Connect with us

Business

A new AI cold war is emerging and Pakistan must avoid becoming collateral damage | The Express Tribune

Published

on

A new AI cold war is emerging and Pakistan must avoid becoming collateral damage | The Express Tribune


Proposals to restrict high-end chips to cloud rental could leave AI use dependent on US servers


ISLAMABAD:

Though the recently released US-China Economic and Security Review Commission report offers interesting insights into the love-hate dynamics of the US-China relationship, it also highlights concerns that could affect Pakistan in the long run.

The report acknowledges military cooperation between China and Pakistan and recognises the supremacy of Beijing’s HQ-9 air defence system, PL-15 missiles and J-10 aircraft. However, the commission did not raise any concerns regarding China’s offer to sell 40 J-35 fighter jets, KJ-500 aircraft and missiles to Pakistan in June 2025, showing that the US views Pakistan as a responsible stakeholder that is not fully aligned with either camp.

The report mentions that Pakistan imports surveillance technologies from China, including facial recognition systems, AI-driven monitoring platforms and digital ID systems, under China’s Digital Silk Road strategy to support initiatives such as “safe cities.” This should not raise an alarm, as Pakistan has legitimate security needs arising from two decades of terrorist threats.

Nevertheless, the fact that Pakistan is not explicitly discussed, unlike countries such as Russia and Iran, indicates that our strategy of maintaining strategic balance to extract benefits from both powers is working in our favour. However, what should concern Pakistan is the growing hostility between the two nations over cutting-edge AI technology and enabling computer chips.

The committee proposed that the US should shift from selling AI chips to renting them via cloud services when the performance capabilities of these chips exceed a given threshold. This means that, in future, developing countries like Pakistan won’t be able to build independent GPU-powered data centres and would instead be forced to rely on servers in the US.

Access to such cloud-based AI compute would then be subject to use-case authorisation, with quotas varying by country. Even commercial entities outside the US would face FATF-style know-your-customer requirements to prevent AI computing from being used for military research or surveillance projects.

The committee also expressed concern over China’s acquisition of German company Kuka, a leading manufacturer of robotic arms and automation solutions. This signals that advanced AI-powered robotics will become another battlefield in global technology competition.

The semiconductor trap

The commission’s recommendation to shift high-end AI chips from sale to cloud-based rental reflects a fundamental shift in thinking: technology access is no longer about commerce but control. If implemented, it would create a two-tier world, countries capable of developing their own AI infrastructure and those perpetually dependent on foreign servers, with their data, algorithms and applications subject to US scrutiny.

The USCC report makes clear that technology competition between major powers will intensify, with export controls tightening, supply chains fragmenting and access to advanced technologies becoming increasingly conditional.

Pakistan may soon find itself forced to choose between dependence on China’s technology ecosystem and reliance on Western, primarily American, technology. At the government level, Pakistan often procures Chinese solutions, yet our research institutions and universities remain heavily dependent on US-based chips for critical research and development.

Pakistan’s National AI Policy and ongoing data centre investments could be rendered obsolete if this rental-only regime is implemented before the country secures essential hardware. Pakistan must recognise this threat early. We should immediately stockpile existing-generation AI chips, particularly Nvidia A100/H100-class GPUs and their equivalents, which are still available for purchase but may soon face export restrictions.

At the same time, we must invest in AI chip design capabilities using open architectures such as RISC-V, though not in manufacturing, which requires tens of billions of dollars. Pakistan should also negotiate technology-transfer agreements for semiconductor packaging and testing, and build relationships with emerging chip makers. We should also join regional technology cooperation consortia, such as the Asia-Pacific Space Cooperation Organisation, of which Pakistan is a member.

The alternative is a future where Pakistan’s AI ambitions require American permission, our manufacturing competitiveness depends on Chinese goodwill, and our economic development is constrained by technologies controlled by others. This is not merely an economic threat; it is an existential challenge to sovereignty in an era where technology is power.

The next two to three years represent a critical window. Technologies and capabilities available today may be restricted tomorrow. The USCC report is a roadmap of the technological fault lines that will define the 21st century. Pakistan cannot match the technology superpowers in resources or scale, but we can build a resilient and diversified technology ecosystem that maintains access to multiple sources. Our focus should be to avoid being caught on the wrong side of those fault lines while the window for action remains open. That window is closing faster than most realise.

The writer is a Cambridge graduate and is working as a strategy consultant



Source link

Business

NaBFID signs pact with PDCOR to expand advisory support for state projects – The Times of India

Published

on

NaBFID signs pact with PDCOR to expand advisory support for state projects – The Times of India


The National Bank for Financing Infrastructure and Development (NaBFID) has signed a Memorandum of Agreement with Projects Development Company of Rajasthan Limited (PDCOR) to strengthen advisory services for state and city-level infrastructure projects.The agreement will also allow both institutions to jointly explore financing and transaction advisory opportunities, including transaction structuring, commercial and technical due diligence, and support for financial closure of projects undertaken by state governments and urban local bodies across India, according to PTI.“This collaboration seeks to enhance access to long-term institutional finance for State Governments and Urban Local Bodies, while strengthening the infrastructure advisory and financing ecosystem,” Rajkiran Rai G., Managing Director of NaBFID, said.He added that the partnership would help both institutions jointly pursue project advisory opportunities, develop replicable financing frameworks, accelerate financial closures and mobilise capital across the infrastructure value chain.Monika Kalia, DMD-CFO, NaBFID, said the tie-up would leverage the strengths of both organisations to provide much-needed advisory support to states and urban local bodies for impactful urban infrastructure projects.Dileep Chingapurath, Chief Executive Officer, PDCOR, said the agreement would address the long-felt need for end-to-end professional support to structure and mobilise sustainable financing solutions, particularly for state governments and their agencies.“Through this collaboration, both institutions aim to enhance the quality of project preparation, mobilise institutional capital more effectively and accelerate the implementation of sustainable infrastructure projects across states and municipalities,” he said.NaBFID is a Development Financial Institution focused on long-term infrastructure financing, while PDCOR is an undertaking of the Government of Rajasthan.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Explained: On way to 4th largest, how India slipped to 6th rank & what it means for 3rd largest economy dream – The Times of India

Published

on

Explained: On way to 4th largest, how India slipped to 6th rank & what it means for 3rd largest economy dream – The Times of India


While India will be the sixth largest economy in FY27, it is likely to overtake both the UK, and Japan to bag the fourth spot in FY28. (AI image)

In April 2025 when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) released its World Economic Outlook, India was seen overtaking Japan to become the world’s fourth largest economy by the end of 2025-26. One year later, India has slipped to the sixth position on the largest economies rankings, with the United Kingdom reclaiming its spot as the fifth largest economy.In fact, IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook (April 2026) sees India sitting at the sixth spot this financial year too. This projection comes even as India has grown better than expected in FY26 and is seen retaining its tag of being the world’s fastest growing major economy.What has led to the sudden fall? Why has India dropped to the sixth position, falling behind the UK, instead of overtaking Japan to become the fourth largest economy? And what does this setback mean for its dream of becoming the third largest economy by the end of this decade? We decode:

Data drive: India projected as 4th largest, but fell to 6th spot

First let’s look at some IMF data to see which way the Indian economy was headed in April 2025, and what the April 2026 outlook data suggestsAs per April 2025 estimates of IMF, India’s economy would have been at $4601.225 billion at the end of FY 2025-26, overtaking Japan which was estimated at $4373.091 billion. The UK at the 6th spot was projected to have a nominal GDP of $4040.844 billion.However, as per the April 2026 estimates, India’s economy had a nominal GDP of $4,153 billion at the end of FY 2025-26, with the UK overtaking it with $4,265 billion GDP. Japan’s GDP is seen at $4,379 billion.As the above estimates show, India’s GDP estimates have seen a drop over one year, while UK’s nominal GDP has grown better than expected. Japan has been steady.So, what went wrong? Blame the rupee and GDP data itself!

Rupee Depreciation Blow & New GDP Series

The first thing to understand is that IMF’s data on the size of a country’s nominal GDP is in dollar terms. Hence, with global rankings based on dollar‑denominated GDP, they are highly sensitive to exchange rate movements. The biggest party pooper for India’s dream of becoming the fourth largest has been the rupee’s slide. The Indian currency has depreciated more than expected over the last year, dropping from 84.57 versus the US dollar in 2024 to 88.48 in 2025, as per IMF data. The IMF estimates see it at 92.59 this year.Several factors have contributed to the rupee’s decline, including capital outflows, uncertainty related to India-US trade deal up until February, and the recent Middle East conflict which has raised crude oil prices and India’s import bill. Also, the RBI while actively managing volatility in the forex market, is not targeting any particular level of the rupee.Arun Singh, Chief Economist, Dun & Bradstreet India says that India’s recent slip to sixth place in global GDP rankings does not reflect a weakening of the economy, but is largely the result of currency conversion effects and a one‑time statistical revision.The rupee’s depreciation from 2024 to 2026, has mechanically compressed India’s GDP in dollar terms, effectively halving apparent growth despite strong domestic expansion, says Arun Singh.According to Ranen Banerjee, Partner and Leader, Economic Advisory Services, PwC India, GDP in US dollar terms would shave off with rupee depreciation. “We have had almost 7-8% depreciation over the last few months owing to the conflict and portfolio outflows. Thus, in effect in US dollar terms, it is close to shaving out almost a year’s nominal GDP,” he tells TOI.And it’s not just about the Indian economy. The United Kingdom which has overtaken India to bag the 5th spot again also has economic factors working in its favour. UK’s GDP growth at 0.5% has recently beaten forecasts of 0.1% by a wide margin. Not only that, its currency – pound – has actually appreciated against the US dollar.The second factor that has impacted the rankings is India’s adoption of a new base year for its latest GDP series. As per the new data, which also makes use of a more refined methodology, the size of India’s nominal GDP in rupee terms has gone down. Sample this: As per the older base year of 2011-12, India’s GDP at the end of 2025-26 would have been Rs 35,713,886 crore. But under the new series, it is estimated to be Rs 34,547,157 crore. The new calculation methodology and base year revision presents a more accurate picture of the size of the Indian economy.Hence the currency effect has been compounded by a one‑time downward revision following India’s shift to a new GDP base year, which has lowered reported nominal levels without affecting real activity.

New GDP Series: Top 10 Points To Know

Does India’s drop to 6th indicate fundamental weakness?

Experts are confident that India’s growth story is intact and fundamentally strong, a fact that is reflected in projections of it continuing to be the world’s fastest growing major economy. They see technical factors behind the current slip, rather than any deterioration in economic fundamentals.It’s also interesting to note that while India will be the sixth largest economy in FY27, in the upcoming financial year, it is likely to overtake both the UK, and Japan to bag the fourth spot.Arun Singh of Dun & Bradstreet India explains this resilience with numbers:IMF World Economic Outlook (April 2026) data show that India’s GDP at current prices in domestic currency rose strongly from ₹318 trillion in 2024 to ₹346.5 trillion in 2025 and further to ₹384.5 trillion in 2026, translating into robust nominal growth of about 8.9% in 2024–25 and nearly 11% in 2025–26, among the fastest globally. In contrast, other large economies recorded more moderate domestic nominal growth – around 5% in the US, roughly 4% in China, 3–5% in the UK, 3–3.5% in Germany, and lower or volatile growth in Japan – underscoring India’s strong underlying momentum. In times of global economic turmoil, while GDP growth is expected to take some hit, most agencies and experts have pegged India’s growth to be strong. Incidentally, the IMF has even marginally raised its GDP growth forecast for FY27 to 6.5% despite the ongoing Middle East conflict.

IMF World Economic Outlook –  Growth Projections

“In India, growth for 2025 is revised upward by 1.0 percentage point relative to October, to 7.6 percent, reflecting the better-than-expected outturn in the second and third quarters of the fiscal year and sustained strong momentum in the fourth quarter,” IMF said in its latest outlook. “For 2026, growth is revised upward moderately by 0.3 percentage point (0.1 percentage point relative to January) to 6.5 percent, led by positive contributions from the carryover of the strong 2025 outturn and the decline in additional US tariffs on Indian goods from 50 to 10 percent, which outweigh the adverse impact of the Middle East conflict. Growth is projected to stay at 6.5 percent in 2027,” it added.

Will India become 3rd largest anytime soon?

The rupee depreciation and the nominal GDP revision has also pushed back India’s dream of becoming the third largest economy by the end of this decade. In the October 2025 estimates, IMF had said that India will overtake Germany to become third largest by FY30. However, the April 2026 projections see it reaching the third rank only by FY 2030-31.Experts point to the rupee’s depreciation versus the dollar to note that the road ahead is likely to be uncertain. Madan Sabnavis, Chief economist, Bank of Baroda is confident that India will continue to do well in the coming years.“We will definitely improve in terms of GDP growth which will be higher than that of other countries especially UK and Japan which are just above us. However, the rupee value will finally determine how India gets placed on the global scale,” he told TOI.Ranen Banerjee of PwC India sees rupee beginning to get support with the conflict containment, relatively lower oil prices and portfolio flow reversals with valuations getting attractive in recent times. “Thus, we should not be experiencing any further sharp depreciation of the rupee in the immediate term provided the conflict does not escalate and oil prices relatively softening from their highs and come down to a range of $85-90 a barrel,” he says.For Arun Singh of Dun & Bradstreet, looking ahead, India’s relative position in US dollar‑based GDP rankings will remain highly sensitive to currency movements rather than domestic growth dynamics. “Continued global dollar strength or capital‑flow volatility may cause periodic slippage in rankings despite robust fundamentals. Sustaining external macro stability and limiting undue rupee volatility will be crucial for India’s strong growth performance to translate more fully into higher global economic rankings,” Arun Singh told TOI.The Indian economy, largely driven by domestic fundamentals, is not immune to external shocks. High US tariffs of 50% from August 2025 to early February, and the ongoing US-Iran war have spelt back-to-back shocks for the economy. Even as experts stress on the resilience of the growth story, the vulnerability to higher crude oil prices, and other global supply chain disruptions is a reality. In such a scenario, India may well have to contend with fluctuating world rankings, while banking on its strong GDP growth to tide over disruptions.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Video: Why Your Paycheck Feels Smaller

Published

on

Video: Why Your Paycheck Feels Smaller


new video loaded: Why Your Paycheck Feels Smaller

Ben Casselman, our chief economics correspondent, explains why wages are not keeping up with inflation and what that means for American workers and the economy.

By Ben Casselman, Nour Idriss, Sutton Raphael and Stephanie Swart

April 18, 2026



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending