Connect with us

Tech

Electric vehicles could strain Quebec’s power grid

Published

on

Electric vehicles could strain Quebec’s power grid


Credit: Unsplash/CC0 Public Domain

Electrification of vehicles is necessary to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, but in Quebec the increasing weight of the battery-powered vehicles could cause electricity demand to rise well beyond projections.

That’s the conclusion of an analysis by Université de Montréal researchers Frédérik Lavictoire and Simon Brassard, supervised by Normand Mousseau, a professor in the Department of Physics.

Their results are published in the journal Sustainable Futures.

Cars are getting heavier

Between 2011 and 2021, the average of vehicles sold in Quebec increased by 11 kg per year for over 10 years, from 1,566 kg to nearly 1,700 kg.

New vehicles weigh an average of 135 kg more than the existing fleet average, while vehicles that are being retired are 104 kg lighter. A vehicle purchased today weighs an average of 110 kg more than the one it replaces.

With 60,000 vehicles being added to Quebec’s fleet each year, the cost of maintaining the road network—and the —is likely to be steep, the UdeM researchers say.

Small SUVs, which accounted for 12.6% of the fleet in 2011, have surged in popularity to reach 28.3% in 2021. They have been the leading category since 2020.

Meanwhile, compact vehicles declined from 28.5% to 25.4% of vehicles on the road, and sedans and minivans fell from 19.7% to 14.6%.

With their heavy batteries, EVs in Quebec now weigh about 23% more than gas-powered vehicles, or an extra 344 kg.

Heavier vehicles also take a toll in terms of premature wear and tear on the roads and more serious injuries in accidents. And as they continue to get heavier, they also put a strain on Quebec’s power grid.

Between 2021 and 2040, the UdeM researchers project that the amount of electricity used by EVs in the province will increase from 0.24 terawatt hours (TWh) to 29.03 TWh.

Harsh winters increase demand

EVs accounted for about 13.6% of Quebec’s total electricity demand in 2019. By 2030, when the government aims to have two million EVs on the roads, EV consumption would reach 7.68 TWh.

That’s roughly consistent with Hydro-Québec’s projection of 7.8 TWh for 2032.

However, Mousseau is concerned about the grid’s capacity in the province’s harsh winter months, when cold spells can be protracted and extreme.

EVs use more power in winter than in summer because reduce battery efficiency, increase tire friction and increase air density.

In January, when the average temperature is -10.3°C, monthly EV consumption will rise to 3.1 TWh once Quebec’s vehicle fleet is fully electrified, compared with 1.9 TWh in August, the UdeM researchers project.

At -20°C, the required capacity is almost double that on a summer day.

“In winter, we need to control electricity usage because adding capacity to meet peak demand costs $150 to $200 per kilowatt,” Mousseau said.

“With a fully electrified fleet in 2040, EVs would require an average additional capacity of 5,261 megawatts when the temperature is -20°C. That’s 12.1% of the total peak demand recorded in 2022.

“If the increasing weight of the EV fleet adds another gigawatt to peak demand, it will cost hundreds of millions of dollars more to generate that electricity.”

Three possible scenarios

The researchers modeled three scenarios for the period 2021-2040.

In the first, they allow the trend toward heavier vehicles to continue without intervention. In this case, the average mass would increase to 2,114 kg by 2040. The fleet’s annual electricity consumption would increase to 29.03 TWh and the additional required capacity on a cold winter’s day would be 5,261 megawatts.

In the second scenario, the increase in weight is limited to the weight of the EV battery: on average in Quebec, about 344 kg.

In the third scenario, the average vehicle weight is frozen at the 2021 level of 1,566 kg. This would reduce EV by 17.6% in 2040, from 29.03 to 23.91 TWh. The required capacity on a -20°C day would drop from 5,261 to 4,332 megawatts.

The saving of almost 6 TWh is equivalent to three percent of Hydro-Québec’s current total production. It would avoid the need to build costly infrastructure that would be needed only for a few hours a year, during winter peaks.

In scenario 1, by 2035, EVs will require additional capacity of 3,232 megawatts when the temperature is -20°C. That is 40.4% of all the additional power projected in Hydro-Québec’s action plan by 2035.

“Electrification of the vehicle fleet will entail system costs that will have to be borne,” said Mousseau. “We believe that reducing the average weight of vehicles is one solution that should be explored.”

Regulations could make batteries lighter

How can the weight of EVs be reduced? The researchers suggest several possibilities.

One is to reduce the weight of the battery, a significant technological challenge but one they believe is achievable with technological progress.

“Between 2017-2018 and 2021-2022, batteries were improved to increase range, but unfortunately, this improvement also increased the weight of the vehicles,” Mousseau said.

The simplest solution would be to amend the existing “Act to increase the number of zero-emission motor vehicles in Québec,” he suggested.

“Manufacturers could be required to comply with a specific average weight, or to offset the additional weight by paying a fine or tax.”

This approach, which has proven effective in stimulating the production of EVs, could also be used to control their weight, Mousseau said.

“For example, Tesla has benefited from the credit transfers allowed by the Act, demonstrating that it is possible to have manufacturers, not consumers, bear the cost of design choices.”

‘Strong global pressure’

Although the Quebec government recently backtracked on banning the sale of gasoline-powered vehicles by 2035, Mousseau is confident about the future of electrification.

“There is strong global pressure: the electrification of road vehicles will happen,” he said.

By postponing electrification, “Quebec is temporarily burying its head in the sand, but it cannot indefinitely block access to more efficient and less expensive electric vehicles, such as those made in China.”

Mousseau also pointed to an important economic issue: “For 20 years, we have watched other countries develop green technologies. What will we be producing 20 years from now, if we keep letting others take the lead? If we don’t put our foot on the accelerator, there’ll be significant economic risks.”

More information:
Frédérik Lavictoire et al, Impact of the car fleet evolution on electricity demand in Québec, Sustainable Futures (2025). DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101296

Citation:
Electric vehicles could strain Quebec’s power grid (2025, November 3)
retrieved 3 November 2025
from https://techxplore.com/news/2025-11-electric-vehicles-strain-quebec-power.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.





Source link

Tech

Koala’s Wanda 4-in-1 Sofa Bed Is Versatile, but Is It Comfortable?

Published

on

Koala’s Wanda 4-in-1 Sofa Bed Is Versatile, but Is It Comfortable?


We’ve all been in situations where we’ve had to sleep on a sofa bed. I can recall many childhood vacations where I’d be tossing and turning on a squeaky setup. If this was also you, sofa beds might not jump out as the most appealing option. But they’ve evolved from the rickety pull-out mattresses of yore—today’s sofa beds are a far more comfortable and efficient way to create a guest bed wherever you need, whether in a spare room or a small apartment.

That said, sofa beds, also known as sleeper sofas, are not all of the same caliber. This is where Australian furniture brand Koala aims to stand out. Since entering the US market in the fall of 2023, it has focused on comfortable, stylish, and easy-to-assemble sofa beds. However, as a professional mattress tester, I was very curious to see if the latest Koala sofa bed offering, the Wanda, was as comfortable and supportive as the mattresses I usually test. So I went on a testing side quest and dedicated a whole week to sleeping on the Wanda. What I found is that it’s a cozy short-term solution for guests and general lounging, but I wouldn’t replace your mattress setup with it.

Quadruple Threat

Sofa beds typically use a “2-in-1” design, combining a couch with a pull-out bed that folds away under the seat cushion when not in use. The Wanda offers a “4-in-1” design that combines a couch with a daybed, a reversible chaise, and a queen-size, slide-out bed.

The Wanda arrived in four large boxes—you will most definitely need help moving them, especially if you plan to go up any stairs. Aside from size, these boxes range in weight from a doable 47 pounds to 104 pounds, which I struggled to move upstairs on my own.

All Together Now

Photograph: Julia Forbes

In honor of all my previous sleeper sofa experiences, I wanted to know how the Wanda would fare in a small room. So instead of my usual spacious studio setup, with dimensions of 13 feet by 15 feet, I decided to use my upstairs home office. Since I didn’t move my desk out of the way, the Wanda took up half the room, which was only 10.5 feet by 10.5 feet, give or take, with other furniture in it. The sofa bed is 99 inches long (8.25 feet) and resembles a sideways “L,” with the chaise jutting out 69 inches (5.75 feet). As if this weren’t cozy enough, my husband and two small dogs decided to set up shop with me.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

EE, Three claim UK’s best mobile internet performance in 2025 | Computer Weekly

Published

on

EE, Three claim UK’s best mobile internet performance in 2025 | Computer Weekly


Industry analysis from nPerf of the UK’s mobile market arena in 2025 has revealed “intense” competition at the top tier, with the best internet performance delivered not just by market leader EE but also rival provider Three.

The nPerf Speed Test analysed the overall quality of the connection experienced by UK mobile users across all four quarters of 2025, considering several criteria, namely download speed, upload speed, latency, browsing performance and streaming quality. Measurements were based on 57,299 tests conducted via the nPerf application on both Android and iOS devices.

Download speeds above 25 Mbps were classified as excellent, and a latency of 0-30 ms was considered excellent, enabling activities such as 4K video streaming and real-time interaction, while 31-100 ms enabled optimal internet performance with minimal delay. Browsing performance was seen as a measure of how quickly and efficiently internet pages were loaded and navigated. A browsing score between 75% and 100% meant near-instant page loading.

A score between 75% and 100% indicates smooth streaming in terms of the quality benchmark. Scores between 50% and 75% were seen as adequate for YouTube streaming. Below 50% resulted in compromised video quality.

Overall, EE and Three were found to have tied for leadership with both operators delivering download speeds exceeding 110 Mbps, supporting what were described as “comprehensive” user experiences.

Both EE and Three Users were seen as benefiting from high-quality mobile experiences, particularly for streaming, gaming and real-time communications.

EE’s performance was rated as having “comprehensive strengths” and demonstrating “strong performances” across all metrics. The BT-owned operator had an overall score of 86,470 nPoints in the study, complementing download speeds of 110.44 Mbps with upload speeds of 15.77 Mbps. EE rated scores of 69.65% for browsing and 76.51% as regards video streaming, delivering “fluid content viewing” for users.

For its part, Three was said to have a “solid top position” additionally guaranteeing “high-quality” video calls and “efficient” content sharing. The operator achieved the best latency in the sector (35.31 ms), perfect for online gaming and real-time communications. Three’s overall rating was 84,993 nPoints, with download speeds reach 110.72 Mbps and upload speeds of 16.50 Mbps, but also with the best latency in the sector (35.31 ms). Leading in upload performance, the operator could guarantee high-quality video calls and efficient content sharing.

In competitive positioning, Vodafone ranked third with 74,892 nPoints and delivered 74.56 Mbps in download speed. The operator was said to have demonstrate solid video streaming performance at 74.35%.

The fourth UK mobile operator, O2, was said to have experienced a “focused” performance in 2025, totalling 66,557 nPoints and displaying “efficient” latency of 37.56 ms, suitable for what were called “responsive” online experiences.

Looking specifically at the mobile internet experience of the UK’s 5G networks, Three subscribers enjoyed the best 5G internet in 2025 with both fastest download and upload speeds. Both O2 and Three offered the best 5G connections with the lowest latency. EE, Three and Vodafone tied for best 5G web browsing performances while Three and Vodafone were seen as delivering the leading 5G streaming performances.

Commenting on the results, Sébastien de Rosbo, CEO of nPerf, said: “The UK mobile market demonstrates strong competition at the top, with both leaders delivering comprehensive performance and user experiences that benefit from high-speed connectivity across all key indicators.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The UK government’s AI skills programme betrays UK workers and our digital sovereignty | Computer Weekly

Published

on

The UK government’s AI skills programme betrays UK workers and our digital sovereignty | Computer Weekly


Last month, the UK government announced the AI Skills Boost programme, promising “free AI training for all” and claiming that the courses will give people the skills needed to use artificial intelligence (AI) tools effectively. There are multiple reasons why we don’t agree.

US dependency over UK sovereignty

The “AI Skills Boost” is the free, badged “foundation” element of the government’s AI Skills Hub which was launched with great fanfare. There are 14 courses, exclusively from big US organisations, promoting and training on their platforms. The initiative increases dependency on US big tech – the opposite of the government’s recent conclusion, in its new AI opportunities action plan, to position the UK “to be an AI maker, not an AI taker”. It is also not clear how increasing UK workers’ reliance and usage of US big tech tools and platforms is intended to increase the UK’s homegrown AI talent.

In stark contrast to President Macron’s announcement last week that the French government will phase out dependency on US-based big tech, by using local providers to enhance digital sovereignty and privacy, technology secretary Liz Kendall’s speech was a lesson in contradictions.

Right after affirming that AI is “far too important a technology to depend entirely on other countries, especially in areas like defence, financial services and healthcare”, the secretary of state went on that the country’s strategy is to adopt existing technologies based overseas.

Microsoft, one of the founding partners for this initiative, has already admitted that “US authorities can compel access to data held by American cloud providers, regardless of where that data physically resides”, further acknowledging that the company will honour any data requests from the US state, regardless of where in the world the data is housed. Is this the sovereignty and privacy the UK government is trying to achieve?

Commercial content rather than quality skills provision

The AI Skills Hub indexes hundreds of AI-related courses. That means the hub, which cost £4.1m to build, is simply a bookmark or affiliate list of online courses and resources that are already available, with seemingly no quality control or oversight. The decision to award the contract to a “Big Four” commercial consultancy, PwC, rather than the proven national data, AI and digital skills providers who tendered, needs to be investigated.

The press releases focus on the “free” element of the training, but 60% of the courses are paid, even some of those which are marked as free, providing a deceptive funnel for paid commercial training providers.

We need to have greater national ambition than simply providing skills training. That the only substandard skills provision available is provided by those with commercial interests in controlling how people think about and use AI is a further insult

The package launched includes 595 courses, but only 14 have been benchmarked by Skills England, and there has been a critical outcry over the dangerously poor quality of many courses, some of which are 10 years’ old, don’t exist, or are poor quality AI slop.

An example of why this is so concerning is that many courses are not relevant to the UK. One of the courses promoted has already been shown to misrepresent the UK law on intellectual property, with the course creators later denying they had any contractual arrangement with the site and admitting that they were “not consulted before our materials were posted and linked from there”.

Warnings on the need for public AI literacy provision ignored

Aside from concerns over the standards, safety, sovereignty and cost of the content offered, there is a much bigger issue, which we have been warning about.

Currently, 84% of the UK public feel disenfranchised and excluded from AI decision-making, and mistrust key institutions, and 91% prioritise safe and fair usage of AI over economic gain and adoption speed.

In 2021, the UK’s AI Council provided a roadmap for developing the UK’s National AI Strategy. It advised on programmes of public and educational AI literacy beyond teaching technical or practical skills. This call has been repeated, especially in the wake of greater public exposure to generative AI since 2023, which now requires the public to understand not just how to prompt or code, but to use critical thinking to navigate a number of related implications of the technology.

In July 2025, we represented a number of specialists, education experts and public representatives, and wrote an open letter calling for investment in the UK’s AI capabilities beyond being passive users of US tools. Despite initial agreements to meet and discuss from the Department for Education and Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, the offer was rescinded.

Without comprehensive public understanding and sustained engagement, developing AI for public good and maintaining public trust will be a significant challenge. By investing in independent AI literacy initiatives that are accessible to all and not just aimed at onboarding uncritical users and consumers, the UK can help to ensure that its AI future is shaped with the UK public’s benefit at the heart.

Wasted opportunity to develop a beneficial UK approach to AI

We need to have greater national ambition than simply providing skills training. That the only substandard skills provision available is provided – at great public cost – by those with commercial interests in controlling how people think about and use AI is a further insult.

Indeed, Kendall’s claim that AI has the potential to add £400bn to the economy by 2030 is lifted from a report built by a sector consultancy that only focuses on the positive impact of Google technologies in the UK. Her announcement leaned heavily on claims such as “AI is now the engine of economic power and of hard power”, which come from a Silicon Valley playbook.

The focus on practical skills undermines the nation’s AI and tech sovereignty, harms the economy, with money leaving the nation to fund big tech. It entrenches political disenfranchisement, with decisions about AI framed as too complex for the general population to meaningfully engage with. It stands on fictitious narratives about inevitable big tech AI futures, in which public voice and public good are irrelevant.

If you wish to sign a second version of the open letter, which we are currently drafting, or to submit a critical AI literacy resource to We and AI’s resource hub, contact us here

This article is co-authored by:

  • Tania Duarte, founder, We and AI
  • Bruna Martins, director at Tecer Digital
  • Dr. Elinor Carmi, senior lecturer in data politics and social justice, City St. George’s University of London
  • Dr. Mark Wong, head of social and urban policy, University of Glasgow
  • Dr Susan Oman, senior Lecturer, data, AI & society, The University of Sheffield
  • Ismael Kherroubi Garcia, founder & CEO, Kairoi
  • Cinzia Pusceddu, senior fellow of the Higher Education Academy, independent researcher
  • Dylan Orchard, postgraduate researcher, King’s College London
  • Tim Davies, director of research & practice, Connected by Data
  • Steph Wright, co-founder & managing director, Our AI Collective



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending