Connect with us

Entertainment

Legal experts question viability of Trump’s $5 billion defamation lawsuit against BBC

Published

on

Legal experts question viability of Trump’s  billion defamation lawsuit against BBC


    Legal experts question viability of Trump’s $5 billion defamation lawsuit against BBC

    U.S. President Donald Trump vows to sue the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) for “anywhere between $1bn and $5bn” over a misleading edited clip in a Panorama documentary faces a steep uphill battle in court, with legal analysts pointing to a series of formidable jurisdiction and legal obstacles.

    “We have to do it, they’ve even admitted that they cheated, Not that they couldn’t have done that. They cheated. They changed the words coming out of my mouth,” President Trump told reporters on board Air Force One.

    BBC have also issued a formal apology last week for an edit in October 2024 documentary which spliced two parts of President’s January 6, 2021, speech.

    With the edited version, there was a “mistaken impression” that he directly called for a violent action.

    While the apology prompted the resignation of the corporation’s top two executives, the news agency has refused to pay financial compensation and has cited that it “strongly disagreed there is a basis for defamation claim” as reported by Sky News.

    Despite BBC’s contrition , legal experts suggest a successful lawsuit is a long shot.

    Legal hurdles in the UK

    The most straightforward path to file a defamation case would be in the United Kingdom, since the program was originally broadcast here. But, this avenue appears to be closed.

    The one-year limitation period for a defamation claim in the UK has almost certainly expired, as the program aired in October 2024. But even if it hadn’t, President Trump would face a difficult task proving serious harm to his reputation, a key requirement under UK law.

    It is anticipated that BBC’s defense would be that the edit was an error in judgment, not malice, and that Trump was re-elected as president shortly after the documentary was aired, and didn’t suffer tangible reputational damage in the UK as a result.

    Legal hurdles in U.S.

    The other way is to bring the case to a U.S. court, potentially in Trump’s home state of Florida, which introduces a different set of challenges, majorly concerning jurisdiction and the high bar for public figures to prove defamation.

    The major problem Trump will face is that the BBC’s Panorama program was not broadcasted on any American television and was geographically restricted on the BBC’s iPlayer platform.

    To sue in Florida, Trump’s legal team would have to convince the court the BBC purposefully directed its content at a Florida audience, which seems a difficult argument to make.

    If a court accepts a jurisdiction, the U.S. President would then have to meet the “actual malice” standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court in New York Times Co. v. Sullivan.

    Since BBC has already stated that the edit was “unintentional” in its formal apology writing in retraction, “We accept that our edit unintentionally created this impression that we were showing a single continuous section of the speech, rather than excerpts from different points in the speech, and this this gave the mistake impression that President Trump had made a direct call for violent action.”

    This statement directly contradicts the “actual malice” standard.

    A political quagmire for UK Prime Minister

    The situation also created a diplomatic and political dilemma for UK Prime minister Keir Starmer.

    Trump told reporters that he plans to have a telephonic conversation with Starmer over the weekend.

    Since BBC is a public corporation, funded by a license fee and legally independent of government, Starmer intervenes to dissuade Trump from the lawsuit, can accused him of compromising the BBC’s editorial independence.

    If he remains silent, he leaves a cherished British institution facing a potentially costly and protracted legal battle with a sitting U.S. president, a fight that could ultimately be funded by British taxpayers.

    In a separate interview on Saturday, November 15, recorded before his comments on Air Force One, Trump declared the lawsuit an “obligation,” adding, “If you don’t do it, you don’t stop it from happening again with other people.

    However, the legal path to a multi-billion dollar payout appears with complications that may make the threat of a lawsuit more potent than its eventual filing. 





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Entertainment

President Zardari signs amendment bills for Army, Air Force and Navy

Published

on

President Zardari signs amendment bills for Army, Air Force and Navy


This undated image shows armed forces soldiers march past during Pakistan Day military parade in Islamabad. — AFP
  • President signs bills on PM Shehbaz’s advice.
  • All three bills passed by parliament this week.
  • COAS will concurrently serve as CDF.

ISLAMABAD: President Asif Ali Zardari on Saturday signed the Pakistan Army, Air Force and Navy Amendment Bills 2025 into law following their approval by parliament.

According to notifications shared by the PPP on the social media platform X, the president gave his assent to the Pakistan Army (Amendment) Bill 2025, the Pakistan Air Force (Amendment) Bill 2025 and the Pakistan Navy (Amendment) Bill 2025.

The bills, presented by Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar and Defence Minister Khawaja Asif, were passed by both the lower and upper houses of parliament — the National Assembly and the Senate — this week.

What are the key changes?

Under the Pakistan Army (Amendment) Bill, the COAS will concurrently serve as Chief of the Defence Forces for five years. Field Marshal Munir’s tenure will restart from the date the new notification is issued.

Article 243 provisions applicable to a Field Marshal will also apply to a General promoted to the rank. The federal government may authorise the Vice Chief of Army Staff or Deputy Chief of Army Staff to exercise powers of the COAS, under written orders issued on the CDF’s recommendation.

The legislation further clarifies that once the first notification for the dual office is issued, the incumbent COAS’ tenure will be deemed to have recommenced from the date of that notification.

The federal government will determine the duties and responsibilities of the CDF, including multi-domain integration, restructuring and ensuring jointness across the armed forces.

A major structural change approved in the bill is the abolition of the post of Chairman Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee (CJCSC), to be replaced by the Commander of the National Strategic Command. The prime minister may appoint the commander from among serving Pakistan Army generals for a three-year term, on the COAS/CDF’s recommendation.

The terms and conditions of the appointment will be set by the prime minister, who may also grant a three-year extension in the national security interest. The bill states that any appointment, reappointment or extension for the Commander shall not be challenged before any court.

The Pakistan Air Force (Amendment) Bill, 2025, removes sections 10D, 10E and 10F of the Pakistan Air Force Act, 1953, which previously dealt with the appointment of the PAF chief as CJCSC, his tenure, extension and retirement. 

All references to the CJCSC have been omitted across the Act. Similarly, the Pakistan Navy (Amendment) Bill, 2025, deletes sections 14D, 14E and 14F concerning the appointment and tenure of the Naval Chief as CJCSC, also removing the term from other provisions of the law.





Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

‘Weak’ King Charles finally agrees to cede power to Prince William

Published

on

‘Weak’ King Charles finally agrees to cede power to Prince William


‘Weak’ King Charles finally agrees to cede power to Prince William

King Charles has finally agreed to cede power to his elder son and heir to throne Prince William amid poor health concerns.

This has been claimed by royal insiders while speaking to the Radar Online.

The insider said, “Prince William sees his dad as kind of weak and incapable of doing things the way he would do it to protect the monarchy.”

The royal confidant continued, “While King Charles was babying his brother, giving him the benefit of the doubt, William was telling him to pump the brakes and kick him out.

“Prince William is no-nonsense. He didn’t like the way his father was ruling.”

The sources went on saying Queen Camilla is “fuming” over how William and his wife, Kate Middleton pushed her aside, undermined Charles, who celebrated his 77th birthday on November 14, and “bulldozed their way” into taking over the response to the fallout from former Duke of York Andrew’s alleged connection to Jeffrey Epstein.

The insider said, “Camilla is all about the power trip. She knows that her husband had been waiting to be king for a very long time, and quite frankly, she had also been waiting to be queen.

“Camilla is just trying to hold on to the throne for as long as possible and taking it away is devastating her.”





Source link

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Fuel dealers seek govt intervention as artificial diesel shortage hits pumps

Published

on

Fuel dealers seek govt intervention as artificial diesel shortage hits pumps


A petrol pump in the federal capital seen in this undated image. — Online/File
  • Dealers say some companies delivering small amounts of diesel.
  • Fuel pumps running dry and unable to serve customers: dealers
  • Dealers also complain of cancellation of orders after placement. 

Fuel traders warn that a manufactured shortage of high-speed diesel is affecting petrol pumps nationwide, calling on the government to act before conditions deteriorate, The News reported on Saturday. 

In a letter to the chairman of the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (Ogra), the Petrol Pump Dealers Association said oil marketing companies (OMCs) have been limiting diesel supplies for the past week. 

According to the dealers, some companies are delivering very small amounts, while others are not supplying fuel at all. Because of this, many pumps are running dry and are unable to serve customers. 

Dealers say they place orders that later get cancelled, and fuel trucks are left waiting for hours without being loaded. They believe the shortage is not natural but artificial, created by companies ahead of a possible increase in fuel prices expected later this month. 

The association said the supply cuts are so severe that stations are “hardly able to meet the public’s needs”. They have asked Ogra to direct OMCs to provide diesel based on each pump’s regular sales so that stations can operate normally again.

The letter, sent on November 14 by the association’s vice chairman, was also shared with senior officials, including the petroleum minister, the petroleum secretary, the director general oil, and the secretary of the Oil Companies Advisory Council.

It may be noted that a fuel price update is expected at midnight today. 

The government jacked up the fuel prices for the outgoing fortnight, effective from November 1, following recommendations from the Oil and Gas Regulatory Authority (OGRA) and the relevant ministries.

The petrol price was increased by Rs2.43 per litre and set at Rs265.45 per litre till tonight, while the price of high-speed diesel (HSD) was also increased by Rs3.02 to Rs278.44 per litre, the Finance Division said in a notification based on the authority’s last review.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending