Entertainment
SJC dismisses complaints against CEC Sikandar Raja, ECP members

- Complaints dismissed over election rigging, irregularities.
- SC’s statement did not disclose identities of complainants.
- PM Shehbaz, opposition begin talks to appoint new CEC.
The Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) has dismissed all complaints filed against Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Sikandar Sultan Raja and two members of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), Nisar Ahmad Durrani and Shah Muhammad Jatoi.
The SJC released its decision on the complaints and published it on the Supreme Court’s official website. The verdict pertains to complaint Nos532/2021, 557/2022, and 563/2022, which were submitted against the CEC and two ECP members, according to The News.
These complaints were reviewed during SJC meetings held on November 8, 2024, and December 13, 2024. The complaints, reportedly filed by the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), alleged irregularities and rigging during the general elections.
However, the Supreme Court’s public statement did not disclose the identities of the complainants.
This dismissal comes at a time of heightened political tension over the credibility of the electoral process, with opposition parties frequently raising concerns about the impartiality of the ECP.
According to the Constitution, only the SJC is authorised to hear and adjudicate cases of alleged misconduct involving the CEC and ECP members. The latest ruling effectively exonerates CEC Sikandar Sultan Raja and the two members of all allegations brought against them.
While Sikandar Sultan Raja has completed his constitutional term, under the provisions of the 26th Constitutional Amendment, he will continue to serve until a successor is appointed.
In this regard, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif wrote to Opposition Leader Omar Ayub on June 4, 2025, initiating consultations for the appointment of a new CEC and two ECP members, whose terms have also expired.
According to the constitutional procedure, both the prime minister and the opposition leader are required to propose three names each.
If consensus cannot be reached, the issue is referred to a parliamentary committee for final consideration.
Entertainment
US judge blocks Trump’s plan to lay off thousands of government workers

- About 4,100 workers have been notified of layoffs during shutdown.
- Two unions representing government employees brought case.
- Judge says explicit political motivation not allowed under law.
A federal judge in California on Wednesday ordered President Donald Trump’s administration to halt mass layoffs of federal workers during a partial government shutdown while she considers claims by unions that the job cuts are illegal.
During a hearing in San Francisco, US District Judge Susan Illston granted a request by two unions to block layoffs at more than 30 federal agencies while the case proceeds.
The decision is likely to be appealed quickly, but it offers a reprieve for federal workers facing a nearly year-long push by the Trump administration to slash their ranks.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The White House said last week that it had begun substantial layoffs across the US government, as Trump followed through on a threat to cut the federal workforce during the government shutdown, now in its 15th day. In an order on Wednesday, Trump extended an existing freeze on hiring new federal workers, with exceptions for military personnel and appointees to political roles.
About 4,100 workers at eight agencies have been notified that they are being laid off so far, according to a Tuesday court filing by the administration.
Illston’s ruling came shortly after White House Budget Director Russell Vought said on “The Charlie Kirk Show” that more than 10,000 federal workers could lose their jobs because of the shutdown.
Illston at the hearing cited a series of public statements by Trump and Vought that she said showed explicit political motivations for the layoffs, such as Trump saying that cuts would target “Democrat agencies.”
“You can’t do that in a nation of laws. And we have laws here, and the things that are being articulated here are not within the law,” said Illston, an appointee of Democratic former President Bill Clinton.
Judge demands details on layoffs
Democracy Forward, a legal group that represents the unions, said Illston made clear that the president’s targeting of federal workers was unlawful.
“Our civil servants do the work of the people, and playing games with their livelihoods is cruel and unlawful and a threat to everyone in our nation,” Skye Perryman, the group’s president and CEO, said in a statement.
Illston ordered the administration to provide by Friday an accounting of any “actual or imminent” layoffs and to outline the steps agencies are taking to comply with her ruling.
A US Department of Justice lawyer, Elizabeth Hedges, at the hearing said she was not prepared to address Illston’s concerns about the legality of the layoffs. She instead argued that the unions must bring their claims to a federal labour board before being able to sue over them in court.
Illston disagreed and chided the Justice Department for refusing to take a position on the unions’ legal claims.
“The hatchet is falling on the heads of employees all across the nation, and you’re not even prepared to address whether that’s legal,” she said.
The American Federation of Government Employees and American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees claim that implementing layoffs is not an essential service that can be performed during a lapse in government funding, and that the shutdown does not justify mass job cuts because most federal workers have been furloughed without pay.
Trump’s Republicans hold majorities in both chambers of Congress but need at least seven Democratic votes to pass a funding bill in the Senate, where Democrats are holding out for an extension of health-insurance subsidies. Democrats have said they will not cave to Trump’s pressure tactics, and a renewed bid to pass a spending bill failed on Wednesday.
Entertainment
Tony Danza responds to Valerie Bertinelli’s dating claim

Tony Danza is clearing the air on Valerie Bertinelli’s claim that he missed a date.
Danza, 74, and Valerie Bertinelli, 65, recently made guest appearances on The Drew Barrymore Show for a cooking segment.
The duo prepared the actor’s so-called “date sauce,” a recipe Danza admits he never made for Bertinelli because, according to him, he never found the note she left in his car with her phone number.
“So, this is a sauce that you never made for me — even though I left my phone number in your glove box,” Bertinelli said, draping an arm around Danza, who chuckled in response.
Barrymore chimed in, “Did you ever find Val’s phone number in your glove box?”
“No, I did not!” Danza replied with a grin. “I think she’s full of baloney!” he added to which Bertinelli laughed along.
Bertinelli also admitted that her attempt to woo Danza never got off the ground. “He never called me!” she said to the audience’s shock, with Barrymore adding, “They never do, by the way.”
Bertinelli was married to Eddie Van Halen from 1981 to 2007 and Tom Vitale from 2011 to 2022, and most recently dated writer Mike Goodnough before splitting in November 2024.
Meanwhile, Danza’s previous marriages were to Rhonda Yeoman from 1970 to 1974 and Tracy Robinson from 1986 to 2013.
Entertainment
Prince Andrew victim Virgina Giuffre speaks on his entitlement: ‘His birthright’

Prince Andrew’s abuse victim has shed light on her experience in an honest confession.
In a posthumous memoir, Virginia Giuffre has described she was chosen to ‘please’ the Duke of York by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell.
In an excerpt from “Nobody’s Girl: A Memoir of Surviving Abuse and Fighting for Justice,” Giuffre noted that after a night of dancing at London hotspot Tramp, Maxwell allegedly told her: “When we get home, you are to do for him what you do for Jeffrey.”
She added: “Back at the house, Maxwell and Epstein said goodnight and headed upstairs, signaling it was time that I take care of the prince. In the years since, I’ve thought a lot about how he behaved. He was friendly enough, but still entitled.”
The deceased added that she saw Andrew full of himself, pretending that it was his ‘birthright’ to abuse her.’
Giuffre then explained her discomfort and admitted that experience was traumatising.
“Afterward, he said thank you in his clipped British accent. In my memory, the whole thing lasted less than half an hour,” she wrote.
Giuffre then added that Maxwell allegedly told her the next morning: “You did well. The prince had fun.”
-
Business1 week ago
Tata Capital IPO: Rs 15,512 crore IPO fully subscribed; stock market debut on Oct 13 – The Times of India
-
Tech7 days ago
Apple Took Down ICE-Tracking Apps. Their Developers Aren’t Giving Up
-
Tech6 days ago
Men Are Betting on WNBA Players’ Menstrual Cycles
-
Tech1 week ago
Anthropic to open India office as AI demand grows
-
Fashion1 week ago
Depop still loss-making but revenue surges
-
Tech1 week ago
IT Sustainability Think Tank: Don’t believe Big Tech’s green IT hype | Computer Weekly
-
Tech1 week ago
My Favorite Affordable 360 Rotating Pet Camera Is on Sale Right Now
-
Tech1 week ago
As long as the cybercriminals’ business model works, companies are vulnerable to attack