Connect with us

Politics

Key takeaways from White House’s unusually polite Ukraine truce talks

Published

on

Key takeaways from White House’s unusually polite Ukraine truce talks


U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Zelenskiy and European leaders at the White House, August 18, 2025. —Reuters
U.S. President Donald Trump meets with Ukrainian President Zelenskiy and European leaders at the White House, August 18, 2025. —Reuters

US President Donald Trump gathered European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for a hastily arranged White House meeting on Monday to discuss a path to ending Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Here are the takeaways from the talks:

Warm tone, little substance

Seven European leaders, the Ukrainian president, their motorcades, dozens of Trump administration staff and more than 100 journalists swarmed the White House campus on Monday in anticipation of the unusual meeting.

Would Trump and Zelensky agree on a path to peace? Or would their latest Oval Office session devolve into a bitter squabble as in February?

Neither scenario occurred. Zelensky, chided for his appearance and manner in February, adjusted both. Wearing more formal clothing and repeatedly expressing his gratitude to Trump, he was greeted by a far more complimentary US president than in the past.

But, despite Trump’s vow to assist in Ukraine’s security after a hypothetical peace deal, there was no immediate sign that any party had substantially changed position on land swaps, security guarantees or sanctions.

Instead, Trump ended with promises to host a meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin to address the many remaining issues.

Heaping praise

“Have you said ‘thank you’ once?” US Vice President JD Vance asked Zelensky in February, accusing him of failing to show sufficient gratitude for US support.

On Monday, Zelensky made sure that was not an issue. His opening remarks in the Oval Office included eight thank-yous, mostly for Trump.

“Thank you so much, Mr. President … thank you for your attention. Thank you very much for your efforts, personal efforts to stop killings and stop this war. Thank you,” Zelensky said.

He included the US first lady, who sent a letter to Putin about abducted children in Ukraine.

“Using this opportunity, my thanks to your wife,” the Ukrainian president said.

“And thanks to all our partners and that you supported this format. And after our meeting, we’re going to have leaders who are around us, the UK and France, Germany… all partners around Ukraine supporting us. Thanks (to) them. Thank you very much for your invitation.”

Unlike in February, Vance this time sat largely silent.

Combat formal

The stakes of the meeting could not have been higher. But one of the most-asked questions among diplomats in DC could not have been more frivolous: Would the Ukrainian president wear a suit?

The answer: kind of.

Zelensky showed up to the White House in what one European diplomat described as “almost a suit.” His black jacket had tiny lapels and jetted chest pockets. He did not wear a tie. His attire, which split the difference between the battlefield and the boardroom, could be described as combat formal.

Those sartorial details matter when it comes to dealing with the US president, who was upset that Zelensky did not wear a suit for their February meeting.

Zelensky passed the fashion test this time, however.

When one journalist in the Oval Office said Zelensky looked “fabulous,” Trump chimed in to agree.

“I said the same thing,” Trump told reporters.

Divide over the ceasefire

The assembled European leaders, Zelensky included, were careful to paper over policy disagreements with Trump, keeping their comments vague and showering the US president with compliments.

But one point of disagreement did bubble to the surface.

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz told the assembled leaders and media that he wanted to see Putin agree to a ceasefire.

Trump had long pushed for a ceasefire in Ukraine. But he largely jettisoned that goal after meeting with Putin last week in Alaska, a shift that was widely seen as a diplomatic defeat for Ukraine. The US president now says he is fine with trying to move directly to a peace deal.

“To be honest, we all would like to see a ceasefire,” Merz said. “I can’t imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire, so let’s work on that.”

Trump pushed back, arguing he has solved many conflicts without first reaching a ceasefire.

Whose boots are on the ground?

One of the great mysteries that hung over the summit was what support the US would give to secure any Russia-Ukraine deal long term.

Trump hasn’t offered US troops “boots on the ground” to guarantee Ukraine’s security from Russia, reflecting American reticence to commit to military entanglements or a head-to-head confrontation with a nuclear power.

Instead, he has offered weapons sales and promised that Americans will do business in Ukraine, assurances that Ukrainians see as far less than a security guarantee. Europeans are preparing for a peacekeeping mission backed by their forces.

Yet, asked explicitly whether US security guarantees for Ukraine could include US troops in the country, Trump did not rule it out. Instead, he teased an announcement as soon as Monday on the topic.

“We’ll let you know that, maybe, later today,” Trump said. He said Europe was the “first line of defence” but that “we’ll be involved.”

What’s next

Trump said he would call Putin and set up a trilateral meeting with Ukraine at a time and place to be determined.

Despite some private misgivings, the assembled leaders agreed that such a meeting was a logical next step.

Still, the path forward is more complex than Trump and his allies are letting on.

For one, Russia has delayed and obstructed high-level meetings with Ukraine in the past, and it was not immediately clear that Putin would sit down with Zelensky, whom he frequently describes as an illegitimate leader.

Additionally, it is unclear how much a principal-level meeting would actually advance the cause of peace.

The gulf between the Russian and Ukrainian positions is vast.

The Kremlin said on Monday that the presence of NATO troops in Ukraine is a non-starter, a stance that would be hard for Ukraine to swallow.

Russia is also calling for Ukraine to fork over significant chunks of territory that Kyiv controls, another proposal that Ukraine’s leaders are not entertaining.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Former South Korean president yoon sentenced to five years in prison

Published

on

Former South Korean president yoon sentenced to five years in prison



A South Korean court on Friday sentenced former President Yoon Suk Yeol to five years in prison on charges that included obstructing attempts by authorities to arrest him following his failed bid to impose martial law in December 2024.

The Seoul Central District Court found Yoon guilty of mobilising the presidential security service to block authorities from executing an arrest warrant that had been legally issued by a court to investigate him for his martial law declaration.

In televised proceedings, he was also found guilty of charges that included fabricating official documents and failing to comply with the legal process required for martial law.

The ruling is the first related to the criminal charges Yoon faces over his botched martial law declaration.

“The defendant abused his enormous influence as president to prevent the execution of legitimate warrants through officials from the Security Service, which effectively privatised officials … loyal to the Republic of Korea for personal safety and personal gain,” the lead judge on the three-justice panel said.

Speaking outside the court immediately after the decision, one of Yoon’s lawyers, Yoo Jung-hwa, said the former president would appeal the ruling. “We express regret that the decision was made in a politicised manner,” she said.

He could face the death sentence in a separate trial on a charge of masterminding an insurrection by declaring martial law without justification.

Yoon has argued it was within his powers as president to declare martial law and that the action was aimed at sounding the alarm over the obstruction of government by opposition parties.

Yoon, who also denied Friday’s charges, could have faced up to 10 years in jail over the obstruction charges related to when he barricaded himself inside his residential compound in January last year and ordered the security service to block investigators.

He was finally arrested in a second attempt involving more than 3,000 police officers. Yoon’s arrest was the first ever for a sitting president in South Korea.

Parliament, joined by some members of Yoon’s conservative party, voted within hours to overturn his surprise martial law decree and later impeached him, suspending his powers.

He was removed from office in April last year by the Constitutional Court, which ruled he violated the duties of his office.

While Yoon’s bid to impose martial law lasted only about six hours, it sent shockwaves through South Korea, which is Asia’s fourth-largest economy, a key US security ally, and long considered one of the world’s most resilient democracies.



Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

South Korean ex-leader jailed for 5 years in first martial law verdict

Published

on

South Korean ex-leader jailed for 5 years in first martial law verdict


South Koreas former president Yoon Suk Yeol attends the third session of the G20 Leaders Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on November 19, 2024. — AFP
South Korea’s former president Yoon Suk Yeol attends the third session of the G20 Leaders’ Meeting in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on November 19, 2024. — AFP
  • Judge finds Yoon guilty of obstructing justice and other crimes.
  • Separate insurrection verdict is scheduled for February 19.
  • Yoon faces another trial over alleged drone flights to North Korea.

SEOUL: A South Korean judge sentenced former president Yoon Suk Yeol on Friday to five years in prison for obstructing justice and other crimes linked to his disastrous martial law declaration and in its chaotic aftermath.

It is the first in a series of verdicts for the disgraced ex-leader, whose brief suspension of civilian rule in South Korea on December 3, 2024 prompted massive protests and a showdown in parliament.

Now ousted from power, he faces multiple trials for actions taken during that debacle and in the turmoil that followed.

On Friday Judge Baek Dae-hyun at Seoul’s Central District Court said he found Yoon guilty of obstruction of justice by blocking investigators from detaining him.

Yoon was also found guilty of excluding cabinet members from a martial law planning meeting.

“Despite having a duty, above all others, to uphold the Constitution and observe the rule of law as president, the defendant instead displayed an attitude that disregarded the… Constitution,” Baek said.

“The defendant’s culpability is extremely grave,” he said.

But Yoon was not guilty of forging official documents due to lack of evidence, the judge said.

Yoon has seven days to appeal, he added.

Prosecutors had called for a 10-year prison term, while Yoon had insisted no law was broken.

Yoon defiant

It comes days after prosecutors in a separate case demanded Yoon be sentenced to death for his role as the “ringleader of an insurrection” in orchestrating the imposition of martial law.

A large screen shows an image of impeached South Korea president Yoon Suk Yeol as light sticks held by his supporters are seen during a rally near his residence in Seoul on January 7, 2025. — AFP
A large screen shows an image of impeached South Korea president Yoon Suk Yeol as light sticks held by his supporters are seen during a rally near his residence in Seoul on January 7, 2025. — AFP 

They argued Yoon deserved the severest possible punishment as he had shown “no remorse” for actions that threatened “constitutional order and democracy”.

If he is found guilty it is highly unlikely the sentence will actually be carried out, as South Korea has had an unofficial moratorium on executions since 1997.

Yoon was seen smiling in court as the prosecutors demanded the punishment.

And the former leader and top prosecutor has remained defiant, saying his martial law declaration was a lawful exercise of his presidential authority.

In closing remarks on Tuesday, he insisted the “exercise of a president’s constitutional emergency powers to protect the nation and uphold the constitutional order cannot be deemed an act of insurrection”.

He accused the then-opposition party of having imposed an “unconstitutional dictatorship” through their control of the legislature.

“There was no other option but to awaken the people, who are the sovereign.”

The court is scheduled to rule on the insurrection charges on February 19.

Yoon also faces a separate trial on charges of aiding the enemy, over allegations he ordered drone flights over North Korea to bolster his case for declaring martial law.





Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Trump accepts Nobel medal from Venezuelan opposition leader Machado

Published

on

Trump accepts Nobel medal from Venezuelan opposition leader Machado


President Trump meets Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado in the Oval Office on Jan 15, 2026. — White House
President Trump meets Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado in the Oval Office on Jan 15, 2026. — White House
  • Machado says meeting was ‘excellent,’ but did not elaborate.
  • Encounter comes as Trump has praised Caracas’ interim leader.
  • Trump has prioritised securing access to Venezuelan oil.

WASHINGTON: Venezuelan opposition leader Maria Corina Machado gave her Nobel Peace Prize medal to US President Donald Trump on Thursday during a White House meeting, as she tries to gain some influence over how the president shapes the South American country’s political future.

A White House official confirmed that Trump intends to keep the medal.

In a social media post on Thursday evening, Trump wrote: “Maria presented me with her Nobel Peace Prize for the work I have done. Such a wonderful gesture of mutual respect. Thank you Maria!”

Machado, who described the meeting as “excellent,” said the gift was in recognition of what she called his commitment to the freedom of the Venezuelan people.

Machado’s attempt to sway Trump came after he dismissed the idea of installing her as Venezuela’s leader to replace the deposed Nicolas Maduro. Trump openly campaigned for the prize before Machado was awarded it last month and complained bitterly when he was snubbed.

Though Machado gave Trump the gold medal that honorees receive with the prize, the honor remains hers; the Norwegian Nobel Institute has said the prize cannot be transferred, shared or revoked.

Asked on Wednesday if he wanted Machado to give him the prize, Trump told Reuters: “No, I didn’t say that. She won the Nobel Peace Prize.”

The Republican president long expressed interest in winning the prize and has at times linked it to diplomatic achievements.

The lunch meeting, which appeared to last slightly over an hour, marked the first time the two have met in person. Machado then met with more than a dozen senators, both Republican and Democratic, on Capitol Hill, where she has generally found more enthusiastic allies.

While the visit was ongoing, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump had been looking forward to meeting Machado, but that he stood by his “realistic” assessment that she did not currently have the support needed to lead the country in the short term.

Machado, who fled Venezuela in a daring seaborne escape in December, is competing for Trump’s ear with members of Venezuela’s government and seeking to ensure she has a role in governing the nation going forward.

After the US captured Maduro in a snatch-and-grab operation this month, various opposition figures, members of Venezuela’s diaspora and politicians throughout the US and Latin America have expressed hope that Venezuela will begin the process of democratisation.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending