Last Updated:November 15, 2025, 11:42 IST

Three repayment choices, one crucial decision — and the difference could cost you lakhs. Pick wisely, and a gold loan becomes far lighter on both your mind and your pocket

Gold loans may be easy to take, but they are not always easy to repay, and a small mistake can cost borrowers thousands, even lakhs, in extra interest. Most people focus only on the 9-10 per cent interest rate, unaware that the real cost depends entirely on the repayment method they choose.

One wrong decision can make a cheap loan expensive; the right one can make it far more affordable.

According to an Economic Times report, Jijith Raj, Business Head at Indel Money, has explained three loan repayment methods and who each of them is best suited for.

1. Regular EMI

In this method, you pay a fixed instalment every month, which includes both principal and interest. As the months pass, the principal reduces, and the total interest you pay is the lowest among the three options.

This method is ideal for people who earn a regular monthly income like salaried employees, pensioners, or those receiving steady rental income. Setting up an auto-debit ensures discipline.

However, if you miss even a single EMI, the bank may quickly classify your account as an SMA and report it to the credit bureau, which can lower your CIBIL score.

2. Bullet Repayment

This is the option most people prefer because it gives them the highest level of flexibility. You may pay nothing or only the interest during the loan period, and then clear the entire principal and remaining interest in one go on the final day. This method works well if you are certain that you will receive a large sum within 6-12 months, such as from selling property, an FD maturing, or a sizeable business payment.

But the risk is high: if you are unable to arrange the lump sum by the due date, the interest balloons because the full principal remains unpaid.

Moreover, 45 days after the loan period ends, the bank can begin the process of auctioning your gold, which catches many borrowers off-guard.

3. Overdraft Facility

This option may appear slightly more expensive upfront, but it is perfect for those with irregular income like freelancers, small shop owners, agents who work on commission, consultants, and similar professions.

The bank sanctions a limit (for example, Rs 10 lakh), and you pay interest only on the amount you actually withdraw, not on the entire limit. When you receive money, you can deposit it back instantly, and your interest reduces immediately. You can withdraw and deposit as many times as you wish.

If you need a top-up, it is usually granted without closing the existing loan. Although the interest rate might be a bit higher, the overall cost remains low because your outstanding balance typically stays small.

Which Method Saves The Most?

• If your income is steady, choose EMI as it results in the lowest interest outflow.
• If you are expecting a lump sum, bullet repayment can work but it is risky.
• If your income is irregular, opt for the overdraft facility, which keeps your interest under control.

A crucial tip: If you have chosen the wrong repayment scheme earlier and a major portion of your loan tenure still remains, close the old loan and take a new loan against the same gold under a better scheme.

Most companies do not charge foreclosure fees, but always confirm this before proceeding.

Read More

Last Updated:November 15, 2025, 10:43 IST

Tata Motors completed its demerger, listing Tata Motors Ltd for commercial vehicles. Shareholders get tax-neutral shares, with gains taxed only on sale.

Tata Motors Demerger

Tata Motors Demerger: Tata Motors Limited, the commercial arm of the automobile, has begun trading on November 12. Shares of Tata Motors Commercial Vehicles Ltd (TMCVL) made their stock market debut at Rs 335 apiece on NSE, a premium of 28.48% to its implied value of Rs 260.75 per share. Shares dropped to end at Rs 317.60 apiece.

The listing follows the Tata Motors demerger, which officially came into effect on October 1, 2025. Under the plan, shareholders received one share of Tata Motors Commercial Vehicles Ltd for every share held in Tata Motors as of the record date, October 14, 2025.

Post-restructuring, the Commercial Vehicles (CV) business has been renamed Tata Motors, while the Passenger Vehicles (PV), Electric Vehicles (EVs), and Jaguar Land Rover (JLR) businesses now operate under Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd (TMPV), which is already listed as a separate entity.

The good news is that receiving these new shares is not taxable. Since the split took place under a court-approved demerger, Section 47 of the Income Tax Act treats this as “tax neutral”, meaning there is no transfer and no tax is triggered at the time of allotment.

What Happens If You Sell These Shares?

But, investors must know that these shares will be taxable if you sell them.

Sujit Bangar, the founder of taxbuddy.com, has explained the demerger taxation in his X post.

Tata Motors has officially declared the cost allocation ratio for the two new entities:

• 31.15% of your original cost goes to the CV company
• 68.85% goes to the PV company

This split must be followed exactly while calculating capital gains.

For example, an investor who originally bought 1,000 Tata Motors shares at Rs 660 each had a total cost of Rs 6,60,000. After applying the official ratio, the revised cost becomes:

• TMCV: Rs 2,05,590
• TMPV: Rs 4,54,410

If these shares are sold at the current market prices—Rs 318 for Tata Motors and Rs 391 for Tata Motors Passenger Vehicle—the investor ends up with:

• Gain of Rs 1,12,410 on the CV company
• Loss of Rs 63,410 on the PV company
• Net long-term gain: Rs 49,000

The original holding period of Tata Motors carries forward for both companies. This decides whether the gain is short-term or long-term.

Varun Yadav

Varun Yadav is a Sub Editor at News18 Business Digital. He writes articles on markets, personal finance, technology, and more. He completed his post-graduation diploma in English Journalism from the Indian Inst…Read More

Varun Yadav is a Sub Editor at News18 Business Digital. He writes articles on markets, personal finance, technology, and more. He completed his post-graduation diploma in English Journalism from the Indian Inst… Read More

Read More

The Chancellor has abandoned plans to hike income tax at the Budget because of improved economic forecasting.

Rachel Reeves had been expected to hike income tax in the face of a yawning gap in her spending plans, hinting as recently as Monday that the alternative would be “deep cuts” to public investment.

But reporting overnight claimed she has abandoned introducing an income tax rise at the November 26 Budget over fears it could anger both voters and backbench Labour MPs.

The PA news agency understands the strength of tax receipts has improved forecasting from the Office for Budget Responsibility, allowing for the U-turn.

This is particularly the case on stronger wage performance: the higher wages are, the more tax is paid on them.

A downgrade in productivity has also not been as bad as was first feared.

While Ms Reeves is no longer understood to be pursuing an income tax hike, tough choices are still said to lie ahead for the Government and other tax rises have not been ruled out.

Income tax thresholds could still be reduced while tax rates are kept the same, a move which could raise billions of pounds for the Treasury.

Limits to salary sacrifice schemes, as well as new measures to tax electric vehicles, are still in the mix as the Treasury pursues a “smorgasbord” approach of raising a range of smaller taxes.

The Chancellor has not changed her approach, it is understood, and still intends to give herself larger fiscal headroom – the buffer against economic headwinds which could impact Government spending plans.

The latest Budget measures were submitted last week, rather than being a knee-jerk response to the turmoil in No 10 this week sparked by a briefing war.

Ms Reeves has been laying the ground for tax rises over recent weeks, including during an early-morning speech on November 4 aimed at preparing the public for the Budget.

Downing Street insisted that the thrust of the speech “stands”.

The Prime Minister’s official spokesman said: “She was very clear about the challenges the country faces and her priorities in addressing those challenges.

“All of that still stands.”

The spokesman refused to comment on Budget speculation, but said the Chancellor will aim to “build more resilient public finances with the headroom to withstand global turbulence”.

This would “give businesses the confidence to invest and leaving the Government freer to act when the situation calls for it”, he added.

Government borrowing costs rose in the wake of the apparent U-turn on income tax on Friday morning.

Speculation about the change in direction sparked a sell-off in UK Government bonds, also known as gilts: the means by which the Government borrows money from private investors.

The gilt market later stabilised somewhat as the reasoning behind the Treasury’s decision-making became apparent.

Among those who welcomed suggestions the tax rise had been abandoned was Health Secretary Wes Streeting.

He told PA: “What I would say about this morning is, it is really important that we keep the promises that we made to the public at the last general election.

“Our economy was broken by the Conservatives, so were our public services, but so was trust in politics itself.

“Our job is to rebuild the economy, rebuild our public services, and rebuild trust in politics.”

Helen Miller, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) think tank, said it was “not unusual” for chancellors to make last-minute changes to their Budget plans.

She added: “But the news that Rachel Reeves has backed away from a plan to increase the rates of income tax will lead investors to worry that the Chancellor will instead increase a range of smaller taxes that can be more damaging to economic growth.

“They may also worry that the change of plans signals that this Government are reluctant to do politically difficult things.

“These are the kinds of concerns that can lead investors to demand higher returns when lending to the Government.”

If the Government does choose to raise a set of smaller taxes, they should also be reformed “so that they do less damage to growth”, the IFS chief said.