Connect with us

Business

Nita Ambani Unveils 2,000-Bed Medical City And Major Green Projects For Mumbai At RIL AGM 2025

Published

on

Nita Ambani Unveils 2,000-Bed Medical City And Major Green Projects For Mumbai At RIL AGM 2025


New Delhi/Mumbai: Nita Ambani, Founder and Chairperson of Reliance Foundation, has announced an ambitious new healthcare initiative in the heart of Mumbai. The state-of-the-art, 2,000-bed medical city is designed to be much more than just a hospital. 

Speaking at the 48th Annual General Meeting of Reliance Industries, Nita Ambani said, “In the heart of Mumbai, a 2,000-bed medical city is being set up — not just another hospital, but one with AI-powered diagnostics and cutting-edge medical technology.”

Add Zee News as a Preferred Source


Reliance foundation said, “For fellow Mumbaikars, Nita Ambani, Founder and chairperson of the Reliance Foundation shared some very interesting developments of taking people back to Nature. Mrs. Ambani said Reliance Foundation has taken up the responsibility of developing a promenade and coastal road garden — the green lung spread over 130 acres.”

Nita Ambani started by reminding everyone of the Reliance Foundation’s core belief: Respect for Life. She shared that in the past ten years, the Sir HN Reliance Foundation Hospital in Mumbai has treated 3.3 million patients and is considered one of India’s top multi-specialty hospitals. Building on this success, she announced the launch of “Jeevan,” a new wing focused on chemotherapy and immunotherapy, with a special focus on advanced cancer treatment for children.

The new medical city will also include a cutting-edge medical college, designed to train the next generation of doctors who will serve India and beyond. Nita Ambani emphasised that the goal isn’t just to increase capacity, but to ensure world-class healthcare is affordable and accessible to every Indian.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Tesla asks court to throw out fatal Autopilot crash verdict

Published

on

Tesla asks court to throw out fatal Autopilot crash verdict


Carmaker Tesla has asked a federal court in Florida to throw out a verdict from a jury that found the company partly liable in a 2019 crash that killed a pedestrian and severely injured another.

Lawyers for the victims had argued that Tesla’s Autopilot driver assistance software contributed to the crash, failing to alert the driver of a Model S and activate the brakes.

Tesla blamed the driver for the crash, and on Friday asked the court to overturn the verdict, order a new trial, or reduce the punitive damages award.

The firm was ordered to pay $243m (£189m) in damages amid claims that boss Elon Musk misrepresented the software’s capabilities.

In a written argument to the court, Tesla said the $243m award flew in the face of “common sense.”

“Auto manufacturers do not insure the world against harms caused by reckless drivers,” the company said.

But Brett Schreiber, who is representing the victims, said the bid “is the latest example of Tesla and Musk’s complete disregard for the human cost of their defective technology”.

“The jury heard all the facts and came to the right conclusion that this was a case of shared responsibility, but that does not discount the integral role Autopilot and the company’s misrepresentations of its capabilities played in the crash,” he added.

Mr Schreiber said he was confident the court would uphold the original verdict.

At trial, the jury heard that driver George McGee had lost sight of the road when he dropped his phone as he was approaching an intersection, causing his car to continue through it and crash into an SUV parked on the other side.

Neither Mr McGee nor the Autopilot software hit the brakes in time to prevent the vehicle from hitting the two victims who were standing nearby.

Naibel Benavides Leon, 22, was killed when she was struck by McGee’s Model S and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, suffered life-long injuries.

Tesla accused the victims’ lawyers of overwhelming the jury “with a flood of highly prejudicial but irrelevant evidence” including statements from Mr Musk.

The lawyers also argued that the multi-million punitive damages award should be discarded or significantly reduced because such punishment requires clear evidence of “egregious wrongdoing” by the manufacturer.

The jury awarded the victims $329m in total damages, including $129m in compensatory damages and $200m in punitive damages which aims to deter Tesla from harmful behaviour in the future.

While other federal lawsuits have been brought against Tesla alleging its Autopilot played a role in fatal crashes, the Florida case which Tesla appealed on Friday was the first federal case of its kind to go to a jury.

Last year, Tesla settled a lawsuit over a 2018 crash that killed an Apple engineer after his Model X collided with a highway barrier while operating the company’s Autopilot software.

In 2023, a California state jury found Tesla was not at fault in a case in which it was alleged that Autopilot had led to a death.

At trial, Mr McGee said his concept of Tesla’s Autopilot was that it would assist him if he made a mistake – adding that he felt the software had failed him.

Mr McGee has settled a separate lawsuit with the victims for an undisclosed sum.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Court documents shed new light on UK-Apple row over user data

Published

on

Court documents shed new light on UK-Apple row over user data


Graham FraserTechnology Reporter

Getty Images The Apple logo on a window, with a city scene including skyscrapers reflected on the windowGetty Images

The UK government may have wanted to force Apple to provide it with access to more customer data than previously thought, a court document has indicated.

A row erupted between the two after it emerged the Home Office asked the tech giant for the right access to highly encrypted user data stored via a service called Advanced Data Protection (ADP).

Now a court document suggests the request – made under legislation called the Investigatory Powers Act – could have also enabled the government to seek access to a wider range of Apple customer data.

It also suggests the government may still be seeking to access data of non-UK users, despite US officials saying last week it had dropped the demand.

The UK government and Apple have been approached for comment.

It is believed the UK government would only want to access this data if there was a risk to national security.

In February, it emerged the government had demanded to be able to access encrypted data stored by Apple users worldwide in its cloud service. It applied to all content stored using ADP service.

The tech uses end-to-end encryption, where only the account holder can access the data stored – even Apple itself cannot see it.

It was an opt-in service, and not all users choose to activate it.

While it makes your data more secure, it comes with a downside – it encrypts your data so heavily that it cannot be recovered if you lose access to your account.

It is unknown how many people choose to use ADP.

‘Back door’

After US politicians and privacy campaigners outlined their anger at the move, Apple decided to pull ADP from customers in the UK.

Now, a new court document has emerged from the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (IPT), an independent judicial body.

The IPT hears complaints from anyone who feels they have been the victim of unlawful action by a public body using covert investigative techniques.

It could also relate to the conduct of UK intelligence services including MI5 and MI6.

In this latest court filing, first reported by the Financial Times, it states Apple was given a technical capability notice (TCN) by the UK government at some point between late 2024 and early 2025.

It states the notice “applies to (although is not limited to) data covered by” ADP – it was previously understood the government’s demand was exclusively focused on data stored using the encryption technology.

The TCN to Apple also included “obligations to provide and maintain a capability to disclose categories of data stored within a cloud based backup service and to remove electronic protection which is applied to the data where that is reasonably practicable”.

The filing adds: “The obligations included in the TCN are not limited to the UK or users of the service in the UK; they apply globally in respect of the relevant data categories of all iCloud users.”

The new court document from the IPT is dated Wednesday, 27 August – eight days after Tulsi Gabbard, the US director of national intelligence, said the UK had withdrawn its controversial demand to access global Apple users’ data if required.

Gabbard said at the time in a post on X the UK had agreed to drop its instruction for the tech giant to provide a “back door” which would have “enabled access to the protected encrypted data of American citizens and encroached on our civil liberties”.

The BBC understood at the time Apple had not yet received any formal communication from either the US or UK governments.

It is not clear if this new court document simply refers to the UK government’s initial intention, or if indicates that the UK government has not yet dropped its wish to be able to access the data of Apple users from around the world, including those from the US.

Apple declined to comment, but says on its website that it views privacy as a “fundamental human right”.

Apple has previously said it would “never build a back door” in its products.

Cyber security experts agree that once such an entry point is in place, it is only a matter of time before bad actors also discover it.

No Western government has yet been successful in attempts to force big tech firms like Apple to break their encryption.

The US government has previously asked for this, but Apple has refused.

In 2016, Apple resisted a court order to write software which would allow US officials to access the iPhone of a gunman – though this was resolved after the FBI was able to successfully access the device.

Similar cases have followed, including in 2020, when Apple refused to unlock iPhones of a man who carried out a mass shooting at a US air base.

A green promotional banner with black squares and rectangles forming pixels, moving in from the right. The text says: “Tech Decoded: The world’s biggest tech news in your inbox every Monday.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Royal Mail owner set to return to profit in first figures since £3.6bn takeover

Published

on

Royal Mail owner set to return to profit in first figures since £3.6bn takeover



The owner of Royal Mail is expected to show a return to annual earnings on Monday in the firm’s first set of results since the completion of its £3.6 billion takeover by Czech billionaire Daniel Kretinsky.

International Distribution Services (IDS) will post figures for the 12 months to March 31 after a milestone year for the group, which saw Royal Mail taken into foreign ownership for the first time in its more than 500-year history.

The year has also seen regulator Ofcom rubber stamp reforms allowing Royal Mail to ditch second class letter deliveries on Saturdays and change the service to every other weekday, which the group can start rolling out from July 28.

IDS” data-source=””>

IDS said in January that it was on course to return to annual adjusted operating profit, before voluntary redundancy costs, in 2024-25, “despite the difficult market environment”.

Its third quarter update showed group revenues lifted 0.8% to £3.6 billion thanks in part to a parcel boost over Christmas.

Royal Mail parcel revenues rose 2.5% to £1.02 billion in the quarter as prices rose, while the division was also helped by a better performance internationally, where revenues jumped 6.6% to £227 million.

But the group warned in November that it was facing a £120 million hit from the incoming national insurance tax hike and that it could not rule out job cuts or price hikes to offset the blow.

It also saw an investigation launched in May after it only delivered just over three-quarters of first-class post on time last year, following hefty fines for missing targets in previous years.

Parent group IDS formally left the London Stock Exchange on June 2 after being taken over by Mr Kretinsky’s EP Group following clearance by the Government at the end of 2024 and approval by shareholders in April.

Royal Mail’s new owner also issued a £1 so-called golden share to the UK Government, as agreed under the deal.

Mr Kretinsky – appointed as the new chairman of Royal Mail – has pledged to stick to the Universal Service Obligation (USO) after the takeover.

Royal Mail also announced in recent days that it will be the first international postal operator to launch new services so people can continue sending goods to the United States as new customs requirements take effect from August 29.

Royal Mail customers now can use the company’s new postal delivery duties paid (PDDP) services, which follows a US executive order last month that goods valued at 800 dollars or less will no longer be exempt from import duties and taxes from August 29.

The Institute of Directors (IoD) has warned around 30% of its member firms that export to the US will be hit by the new rules, with smaller companies predominantly impacted.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending