Business
Inflation Climbs to 16-Month High at 7% in February – SUCH TV
Pakistan’s inflation rose to 7% in February 2026, marking the highest level since October 2024, as electricity price hikes and rising global uncertainty pushed consumer costs upward.
According to the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics, the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increased 6.98% year-on-year, compared to 5.8% in January and 1.5% in February last year.
Electricity Tariffs Drive Surge
The biggest impact came from higher electricity prices after subsidy cuts and revised tariff structures.
Housing, water, electricity, gas & fuels index rose 9.65% annually
Electricity prices alone increased 10.03% month-on-month
These adjustments significantly burdened households already coping with high living costs.
Core Inflation & Interest Rates
Core inflation showed slight easing:
Urban core inflation: 7.1% (down from 7.2%)
Rural core inflation: Stable at 8.3%
The rise in CPI reduced real interest rates by around 120 basis points. The State Bank of Pakistan kept its policy rate unchanged at 10.5% last month.
Food Prices Mixed
Food inflation rose to 5.8%, up from 3.9% in January.
Major increases:
Tomatoes: +82%
Wheat: +42.6%
Wheat flour: +25.9%
Meat: +11.3%
Milk powder: +9.4%
Price declines:
Potatoes: -40%
Chicken: -21.8%
Gram pulse: -21.7%
Onions: -17%
Wholesale Pressure Rising
The Wholesale Price Index (WPI) increased to 1.0%, signaling growing producer-level cost pressures that could pass on to consumers in coming months.
External Risks Loom
Analysts warn that escalating Middle East tensions could:
Raise global oil prices
Increase Pakistan’s import bill
Pressure the rupee
Worsen inflation further
With millions of Pakistanis working in Gulf countries, any prolonged instability could also affect remittances — a key pillar of the economy.
One man says he cancelled his holiday to Spain due to the rising costs and uncertainty.
Source link
MUMBAI: Vijay Singh, a former Indian defence secretary whose eligibility as a trustee has come under legal challenge, absented himself from the board meeting of the Bai Hirabai Jamsetji Tata Navsari Charitable Institution on Friday, the latest sign of an intensifying governance dispute within India’s most powerful philanthropic network.The challenge was brought by Mehli Mistry, a former trustee, before the Maharashtra charity commissioner, questioning the appointments of Singh and Venu Srinivasan as trustees of Bai Hirabai. Mistry cited clauses in the 1923 trust deed requiring all trustees to be Zoroastrians and permanent residents of Mumbai, and argued that neither of them met those conditions.Srinivasan, chairman emeritus of TVS Motors, stepped down citing other commitments, but later acknowledged he had done so at the request of Tata Trusts management. Singh declined a similar request. Those present at the Friday meeting included chairman Noel Tata, trustees Darius Khambata and Jehangir HC Jehangir, the last of whom joined by video conference from Europe. Jimmy Tata, Noel’s older half-brother and a fellow trustee, was again absent. Singh confirmed he did not attend the meeting. A person familiar with the proceedings said the board discussed, among other matters, Mistry’s objections and next steps.The dispute has exposed a deeper legal tension. Both Srinivasan and Singh alleged that Tata Trusts had withheld from them a legal opinion by former chief justice of India MH Kania, who held that the restrictive eligibility clauses in Bai Hirabai’s trust deed were “bad in law.” That interpretation had previously allowed former Tata Group director RK Krishnakumar to be inducted onto the board. Tata Trusts said irrespective of that opinion and past precedent, appointments of non-Zoroastrians remained open to challenge under the deed’s provisions, adding that a legal opinion did not substitute for a judicial pronouncement. The commissioner has yet to order a formal inquiry. Bai Hirabai was endowed by Sir Ratan Tata, younger son of Tata Group founder Jamsetji Tata, who bequeathed properties in Mumbai and Navsari to the institution, the provenance that gives its century-old deed its continuing legal force.
The UK’s biggest mobile providers have been outperformed by smaller rivals in an annual customer service survey by watchdog Which?
Three, O2 and Lycamobile were the lowest performing networks in the survey of more than 5,000 mobile users, receiving customer scores of 65%, 67% and 68% respectively.
Three received a two-star rating in every category including network reliability and technical support, the consumer group found.
O2 received just two stars for value for money and customer service, shortly after it increased its annual price rises from £1.80 to £2.50 a month for all customers.
Lycamobile received four stars for value for money but two stars in every other category.
EE and Vodafone achieved scores of 74% and 72% respectively, although Which? described them as “stuck in the middle to lower reaches of the table”.
Talkmobile topped the rankings with a customer score of 83% followed by Tesco Mobile on 81%, with both impressing customers with their network reliability, customer service and value for money.
Other top-rated networks included Giffgaff and Smarty, which both received a score of 79%, driven by their flexibility and affordable Sim-only deals.
Lebara and 1pMobile both achieved a score of 78%, with customers praising 1pMobile’s network reliability and value for money and Lebara earning five stars for value for money.
According to the survey, respondents using one of the ‘big four’ – EE, O2, Three and Vodafone – paid an average of £16 for a Sim-only contract, compared with just £9 on smaller networks.
For contracts including a phone, users paid an average £40 with the ‘big four’ compared with £28 with smaller providers.
Many smaller firms use the infrastructure of the ‘big four’, meaning customers often receive the same signal and coverage.
Which? head of home products and services, Natalie Hitchins, said: “Our latest research shows that smaller providers are consistently outshining the industry’s largest mobile firms by offering better customer service and far cheaper deals.
“Many top-rated challengers avoid mid-contract price hikes, offering households struggling with the cost of living much-needed certainty.
“Any customers nearing the end of their contract who are unhappy with their service, or simply looking to save money, should not hesitate to vote with their feet and move to a provider that actually delivers on value.”
US renews Russian oil waiver amid Iran war-driven price shocks
Iran war causing staycation spike – Suffolk holiday firms
Top Vietnamese, Chinese leaders hold talks on advancing cooperation
-
Tech1 week agoThis AI Button Wearable From Ex-Apple Engineers Looks Like an iPod Shuffle
-
Politics1 week agoIndian airlines hit hardest after Dubai limits foreign flights until May 31
-
Politics1 week agoChinese, Taiwanese will unite, Xi tells Taiwan opposition leader
-
Entertainment5 days agoPalace left in shock as Prince William cancels grand ceremony
-
Sports5 days agoThe case for Man United’s Fernandes as Premier League’s best
-
Entertainment7 days agoDua Lipa hits major career high ahead of wedding with Callum Turner
-
Sports1 week agoDocuments: NC State trainer initiated ‘unwelcome,’ ‘sexual’ contact
-
Business5 days agoUK could adopt EU single market rules under new legislation