Connect with us

Business

Solar against fossil fuel-led energy generation dilemma | The Express Tribune

Published

on

Solar against fossil fuel-led energy generation dilemma | The Express Tribune


Country has agreed to achieve 60% renewable energy share but is discouraging it under influence of IPPs


ISLAMABAD:

Pakistan possesses a solar power potential of 40 gigawatts as reported by the World Bank. This may help to push the share of solar to 60% in energy mix by 2030.

Historically, Pakistan depends on fossil fuels, especially oil and gas, for power generation; however, due to advances in solar technology and its increased supply low prices have shifted the energy mix paradigm more to renewable sources in recent years. Therefore, the government has developed the net metering policy, also referred to as net energy metering (NEM), which in fact is an electricity billing method that enables consumers generate their own power to sell it to the power generating company. It involves customers with solar panels transferring the excess electricity they produce to the grid and receiving credits from the utility company on their electric bill. When solar panels generate more electricity than its consumption, the surplus power flows back to the grid.

The government has endorsed the Alternative and Renewable Energy Policy 2019, offering incentives and support for renewable energy ventures. However, challenges persist in executing the National Electricity Policy 2021, which was ratified by the Council of Common Interests in February 2021.

Reports indicate that the government plans to slash the price for solar power exported to the national grid from Rs21 per unit to Rs11 per unit, sparking widespread criticism. This is in sharp contrast to the tariff of Rs60 per unit for power generated from fossil fuel.

The installed capacity of solar net metering has surged to 3,000 megawatts. Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) data show that in 2020, fossil fuels constituted roughly 63% of total power generation, followed by hydropower at 29%, nuclear energy at 5% and renewable energy at approximately 3%. The proposed solar rate reduction is believed to be influenced by the independent power producers (IPPs), who fear loss of revenue with the rapid increase in solar power installations, potentially at the expense of consumers. Notably, regulatory bodies like the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) are perceived to favour IPPs over consumers and solar net metering users.

The surge in demand for solar panels has disrupted the government’s capacity payment plan amid fears that IPPs will lose business. While the government contends that the current rate enables consumers to recoup their solar panel installation costs within 18 months, the IPPs are pushing for an extension in this payback period to 10 years. Globally, the Sustainable Energy for All (SE4All) initiative aims to achieve universal access to modern energy by 2030 and double the share of renewable energy and energy efficiency gains. Consequently, there’s a rapid transition towards renewable and alternative energy sources for power generation.

The EU’s revised Renewable Energy Directive elevates its binding renewable target for 2030 to a minimum of 42.5%, up from the previous 32%, with an ambition to reach 45% of total energy from renewable sources, nearly doubling the existing share. Similarly, other advanced countries are also committed to increasing the proportion of renewable energy in their energy mix by 2030.

The Sustainable Development Goal 7 (SDG-7) advocates for “affordable, reliable, sustainable, and modern energy for all” by 2030, with three core targets forming the foundation of this endeavour to ensure universal access to affordable, reliable, and modern energy services. Pakistan has ratified the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and adopted SDG-7 to align with global efforts to combat climate change and transition away from traditional fossil fuels and other carbon-intensive energy sources. To meet its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) target, Pakistan aims to transition to 60% renewable energy and achieve 30% penetration of electric vehicles by 2030. Additionally, Pakistan plans to ban coal imports and expand nature-based solutions.

Solar net metering stands out as a rapidly growing sector, offering consumers the opportunity to leverage their own resources for energy generation. Through such initiatives, Pakistan can fulfil its commitments under the Paris Agreement, UNFCCC, and SDG-7.

Keeping in view the above national and global commitments, leveraging net metering facilities can significantly aid in fulfilling Pakistan’s obligations under the UNFCCC and Paris Agreement. Therefore, reducing the per-unit price of solar energy from Rs21 to Rs11 could undermine the transition to renewable energy. The irony is that Pakistan has committed to achieving a 60% renewable energy share, but is discouraging it under the influence of IPPs. The world is moving fast to renewable sources of energy as Australia is offering three hours a day of free solar energy to citizens, and the EU has already achieved renewable energy targets well ahead of the committed deadline of 2030.

The government should work with the public in promoting solar energy rather than obstructing it. Renewable sources of energy like solar, wind, biomass and biogas are highly sustainable and may help reduce the import bill of oil and gas meant for power production.

A comprehensive review, involving the input from market experts and the Ministry of Climate Change, as well as consultation with solar consumers, is imperative. It’s crucial to assess broader national and global dynamics before making any unilateral decisions.

This approach will help to uphold Pakistan’s international obligations and safeguard the interests of citizens.

The writer is a climate change, forestry, and environment expert



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Key Financial Deadlines That Have Been Extended For December 2025; Know The Last Date

Published

on

Key Financial Deadlines That Have Been Extended For December 2025; Know The Last Date


New Delhi: Several crucial deadlines have been extended in December 2025, including ITR for tax audit cases, ITR filing and PAN and Aadhaar linking. These deadlines will be crucial in ensuring that your financial affairs operate smoothly in the months ahead.

Here is a quick rundown of the important deadlines for December to help you stay compliant and avoid last-minute hassles.

ITR deadline for tax audit cases

The Central Board of Direct Taxes has extended the due date of furnishing of return of income under sub-Section (1) of Section 139 of the Act for the Assessment Year 2025-26 which is October 31, 2025 in the case of assessees referred in clause (a) of Explanation 2 to sub-Section (1) of Section 139 of the Act, to December 10, 2025.

Add Zee News as a Preferred Source


Belated ITR filing deadline

A belated ITR filing happens when an ITR is submitted after the original due date which is permitted by Section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act. Filing a belated return helps you meet your tax obligations, but it involves penalties. You can only file a belated return for FY 2024–25 until December 31, 2025. However, there will be a late fee and interest charged.

PAN and Aadhaar linking deadline

The Income Tax Department has extended the deadline to link their PAN with Aadhaar card to December 31, 2025 for anyone who acquired their PAN using an Aadhaar enrolment ID before October 1, 2024. If you miss this deadline your PAN will become inoperative which will have an impact on your banking transactions, income tax return filing and other financial investments.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Stock Market Live Updates: Sensex, Nifty Hit Record Highs; Bank Nifty Climbs 60,000 For The First Time

Published

on

Stock Market Live Updates: Sensex, Nifty Hit Record Highs; Bank Nifty Climbs 60,000 For The First Time


Stock Market News Live Updates: Indian equity benchmarks opened with a strong gap-up on Monday, December 1, touching fresh record highs, buoyed by a sharp acceleration in Q2FY26 GDP growth to a six-quarter peak of 8.2%. Positive cues from Asian markets further lifted investor sentiment.

The BSE Sensex was trading at 85,994, up 288 points or 0.34%, after touching an all-time high of 86,159 in early deals. The Nifty 50 stood at 26,290, higher by 87 points or 0.33%, after scaling a record intraday high of 26,325.8.

Broader markets also saw gains, with the Midcap index rising 0.27% and the Smallcap index advancing 0.52%.

On the sectoral front, the Nifty Bank hit a historic milestone by crossing the 60,000 mark for the first time, gaining 0.4% to touch a fresh peak of 60,114.05.

Meanwhile, the Metal and PSU Bank indices climbed 0.8% each in early trade.

Global cues

Asia-Pacific markets were mostly lower on Monday as traders assessed fresh Chinese manufacturing data and increasingly priced in the likelihood of a US Federal Reserve rate cut later this month.

According to the CME FedWatch Tool, markets are now assigning an 87.4 per cent probability to a rate cut at the Fed’s December 10 meeting.

China’s factory activity unexpectedly slipped back into contraction in November, with the RatingDog China General Manufacturing PMI by S&P Global easing to 49.9, below expectations of 50.5, as weak domestic demand persisted.

Japan’s Nikkei 225 slipped 1.6 per cent, while the broader Topix declined 0.86 per cent. In South Korea, the Kospi dropped 0.30 per cent and Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 was down 0.31 per cent.

US stock futures were steady in early Asian trade after a positive week on Wall Street. On Friday, in a shortened post-Thanksgiving session, the Nasdaq Composite climbed 0.65 per cent to 23,365.69, its fifth consecutive day of gains.

The S&P 500 rose 0.54 per cent to 6,849.09, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average added 289.30 points, or 0.61 per cent, to close at 47,716.42.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Global Conflicts Drive Arms Industry to $679 Billion Record Revenues – SUCH TV

Published

on

Global Conflicts Drive Arms Industry to 9 Billion Record Revenues – SUCH TV



Sales by the world’s top 100 arms makers reached a record $679 billion last year, as conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza fueled demand, according to researchers. Production challenges, however, continued to hamper timely deliveries.

The figure represents a 5.9 percent increase from the previous year, and over the 2015–2024 period, revenues for the top 100 arms makers have grown by 26 percent, according to a report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI).

“Last year, global arms revenues reached the highest level ever recorded by SIPRI, as producers capitalized on strong demand,” said Lorenzo Scarazzato, a researcher with the SIPRI Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme.

Regional Trends

According to SIPRI researcher Jade Guiberteau Ricard, the growth is mostly driven by Europe, though all regions saw increases except Asia and Oceania.

The surge in Europe is linked to the war in Ukraine and heightened security concerns regarding Russia.

Countries supporting Ukraine and replenishing their stockpiles have also contributed to rising demand.

Ricard added that many European nations are now seeking to modernize and expand their militaries, creating a new source of demand.

US and European Arms Makers

The United States hosts 39 of the world’s top 100 arms makers, including the top three: Lockheed Martin, RTX (formerly Raytheon Technologies), and Northrop Grumman. US companies saw combined revenues rise 3.8 percent to $334 billion, nearly half of the global total.

European arms makers (26 companies in the top 100) recorded aggregate revenues of $151 billion, a 13 percent increase.

The Czech company Czechoslovak Group recorded the sharpest rise, with revenues jumping 193 percent to $3.6 billion, benefiting from the Czech Ammunition Initiative, which supplies artillery shells to Ukraine.

However, European producers face challenges in meeting increased demand, as sourcing raw materials has become more difficult.

Companies like Airbus and France’s Safran previously sourced half of their titanium from Russia before 2022 and have had to identify new suppliers.

Additionally, Chinese export restrictions on critical minerals have forced firms such as France’s Thales and Germany’s Rheinmetall to restructure supply chains, raising costs.

Russian Arms Industry

Two Russian arms makers, Rostec and United Shipbuilding Corporation, are among the top 100, with combined revenues rising 23 percent to $31.2 billion, despite component shortages caused by international sanctions.

Domestic demand largely offset the decline in exports. However, Russia’s arms industry faces a shortage of skilled labor, limiting its ability to sustain production rates necessary for ongoing military operations.

Israeli weapons still popular

The Asia and Oceania region was the only region to see the overall revenues of the 23 companies based there go down — their combined revenues dropped 1.2 percent to $130 billion.

But the authors stressed that the picture across Asia was varied and the overall drop was the result of by a larger drop among Chinese arms makers.

“A host of corruption allegations in Chinese arms procurement led to major arms contracts being postponed or cancelled in 2024,” Nan Tian, Director of SIPRI’s Military Expenditure and Arms Production Programme, said in a statement.

Tian added that the drop deepened “uncertainty” around China’s efforts to modernise its military.

In contrast, Japanese and South Korean weapons makers saw their revenues increase, also driven by European demand.

Meanwhile, nine of the top 100 arms companies were based in the Middle East, with combined revenues of $31 billion.

The three Israeli arms companies in the ranking accounted for more than half of that, as their combined revenues grew by 16 percent to $16.2 billion.

SIPRI researcher Zubaida Karim noted in a statement that “the growing backlash over Israel’s actions in Gaza seems to have had little impact on interest in Israeli weapons”.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending