Sports
California school board votes to ban trans athletes from girls’ sports amid state’s lawsuit with Trump
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!
A school board in California voted to defy state policy and ban trans athletes from girls’ sports Tuesday.
The Kern County Board of Education approved a resolution to comply with the federal definition of Title IX.
The vote comes amid a feud and lawsuit between the state and President Donald Trump‘s administration over the issue of males competing in girls’ sports. Now, at least one school board has opted to side with Trump over the state authorities that have rigorously committed to keeping males in girls’ sports this year.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM
Trump signed an executive order to ban males from girls’ and women’s sports nationally back in February, but California was one of the first states to publicly defy the order. The defiance enabled multiple incidents of trans athletes competing in high school girls’ basketball, cross-country and track and field in 2025, as California schools were made to continue following the state law that has protected trans inclusion in sports dating back to 2014.
The issue came to a head during the spring high school track and field postseason, when transgender athlete AB Hernandez of Jurupa Valley High School made a run for two girls’ state titles.
In May, three of the state’s esteemed Christian high schools sent a letter to the California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) challenging its longstanding policy that allows biological males in girls’ sports. Many residents, girls’ athletes and even entire educational institutions protested the trans athlete’s inclusion.
Earlier that month, JSerra Catholic High School, Orange Lutheran High School and Crean Lutheran High School sent a joint letter to the CIF on Thursday.
“CIF’s Gender Identity Policy also fosters an environment that is increasingly hostile to religious member schools. CIF’s expectation that all faith-based schools facilitate the CIF Gender Identity Policy puts religious schools in the untenable position of adhering to the tenets of their faith in their classrooms and communities but practicing something contrary to their faith on their athletic fields,” the letter read.
Now, the Kern County Board of Education is the first public school board to stand up to the state and side with Trump over the issue.
Maine, which is engulfed in a similar lawsuit with Trump over the same issue, also saw two of its public school boards pass resolutions in April to locally ban trans athletes from competing in girls’ sports.
Trump’s Department of Justice is now suing both states, seeking injunctions on the policies that continue to enable males to compete in girls’ sports and use girls’ locker rooms.
California’s policies “eviscerate equal athletic opportunities for girls … they also require girls to share intimate spaces, such as locker rooms, with boys, causing a hostile educational environment that denies girls educational opportunities,” the lawsuit against California argues.
“The results of these illegal policies are stark: girls are displaced from podiums, denied awards, and miss out on critical visibility for college scholarships and recognition.”
California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom has said that the California Department of Education and CIF were following laws enacted in 2013.
“I struggled with the issue of fairness when it came to sports,” Newsom said in response to the lawsuit at a July event. “And we tried to figure that out a couple of years ago, and we were unsuccessful, and we struggled with that recently.
“And my position is that I don’t think it’s fair, but I also think it’s demeaning to talk down to people, and to belittle the trans community. And I don’t like the way the right wing talks about the trans community. These people just want to survive.”
Newsom previously garnered mixed responses within his party when he said he believed males competing in girls’ sports is “deeply unfair” in a March episode of his podcast. Still, he has declined to commit to or even support the idea of banning males from girls’ sports.
Newsom is not named as a defendant in the DOJ lawsuit.
A bipartisan survey by the Public Policy Institute of California found the majority of California residents oppose biological male trans athletes competing in women’s sports.
That figure included more than 70% of the state’s school parents.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
“Most Californians support requiring transgender athletes to compete on teams matching the sex they were assigned at birth,” the poll stated.
“Solid majorities of adults (65%) and likely voters (64%) support requiring that transgender athletes compete on teams that match the sex they were assigned at birth, not the gender they identify with. An overwhelming majority of public school parents (71%) support such a requirement.”
Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.
Sports
More than 500 million request of World Cup tickets, says FIFA – SUCH TV
Football’s global governing body FIFA said Wednesday it had received more than 500 million requests for tickets to this year’s World Cup despite rumbling controversy over sky-high prices to attend the event.
FIFA said in a statement it had received applications from fans in all of its 211 member nations and territories for the tournament staged in the United States, Canada and Mexico.
The window for submitting requests to be entered in a lottery which will allocate tickets closed on Tuesday. FIFA said fans would be notified of whether their requests had been successful “no earlier than 5 February.”
Outside of the tournament’s host nations, FIFA said the heaviest demand came from fans in Germany, England, Brazil, Spain, Portugal, Argentina and Colombia.
The most requested ticket was Colombia’s clash with Portugal in Miami on June 27, followed by Mexico’s game against South Korea in Guadalajara on June 18, and the World Cup final in New Jersey on July 19.
“Half a billion ticket requests in just over a month is more than demand – it’s a global statement,” FIFA President Gianni Infantino said. “I would like to thank and congratulate football fans everywhere for this extraordinary response.”
“Knowing how much this tournament means to people around the world, our only regret is that we cannot welcome every fan inside the stadiums.”
FIFA has faced sharp criticism over its ticket pricing strategy for the 48-team tournament, with fan groups branding the cost as “extortionate” and “astronomical.”
Football Supporters Europe (FSE) said ticket prices were almost five times higher than at the 2022 tournament in Qatar.
Those criticisms prompted FIFA to introduce a new category of cut-price tickets in December set at 60 US dollars (51 euros) each.
Sports
Sources: Harbaugh, Giants working to finalize deal
EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. — John Harbaugh and the New York Giants are working to finalize an agreement to make him their next head coach, and barring a setback, a deal is expected, sources told ESPN’s Adam Schefter on Wednesday night.
The deal is not final and contract numbers still are being negotiated, with one source telling Schefter: “There still is a lot to work through.”
But barring any setbacks, Harbaugh is ready to accept the Giants’ deal and the team is expected to hire him as soon as possible, sources said.
Sports
NCAA asks CFTC to suspend prediction markets
The NCAA asked a federal regulatory body Wednesday to stop prediction markets from offering trades on college sports until more safeguards are in place.
In a letter addressed to the chairman of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the federal agency that regulates prediction markets, NCAA president Charlie Baker said the growth of prediction markets poses a threat to the well-being of student-athletes as well as the integrity of competition.
“I implore you to suspend collegiate sport prediction markets until a more robust system with appropriate safeguards is in place,” Baker wrote.
Baker identified several areas where he believes prediction markets need additional safeguards: age restrictions, advertising restrictions, robust integrity monitoring, the involvement of national governing bodies such as the NCAA, restrictions on prop bets, harm reduction resources and anti-harassment measures.
Kalshi, a leading prediction market company, uses IC360, a firm that monitors the betting market for irregularities and works with sports leagues, including the NCAA. Baker acknowledged that some prediction markets monitor for integrity concerns but said “heightened levels of review that don’t exist in many prediction markets” are needed, such as tracing the geolocation of bettors. He also said prediction market operators are not required to report integrity concerns to other operators through an intermediary — a requirement for sportsbooks in most states.
He added that the NCAA is willing to work with the CFTC to develop these protections, which exist for legal sportsbooks.
ESPN has reached out to the CFTC and the Coalition for Prediction Markets, which represents many of the largest operators, for comment.
Baker also discussed the request in a speech Wednesday at the 2026 NCAA Convention.
“So-called prediction markets are offering what anyone can see is unregulated betting on college games,” he said. “We need federal regulators to stabilize this market.”
In his speech, Baker referenced the steps Kalshi had taken to offer markets on the transfer portal as an example of why the NCAA needs federal intervention. In December, Kalshi notified the CFTC that it was self-certifying markets on whether college athletes would enter the transfer portal. Though Kalshi said it has no immediate plans to begin offering trading on the portal, the decision drew sharp criticism from the NCAA.
Prediction markets, which allow users to trade on the yes/no outcome of events, including sports, have increased in popularity over the past year. While traditional sportsbooks operate in 39 states and the District of Columbia, where the betting age is usually 21, prediction markets are available in all 50 states to users 18 and older.
Oversight of prediction markets is a hotly contested legal issue. State gambling regulators, which oversee traditional sportsbooks, are locked in legal battles in multiple states with leading prediction market companies.
Those companies say they are not sportsbooks because users are not going up against the house but instead trading contracts with other users on the opposite side of the proposition. While bookmakers charge a vig, or commission, on losing wagers, prediction markets make money from a transaction fee, similar to a broker, and have no stake in the result.
Major sports leagues have so far been split on the question of prediction markets. The NFL has expressed its concern about the industry’s rise to Congress, while the NHL and UFC have inked deals with Kalshi and prediction market company Polymarket.
-
Entertainment1 week agoDoes new US food pyramid put too much steak on your plate?
-
Politics1 week agoUK says provided assistance in US-led tanker seizure
-
Entertainment1 week agoWhy did Nick Reiner’s lawyer Alan Jackson withdraw from case?
-
Business1 week agoTrump moves to ban home purchases by institutional investors
-
Sports4 days agoClock is ticking for Frank at Spurs, with dwindling evidence he deserves extra time
-
Sports1 week agoPGA of America CEO steps down after one year to take care of mother and mother-in-law
-
Business1 week agoBulls dominate as KSE-100 breaks past 186,000 mark – SUCH TV
-
Business1 week agoGold prices declined in the local market – SUCH TV
