Connect with us

Business

Rhode Island’s ‘Taylor Swift Tax’ on vacation homes of the wealthy is spreading to other states

Published

on

Rhode Island’s ‘Taylor Swift Tax’ on vacation homes of the wealthy is spreading to other states


Taylor Swift attends the 67th GRAMMY Awards on February 02, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.

Frazer Harrison | Getty Images Entertainment | Getty Images

A version of this article appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

A new push by states to tax the real estate of the wealthy has sparked a backlash among brokers and potential buyers, who say the taxes punish the most important local spenders.

From tax hikes on pricey second homes in Rhode Island and Montana to Cape Cod’s proposed transfer tax on homes over $2 million and the L.A. mansion tax, state and local governments see a revenue gold mine in the pricey properties of the wealthy.

“It’s a smack in the face to people who just spend money here,” said Donna Krueger-Simmons, sales agent with Mott & Chace Sotheby’s International in Watch Hill, Rhode Island.

The tax hikes are being driven by tighter state budgets and populist anger over housing costs. States are looking to offset budget cuts expected from the new tax and spending bill in Washington. At the same time, the housing market has become a tale of two buyers, with the middle class and younger families struggling to afford homes while the luxury housing market thrives from wealthy all-cash buyers.

The solution for many states: tax the homes of the rich.

Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

Rhode Island’s new levy, nicknamed “The Taylor Swift Tax,” is among the most extreme. The popstar bought a beach house in the state’s elite Watch Hill community in 2013.

The measure imposes a new surcharge on second homes valued at more than $1 million. For non-primary residences, or those not occupied for more than 182 days a year, the state will charge $2.50 for every $500 in assessed value above the first $1 million. That charge is on top of existing property taxes and will add up to big increases for luxury homes in Newport, Watch Hill and other well-heeled, summer communities in the state.

Swift’s house, for instance, is assessed at around $28 million, according to local real estate records. Her current property taxes are estimated at around $201,000 a year. The new charges will add another $136,442 to her annual taxes, bringing her yearly total to $337,442 – even though locals say she rarely visits.

Real estate brokers say the increase targets the very taxpayers who already contribute the most. Wealthy second-homeowners pay hefty property taxes but don’t use many local services, since their primary residences are in New York; Boston; Palm Beach, Florida; or other locales. Their kids typically don’t attend the local schools, and they’re infrequent users of the police, fire, water and other municipal services since most stay for only 10 to 12 weeks out of the year.

“These are people who just come here for the summer, spend their money and pay their fair share of taxes,” said Krueger-Simmons. “They’re getting penalized just because they also live somewhere else.”

Brokers and longtime residents say the summer residents of Newport, Watch Hill and other seasonal beach towns are the economic engines for local businesses, restaurants and hotels.

“You’re just hurting the people who support small business,” said Lori Joyal, of the Lila Delman Compass office in Watch Hill. “You’re chasing away the people who spend most of the money in these towns.” 

Rhode Island is also hiking its conveyance tax on luxury real estate starting in October. The tax on real estate sales will be an additional $3.75 for each $500 paid above $800,000 for a real estate purchase. At the same time, the state’s steep estate tax deters many of the ultra-wealthy from living there full-time.

Brokers say some second-home owners are considering selling and many would-be buyers are pausing their purchases. While the tax hike alone isn’t expected to lead to any significant wealth flight, Joyal said potential buyers in Rhode Island are already looking at coastal towns in Connecticut as alternatives.

“It’s always about choices,” she said. “At the end of the day it’s about how they can choose to spend their discretionary dollars. Connecticut has some beautiful coastal towns without some of these other high taxes.”

FILE – In this May 27, 2013, file photo, people walk past a house owned by Taylor Swift in the village of Watch Hill in Westerly, R.I.

Dave Collins | AP

Montana has passed a similar tax. The influx of Californians and other affluent newcomers who poured into the state during Covid has led to soaring home prices and growing resentment over gentrification. Meanwhile, the state’s low income tax rate and lack of a sales tax has left it little room for revenue increases to handle the necessary increase in services.

In May, the state passed a two-tier property tax plan, lowering rates for full-time residents and raising taxes on second homes and short-term rentals. For primary residences and long-term rentals valued at or below the state’s median home price, the tax rate will be 0.76%. Homes worth more than that will face a tiered-rate system of up to 1.9% on any value over four times the median price.

The Montana Department of Revenue expects the changes, which will start next year, will hike second-home taxes by an average of 68%. Brokers say some buyers are waiting to see the tax bills next year before making any decisions about whether to buy or sell.

“I’ve heard about some buyers who have put on the brakes to wait for the dust to settle and see what happens,” said Valerie Johnson, with PureWest Christie’s International Real Estate in Bozeman, Montana.

Johnson said that while the tax was touted by legislators as hitting wealthy second-home owners, it will also hit longtime locals who own investment homes and rent them out for income.

“These are small businesses for many people,” she said.

Manish Bhatt, a senior policy analyst at the Tax Foundation, said tax hikes aimed at wealthy second-home owners may be popular politically, but they rarely make for successful or efficient tax policy. Real property tax reform should be broad based, rather than focused on taxpayers who are singled out just because they don’t live in a community full-time, he said.

“There is a grab to find revenue right now,” he said. “But taxing second-home owners could have the opposite impact – dissuading people from owning a second home or continue to own in those communities.”

While the new taxes alone might not drive out the wealthy, “we do know that taxes are important to businesses and individuals and could cause people to make a decision to buy in another nearby state,” Bhatt said.

The projected revenue from the new taxes may also disappoint. When Los Angeles passed its so-called “mansion tax” in 2022, proponents touted revenue projections of between $600 million to $1.1 billion a year. The tax, imposed on real estate sales over $5 million, has only raised $785 million after more than two years, according to the Los Angeles Housing Department.

Higher interest rates that hurt the housing market have played a role, experts say. Yet Michael Manville, professor of urban planning at the UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, said wealthy buyers and sellers also reduced transactions in response to the tax.

“The lower revenue is a reason to be concerned because it suggests that the tax might actually be reducing transactions, which in turn can reduce housing production and property tax revenue,” he said.



Source link

Business

Explained: On way to 4th largest, how India slipped to 6th rank & what it means for 3rd largest economy dream – The Times of India

Published

on

Explained: On way to 4th largest, how India slipped to 6th rank & what it means for 3rd largest economy dream – The Times of India


While India will be the sixth largest economy in FY27, it is likely to overtake both the UK, and Japan to bag the fourth spot in FY28. (AI image)

In April 2025 when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) released its World Economic Outlook, India was seen overtaking Japan to become the world’s fourth largest economy by the end of 2025-26. One year later, India has slipped to the sixth position on the largest economies rankings, with the United Kingdom reclaiming its spot as the fifth largest economy.In fact, IMF’s latest World Economic Outlook (April 2026) sees India sitting at the sixth spot this financial year too. This projection comes even as India has grown better than expected in FY26 and is seen retaining its tag of being the world’s fastest growing major economy.What has led to the sudden fall? Why has India dropped to the sixth position, falling behind the UK, instead of overtaking Japan to become the fourth largest economy? And what does this setback mean for its dream of becoming the third largest economy by the end of this decade? We decode:

Data drive: India projected as 4th largest, but fell to 6th spot

First let’s look at some IMF data to see which way the Indian economy was headed in April 2025, and what the April 2026 outlook data suggestsAs per April 2025 estimates of IMF, India’s economy would have been at $4601.225 billion at the end of FY 2025-26, overtaking Japan which was estimated at $4373.091 billion. The UK at the 6th spot was projected to have a nominal GDP of $4040.844 billion.However, as per the April 2026 estimates, India’s economy had a nominal GDP of $4,153 billion at the end of FY 2025-26, with the UK overtaking it with $4,265 billion GDP. Japan’s GDP is seen at $4,379 billion.As the above estimates show, India’s GDP estimates have seen a drop over one year, while UK’s nominal GDP has grown better than expected. Japan has been steady.So, what went wrong? Blame the rupee and GDP data itself!

Rupee Depreciation Blow & New GDP Series

The first thing to understand is that IMF’s data on the size of a country’s nominal GDP is in dollar terms. Hence, with global rankings based on dollar‑denominated GDP, they are highly sensitive to exchange rate movements. The biggest party pooper for India’s dream of becoming the fourth largest has been the rupee’s slide. The Indian currency has depreciated more than expected over the last year, dropping from 84.57 versus the US dollar in 2024 to 88.48 in 2025, as per IMF data. The IMF estimates see it at 92.59 this year.Several factors have contributed to the rupee’s decline, including capital outflows, uncertainty related to India-US trade deal up until February, and the recent Middle East conflict which has raised crude oil prices and India’s import bill. Also, the RBI while actively managing volatility in the forex market, is not targeting any particular level of the rupee.Arun Singh, Chief Economist, Dun & Bradstreet India says that India’s recent slip to sixth place in global GDP rankings does not reflect a weakening of the economy, but is largely the result of currency conversion effects and a one‑time statistical revision.The rupee’s depreciation from 2024 to 2026, has mechanically compressed India’s GDP in dollar terms, effectively halving apparent growth despite strong domestic expansion, says Arun Singh.According to Ranen Banerjee, Partner and Leader, Economic Advisory Services, PwC India, GDP in US dollar terms would shave off with rupee depreciation. “We have had almost 7-8% depreciation over the last few months owing to the conflict and portfolio outflows. Thus, in effect in US dollar terms, it is close to shaving out almost a year’s nominal GDP,” he tells TOI.And it’s not just about the Indian economy. The United Kingdom which has overtaken India to bag the 5th spot again also has economic factors working in its favour. UK’s GDP growth at 0.5% has recently beaten forecasts of 0.1% by a wide margin. Not only that, its currency – pound – has actually appreciated against the US dollar.The second factor that has impacted the rankings is India’s adoption of a new base year for its latest GDP series. As per the new data, which also makes use of a more refined methodology, the size of India’s nominal GDP in rupee terms has gone down. Sample this: As per the older base year of 2011-12, India’s GDP at the end of 2025-26 would have been Rs 35,713,886 crore. But under the new series, it is estimated to be Rs 34,547,157 crore. The new calculation methodology and base year revision presents a more accurate picture of the size of the Indian economy.Hence the currency effect has been compounded by a one‑time downward revision following India’s shift to a new GDP base year, which has lowered reported nominal levels without affecting real activity.

New GDP Series: Top 10 Points To Know

Does India’s drop to 6th indicate fundamental weakness?

Experts are confident that India’s growth story is intact and fundamentally strong, a fact that is reflected in projections of it continuing to be the world’s fastest growing major economy. They see technical factors behind the current slip, rather than any deterioration in economic fundamentals.It’s also interesting to note that while India will be the sixth largest economy in FY27, in the upcoming financial year, it is likely to overtake both the UK, and Japan to bag the fourth spot.Arun Singh of Dun & Bradstreet India explains this resilience with numbers:IMF World Economic Outlook (April 2026) data show that India’s GDP at current prices in domestic currency rose strongly from ₹318 trillion in 2024 to ₹346.5 trillion in 2025 and further to ₹384.5 trillion in 2026, translating into robust nominal growth of about 8.9% in 2024–25 and nearly 11% in 2025–26, among the fastest globally. In contrast, other large economies recorded more moderate domestic nominal growth – around 5% in the US, roughly 4% in China, 3–5% in the UK, 3–3.5% in Germany, and lower or volatile growth in Japan – underscoring India’s strong underlying momentum. In times of global economic turmoil, while GDP growth is expected to take some hit, most agencies and experts have pegged India’s growth to be strong. Incidentally, the IMF has even marginally raised its GDP growth forecast for FY27 to 6.5% despite the ongoing Middle East conflict.

IMF World Economic Outlook –  Growth Projections

“In India, growth for 2025 is revised upward by 1.0 percentage point relative to October, to 7.6 percent, reflecting the better-than-expected outturn in the second and third quarters of the fiscal year and sustained strong momentum in the fourth quarter,” IMF said in its latest outlook. “For 2026, growth is revised upward moderately by 0.3 percentage point (0.1 percentage point relative to January) to 6.5 percent, led by positive contributions from the carryover of the strong 2025 outturn and the decline in additional US tariffs on Indian goods from 50 to 10 percent, which outweigh the adverse impact of the Middle East conflict. Growth is projected to stay at 6.5 percent in 2027,” it added.

Will India become 3rd largest anytime soon?

The rupee depreciation and the nominal GDP revision has also pushed back India’s dream of becoming the third largest economy by the end of this decade. In the October 2025 estimates, IMF had said that India will overtake Germany to become third largest by FY30. However, the April 2026 projections see it reaching the third rank only by FY 2030-31.Experts point to the rupee’s depreciation versus the dollar to note that the road ahead is likely to be uncertain. Madan Sabnavis, Chief economist, Bank of Baroda is confident that India will continue to do well in the coming years.“We will definitely improve in terms of GDP growth which will be higher than that of other countries especially UK and Japan which are just above us. However, the rupee value will finally determine how India gets placed on the global scale,” he told TOI.Ranen Banerjee of PwC India sees rupee beginning to get support with the conflict containment, relatively lower oil prices and portfolio flow reversals with valuations getting attractive in recent times. “Thus, we should not be experiencing any further sharp depreciation of the rupee in the immediate term provided the conflict does not escalate and oil prices relatively softening from their highs and come down to a range of $85-90 a barrel,” he says.For Arun Singh of Dun & Bradstreet, looking ahead, India’s relative position in US dollar‑based GDP rankings will remain highly sensitive to currency movements rather than domestic growth dynamics. “Continued global dollar strength or capital‑flow volatility may cause periodic slippage in rankings despite robust fundamentals. Sustaining external macro stability and limiting undue rupee volatility will be crucial for India’s strong growth performance to translate more fully into higher global economic rankings,” Arun Singh told TOI.The Indian economy, largely driven by domestic fundamentals, is not immune to external shocks. High US tariffs of 50% from August 2025 to early February, and the ongoing US-Iran war have spelt back-to-back shocks for the economy. Even as experts stress on the resilience of the growth story, the vulnerability to higher crude oil prices, and other global supply chain disruptions is a reality. In such a scenario, India may well have to contend with fluctuating world rankings, while banking on its strong GDP growth to tide over disruptions.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

‘It’s just scale’: Local mom-and-pop car dealerships are growing or dying amid industry consolidation, rise of mega-retailers

Published

on

‘It’s just scale’: Local mom-and-pop car dealerships are growing or dying amid industry consolidation, rise of mega-retailers


Derek Sylvester with members of his family, team and mascot Molly, who was featured on the dealership’s logo.

Courtesy Sylvester Chevrolet

Derek Sylvester’s father built the family’s original Chevrolet dealership with his bare hands on Main Street in rural Peckville, Pennsylvania, in 1972.

The store and family have been a pillar of the village, outside Scranton, ever since. That was until late last month, when Sylvester and his family closed a deal to sell Sylvester Chevrolet to a New York-based dealer group.

“As a family, we decided this might be the time,” said Sylvester, who at 67 has been contemplating retirement. “Unless you’re a larger store, a much larger store, it’s a little bit harder to make money. … It’s just scale.”

Many of Sylvester’s family members plan to continue working at the dealership, but he said they didn’t feel they were in a position to continue running the business amid the rapidly changing automotive retail landscape in the U.S. The industry is facing a tumultuous adoption of all-electric vehicles, technological shifts such as artificial intelligence, and growing demands from automakers.

Sales of dealerships such as Sylvester Chevrolet are occurring across the country at a rapid pace as the business of selling cars, once considered the purview of mom-and-pop shops, has evolved into a lucrative trillion-dollar industry rife with consolidation that has drawn more notice from Wall Street and investors in recent years.

While the National Automobile Dealers Association, or NADA, reports that the vast majority of its U.S. franchised dealers are small business owners such as Sylvester who have fewer than six stores, the top retailers in the country have significantly grown.

The top 150 dealers sold 27% of all retail and fleet new vehicles in 2025, up from 24.3% in 2021 and 21.2% in 2015, according to Automotive News’ annual ranking of top automotive retailers. They also owned roughly a quarter of dealerships last year, up from less than 20% a decade ago, according to the trade publication.

Meanwhile, top publicly traded dealers such as Lithia Motors and AutoNation have ballooned to market caps of more than $6 billion each. Even online used-car retailer Carvana — and its $74 billion market cap, which surpasses the value of most car companies it sells vehicles from — has quietly started purchasing new vehicle franchises without disclosing its future plans.

“There’s a lot of money that wants to come to the industry,” Brian Gordon, president of dealer advisor and broker Dave Cantin Group, told CNBC. “And, generally, the industry is sort of aligned on how to value these things. That makes for a good climate for [mergers and acquisitions].”

Industry consolidation

Multibillion-dollar dealerships have been on the rise amid a decadeslong consolidation that has led to a grow-or-die mentality for many U.S. automotive retailers.

NADA, a trade association representing franchised dealers, reports the average dealership owner has between two and three stores, but the largest growth area over the past decade has been in medium-sized dealerships that own between six and 25 stores.

NADA reports 90.5% of its nearly 17,000 dealers own between one and five stores, down from 94.4% in 2016. Meanwhile, 0.2% of dealers own 50 stores or more, up from 0.1% during that time frame.

“It’s clear that it’s a consolidating industry, and it’s an industry that is going to continue to consolidate,” Gordon said. But, he added, that is happening at every level, especially the expansion of mom-and-pop shops to larger players.

Dave Cantin Group — the advisor for Matthews Auto Group, the dealer group that acquired Sylvester Chevrolet — conducts dozens of such deals a year and said it expects the pace of consolidation and mergers and acquisitions to continue to increase this year.

Matthews Auto Group is one of many regional dealership companies that has decided to expand. The family-owned company started in Vestal — in central New York, south of Syracuse — in 1973 with a single Chrysler-Plymouth store that has grown into a roughly $800 million business with 18 locations and 800 employees.

Rob Matthews, a second-generation owner and CEO of Matthews Auto Group, said the company’s decision to grow is ongoing and that it aims to be more profitable and better compete in its current markets of New York and Pennsylvania.

Matthews Auto Group CFO John Totolis (from left to right), Dave Cantin Group managing director Talon Fee, Sylvester Chevrolet President Derek Sylvester, partner Sylvester Chevrolet Neil Sylvester, Matthews Auto Group CEO Rob Matthews and Matthews Auto Group President Mark Gaeta outside Sylvester Chevrolet in Peckville, Pennsylvania

Courtesy image

“I think that’s certainly a competitive advantage. I think staying still is probably not the best play. You’re seeing continued scale,” Matthews said. “The trend is you’re just going to continue to see consolidation to allow you to stay competitive.”

That’s also why Sylvester said he wanted to sell his business, with stipulations about retaining the store’s dozens of employees — something that’s part of Matthews’ strategy when acquiring a store.

“There’s a lot of things that, because of our scale, we see we can really unlock a store like his,” Matthews said. “I think, honestly, it’s exciting in the sense that we’re just looking to give them more tools and hopefully let everyone work going forward.”

Growth of mega-dealers

Wall Street has taken notice of how lucrative and protected franchised dealerships are in the U.S. The franchised dealer system, which exists to sell new vehicles to consumers rather than automakers selling their vehicles themselves, is unique and heavily regulated.

“I think there’s endless upside. The opportunity for growth in our company is just endless,” Sonic Automotive President Jeff Dyke told CNBC during a recent interview. “I think having mom-and-pop dealers is really good for the business. The thing is, the mom-and-pop dealer is going to have to advance their thinking.”

Sonic Automotive, a publicly traded company with a market cap of more than $2 billion, has grown from 96 franchised dealership stores in 2015 to 134 to end last year. It’s also gone through a massive expansion of its EchoPark used vehicle stores and Sonic Powersports. The company’s revenue during that time jumped 58% to $15.2 billion last year.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

Dealership stocks

Others, such as Lithia Motors, have been even more aggressive in growth. The Medford, Oregon-based company surpassed longstanding dealership group AutoNation to become the top U.S. new vehicle franchised dealer in 2022.

Lithia, with a $6.3 billion market cap, has executed an audacious growth plan, from $8.7 billion in revenue in 2016 to $37.6 billion last year. The company nearly tripled its new and used stores from 154 locations to 455 stores during that time frame.

John Murphy, a longtime automotive analyst who is a managing director of strategic advisory at buy-sell advisory firm Haig Partners, said he believes that dealerships remain an extremely lucrative market for investors, despite things settling down somewhat after companies saw inflated profits during the Covid pandemic.

“Structurally, there’s some real potential upside, and there is an increasing level of attention by existing capital in the dealership community as it stands right now from outside players, private equity family offices, other pools of capital on this limited number of dealers and finite number of dealers,” he said. “The earnings upside is increasing and there’s increasing attention, or demand, on the buy side of the equation.”

Mom-and-pops remain

All of that combines to make many mom-and-pop dealerships ripe for acquisition or expansion.

“There’s just so many factors that make competition for a small mom-and-pop dealership more difficult,” said Talon Fee, a managing director at Dave Cantin Group who led the sale of Sylvester Chevrolet to Matthews Auto Group. “It’s not to say that small mom-and-pop dealerships can’t continue to exist and thrive and survive, but they do need to have a plan.”

Fee and others said the top reasons for owners to sell are a lack of succession planning, a growing competitive and changing industry, and a lack of commitment to reinvest in the businesses.

“There’s a lot of outside capital that’s figured out how to come in, given the fact that you have to be an operator in order to get approved by a manufacturer,” said Gordon, of Dave Cantin Group.

But the industry is changing in other ways, as new automakers such as Tesla, Rivian and Lucid try to bypass the franchised dealer model and sell vehicles directly to consumers.

Such companies have continuously fought state laws to allow such sales, with Rivian recently winning a battle with car dealers in Washington state by threatening to take its case to voters with a ballot measure to permit direct sales.

It adds to the evolving U.S. automotive retail landscape that owners such as Sylvester and his wife, who also worked at the dealership, haven’t had to deal with in the past. It’s also something Sylvester and many other smaller mom-and-pop stores won’t have to compete with once they sell their businesses.

“I lived a great life, don’t get me wrong. But, hey, good things come to an end,” said Sylvester, who plans to spend retirement caring for a 92-acre farm in Pennsylvania. “We made a good living. You know, we helped the community out.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Hormuz flashpoint: Why Indian-flagged ships are in focus as Middle East tensions hit global shipping – The Times of India

Published

on

Hormuz flashpoint: Why Indian-flagged ships are in focus as Middle East tensions hit global shipping – The Times of India


As tensions rise in Middle East and vessel safety in the Strait of Hormuz comes under renewed focus, the flag a ship flies has emerged as a key factor in maritime security, regulation and state protection.Flagging a vessel means it is registered with a country and must comply with that nation’s maritime laws and regulations. It also gives the flag state powers to investigate and penalise violations of domestic and international laws. Since regulations differ across countries, shipowners often choose jurisdictions that best suit operational and commercial needs, according to an ET report.An Indian-flagged vessel is a commercial ship registered with the Directorate General of Shipping and authorised to fly the national flag. Such vessels are governed by the Merchant Shipping Act and operate under Indian jurisdiction as a sovereign extension on the high seas.These ships are taxed by Indian authorities and must comply with Indian maritime safety, labour and environmental rules. To qualify for Indian flagging, vessels must come to domestic waters for registration and the owning company must be incorporated in India.Indian-flagged ships also receive strategic backing. India protects their interests through naval and diplomatic intervention when required. Experts say this creates a higher compliance burden than “Flag of Convenience” jurisdictions such as Panama and St Kitts.According to Rajeev Kumar Yadav, as quoted ET, director at Vertex Marine Services, Flag of Convenience systems allow vessels to be flagged from anywhere in the world within “3-4 days”.Indian-flagged ships calling at domestic ports can also benefit from lower port levies and tax liabilities, along with priority in government cargo movement and public sector charter contracts.During the Iran crisis, more than two dozen Indian ships were stranded west of the Strait of Hormuz after strict high-risk area classifications were imposed. The Indian Navy escorted several tankers to safety, though some vessels remain in the Persian Gulf.No direct attacks have been reported on Indian-flagged vessels so far, largely due to India’s balanced diplomatic approach in the crisis.However, being Indian-flagged does not give the government powers to decide freight rates or commercial destinations. The state’s role is limited to enforcing civil, criminal and regulatory laws onboard, along with international safety, environmental and labour compliance norms.India’s flagged fleet has been expanding. The Indian-flagged vessel fleet reached 14.2 million Gross Tonnage (GT) in March, with 92 vessels of 1.5 million GT joining during FY26.The long-term Maritime Amrit Kaal Vision 2047 aims to sharply raise India’s share of the global flagged fleet and increase utilisation of Indian-flagged ships from about 7 per cent currently to 30-40 per cent by 2047.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending