Connect with us

Business

‘No Company Is Going To Be Immune If…’: Sundar Pichai Cautions Against ‘Irrationality’ In AI Boom

Published

on

‘No Company Is Going To Be Immune If…’: Sundar Pichai Cautions Against ‘Irrationality’ In AI Boom


Last Updated:

‘I think no company is going to be immune, including us,’ says Google CEO Sundar Pichai, when asked whether Google could withstand a potential AI downturn.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai.

Google CEO Sundar Pichai has cautioned against the “irrationality” surrounding the ongoing artificial intelligence (AI) boom, warning that no company, including Google, would be immune if the AI bubble were to burst. He described the current moment as an “extraordinary” phase for the industry.

Speaking to the BBC at Google’s California headquarters, Pichai said, “We can look back at the internet right now. There was clearly a lot of excess investment, but none of us would question whether the internet was profound… I expect AI to be the same. So, I think it’s both rational and there are elements of irrationality through a moment like this.”

When asked whether Google could withstand a potential AI downturn, Pichai responded: “I think no company is going to be immune, including us.”

Alphabet’s market capitalisation has doubled in the past seven months to $3.5 trillion, driven by a sharp rally fuelled by the AI wave.

AI Bubble Concerns Rising Among Tech Leaders

Several other tech leaders have also voiced concerns about an AI bubble. At OpenAI’s DevDay last month, CEO Sam Altman acknowledged that parts of the AI ecosystem are already showing signs of excess. “I know it’s tempting to write the bubble story. In fact, there are many parts of AI that I think are kind of bubbly right now,” he said.

Amazon founder Jeff Bezos echoed a similar sentiment, calling the current phase an “industrial bubble” driven by AI’s sweeping influence across industries. He noted that such bubbles differ from financial ones, which can destabilise the economy. “This is kind of an industrial bubble as opposed to financial bubbles,” Bezos said, adding that industrial bubbles can actually spur innovation.

“The banking bubble… that’s just bad, that’s like 2008. Those bubbles society wants to avoid. The ones that are industrial are not nearly as bad, they can even be good. Because when the dust settles and you see who are the winners, society benefits from those inventions,” he added.

Mohammad Haris

Mohammad Haris

Haris is Deputy News Editor (Business) at news18.com. He writes on various issues related to personal finance, markets, economy and companies. Having over a decade of experience in financial journalism, Haris h…Read More

Haris is Deputy News Editor (Business) at news18.com. He writes on various issues related to personal finance, markets, economy and companies. Having over a decade of experience in financial journalism, Haris h… Read More

Follow News18 on Google. Join the fun, play QIK games on News18. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trendsstock updatestax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. To Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated.
News business ‘No Company Is Going To Be Immune If…’: Sundar Pichai Cautions Against ‘Irrationality’ In AI Boom
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Read More



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Trump’s tariff impact! US trade deficit falls 24% as imports plunged in August; government shutdown delayed data release – The Times of India

Published

on

Trump’s tariff impact! US trade deficit falls 24% as imports plunged in August; government shutdown delayed data release – The Times of India


The US trade deficit narrowed by about 24 per cent in August as sweeping tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump reduced imports, according to a delayed Commerce Department report released Wednesday. According to Associated Press, citing the report, the trade gap fell to $59.6 billion in August from $78.2 billion in July. Imports declined 5 per cent to $340.4 billion as businesses slowed purchases from abroad after stockpiling goods ahead of tariffs that took effect on August 7. Exports rose 0.1 per cent to $280.8 billion. Trump has upended decades of US free-trade policy by levying broad duties on most trading partners as well as on products such as steel, copper and automobiles. He argues that chronic trade deficits reflect foreign nations exploiting the US. Economists say tariffs are contributing to inflation by raising costs that importers largely pass to consumers. Despite August’s pullback, the trade deficit has widened in 2025, reaching $713.6 billion through August — up 25 per cent from $571.1 billion in the same period last year. A narrower trade gap typically supports economic growth because imports subtract from gross domestic product. “August’s smaller trade deficit will be a tailwind for third-quarter real GDP, since it means more US spending went to domestically-produced goods and services,” said Bill Adams, chief economist at Comerica Bank. The release was delayed due to the government shutdown. Public anger over living costs contributed to Democratic gains in the November 4 elections. Days later, Trump rolled back tariffs on items such as beef, coffee, tea, fruit juice, cocoa, spices, bananas, oranges, tomatoes and some fertilisers, acknowledging their effect on prices. The Supreme Court is weighing the legality of the tariffs. During a November 5 hearing, justices questioned whether a president can impose open-ended duties under emergency powers without approval from Congress.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Dutch government suspends intervention into chipmaker Nexperia

Published

on

Dutch government suspends intervention into chipmaker Nexperia


The Dutch government has suspended its intervention at Nexperia, a Chinese-owned chipmaker based in the Netherlands, following talks with China.

The Hague took action in September over “serious governance shortcomings” and concerns over the European supply of semiconductors for cars and other electronic goods. In response, Beijing blocked exports of the firm’s chips.

However, on Wednesday the Dutch government said it would halt its original decision following “constructive talks” with Beijing.

China said it welcomed the move, adding it was a “first step in the right direction towards a proper resolution”.

Nexperia is a major supplier of basic computer chips to the car industry, and shortages have threatened global supply chains.

A shortage of computer chips used in various electronic goods and cars would hugely impact the ability of manufacturers to make their products.

The decision by the Dutch government will ease tensions between the European Union and China, which have been mounting in recent months over trade and Beijing’s relationship with Russia.

Vincent Karremans, economic affairs minister, said that he considered it right to suspend action, made under the Goods Availability Act, ahead of further talks with the Chinese government.

“We are positive about the measures already taken by the Chinese authorities to ensure the supply of chips to Europe and the rest of the world,” he said in a statement.

The Dutch government said it originally invoked the Act following concerns “from actions attributed to the now-suspended CEO, involving the improper transfer of product assets, funds, technology, and knowledge to a foreign entity”.

“These actions ran counter to the interests of the company, its shareholders, and Dutch and European strategic autonomy and security of supply,” it said.

In October, a Dutch court ordered the removal of ex-Nexperia CEO and Wingtech founder Zhang Xuezheng, citing alleged mismanagement.

The Dutch government added that its decision had aimed to prevent a situation in which chips could become unavailable in an emergency.

In December last year, the US government placed Wingtech, which owns Nexperia, on its so-called “entity list”, identifying the company as a national security concern.

Under the regulations, US companies are barred from exporting American-made goods to businesses on the list unless they have special approval.

In the UK, Nexperia was forced to sell its silicon chip plant in Newport after MPs and ministers expressed national security concerns. It currently owns a UK facility in Stockport.

Following the Dutch government’s reversal, the Beijing acknowledged the move but said it was “still a step away from addressing the root cause of the global semiconductor supply chain turmoil and chaos”.

“Furthermore, the erroneous ruling by the corporate court, spearheaded by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, to strip Wingtech of its control over Nexperia remains a key obstacle to resolving the issue,” it added.

Wingtech has said it will fight the decision.

Following the latest move, a spokesperson for Wingtch said the company “strongly” rejected the allegations against its chief executive.

“To date, no proof has been provided,” it added. “If the Dutch government is sincere about solving the problem, the Ministry should now file a letter with the Enterprise Chamber, explicitly withdrawing its support for the proceedings.

“These proceedings form a threat to the continuity of Nexperia B.V. and therefore for the economic security of the Netherlands and Europe – which is the exact same argument the Dutch government made previously in support of judicial intervention.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Why Do Most Indians Quit SIPs Within 3 Years? Analysts Explain The Real Reason

Published

on

Why Do Most Indians Quit SIPs Within 3 Years? Analysts Explain The Real Reason


Last Updated:

Nearly 9 out of 10 retail investors discontinue SIPs within 3 years, missing out on long-term wealth as experts urge discipline and patience for successful mutual fund investing

Finance and corporate banking provide a stable and lucrative career for CAT-qualified candidates. Professionals work in banks, financial institutions, and investment firms managing portfolios, corporate loans, and risk assessment. These roles require solid analytical and decision-making abilities.

Finance and corporate banking provide a stable and lucrative career for CAT-qualified candidates. Professionals work in banks, financial institutions, and investment firms managing portfolios, corporate loans, and risk assessment. These roles require solid analytical and decision-making abilities.

A striking pattern in India’s fast-expanding mutual fund landscape is worrying market observers. Even as systematic investment plans (SIPs) continue to attract record enrolments, industry data show that nearly 9 out of 10 retail investors discontinue their SIPs within the first three years, undermining long-term wealth creation.

Financial planners attribute this churn to a predictable cycle of emotion-driven decision-making. The initial year is marked by enthusiasm, with investors entering the market buoyed by optimism. By the second year, even a modest correction triggers anxiety, prompting many to pause or cancel their contributions. When markets rebound in the third year, these same investors return, often with a sense of missed opportunity. This loop of excitement, fear and regret, experts say, erodes the very advantage SIPs are designed to offer.

Wealth managers point out that the cost of such interruptions is far greater than most investors realise. Illustrating the impact, they explain that a monthly investment of Rs 5,000 over 20 years, earning an annualised return of 12%, can accumulate to roughly Rs 45 lakh. But halting contributions for just three years during that period could shave off nearly Rs 15 lakh from the final corpus, solely due to lost compounding.

Analysts stress that the principle of rupee-cost averaging works best during downturns, when investors accumulate more units at lower prices. Ironically, that is also when most investors choose to step back. Market strategists liken it to “switching off the engine just as the vehicle picks up speed”, arguing that the true strength of SIPs emerges when investors hold steady through volatility.

Industry experts emphasise that long-term investing hinges on discipline rather than attempts to outguess short-term market movements. Each missed instalment delays financial goals, and frequent breaks weaken the compounding effect that underpins SIP performance. Seasoned investors, they note, continue investing through market cycles, treating fluctuations as part of the normal rhythm of equity markets.

While volatility may feel unsettling, advisors reiterate that markets have historically rewarded patience. The consensus across the industry remains unchanged; wealth creation is a function of staying invested, not timing entry and exit.

Follow News18 on Google. Join the fun, play QIK games on News18. Stay updated with all the latest business news, including market trendsstock updatestax, IPO, banking finance, real estate, savings and investments. To Get in-depth analysis, expert opinions, and real-time updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated.
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Read More



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending