Politics
Russian jets enter Estonia’s airspace in latest test for Nato


- Estonia reports unprecedented airspace violation by Russian jets.
- Incident follows recent Russian drone incursions into Polish airspace.
- Russia denies violation, says jets flew over neutral waters.
Three Russian military jets violated Nato member Estonia’s airspace for 12 minutes on Friday in an “unprecedentedly brazen” incursion, its government said, the latest in a series of recent military actions by Russia that have rattled the alliance.
Russia’s Defence Ministry denied its jets violated Estonian airspace, saying they flew over neutral waters.
With tensions already high because of the war in Ukraine, the incursion came just over a week after more than 20 Russian drones entered Polish airspace on the night of September 9-10. That prompted Nato jets to down some of them and Western officials to say Russia was testing the alliance’s readiness and resolve.
It also occurred three days after Russia and Belarus ended their “Zapad-2025” joint military exercises, which included the rehearsal of the launch of Russian nuclear weapons.
Tallinn said the three MiG-31 fighter jets entered Estonian airspace without permission and stayed for a total of 12 minutes before they were forced to withdraw, during which time the high-speed aircraft could have traversed broad swaths of the country.
“Russia has violated Estonian airspace four times already this year, which is unacceptable in itself, but today’s violation, during which three fighter jets entered our airspace, is unprecedentedly brazen,” Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna said.
Russian jets routinely fly over the Baltic Sea between mainland Russia and its exclave of Kaliningrad.
In a statement issued early on Saturday, the Russian Defence Ministry said its jets flew over neutral waters of the Baltic Sea in proceeding from northwest Russia to Kaliningrad.
“The flight was carried out in strict conformity with international rules governing airspace with no violation of the borders of other states as is confirmed by independent checks,” the ministry said of the three MiG-31 fighters in a post on Telegram.
“During the flight, the Russian aircraft did not deviate from the agreed flight path and did not violate Estonian airspace.”
Separately, Poland said on Friday two Russian fighter jets violated the safety zone of the Petrobaltic drilling platform in the Baltic Sea.
Eyes on Trump
US President Donald Trump said late on Friday afternoon he had not been briefed on the incident but expected he would be later.
“I don’t love it. I don’t like when that happens,” Trump told reporters when asked if he saw the incursion by Russian jets as a threat to Nato. “Could be big trouble. I’ll let you know later.”
Trump’s administration is being closely watched for a response.
Washington had little to say about the drone incursion into Poland and did not participate directly in fending it off, triggering anxiety among Nato members, who have questioned Trump’s commitment to their defence in case of a Russian attack.
Nato said Russia was reckless.
“Earlier today, Russian jets violated Estonian airspace. Nato responded immediately and intercepted the Russian aircraft. This is yet another example of reckless Russian behaviour and Nato’s ability to respond,” a Nato spokesperson said on X.
No accident
Europeans quickly responded to the Russian jet incident on Friday. “This was no accident,” EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas – a former Estonian prime minister — said in comments relayed by a spokesperson.
Estonia said it had summoned the top Russian diplomat in the country to lodge a protest and deliver a note.
Estonian Prime Minister Kristen Michal said his country had decided to ask Nato to open consultations under Article 4 of the alliance’s treaty, and that the Russian jets flew around 5 nautical miles (9 km) into Nato airspace before Italian F-35s, currently stationed at a base in Estonia, pushed them out.
Nato polices the airspace of Estonia and other Baltic nations in its “Baltic Sentry” mission.
Tsahkna suggested that Estonia would be asking allies for more air defences. “It was a very clear provocation. It was definitely meant like this. And that’s why we are calling the Article 4 political consultations,” he told Reuters.
Article 4 states that members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation will consult together whenever, in the opinion of any of them, the territory, political independence or security of any of them is threatened.
Ukraine called the incursion an unacceptable new destabilisation measure by Russia and said it stands with Estonia. “Strong action is needed, both jointly and from individual countries,” President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said on the Telegram messaging app.
Lithuanian Defence Minister Dovile Sakaliene said NATO should urgently move air defence capabilities to frontline states.
“We are being tested, our citizens are being threatened almost every day now. This means that we need to have capabilities collected from our allies (to be placed) by our borders, because that’s the border of NATO,” she told Reuters.
Estonia said the airspace violation occurred on Friday morning in the area of Vaindloo Island, around 100 kilometres (62 miles) from the capital Tallinn.
The aircraft did not have flight plans, their transponders were not switched on and they were not in contact with air traffic control, Estonia said.
While incursions over Vaindloo Island by Russian aircraft are fairly common, they do not usually last as long as Friday’s incident. “It’s tough to see how this wasn’t intentional,” a US official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said.
Jakub M. Godzimirski, a research professor in Russian security policy at the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs, said the incident could be a test, but could also be purely coincidental.
“Still, this happens in a given context, having in mind what happened with the drone incursion in Poland a few days ago,” Godzimirski said.
A staunch supporter of Ukraine, Tallinn said in May that Moscow had briefly sent a fighter jet into Nato airspace over the Baltic Sea during an attempt to stop a Russian-bound oil tanker thought to be part of a “shadow fleet” defying Western sanctions on Moscow.
Politics
Nasa announces weekend solar eclipse, but will Pakistan see it?


Sky watchers, take note: a partial solar eclipse will cross skies overnight on 21-22 September, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has announced.
However, the rare celestial event won’t be visible in the United States — but those in Australia, Antarctica, and across the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans will get front-row seats.
Pakistan, however, will miss out. The Climate Data Processing Centre of the Pakistan Meteorological Department (PMD) says the eclipse will begin at 10:30pm (PST) on 21 September, reach its peak at 12:42am, and wrap up by 2:54am — but the spectacle will remain invisible from anywhere in the country.
According to USA Today, Nasa explains that a partial solar eclipse happens when the Moon slides between the Sun and Earth without perfect alignment, leaving a glowing crescent of the Sun in view.
This will be the second big sky event this month — the first was a total lunar eclipse on September 7-8. And there’s more: the September equinox follows just a day later, on September 22, when day and night are nearly equal worldwide.
Looking ahead, Nasa says the next total solar eclipse visible in parts of North America will happen on August 12, 2026, crossing Greenland, Iceland, Spain, Russia and a small corner of Portugal.
A partial eclipse on that date will be visible across North America, Europe, Africa, the Atlantic, Arctic and Pacific Oceans. Plus, there’s an annular eclipse coming on February 17, 2026, visible in parts of Antarctica, with a partial eclipse across Africa, South America, and several oceans.
Nasa has one important reminder: never look directly at the Sun without proper eclipse glasses or filters. “Viewing any part of the bright Sun through a camera lens, binoculars, or a telescope without a special-purpose solar filter… will instantly cause severe eye injury,” the agency warns.
Politics
French couple submits ‘scientific’ evidence in lawsuit against US influencer

Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron plan to present “scientific” evidence and photos proving that France’s first lady is a woman, their lawyer confirmed Friday.
Attorney Tom Clare said the Macrons intend to testify in their lawsuit against conservative American commentator Candace Owens, who they accuse of fueling online rumors questioning whether Brigitte Macron is transgender.
“There will be expert testimony, scientific in nature, demonstrating the falsity of the statements,” Clare told the BBC on the “Fame Under Fire” podcast. The law firm confirmed his comments to AFP.
Speculation about Brigitte Macron’s gender has circulated in France for years. The lawsuit comes as President Macron faces low popularity and political instability.
Clare did not disclose details about the expert testimony but said it is designed to show that Owens, a social media influencer with a large following, spread false claims about the first lady.
The plaintiffs filed their defamation case in Delaware in July and also plan to submit photos of Brigitte Macron with her children and from her pregnancies.
“These falsehoods are like a cancer,” Clare said. “They metastasize into mainstream media. And because Owens has a large audience, people pay attention.”
On Thursday, Owens posted a message on her X channel dismissing the Macrons’ allegations against her as “verifiably false.”
“She [Brigitte Macron] isn’t suing me for saying she’s a man. She has never sued anyone ever for saying she’s a dude. Because she is one,” Owens wrote.
Brigitte Macron, 72, has also taken to the courts in France to combat claims she was born a man.
Two women were convicted in September 2024 of spreading false claims after they posted a YouTube video in December 2021 alleging that Brigitte Macron had once been a man named Jean-Michel Trogneux who is actually her brother.
The ruling against Natacha Rey and Amandine Roy was overturned by a Paris appeals court and Macron appealed to the highest appeals court, the Court de Cassation, earlier in July.
Politics
Trump administration to impose $100,000 fee per year for H-1B visas


- Visas are used principally by tech sector.
- Over 70% of beneficiaries of H-1B visas enter US from India.
- Latest move in Trump’s broader immigration crackdown.
WASHINGTON: The Trump administration said on Friday it would ask companies to pay $100,000 per year for H-1B worker visas, potentially dealing a big blow to the technology sector that relies heavily on skilled workers from India and China.
Since taking office in January, Trump has kicked off a wide-ranging immigration crackdown, including moves to limit some forms of legal immigration. The step to reshape the H-1B visa program represents his administration’s most high-profile effort yet to rework temporary employment visas.
“If you’re going to train somebody, you’re going to train one of the recent graduates from one of the great universities across our land. Train Americans. Stop bringing in people to take our jobs,” US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said.
Trump’s threat to crack down on H-1B visas has become a major flashpoint with the tech industry, which contributed millions of dollars to his presidential campaign.
Critics of the program, including many US technology workers, argue that it allows firms to suppress wages and sideline Americans who could do the jobs. Supporters, including Tesla CEO and former Trump ally Elon Musk, say it brings in highly skilled workers essential to filling talent gaps and keeping firms competitive. Musk, himself a naturalised US citizen born in South Africa, has held an H-1B visa.
Some employers have exploited the program to hold down wages, disadvantaging US workers, according to the executive order Trump signed on Friday.
The number of foreign science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) workers in the US more than doubled between 2000 and 2019 to nearly 2.5 million, even as overall STEM employment only increased 44.5% during that time, it said.
Move could deter global talent
Adding new fees “creates disincentive to attract the world’s smartest talent to the US,” said Deedy Das, partner at venture capital firm Menlo Ventures, on X. “If the US ceases to attract the best talent, it drastically reduces its ability to innovate and grow the economy.”
The move could add millions of dollars in costs for companies, which could hit smaller tech firms and start-ups particularly hard.
Reuters was not immediately able to establish how the fee would be administered. Lutnick said the visa would cost $100,000 a year for each of the three years of its duration but that the details were “still being considered.”
Some analysts suggested the fee may force companies to move some high-value work overseas, hampering America’s position in the high-stakes artificial intelligence race with China.
“In the short term, Washington may collect a windfall; in the long term, the US risks taxing away its innovation edge, trading dynamism for short-sighted protectionism,” said eMarketer analyst Jeremy Goldman.
India accounts for most H-1B visas
India was the largest beneficiary of H-1B visas last year, accounting for 71% of approved beneficiaries, while China was a distant second at 11.7%, according to government data.
In the first half of 2025, Amazon.com and its cloud-computing unit, AWS, had received approval for more than 12,000 H-1B visas, while Microsoft and Meta Platforms had over 5,000 H-1B visa approvals each.
Lutnick said on Friday that “all the big companies are on board” with $100,000 a year for H-1B visas.
“We’ve spoken to them,” he said.
Many large US tech, banking and consulting companies declined to comment or did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Indian embassy in Washington and the Chinese Consulate General in New York also did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Shares of Cognizant Technology Solutions, an IT services company that relies extensively on H-1B visa holders, closed down nearly 5%. US-listed shares of Indian tech firms Infosys and Wipro closed between 2% and 5% lower.
Immigration crackdown
Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy director of the American Immigration Council, questioned the legality of the new fees. “Congress has only authorised the government to set fees to recover the cost of adjudicating an application,” he said on Bluesky.
The H-1B program offers 65,000 visas annually to employers bringing in temporary foreign workers in specialised fields, with another 20,000 visas for workers with advanced degrees.
Under the current system, entering the lottery for the visa requires a small fee and, if approved, subsequent fees could amount to several thousand dollars.
Nearly all the visa fees have to be paid by the employers. The H-1B visas are approved for a period of three to six years.
Trump also signed an executive order on Friday to create a “gold card” for individuals who can afford to pay $1 million for US permanent residency.
-
Fashion1 week ago
Acne Studios expands in France with redesigned historic HQ
-
Tech7 days ago
How a 2020 Rolex Collection Changed the Face of Watch Design
-
Fashion1 week ago
Mexico imposes ADD on footwear originating in China
-
Tech1 week ago
Cancel Culture Comes for Artists Who Posted About Charlie Kirk’s Death
-
Tech7 days ago
OpenAI reaches new agreement with Microsoft to change its corporate structure
-
Fashion1 week ago
Vintage concept Styx debuts in Porto with luxury fashion and art
-
Fashion1 week ago
Dior names Greta Lee as brand ambassador
-
Fashion1 week ago
UK real GDP grows 0.2% QoQ, 1.2% YoY in May-Jul 2025: ONS