Business
Ofcom investigates Elon Musk’s X over Grok AI sexual deepfakes
Laura CressTechnology reporter
SOPA Images via GettyOfcom has launched an investigation into Elon Musk’s X over concerns its AI tool Grok is being used to create sexualised images.
In a statement, the UK watchdog said there had been “deeply concerning reports” of the chatbot being used to create and share undressed images of people, as well as “sexualised images of children”.
If found to have broken the law, Ofcom can potentially issue X with a fine of up to 10% of its worldwide revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater.
X referred the BBC to a statement posted by its Safety account at the start of January: “Anyone using or prompting Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content.”.
Elon Musk later said the UK government wanted “any excuse for censorship” in response to a post questioning why other AI platforms were not being looked at.
The BBC has seen several examples of digitally altered images on X, in which women were undressed and put in sexual positions without their consent. One woman said more than 100 sexualised images have been created of her.
If X does not comply, Ofcom can seek a court order to force internet service providers to block access to the site in the UK altogether.
Technology Secretary Liz Kendall told the BBC she welcomed the body’s investigation and urged it to complete it as soon as possible.
“It is vital that Ofcom complete this investigation swiftly because the public – and most importantly the victims – will not accept any delay,” she said.
Kendall’s predecessor Peter Kyle told BBC Breakfast it was “appalling” that Grok had “not been tested appropriately”.
“The fact that I met just yesterday a Jewish woman who has found her image of herself in a bikini outside of Auschwitz being generated by AI and put online made me feel sick to my stomach,” he said.
Other MPs who have raised concerns include Northern Ireland politician Cara Hunter, who said she had decided to leave the platform.
Downing Street meanwhile said the government remains focused on “protecting children” but would keep its presence on X “under review”.
“I think we’ve been clear that all options are on the table,” the Prime Minister’s official spokesperson said.
‘Highest priority’
Ofcom will now examine whether X has failed to take down illegal content quickly when it became aware of it, and taken “appropriate steps” to prevent people in the UK from seeing it.
It said such illegal content included “non-consensual intimate images” and child sexual imagery.
It will also check whether X has used “highly effective age assurance” measures to stop children from seeing pornographic images.
The decision follows global backlash over Grok’s image creation feature, with both Malaysia and Indonesia temporarily blocking access to the tool over the weekend.
An Ofcom spokesperson did not give an indication on how long the investigation would take but said it would be a “matter of the highest priority”.
“Platforms must protect people in the UK from content that’s illegal in the UK,” they said.
“We won’t hesitate to investigate where we suspect companies are failing in their duties, especially where there’s a risk of harm to children.”
Lorna Woods, professor of internet law at Essex University, told the BBC it was “hard to predict” how quickly the investigation would move.
“Ofcom has a degree of choice in how fast – or slow – they take the investigation,” she said.
She said the regulator could apply for a business disruption order – a court order to block access to X in the UK – straight away rather than as a last resort, but only in “rare circumstances” in response to an ongoing problem.
Business
Indias Net Direct Tax Collections In FY26 Rise, Grow 8.82% To Rs 18.38 Lakh Crore Till Jan 11
New Delhi: India’s net direct tax collections for the financial year 2025–26 recorded strong growth of 8.82%, reaching Rs 18.38 lakh crore as of January 11, 2026, compared with Rs 16.89 lakh crore collected during the same period last year, according to official data released by the Income Tax Department on Monday.
Gross direct tax collections stood at Rs 21.50 lakh crore, marking a 4.14% increase over the Rs 20.64 lakh crore collected in the corresponding period of FY25. Corporate tax collections rose modestly to Rs 10.47 lakh crore, while non-corporate tax collections—which include taxes paid by individuals and other entities—increased to Rs 10.58 lakh crore.
Refunds issued during the period declined sharply by 16.92% to Rs 3.12 lakh crore from Rs 3.75 lakh crore in the previous year, contributing to higher net collections. Net corporate tax collections rose to Rs 8.63 lakh crore, while net non-corporate tax collections increased significantly to Rs 9.30 lakh crore. Securities Transaction Tax (STT) collections remained stable at around Rs 44,867 crore, while collections from other taxes were marginal during the period.
The Union Budget 2026 will be presented on February 1. Earlier, in an email interview with ANI, Sonal Badhan, Economist at Bank of Baroda, said the Union Budget 2026 is likely to target 8.5–9% growth next year and increase capital expenditure to Rs 12–12.2 lakh crore.
“We expect the government to meet its fiscal deficit target of 4.4% for FY26. For next year, we estimate the deficit ratio will be lowered by 30–40 basis points to 4–4.1%. Capital expenditure allocation will be of key interest. In the ongoing fiscal year, the government has already met around 60% of the budgeted target till November 2025,” the BoB economist said.
Business
Trump’s credit card rate cap plan has unclear path, ‘devastating’ risks, bank insiders say
Bank executives were sent scrambling over the weekend after President Donald Trump declared late Friday that American credit card companies would be subject to a 10% cap on the interest rate they can charge customers.
The move sent shares of large banks including Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo and Bank of America down between 1% and 4% in early trading Monday. Companies more tightly tethered to the card industry, like Visa, Mastercard and American Express, also fell. Capital One, whose loan book is mostly from credit cards, sank nearly 7%.
Trump proposed a one-year cap on interest rates starting Jan. 20. While it’s unclear exactly how that would be enforced, the industry’s message is clear: the plan would bring unintended consequences for consumers and the American economy.
The move would make large swaths of the credit card industry unprofitable, especially tied to customers with less-than-ideal credit profiles, according to banks and analysts. The average credit card rate nationally is 19.7% as of this month, according to a weekly survey from Bankrate.com, while rates for subprime borrowers and store-specific cards are even higher.
Rather than offer loss-making products to consumers, the industry would simply stop offering access to customers with subprime credit, along with a slew of other changes around card programs including scaling back rewards, insiders say. Consumers would either spend less or rely on other forms of unsecured debt, many of which carry even higher interest rates than credit cards, they say.
“We cannot offer products at a loss; there’s no scenario where we would take our entire portfolio to 10%,” said a person with knowledge of the operations of a large bank, who asked to remain anonymous to speak candidly. “It’s not a stretch to suggest this will very quickly tank the economy.”
The drag on the economy from less spending could be more acute for airlines, retailers and restaurants, which would have to make up for lost card revenues by “potentially raising pricing” on their services, KBW analysts led by Sanjay Sakhrani and Chris McGratty said in a Jan. 11 research note.
The industry’s trade groups issued a joint statement late Friday making their case.
“Evidence shows that a 10% interest rate cap would reduce credit availability and be devastating for millions of American families and small business owners who rely on and value their credit cards, the very consumers this proposal intends to help,” the trade groups said.
(L-R) Wells Fargo CEO and President Charles Scharf, Brian Bank of America Chairman and CEO Thomas Moynihan, JPMorgan Chase Chairman and CEO Jamie Dimon, Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser, State Street CEO Ronald OÕHanley, BNY Mellon CEO Robin Vince, Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon and Morgan Stanley CEO James Gorman, testify during a Wall Street oversight hearing by the Senate Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, December 6, 2023.
Saul Loeb | AFP | Getty Images
‘Opening bid?’
This isn’t the industry’s first time contending with possible price controls. A bill was introduced last year from Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri and Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont that would limit card APRs at 10% for five years.
While that bill is stalled in Congress, a study looking at the Missouri market from the Electronic Payments Coalition found that a 10% cap on rates would mean that more than 80% of card accounts would lose access. Most accounts with credit scores below 740 would be shut, the study claimed.
Complicating matters, it is unclear to bankers how Trump’s rate cap would take place.
The most straightforward approach, through legislation in Congress, isn’t possible by the proposed Jan. 20 start date, said Tobin Marcus, head of U.S. policy at Wolfe Research.
Other enforcement means, through banking regulators including the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, are also possible. But the Trump administration has repeatedly tried to shutter that agency, and the industry has had a successful run at defeating CFPB rules in federal courts.
“I’m not aware of an authority that they can use to do this unilaterally in any kind of a sweeping way,” Marcus said. “As far as I can tell, telling them they have until Jan. 20 is an attempt to create pressure and have them do it voluntarily.”
While the exact mechanism that Trump can use to enforce an interest rate cap is unclear, card issuers now face the risk that rates could be headed lower in some form of negotiated compromise with the government, KBW’s McGratty said in an interview.
“Is 10% an opening bid?” he said. “There’s a long distance between 10% and what companies charge today.”
Americans had a collective $1.23 trillion in credit card debt as of the third quarter last year, according to data from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Balances have been climbing as many Americans spent down the savings they’d built up during the global coronavirus pandemic.
Correction: This story has been updated to correct the spelling of Capital One.
Business
Hargreaves Lansdown poaches new boss from rival Vanguard
Hargreaves Lansdown has poached the boss of rival group Vanguard to head up the business as its new chief executive.
The UK’s biggest DIY investment platform announced it had appointed Matt Benchener to step into the top role from July.
He will move from his current position as managing director at Vanguard and the head of its personal investor platform, which serves millions of the company’s clients in the US.
Mr Benchener’s new role will bring an end to a more than 17-year career at Vanguard, where he also held senior roles including within its corporate strategy businesses.
He will join Bristol-based Hargreaves Lansdown in March for a handover period before taking over from current interim chief executive Richard Flint, subject to the approval of regulators.
Hargreaves Lansdown was taken over by a group of private equity investors last year, including buyout giant CVC Capital Partners and the Abu Dhabi wealth fund.
The £5.4 billion deal took the company off the London Stock Exchange and into private hands, with the new owners saying they wanted to invest in a technology-led transformation.
Peter Hargreaves, the company’s founder, said he was “delighted to see a CEO (chief executive) who truly understands Hargreaves Lansdown inside and out”.
“His client focus and hard-won investment platform experience make him exactly the right person to take the firm forward to the benefit of clients,” he added.
Mr Hargreaves recently announced his retirement having rejoined the board earlier in 2025 to help steer it through the takeover, with his board position being handed to his son Robert.
Incoming boss Mr Benchener said Hargreaves Lansdown was in a position of responsibility to “support the long-term financial wellbeing of millions”.
“It is a privilege to lead the company through this exciting stage in its history and to deliver even more for clients and help the UK become a nation of retail investors,” he said.
The appointment comes at a time when Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been stepping up efforts to attract more investment into the UK and encourage more retail investing among households.
In November’s autumn budget, she announced a change to the individual savings account (Isa) limit that lowers the cash element from £20,000 to £12,000 with the remaining £8,000 redirected into stocks and shares from April 2027.
-
Politics5 days agoUK says provided assistance in US-led tanker seizure
-
Entertainment1 week agoMinnesota Governor Tim Walz to drop out of 2026 race, official confirmation expected soon
-
Entertainment5 days agoDoes new US food pyramid put too much steak on your plate?
-
Sports1 week agoVAR review: Why was Wirtz onside in Premier League, offside in Europe?
-
Entertainment5 days agoWhy did Nick Reiner’s lawyer Alan Jackson withdraw from case?
-
Business5 days agoTrump moves to ban home purchases by institutional investors
-
Business1 week ago8th Pay Commission: From Policy Review, Cabinet Approval To Implementation –Key Stages Explained
-
Sports1 week agoFACI invites applications for 2026 chess development project | The Express Tribune
