Connect with us

Politics

Five takeaways from Trump and Xi’s superpower summit

Published

on

Five takeaways from Trump and Xi’s superpower summit


US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping while leaving after a visit to the Zhongnanhai Garden in Beijing, China, May 15, 2026. — Reuters
US President Donald Trump shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping while leaving after a visit to the Zhongnanhai Garden in Beijing, China, May 15, 2026. — Reuters

US President Donald Trump left Beijing on Friday after talks, a temple tour and tea with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, with their discussions ranging from trade to the Middle East.

Here are five takeaways from the two-day superpower summit:

Deals struck?

Trump said he made “fantastic trade deals” with Xi, who referenced reaching a “consensus”.

But there have been no official announcements or details from either side.

Trump was after big purchases by China of American planes and farm goods — a key issue for his domestic base.

After leaving Beijing, the US president told reporters on Air Force One that China would be “buying billions of dollars of soybeans”.

He added China had agreed to buy “over 200 planes from Boeing with a promise of 750 planes… if they do a good job with the 200, which I´m sure they will.”

Trump told Fox News after day one of the summit that Xi had also agreed to buy more American oil.

China’s foreign ministry did not confirm or deny any purchase agreements when asked at a news briefing shortly after the US leader’s departure.

Meanwhile, a surprise omission from the agenda was tariffs — the leaders had been expected to discuss extending a trade truce reached last October.

Trump said the matter hadn’t come up.

Opening Hormuz

China has described the United States’ ongoing war in Iran as “illegal” and has repeatedly called for its end.

It has quietly acted as mediator, with Beijing hosting Iran’s foreign minister a week before Trump’s visit and taking calls from several Gulf nations.

Trump said that during Thursday’s talks, Xi agreed to help re-open the vital Strait of Hormuz, which has been largely blocked by Iran since the US and Israel began striking the country on February 28.

“The two sides agreed that the Strait of Hormuz must remain open to support the free flow of energy,” the White House said.

US President Donald Trump participates in a friendship walk through Zhongnanhai Garden with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, China, May 15, 2026. — Reuters
US President Donald Trump participates in a friendship walk through Zhongnanhai Garden with Chinese President Xi Jinping in Beijing, China, May 15, 2026. — Reuters

China is directly affected by the strait’s blockade and has long advocated for safe transit through it.

More than half of the crude imported by sea to China comes from the Middle East, according to maritime analytics firm Kpler.

However, China’s foreign ministry did not comment when asked if Xi had told Trump he would help re-open the waterway.

Taiwan? No comment

In unusually blunt remarks, Xi warned Trump in their first bilateral meeting that mishandling Taiwan could push their two countries into “conflict”, framing it as the most important issue imperilling the US-China relationship.

Analysts had suggested before the summit that Beijing saw an opportunity to angle for a change to the established US position on the island.

Trump said Xi asked if Washington would defend Taiwan in case of a conflict and that he responded: “I don’t talk about that.”

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio told NBC on Thursday that “US policy on the issue of Taiwan is unchanged”.

‘Milestone’

Trump heaped praise on Xi throughout the trip, addressing the Chinese leader as “friend” and a “great leader”, and inviting him to the United States in September.

Xi refrained from matching Trump’s public affection, though in a sign of goodwill said he would send some Chinese rose seeds to the White House as Trump admired the flora in the exclusive Zhongnanhai leadership compound.

The Chinese president did call the visit a “milestone”, hailing a new official line of “constructive strategic stability” to define the US-China relationship for the next three years.

“This is not merely a procedural consensus but a major strategic repositioning. It defines how the two great powers should coexist… setting clear guardrails for managing frictions while expanding shared interests,” said Dong Wang, a professor at Peking University.

“Even as differences over advanced technology and geopolitics remain, both sides now operate under this new strategic consensus to avoid misjudgement and miscalculation,” he said.

The term “can be seen as progress compared with ‘strategic competition’ for (Trump predecessor Joe) Biden’s era”, noted The Asia Group´s George Chen.

After Trump’s departure from China, state news agency Xinhua reported that Beijing’s top diplomat said Xi is expected to visit the United States in the autumn.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Pakistan-led mediation between US-Iran not failed but in difficult phase: Araghchi

Published

on

Pakistan-led mediation between US-Iran not failed but in difficult phase: Araghchi


Irans Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi attends a press conference at the Iranian embassy in New Delhi, India, May 15, 2026. — Reuters
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi attends a press conference at the Iranian embassy in New Delhi, India, May 15, 2026. — Reuters
  • Araghchi says Iran ready to resume fighting if diplomacy fails.
  • Iran’s FM welcomes Chinese mediation, calls China strategic partner.
  • Iran aims to normalise Hormuz traffic if negotiations progress: FM.

Tehran has “no trust” in the US and is interested in negotiating with Washington only if it is serious, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Friday, as talks on ending the war remained on hold.

All vessels can pass through the Strait of Hormuz except those at war with Tehran, Araqchi told reporters in New Delhi during a visit to attend the Brics foreign ministers’ meeting, adding that vessels wanting to transit should coordinate with its navy.

The situation around the key conduit was “very complicated”, he said.

Iran effectively shut the strait, which earlier handled about one-fifth of the world’s oil and gas supply, to most shipping traffic after its war with the US and Israel erupted in February.

Washington and Tehran announced a ceasefire last month but have been struggling to thrash out a permanent peace pact. Talks, mediated by Pakistan, have been suspended since Iran and the US each rejected the other’s most recent proposals last week.

“Contradictory messages” have made us reluctant about the real intention of the Americans on negotiations, Araghchi said, adding that the mediation process by Pakistan has not failed but is in “difficulty”.

Araghchi also said that Tehran is open to any support, including from China, to help resolve the conflict in the Middle East

Iran is trying to keep the ceasefire to give diplomacy a chance but is also prepared to go back to fighting, he said.

The issues holding up negotiations between the two sides include Iran’s nuclear ambitions and its control of ⁠the Hormuz.

Araqchi’s statement on Friday came hours after US President Donald Trump said his patience with Iran was running out and agreed in talks with Chinese President Xi ​Jinping that Tehran must reopen the strait.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Israel threatens to sue NYT over report on sex abuse of Palestinian inmates

Published

on

Israel threatens to sue NYT over report on sex abuse of Palestinian inmates


The New York Times building is seen in Manhattan, New York, US, August 3, 2020. — Reuters
The New York Times building is seen in Manhattan, New York, US, August 3, 2020. — Reuters

JERUSALEM: Israel on Thursday threatened to take The New York Times to court over a piece it published denouncing allegedly widespread sexual abuse against Palestinian detainees.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Saar have ordered the “initiation of a defamation lawsuit against The New York Times”, according to a joint statement issued by their offices.

The offices said that the piece by Nicholas Kristof, a prominent opinion columnist, was “one of the most hideous and distorted lies ever published against the State of Israel in the modern press, which also received the backing of the newspaper”.

Kristof’s investigation is based on testimonies gathered in the Israeli-occupied West Bank from 14 men and women who said that they had been sexually assaulted by Israeli settlers or members of the security forces.

The report described “a pattern of widespread Israeli sexual violence against men, women and even children — by soldiers, settlers, interrogators in the Shin Bet internal security agency and, above all, prison guards”.

The New York Times responded that any legal claim over the “deeply reported opinion column” lacked merit.

“This threat, similar to one made last year, is part of a well-worn political playbook that aims to undermine independent reporting and stifle journalism that does not fit a specific narrative,” Danielle Rhoades Ha, a spokesperson for the newspaper, said in a statement.

Kristof’s piece said there was no evidence that Israeli leaders ordered rapes.

The Israeli foreign ministry alleged that Kristof had based his piece “on unverified sources tied to Hamas-linked networks”.

It also accused the paper of deliberately timing the publication to “undermine” an independent Israeli report on Hamas sexual violence perpetrated during its October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which was published on the same day.

Israeli forces have detained thousands of Palestinians in the West Bank since Hamas’s 2023 attack.

The United States has high protections for journalistic expression, with libel suits needing to prove that information was purposefully untrue and with harmful intent.

President Donald Trump and his allies have nonetheless filed a number of lawsuits against media outlets, some of which have reached settlements rather than risk repercussions from his administration.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Iran parl. speaker warns US theatrics in Hormuz could trigger new global financial crisis

Published

on

Iran parl. speaker warns US theatrics in Hormuz could trigger new global financial crisis



Iran’s Majlis (Parliament) speaker has warned that the United States’ efforts at sustaining military escalation near the Strait of Hormuz could trigger a fresh global financial crisis at a time when Washington’s national debt already stands at a whopping $39 trillion.

Mohammad-Baqer Qalibaf made the remarks in a post on X on Thursday after it was reported that yields on 30-year US Treasury bonds had climbed above five percent for the first time since before the 2008 global financial crisis, amid mounting concerns over inflation and war-driven energy costs.

“So you’re funding [Pete] Hegseth the failed TV host at rates unheard of since 2007, so he can cosplay as Secretary of War in our backyard in Hormuz?” Qalibaf wrote, referring to the US official’s former career in television.

The top legislator noted how the US’s funding crisis had caused the debt to snowball and its continued aggressive posture at astronomical costs only served a “live action role-playing (LARP)” in Hormuz.

“You know what’s crazier than $39 trillion in debt? Paying a pre-GFC (global financial crisis) premium to fund a LARP and all you’ll get is a brand new GFC,” he wrote.

On April 13, US President Donald Trump announced continuation of an illegal blockade of Iran’s vessels and ports in violation of the terms of a ceasefire he had announced earlier that month.

Iran, which had already shut down the strait to enemies and their allies in retaliation for the unprovoked American-Israeli aggression that targeted the country from February 28 to April 7, then began imposing far stricter controls over the waterway.

The Islamic Republic has refused to rejoin negotiations with Washington unless Tehran’s demands, including removal of the blockade, realization of a definitive end to whatever aggression on all fronts, and provision of compensation, were met.

Both Hegseth and Trump have been painting victorious pictures of either the war or the current American posture towards Iran.

Numerous reports, however, have been proving otherwise, including those pointing to the US secretary of war’s misleading Trump about “American success” against the Islamic Republic.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending