The US has pulled the plug on a long-running global tariff exemption that has been widely used by buyers of low-cost goods.
From Friday, imports valued at $800 (£592) or less will no longer be duty-free and will face tighter customs checks, in a move set to affect millions of shipments a day.
Last year, almost 1.4 billion packages – worth a total of more than $64bn – entered America without being charged duties under a rule called the de minimis exemption, according to US Customs.
Experts say US President Donald Trump’s policy change will hit small businesses hardest and shoppers should brace for higher prices and fewer options – at least until the dust settles.
“I’ve reached the point of acceptance, but when I first heard the news about two and half, three weeks ago, I felt like it might be the end for my business,” said Katherine Theobalds, founder and creative director of Buenos Aires-based shoe brand Zou Xou. “It still might – that remains to be seen.”
What’s the de minimis rule?
De minimis is a Latin term that broadly translates to “about the smallest things”, often used in legal contexts to describe matters too trivial to merit concern.
The de minimis exemption was introduced in 1938 to avoid the expense of collecting only small amounts of import duties in the US.
The rule’s threshold rose over the years, allowing e-commerce firms and global retailers that ship small packages to the US to thrive.
The exemption was often associated with companies like Chinese e-commerce giants Shein and Temu, which delivered Americans cheap goods that could be quickly shipped from the manufacturing source – with no warehouse stock or associated overhead costs.
But while Shein and Temu helped pioneer this way of working, many other businesses – foreign and domestic, large and small – came to incorporate the “loophole” into their supply chains and sales models.
Executives at Tapestry – the parent company of US fashion brand Coach, which is known for leather bags that sell from roughly $200 to $1,000 – told analysts this month that it expects to take a $160m hit to its profits due to changing tariff policies, with about a third of that attributed to the elimination of the de minimis rule.
Coach has rapidly expanded in recent years in a comeback campaign fuelled by Gen Z shoppers and Tapestry remains confident the momentum will offset some of the impact of tariffs. Still, the elimination of de minimis represents a logistical challenge.
Shipments under the exemption made up more than 90% of all the cargo entering the country, according to US customs.
The president and his predecessor, Joe Biden, criticised the policy as harmful to US businesses and said it has been abused to smuggle illegal goods, including drugs like fentanyl.
In a phone call with reporters on Thursday, Trump’s trade adviser, Peter Navarro, said the move will “save thousands of American lives by restricting the flow of narcotics” through the mail, as well as add $10bn a year to US coffers.

Trump fast-tracked the rule’s repeal with an executive order this year, well ahead of a planned 2027 expiry date.
With the necessary documentation, shippers will pay duties based on the country of origin’s tariff rate. Otherwise, they can choose to pay a fixed fee between $80 and $200 per package, according to the White House.
The second option, which is aimed to give postal services more time to adjust to the change, will only be available for six months.
Mainland China and Hong Kong were the first to be cut from the de minimis rule in May, prompting e-commerce giant Temu to halt direct sales to the US.
Letters and personal gifts worth less than $100 will still be duty-free.
Smaller variety, longer waits
US consumers may see less variety of goods in shops and on e-commerce platforms as businesses get to grips with customs documentation, trade experts have told the BBC.
Smaller firms need time to adjust as they have mostly been spared from such paperwork until now, said Tam Nguyen from logistics administration firm GOL Solution. The company handles exports from South East Asia to the US.
“You need to indicate the source of all the materials in a product, which can come from many countries with different tax rates. This would absolutely make shipments slower.”
The complexity could deter sellers from offering a broader range of products for export, she added.
That could have a particular impact on more niche markets.
Christopher Lundell, is a 53-year-old psychologist based in Portland, Oregon who also DJs and mixes music as a hobby. He is an avid vinyl record collector who recently became aware of the de minimis exemption suspension when he tried to – unsuccessfully – buy a $5 rare record from a seller in the UK.
“He cancelled my order and said, ‘I’m sorry but the UK is not shipping to the United States anymore.'”
Mr Lundell says he tries his best to find US-based record sellers before searching online for overseas sellers based in countries like the UK, Japan and China. He adds that he understands the need to protect US businesses, but says that he believes a blanket suspension of the de minimis exemption is “political theatre”.
Some orders may also be frozen for the next few weeks. Ms Nguyen said clients, including some in the healthcare sector, have halted orders.
Major postal services in the UK, Europe and and the Asia-Pacific region paused deliveries to the US this week.
The operators blamed uncertainty about how the tariffs would work and a lack of time to prepare.
Prices to rise
Without the exemption, businesses will have to factor in tariffs the US has imposed on the country of origin, which came into effect for most nations in August.
Those levies can be as low as 10% for countries like the UK and Australia, while goods from Brazil and India face the highest tariffs at 50%.
Following the change, specific duties will be imposed of $80 per item for countries with tariffs of 16% or less, $160 for shipments from countries with between 16% and 25% tariffs or $200 for items from countries with higher tariffs.
A senior administration official downplayed consumer concerns, saying that the move will “benefit” Americans by making them “safer” and “prosperous”.
Some American businesses welcomed the news, arguing the elimination would level the playing field.
“Gap Inc. welcomes the Administration’s decision to suspend duty-free de minimis treatment worldwide. The de minimis loophole has long provided an opportunity for some importers & retailers to avoid paying their fair share of US duties,” the company said in a statement.
Small firms, in particular, will feel the strain from the costly audits needed to clear US customs, making it tough for sellers to keep prices stable, said trade expert Deborah Elms.
With many postal services holding off on US shipments, sellers may have to pay for more expensive express couriers to reach American buyers for now, said Ms Elms from research firm Hinrich Foundation.
British retailer Wool Warehouse is among firms that have paused orders from the US.
“There is a lot of uncertainty at the moment” due to the short time firms have had to figure out shipment process and fees involved, said managing director Andrew Smith.
His firm hopes to resume orders to the US – its largest export market – within two weeks, he said, adding that time is needed to wait to see how other companies have responded to the changes.
Prices of its goods – mostly wool and crafting materials sourced globally – are likely to rise by up to 15%, said Mr Smith.
The company also plans to revamp its website to indicate the tariff rate chargeable for each product, he said.
“We’re aiming for full transparency so people know what it will cost with certainty and then they can decide whether they want to make the purchase or not.”
At Zou Xou, Ms Theobalds specialises in artisan-made women’s shoes, crafted by small workshops in Argentina, that sell for between $200-$300. She began her career in New York, and has focussed her business on American customers.
She has long operated a two-tier system – customers either receive shoes from a US warehouse where she keeps some stock, or shipped direct from Argentina through DHL.
Larger shipments of shoes into the US were already subject to customs fees, she says, but sending one or two pairs from Buenos Aires to a customer was achieved cheaply and efficiently because of the de minimis exemption.
Now, she’s not sure how to factor in the added costs and is exploring several options and hoping to get more clarity on how to shift her business model.
Equally important, she said, is how businesses like hers explain the changes to consumers.
She worries that even if pricing doesn’t change much, a duty process that seems too complicated could turn off even those who want a higher-end product.
“The reason our customers come to us is because they appreciate the artisanal quality. They could have always gone to a mass retailer,” she says. “But what people will have to think about is ‘does that matter to me all that much, or do I just want a pair of shoes?'”
A boost for China?
US-based retailers stand to gain if prices of goods ordered from overseas rise, Ms Elms said.
“If it’s too expensive, they’ll probably go to Walmart or Target to buy it there,” she said.
But with so many goods being sent from around world now being subject to customs duties, US consumers may once again turn to China for cheaper options.
Chinese companies like Shein and Temu have set up distribution centres in the US that will help ease some of the cost of tariffs, said Ms Nguyen.
And China is “months ahead” in figuring out the paperwork as compared to firms in other countries that are now scrambling to get up to speed, she added.
There may be fewer competitors in the overall market, as the end of the de minimis exemption makes it harder for small businesses to launch e-commerce sites, said Ms Nguyen.
“It used to be: Set up a site, list products and start shipping. But now that low-cost entry point is gone.”
Additional reporting by Nadine Yousif and Bernd Debusmann Jr
Business
Bank share prices tumble after calls for tax on profits

The share prices of leading UK banks have tumbled following calls for the government to introduce a new tax on banking profits.
Traders and investors have reacted to the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) saying a windfall tax could raise up to £8bn a year for the government.
The think tank said the policy would compensate taxpayers for losses on the Bank of England’s cash printing drive.
While the Treasury has not commented on any policy, concerns led to NatWest, Lloyds and Barclays being the biggest fallers on the main index of the London Stock Exchange early on Friday.
NatWest and Lloyds share prices were down by more than 4%, and Barclays had dropped by more than 3% in early trading.
Charlie Nunn, the chief executive of Lloyds bank, has previously spoken out against any potential tax rises for banks in the Budget.
He said efforts to boost the UK economy and foster a strong financial services sector “wouldn’t be consistent with tax rises”.
The Treasury has been contacted for comment.
The IPPR, a left-leaning think tank, said a levy on the profits of banks was needed as the Bank of England’s quantitative easing (QE) drive was costing taxpayers £22bn a year.
The Bank of England buys bonds – essentially long term IOUs – from the UK government and corporations to increase bond prices and reduce longer term interest rates.
The Bank is selling off some of these bonds, and the IPPR said it is now making huge losses from both selling the government bonds below their purchase value and through interest rate losses.
The IPPR described those interest rate losses as “a government subsidy to commercial banks”, and highlighted commercial bank profits compared to before the pandemic were up by $22bn.
The tax suggestion comes as Chancellor Rachel Reeves faces the difficult task of maintaining her fiscal rules while finding room for spending promises in the upcoming autumn Budget.
Carsten Jung, associate director for economic policy at IPPR and former Bank of England economist, said the Bank and Treasury had “bungled the implementation of quantitative easing”.
“Public money is flowing straight into commercial banks’ coffers because of a flawed policy design,” he said.
“While families struggle with rising costs, the government is effectively writing multi-billion-pound cheques to bank shareholders.”
Speaking on BBC’s Today programme, Mr Jung said the £22bn taxpayer loss was roughly equivalent to “the entire budget of the Home Office every year”.
“So we’re suggesting to fix this leak of taxpayer money, and the first step would be a targeted levy on commercial banks that claws back some of these losses,” he said.
A tax targeting the windfall profits linked to QE would still leave the banks with “substantially higher profits”, the IPPR report said, while saving the government up to £8bn a year over the term of parliament.
But financial services body UK Finance said that a further tax on banks would make Britain less internationally competitive.
“Banks based here already pay both a corporation tax surcharge and a bank levy,” the trade association said.
The association said a new tax on banking would also “run counter to the government’s aim of supporting the financial services sector”.
Russ Mould, AJ Bell investment director, said the UK stock market had soured following the suggestion, with investors wondering “if the era of bumper profits, dividends and buybacks is now under threat”.
“The timing of the tax debate, fuelled by a report from think-tank IPPR, is unfortunate given it coincides with a new poll from Lloyds suggesting a rise in business confidence, despite cost pressures,” he said.
The Chancellor has worked hard since Labour won power to woo the City. In her Mansion House speech in November last year, Reeves said that banking regulation after the 2008 financial crisis had “gone too far”.
But she faces difficult fiscal decisions in the run-up to her budget, after the government watered down its planned welfare savings and largely reversed winter fuel allowance cuts – decisions which narrowed her budget headroom.
Business
Trophy-property ranches hit the market as more heirs chose to sell

Owned by the same family for more than 116 years, Reynolds Ranch is now on the market for $30.7 million.
Courtesy of California Outdoor Properties
For more than 116 years, Deanna Davis’ family has owned Reynolds Ranch, spanning 7,600 acres in California’s Central Coast region. With the heirs in disagreement over the homestead’s future, Reynolds Ranch is now on the market for $30.7 million.
“It’s so hard to make decisions together as a family about the ranch,” she told CNBC. “If I had the cash, I would buy the whole thing right now and cash everybody out and start over and take the title in a LLC.”
It’s a common predicament for family trees that have too many branches, said Davis, who runs the ranch. Her mother, who died last December, was the last family member who grew up on Reynolds Ranch. Now the family is scattered across the country and some of her relatives live overseas. Some family members who can only visit once or twice a year would rather cash out.
Families like Davis’ are increasingly choosing to sell these long-held properties, high-end ranch brokers told CNBC.
The legacy properties are in big demand — even if not at pandemic highs — as deep-pocketed buyers crave wide open skies and a slower pace of life. The so-called “Yellowstone” effect remains in full force, with fans of the Paramount show seeking sprawling properties in Montana, Wyoming, Colorado and other Western states.
“All I know is whoever buys this property, when they sit on the porch in the afternoon, sipping their margarita or iced tea, they will think they landed in paradise,” Davis said.
‘Nothing quite like it’
Ranch brokerage Live Water Properties currently has $700 million in listing inventory, up from under $200 million in May 2024, according to Jackson Hole, Wyoming, broker Latham Jenkins. Many of these properties are legacy ranches that are on the market for the first time in generations, he said.
One such listing is Antlers Ranch in Meeteetse, Wyoming, which spans 40,000 acres — nearly three times the size of Manhattan — and is priced at $85 million. Antlers Ranch is on the market for the first time in five generations.
“Large historic properties are less common as many have been broken up and sold off,” Jenkins said. “Those that remain are highly desirable.”
These legacy ranches can demand a premium for reasons other than acreage, he said. Many historic ranches, like another one of his listings, Red Hills Ranch, a 190-acre property asking for $65 million, are surrounded by public lands that cannot be developed. Buyers are drawn to that privacy, as well as the ability to hike and fish nearby and see wildlife up close.
Red Hills Ranch, 25 miles outside Jackson WY, spans 190 acres and is listed for $65 million. Nestled in the Bridger-Teton National Forest, Red Hills Ranch was formerly the private guest ranch of late senator Herb Kohl.
Courtesy of Live Water Properties
“When you sit next to a running river, watching sunrises and sunsets, seeing an elk calf be born, there’s nothing quite like it,” Jenkins said.
Families usually come to him when the next generation has little interest in taking over the ranch or the heirs can’t come to an agreement. He described it as “bittersweet” when these one-of-a-kind properties become available for the first time in generations.
“That’s the thing with real estate. The land is perpetual, but the ownership is not,” he said.
Bill McDavid, a broker at Hall and Hall, represents Rocking Chair Ranch, a 7,200-acre Montana ranch that has been in the same family for more than seven decades.
“The adult children just got to the point where they realized, ‘No, it’s time for this family to move on and do something else,” he said of the sellers behind the property, which is listed at $21.7 million.
Generational transfer of wealth
As ranching has been on the decline for decades, many multigenerational ranches have already changed hands, according to McDavid, who is based in Missoula, Montana. However, he is also seeing a rise in families looking to sell ranches they bought 20 to 30 years ago. The owners typically don’t have family ties to ranching and decided to buy trophy properties after making their fortune in tech or finance.
“For the buyer who made their money in the dot-com era, they had a grand idea about a family legacy, or whatever,” he said. “And then their kids got older, and they didn’t move to the ranch because nobody ever moved to the ranch. I mean, the dot-com guy, he came out and visited for at most the summer.”
He added of the heirs, “it was never in the cards for them to take over the ranch.”
Davis said she hopes a local ranching family will buy her California property, which has abundant grazing pastures and water sources. However, she said its likely a buyer from Silicon Valley will snap up Reynolds Ranch, which is only an hour and a half drive from San Jose and can accommodate a landing strip for a private plane.
John Onderdonk, who advises on agricultural properties for wealth manager Northern Trust, said the generational transfer of wealth is shaping the market. He is also a fourth-generation cattle rancher and said he is fortunate that his brothers agree on keeping their central California ranch in the family. However, he said many of the families he works with that choose to sell do so because of finances rather than disinterest.
“Real estate is a capital-intensive asset class, and if there isn’t liquidity in the portfolio, and the rest of the family isn’t able to support that, tough decisions come into play,” he said.
Listed at $21.7 million, Rocking Chair Ranch is on the market for the first time in over seven decades. The Philipsburg, MT, ranch spans 7,200 acres.
Courtesy of Hall and Hall
Legacy ranches, which may come with livestock and cropland, are attractive but require much due diligence, according to Ken Mirr of Mirr Ranch Group. For instance, these ranches are usually run by long-tenured managers who might leave when the property is sold and are hard to replace, said the Denver, Colorado-based broker. Or, they stay and have a rough time adjusting to new ownership, Mirr added.
“Those managers who have been here a long time start thinking that they own the place, right?” he said. “Sometimes that’s not the best person to be managing the ranch.”
Buyers expecting complete privacy can get a rude awakening. For instance, Mirr said, the previous family could have a longstanding verbal agreement with a neighbor allowing them to cross through their property. Depending on the state, members of the public may also be fish or wade in rivers located on private property, he said.
McDavid said buyers with deep pockets can have unrealistic expectations, wanting a rural property without sacrificing convenience. For instance, many want to live within 30 minutes’ driving distance of a major airport. Buyers also prefer move-in-ready properties, and multigenerational ranches may lack modern amenities.
As for the sellers, they get a windfall but aren’t able to replicate the lifestyle that comes with a legacy ranch.
“It’s just kind of a unique thing when you’re sitting on your porch and you look around and you own everything as far as your eyes can see,” Davis said. “It’s extremely difficult, the concept of losing the place, but on the other hand it’s going to make the next family very happy.”
Business
Reliance Industries AGM 2025 Live Updates: Mukesh Ambani Set To Address 44 Lakh RIL Shareholders Shortly

Reliance AGM 2025 Live Updates: Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL) is set to hold its 48th Annual General Meeting (AGM) today at 2:00 pm through video conferencing (VC) and other audio-visual means (OAVM). Investors will keenly watch RIL Chairman & Managing Director Mukesh Ambani’s live speech for announcements that could shape the company’s next phase of growth across its digital, retail, and energy businesses.
The event will be livestreamed across digital platforms, including YouTube, X, Facebook, Instagram, and JioEvents. The streaming will start at 2:00 pm.
(Disclaimer: Network18 and TV18 – the companies that operate news18.com – are controlled by Independent Media Trust, of which Reliance Industries is the sole beneficiary.)
-
Business1 week ago
RSS Feed Generator, Create RSS feeds from URL
-
Tech1 week ago
Korea develops core radar components for stealth technology
-
Fashion1 week ago
Tariff pressure casts shadow on Gujarat’s textile landscape
-
Fashion1 week ago
Rent the Runway to swap debt for equity in revival effort
-
Fashion1 week ago
US retailers split on holiday prospects amid consumer caution
-
Tech1 week ago
Qi2’s Magnetic Wireless Charging Finally Arrives on Android
-
Sports1 week ago
Dan Quinn says Terry McLaurin is healthy, ‘closer’ to Commanders return
-
Tech2 days ago
Review: Google Pixel 10 Series