Connect with us

Tech

AI transcribes UK Supreme Court hearings and links them to written judgments

Published

on

AI transcribes UK Supreme Court hearings and links them to written judgments


Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

Millions of words spoken in the U.K.’s highest court risk being misunderstood, misquoted or simply missed because transcribing them accurately is too difficult and too expensive, according to a new study from the University of Surrey.

In a new article published in Applied Sciences, the researchers detail how they built an artificial intelligence system that can automatically transcribe U.K. Supreme Court hearings and link them directly to the written judgments—helping lawyers, academics and the public navigate justice like never before.

Every year, more than 449,000 cases move through U.K. tribunals, yet recordings of court hearings remain hard to use. Traditional transcription is slow, costly and prone to errors. Off-the-shelf speech recognition tools struggle with courtroom language, mishearing “my lady” (pronounced “mee-lady” by barristers when addressing a female judge) as “melody” or legal terms like “inherent vice” as “in your advice.”

To tackle this, researchers developed a custom speech recognition system trained on 139 hours of Supreme Court hearings and . By fine-tuning the model with specialist vocabulary and etiquette, the system reduced transcription errors by up to 9% compared with leading commercial tools. It also proved more reliable at capturing crucial entities such as provisions, case names and judicial titles.

Professor Constantin Orăsan, co-author of the study and Professor of Language and Translation Technologies at the University of Surrey, said, “Our courts deal with some of the most important questions in society. Yet the way we record and access those hearings is stuck in the past.

“By tailoring AI to the unique language of British courtrooms, we’ve built a tool that makes justice more transparent and accessible—whether you’re a barrister preparing an appeal or a member of the public trying to understand why a judgment was reached.”

The second part of the project used AI to semantically match paragraphs of judgments with the precise timestamp in the video where the argument was made. A prototype interface now lets users scroll through a judgment, click on a paragraph and instantly watch the relevant exchange from the hearing. Tests showed the system correctly linked text and video with an F1 score of 0.85.

An F1 score is a way of measuring how well a system balances two things:

  • Precision—of all the results it gave, how many were actually correct.
  • Recall—of all the correct results that existed, how many it managed to find.

It punishes a system that is very good at one but bad at the other. It ranges from 0 to 1:

  • 1.0 means perfect precision and recall (the system found everything and made no mistakes).
  • 0 means total failure.

Evaluation with real users showed that their productivity is dramatically increased when using the UI. Without AI assistance, a legal expert needed 15 hours to identify 10 links, whereas with AI support they were able to validate 220 links in just three hours.

The tool is already attracting interest from legal bodies, including the U.K. Supreme Court and the National Archives. By reducing hours of manual searching into seconds, it promises to help lawyers prepare cases, speed up legal training and allow the public to see how decisions are formed.

More information:
Hadeel Saadany et al, Employing AI for Better Access to Justice: An Automatic Text-to-Video Linking Tool for UK Supreme Court Hearings, Applied Sciences (2025). DOI: 10.3390/app15169205

Citation:
AI transcribes UK Supreme Court hearings and links them to written judgments (2025, September 16)
retrieved 16 September 2025
from https://techxplore.com/news/2025-09-ai-uk-supreme-court-links.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.





Source link

Tech

The Doomsday Glacier Is Getting Closer and Closer to Irreversible Collapse

Published

on

The Doomsday Glacier Is Getting Closer and Closer to Irreversible Collapse


Known as the “Doomsday Glacier,” the Thwaites Glacier in Antarctica is one of the most rapidly changing glaciers on Earth, and its future evolution is one of the biggest unknowns when it comes to predicting global sea level rise.

The eastern ice shelf of the Thwaites Glacier is supported at its northern end by a ridge of the ocean floor. However, over the past two decades, cracks in the upper reaches of the glacier have increased rapidly, weakening its structural stability. A new study by the International Thwaites Glacier Collaboration (ITGC) presents a detailed record of this gradual collapse process.

Researchers at the Centre for Earth Observation and Science at the University of Manitoba, Canada, analyzed observational data from 2002 to 2022 to track the formation and propagation of cracks in the ice shelf shear zone. They discovered that as the cracks grew, the connection between the ice shelf and the mid-ocean ridge weakened, accelerating the upstream flow of ice.

A fast-motion video of Thwaites Glacier in Antarctica over a period of about 10 years.

Video: University of Manitoba

The Crack in the Ice Shelf Widens in Two Stages

The study reveals that the weakening of the ice shelf occurred in four distinct phases, with crack growth occurring in two stages. In the first phase, long cracks appeared along the ice flow, gradually extending eastward. Some exceeded 8 km in length and spanned the entire shelf. In the second phase, numerous short cross-flow cracks, less than 2 km long, emerged, doubling the total length of the fissures.

Analysis of satellite images showed that the total length of the cracks increased from about 165 km in 2002 to approximately 336 km in 2021. Meanwhile, the average length of each crack decreased from 3.2 km to 1.5 km, with a notable increase in small cracks. These changes reflect a significant shift in the stress state of the ice shelf, that is, in the interaction of forces within its structure.

Between 2002 and 2006, the ice shelf accelerated as it was pulled by nearby fast-moving currents, generating compressive stress on the anchorage point, which initially stabilized the shelf. After 2007, the shear zone between the shelf and the Western ice tongue collapsed. The stress concentrated around the anchorage point, leading to the formation of large cracks.

Since 2017, these cracks have completely penetrated the ice shelf, severing the connection to the anchorage. According to researchers, this has accelerated the upstream flow of ice and turned the anchorage into a destabilizing factor.

Feedback Loop Collapse

One of the most significant findings of the study is the existence of a feedback loop: Cracks accelerate the flow of ice, and in turn, this increased speed generates new cracks. This process was clearly recorded by the GPS devices that the team deployed on the ice shelf between 2020 and 2022.

During the winter of 2020, the upward propagation of structural changes in the shear zone was particularly evident. These changes advanced at a rate of approximately 55 kilometers per year within the ice shelf, demonstrating that structural collapse in the shear zone directly impacts upstream ice flow.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Grado’s Signature S750 Headphones Sound Modern but Feel Like the ’70s

Published

on

Grado’s Signature S750 Headphones Sound Modern but Feel Like the ’70s


The friction-pole mechanism for headband adjustment is no less agricultural, for all its familiarity where Grado headphone designs are concerned. And while the detachable cable is a fair bit more flexible than some older Grado models, that’s not the same as saying it’s meaningfully flexible. If there’s a more willfully unhelpful length of cable in all of headphone-land, I’ve yet to encounter it.

On the subject of the cable: Grado provides 180-ish centimeters of it with a 6.3-mm termination at the end. When you’re charging this sort of money for headphones, it’s not outlandish to imagine your customer might have a device that accepts a balanced connection. Frankly, why there isn’t a choice of cables in the packaging is, frankly, beyond me. It’s something that the overwhelming majority of Grado’s rivals provide as a matter of course, and though the company’s website suggests there are forthcoming cable options “including a variety of lengths, as well as balanced terminations such as 4-pin XLR and 4.4mm,” these have been “forthcoming” for quite some time now, and will have a cost attached.

Photograph: Simon Lucas

I’m in no position to doubt the effectiveness of the “B” ear cushions where sound quality is concerned. After all, the Signature S750 sound superb, and Grado suggests the cushion design is a contributing factor. What I do feel qualified to say, though, is that the raw-feeling foam of the ear cushions is not especially comfortable, and that it retains and returns the wearer’s body heat with something approaching glee. “Premium” and “luxurious” are not words that apply.

Ultimately, it depends on what your priorities are. There’s certainly no arguing with the way the Signature S750 sound. They’re uncomplicatedly impressive and periodically quite thrilling to listen to, depending on the mix. But unless you’re one of those hair-shirt hi-fi fundamentalists from back in the day, one of those listeners who somehow doesn’t believe outstanding sound quality is valid unless there’s some suffering attached, there may well be too many shortcomings to overlook when it comes to these Grados. “Hand-assembled in Brooklyn, USA” notwithstanding.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The Future of EVs Is Foggy—but California Still Wants More of Them

Published

on

The Future of EVs Is Foggy—but California Still Wants More of Them


It’s been a weird and confusing few weeks for the auto industry—especially for those who hoped to see more batteries on the road in the coming decade.

Just this month: Ford announced a retrenchment in its EV business, canceling some battery-powered vehicle plans and delaying others; the European Commission proposed to backtrack its goal to transition fully to zero-emission cars by 2035; the US government said it would loosen rules that would have required automakers to ratchet up the fuel economy of their fleets. BloombergNEF projects 14 million fewer EVs will be sold in the US by 2030 than it did last year—a 20 percent drop.

What has not changed, it seems, is California’s interest in shifting to cleaner transportation. “The state is doubling down on our zero-emission vehicle deployment, providing market certainty, and continuing to lead on clean transportation regardless of policy reversals elsewhere or shifts by automakers,” Anthony Martinez, a spokesperson for Governor Gavin Newsom, wrote in a statement to WIRED. He said the governor’s “commitment to accelerating California’s clean transportation transition hasn’t changed.”

In 2020, Newsom became one of the first lawmakers in the world to commit to full electrification when he signed an executive order directing state agencies to create rules that would ban the sale of new gas-powered cars in the state by 2035. Those rules eventually aimed to ratchet up the share of battery-electric vehicles, with an ultimate goal of a mix of pure EVs and plug-in hybrids. (The PHEVs could only account for about 20 percent of sales.) Several other states, including Massachusetts, New York, Oregon, and Washington State, pledged to do the same.

Earlier this year, the GOP-led Congress revoked, through legislation, California’s power to set its own clean air regulations. The state responded with a lawsuit, which is still being argued. Meanwhile, Newsom signed another executive order directing state agencies to further the state’s electrification goals in other ways.

Now auto industry experts and players say the state’s determination to push through policy and market changes to meet its now half-decade-old goal may be overly ambitious.

“Getting to 100 percent might be challenging,” says Stephanie Valdez Streaty, the director of industry insights at Cox Automotive. “There are a lot of headwinds.”

A coalition of California business groups have argued that the state’s goals even for next year—a requirement that 35 percent of model year 2026 vehicles sold are zero-emission—aren’t realistic, and that California should push back its goals for zero-emission new car sales. (Enforcement of the rules is paused while the larger battle with US Congress plays out.) Zero-emission cars accounted for 21 percent of the overall annual state new car sales as of the fall, according to the California New Car Dealers Association, well below the 35 percent goal. “The timeline needed to be adjusted,” says the group’s president, Brian Maas.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending