Entertainment
Major win for Trump on Gaza, but will it stand test of time?

US President Donald Trump has undeniably scored a diplomatic victory by helping to broker a truce for Gaza, but the path to the lasting peace he says he wants for the Middle East is littered with obstacles.
And it remains to be seen whether the 79-year-old Trump — who is not exactly known for his attention to the fine print — will devote the same level of energy to the conflict over the long term, once his victory lap in the region is over next week.
“Any agreement between Israelis and Palestinians, but especially one indirectly brokered between Israel and Hamas is an extraordinary achievement,” Aaron David Miller, who worked for multiple US administrations of both parties, told AFP.
“Trump decided to do something that no American president… of either party has ever done, which is to pressure and squeeze an Israeli prime minister on an issue that that prime minister considered vital to his politics,” said Miller, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
But Miller, who has participated in Middle East peace talks over the years, warned of the “universe of complexity and detail” that remains to be hashed out with respect to the implementation of phase two of the deal.

The Israeli army said its troops had ceased fire at 0900 GMT Friday in the Gaza Strip, in anticipation of the release of all Israeli hostages, dead and alive, in the subsequent 72 hours, in compliance with the deal it reached with Palestinian armed group Hamas.
Trump has said he expects to head to the Middle East on Sunday, with stops in Egypt, where the talks took place, and Israel.
Art of the deal?
Given that every US president over the past 20 years has been unsuccessful in resolving crises between Israel and the Palestinians, Trump’s accomplishment is already remarkable.
But the Republican billionaire president has broader aspirations — to revive the Abraham Accords reached during his first White House term, under which the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and Morocco offered Israel diplomatic recognition.
Trump has brought his son-in-law Jared Kushner, one of the architects of those accords, back into the administration to work with special envoy Steve Witkoff on the Gaza negotiations.
Officials and foreign policy observers agree that Trump deftly used a mix of carrot and stick — publicly and privately, and especially with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — to get the deal done.
He also leveraged his strong ties with Arab and Muslim leaders including Turkey’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
For Miller, Trump clearly played a “decisive” role.
But while the agreement’s first phase appears to be on track, much remains undefined, including how — and if — Hamas will agree to disarm after two years of devastating conflict in the Palestinian territory, following its October 7, 2023 attack on Israel.

“A ceasefire is not yet a lasting peace,” French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot said Thursday, after meeting with European and Arab ministers on how to help the Palestinians in the post-conflict period.
Steven Cook, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, wrote: “Whether this leads to an end to the war remains an open question.”
Huge challenges
Cook says the challenge now is to fully implement Trump’s 20-point plan, which calls for Hamas to surrender its weapons, the creation of an international stabilisation force and new governing structures for Gaza that will not include the Palestinian resistance group.
Trump insisted Thursday that “there will be disarming” by Hamas and “pullbacks” by Israeli forces.
Then on Friday, he added: “I think there is consensus on most of it, and some of the details, like anything else, will be worked out.”
But his administration will need to work hard to finalise the deal, and ensure that Arab countries in the region are invested in helping rebuild a devastated Gaza.
A team of 200 US military personnel will “oversee” the Gaza truce, senior US officials said Thursday.

Miller said there are “operational” holes in the plan as it stands, including “no detailed planning for either how to decommission and/or demilitarise Gaza, even if you had Hamas’s assent, which you don’t.”
The plan also calls for the creation of a so-called “Board of Peace,” a transitional body to be chaired by Trump himself — a proposal Hamas rejected on Thursday.
“Despite coming to office eager to shed America’s Middle East commitments, Trump just took on a huge one: responsibility for a peace plan that will forever bear his name,” wrote Robert Satloff, executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.
Entertainment
Beijingers shrug off Trump tariff threat

Residents of China’s capital city expressed indifference and defiance on Saturday when asked by AFP about the latest threat by US President Donald Trump to impose blistering new tariffs on the country.
On Friday, Trump announced suddenly that the United States would slap additional 100% tariffs on all Chinese imports from November 1 “or sooner”, also calling into question an upcoming meeting with President Xi Jinping.
Chinese authorities have yet to publicly respond on the threat, which Trump said was in retaliation for Beijing’s new export control measures in the strategic rare-earth sector.
The ministries of foreign affairs and commerce did not comment when asked about it by AFP on Saturday.
“I felt nothing when I first saw the news,” said Liu Ming, a 48-year-old employee in a software company, outside a large Beijing shopping mall.
“Trump always has these childlike or capricious policies,” said Liu.
“China isn’t afraid of any US sanctions or policies aimed at limiting us. We have the confidence and ability to do better ourselves.”
‘Great commotion’
Like others interviewed by AFP on the streets of Beijing on Saturday, Liu sees Trump as fickle.
“From the perspective of a Chinese person, he is a bit unreliable,” he said.
“He always goes from this policy to that policy, causing great commotion in the world.
“It is not stable.”
Irene Wang, an insurance worker in her thirties, echoed the sentiment.
“He says one thing today, but maybe after a nap he’ll change his mind again,” joked Wang.
“At his age (79), he should be a little more composed!”
She believes the sky-high tariffs Trump is threatening could backfire.
“For Americans, it could have an impact,” she said, as tariffs on Chinese products could drive up prices in the United States.
As for the potential impact on people living in China, Wang acknowledged she couldn’t completely ignore the news.
“Honestly, it isn’t the first time, so we will have to wait and see how things play out.”
Hoping for ‘normal’
Some residents of the Chinese capital told AFP they expected only a moderate impact on their country’s economy if the trade war with Washington escalates again.
“The import-export sector, especially those businesses, will inevitably be affected to some extent,” said Jesicca Yu, 40.
But “for ordinary people in China, in the immediate future, I don’t think much will change in their daily lives,” she said.
Yu also bemoaned the tense relationship between Beijing and Washington.
“The more peaceful things are, the more economic development can take place,” she said.
“We hope things go back to normal.”
Lisa Liu, a colleague of Yu who is in her thirties, said she saw one good thing in Trump’s unpredictable approach to governing.
“He gives us a lot to talk about at the dinner table,” she said.
Entertainment
Justin Hawkins addresses Yungblud ‘feud’ over VMAs Ozzy tribute

Justin Hawkins just admitted he never “intended to incite a feud” with Yungblud.
Yungblud was furious after The Darkness front man Justin blasted his MTV VMAs tribute to the late Ozzy Osbourne, saying: “Yungblud seems to have positioned himself as a natural heir to the Ozzy legacy, having nothing to do with the really important stuff.”
In a new video on his Justin Hawkins Rides Again YouTube channel titled Yungblud And The Cost of Having An Opinion, Justin said: “There’s nothing feudy about it, especially when it comes to my reactions to the VMAs performance.”
He could also be heard saying, “None of that was intended to incite a feud. I think that Yungblud is a very well-connected and, as such, dangerous artist. He’s an individual who is not the sort of bear you’d go round poking.”
“But I think that when there’s real-time pitch correction happening [referring to his criticism of Yungblud’s use of autotune] and stuff like that, and the other observations I made about the overall delivery of it… you’re talking about somebody that came from musical theatre via Disney and is now being lauded as the future of rock. And if they have real-time pitch correction and that kind of background, I think it’s OK to be a bit skeptical about it,” Justin expressed.
He continued, “I know that’s not a very popular opinion but from the reaction community if you can’t say something negative about something that leaves you only one opinion available to you and that’s not how life works. Everybody’s allowed to say whatever they want.”
“I’m not slagging him off because… I don’t even think I’m slagging it off actually. I think I’m making a point that if the future of rock requires real-time pitch correction in a live environment rock is pretty f**ked, isn’t it?” Justin Hawkins concluded.
This comes after Yungblud slammed the “bitter and jealous” Justin Hawkins during his appearance on Ozzy Osbourne’s son, Jack Osbourne’s Trying Not To Die podcast, where he said, “I think the strangest thing about that was all I was trying to do was my best for your old man, because he gave me such a gift.
“When people try and intellectualise a sense of spirit and six musicians on a stage going ‘f**king love you man’, it’s just bitter and jealous,” the Zombie hitmaker further said at that time.
Entertainment
Angelina Jolie doesn’t ‘regret’ major surgery decision

Angelina Jolie just admitted that she has no regrets about her decision to have a double mastectomy and ovary removal.
The 50-year-old star opted for the procedures after she learned that she carries the BRCA gene mutation, which dramatically heightens breast and ovarian cancer risks.
In a candid chat with Hello! magazine, revealing how witnessing her mum and grandmother’s cancer battles influenced her choice.
She explained: “I did choose to have that (surgery) because I lost my mother and my grandmother very young. I have the BRCA gene, so I chose to have a double mastectomy a decade ago. And then I’ve also had my ovaries removed, because that’s what took my mother.”
Angelina’s mum, Marcheline Bertrand, passed away in 2007 at just 56 after fighting breast and ovarian cancer.
The star admitted that she is completely comfortable with her preventive surgery decisions while preaching that every woman must make their own healthcare choice.
Angelina added: “Those are my choices. I don’t say everybody should do it that way, but it’s important to have the choice. And I don’t regret it.”
The Maleficent star revealed in 2013 that she underwent a preventative double mastectomy after medical professionals calculated she faced an 87 percent risk of developing breast cancer and a 50 percent chance of ovarian cancer. Then, in 2015, she underwent removal of her ovaries and fallopian tubes.
-
Tech1 week ago
AI could make it easier to create bioweapons that bypass current security protocols
-
Tech7 days ago
Amazon Prime Big Deal Days Is Next Week, but We Already Found 40 Early Deals
-
Fashion1 week ago
ASEAN manufacturing hits 14-month high in September
-
Tech1 week ago
Quantum computing can make HVAC systems smarter and greener
-
Tech7 days ago
Amazon is overhauling its devices to take on Apple in the AI era
-
Tech1 week ago
OpenAI now worth $500 billion, possibly making it the world’s most valuable startup
-
Fashion1 week ago
US’ Nike partners with Jacquemus to reinterpret historic Moon Shoe
-
Tech1 week ago
The Vision Pro Was An Expensive Misstep. Now Apple Has to Catch Up With Smart Glasses