Business
Starmer faces cabinet revolt over Budget tax rises driving wealthy away
Sir Keir Starmer’s cabinet is deeply divided over economic policy, with senior ministers fearful further measures to target the rich in next month’s Budget could accelerate the wealth exodus from Britain.
Cabinet ministers have told the The Independent they believe Rachel Reeves has already gone too far with measures targeting the wealthy and businesses, and have urged the chancellor to change course if she is to have any hope of achieving growth.
They cited “anti-aspiration” measures such as the abolition of non-dom status and VAT on private school fees as key drivers of wealth away from the UK, saying they are “harming this country”. Further measures reportedly being considered include a property tax on high-value homes and a new bank profits tax.
Ministers have instead urged the prime minister and Ms Reeves to consider “efficiency savings” and cuts to fill a Budget black hole estimated to be between £30bn and £40bn.
Those on the left in Labour have noted that the recent reshuffle has “handed more power to the right of the party” while left-wingers who support wealth taxes have been demoted or pushed out.
But a powerful group within cabinet on the right of the party believes the government is failing to rein in spending and needs to be more ready “to reform the state in a Labour way.”
One minister said: “The trouble is we have crossed a line in trying to encourage aspiration. The non-dom change and the VAT on school fees have sent the opposite message.”
Noting the record number of millionaires leaving London in particular, the minister added: “It’s doing a lot of harm to the country.”
Another cabinet minister said: “I just think the non-dom changes made no real sense. Why do we want people with money to move it out of the country? It is really bad for London.”
Ms Reeves is currently refusing to budge on the manifesto promise not to raise VAT, income tax or employee national insurance contributions, but is facing mounting pressure is mounting there too.
However, one of her firmest allies in sticking to this pledge is new welfare secretary Pat McFadden, who has warned colleagues that “election wins are hard to come by and that manifesto promise was key to achieving it”.
He is in charge of trying to revive welfare reform after the government’s plans to slash disability payments were derailed by a massive rebellion by Labour MPs before the summer.
However, there is another faction within the cabinet that is backing growing calls from unions and Labour members for wealth taxes to plug the hole in the nation’s finances, such as a property tax that would hit those who have high-value homes.
There are others who are supporting the TUC’s campaign for a new bank profits tax and to hit the super-rich with a wealth tax.
One minister said: “It only seems fair that the rich carry the burden.”
However, question marks have been raised over whether so-called wealth taxes can fill the Budget black hole or would do more damage.
Professor Stephen Millard, deputy director of the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (NIESR), has warned that Ms Reeves will eventually have to break her manifesto promise not to raise any of the big taxes – VAT, income tax or employee national insurance contributions.
The NIESR estimates that the black hole will be above £40bn, and Prof Millard warned: “It is likely that, absent any change in policy, the chancellor will have a large gap to fill to meet her fiscal rules; a reduction in spending would be hard to achieve given we’ve just had a comprehensive spending review.
“It is likely that any change to the rules enabling the chancellor to increase borrowing would result in an adverse market reaction; so the chancellor will need to raise taxes.
“Given our estimate of the extent of the gap, we do not think that the Chancellor will be able to fill it by ‘tinkering’ with lots of changes to the non big four taxes; so we think she will have to raise either income tax, NICs or VAT.”
Isaac Delestre, senior research economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), warned: “If the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) forecast deteriorates and the chancellor wants to stick to her fiscal rules she will either need to deliver spending reductions or tax increases.”
Business
Ho hum holiday: Retail’s early results show modest growth in critical shopping season
People shop at a mall decorated with holiday lights in Manhattan on Dec. 18, 2025 in New York City.
Spencer Platt | Getty Images
Some retailers provided early holiday results on Monday that showed the crucial shopping season was solid, but didn’t blow away expectations.
Lululemon, which is preparing for a new CEO and staring down a proxy battle with its founder, said in a release it expects its holiday quarter to be “toward the high end” of its previously released guidance. Shoe maker Birkenstock and thrift store Savers Value Village also released lackluster early holiday results.
Lululemon said it expects fiscal fourth quarter revenue to be close to $3.60 billion and earnings to be close to $4.76 per share. Both figures are at the high end of the guidance the company released in December when it announced fiscal third-quarter earnings.
It made no changes to its previous guidance for gross margin, effective tax rate and selling, general and administrative expenses.
Shares were slightly higher in premarket trading.
“We remain focused on executing our action plan to drive improvement in our U.S. business and look forward to the opportunities in front of us,” finance chief Meghan Frank said in a statement.
When announcing last quarter’s earnings on Dec. 11, outgoing CEO Calvin McDonald said the company was “encouraged” by its early holiday performance but acknowledged wide discounting had driven demand during the Thanksgiving holiday period. When the shopping stretch ended, trends slowed, he said at the time.
Like other higher-end brands, Lululemon has historically been very selective with discounts, but it has used them more liberally in recent quarters to offload old merchandise and styles that weren’t resonating with shoppers.
During its fiscal third quarter, margins fell by 2.9 percentage points, due primarily to higher tariffs and the bigger markdowns, it said at the time.
Birkenstock, which didn’t provide specific holiday-quarter guidance last year, said it expects sales in the quarter ended Dec. 31 to grow 11% to €402 million ($470 million). The results appeared to disappoint investors, with shares falling about 3% in premarket trading.
Savers Value Village saw sales grow 8.4% during its holiday quarter, with comparable sales up 5.4%, excluding the impact of an extra week the company had in its calendar. Despite relatively strong growth, the company only reaffirmed its fiscal 2025 adjusted net income and EBITDA outlooks. Shares were slightly higher in premarket trading.
The early results, which were announced ahead of the annual ICR conference in Orlando, Florida, show what many analysts had expected for the holiday shopping season. Wall Street largely anticipated results would be solid, but they wouldn’t show massive gains in consumer spending.
The National Retail Federation previously forecasted retail sales in November and December would rise between 3.7% and 4.2% compared to 2024. That’s solid growth, but when higher prices from tariffs are taken into account, some analysts expect volume growth to be largely flat.
Business
JPMorgan’s looming question: What happens when CEO Jamie Dimon leaves?
As Wall Street’s top bankers huddled in New York last month, preparing to convince Elon Musk’s SpaceX that they should be chosen to lead its upcoming IPO, one firm wasn’t letting its star advisor miss the bake-off.
Among the squad of JPMorgan Chase investment bankers flying 2,500 miles west to California to pitch SpaceX was the lender’s boss, billionaire CEO Jamie Dimon, people with knowledge of the trip told CNBC.
The morning after that pitch meeting, on Dec. 19, Dimon was already back in his customary early Friday perch: sitting in his bank’s New York lobby, taking meetings in full view of the thousands of employees streaming through the building’s turnstiles.
The whirlwind few days highlight the reality of Dimon’s singular impact on JPMorgan, the world’s largest bank by market capitalization.
Dimon marks his 20th anniversary as CEO this month and remains deeply involved across the sprawling businesses of JPMorgan, a giant across Wall Street and Main Street with $4.6 trillion in assets. Half a dozen executives across investment banking, asset management and consumer banking echoed that view.
Which makes the inevitable questions surrounding Dimon’s tenure loom large as he approaches 70 years of age. Dimon has for years maintained, somewhat tongue-in-cheek, that his retirement was perpetually 5 years away. In 2024, for the first time, he acknowledged that window was shrinking.
Will JPMorgan’s era of dominance be over when Dimon exits as CEO?
“Given his track record, anybody else would be a downgrade,” said Ben Mackovak, a bank board member and investor through his firm Strategic Value Bank Partners.
“I’m sure somebody else could grow into the role and surprise people,” Mackovak said. “But on day one, no one is going to be as qualified to run that bank as Jamie.”
Jamie Dimon, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., attends the ribbon-cutting ceremony opening the firm’s new headquarters at 270 Park Avenue, in New York City, U.S., October 21, 2025.
Eduardo Munoz | Reuters
In two decades, Dimon took a middle-of-the-pack American lender and, with his unique combination of judgment, paranoia, attention to detail and scope of vision, created a juggernaut of finance that the world hadn’t seen before.
During calm times, he invested aggressively for the future, and during periods of tumult, like 2008 and 2023, he avoided pitfalls that consumed other banks, allowing him to snap up three failed institutions.
Over the past 20 years, the bank’s annual net income soared more than 500% to $58.5 billion in 2024. The firm reports full-year 2025 results on Tuesday.
Now, at a market cap of roughly $900 billion, JPMorgan is worth nearly as much as the next three largest U.S. banks combined: Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo.
Besides running JPMorgan, Dimon has taken on an outsized role in global finance as a top voice explaining market gyrations or emerging risks and influencing regulators amid policy shifts. It was Dimon’s recession warning on a Fox News segment in April that helped convince President Donald Trump to pivot on his trade policy, igniting a historic relief rally.
“It’s just the aura he has, the credibility that he’s built up in the markets,” said Fitch Ratings analyst Chris Wolfe. “The minute you step out of that role, it’s not like you can just hand that over, your successor doesn’t automatically inherit that. I think that’s the real challenge.”
Potential successors
The question of who could take over for Dimon — who was already a cancer survivor when he nearly died in 2020 from a ruptured aorta — has been openly discussed among investors for more than a decade.
To investors, his most likely successor is currently Marianne Lake, head of the firm’s giant consumer bank and former CFO of the company, followed by Doug Petno and Troy Rohrbaugh, the co-heads of the firm’s commercial and investment bank.
Marianne Lake, chief financial officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Jin Lee | Bloomberg | Getty Images
Other contenders include asset and wealth management head Mary Erdoes and CFO Jeremy Barnum.
“If investors were to do a straw poll today, they’d probably pick Marianne,” said Truist bank analyst Brian Foran.
“The running joke is that she’s a human supercomputer when it comes to banking,” Foran said. “Really, the only question mark people have about her is, she’s so analytical, can she do the kind of ‘rah-rah’ stuff to inspire the sales force?”
Wells Fargo banking analyst Mike Mayo hypothesized that JPMorgan stock could immediately drop 5% if Dimon were to suddenly exit, regardless of the named replacement. (The bank has said Dimon would serve as chairman even after relinquishing the CEO role.)
It’s a somewhat common occurrence on Wall Street for companies with iconic CEOs: The stock premium shrinks, at least for a period, when their longtime leaders announce their departures. For instance, Berkshire Hathaway shares trailed the S&P 500 last year after Warren Buffett said he was stepping down as CEO.
‘Never going to quit’
When asked about CEO succession, JPMorgan executives say that Dimon is as plugged in as ever, and unlikely to step down soon.
Depending on how long he sticks around, that means it’s not necessarily his current direct reports like Lake, Petno and Rohrbaugh who are in line, but more junior executives now being groomed and evaluated for leadership roles, they told CNBC.
“There’s a lot of work going into imagining that day without him,” said a JPMorgan executive who asked not to be named speaking about his boss. “If he stays until he’s 85, it’s not his direct reports that are going to be next in line, its maybe one or two levels down from today.”
“Does he leave a huge vacuum? Yes,” said the executive. “It’s not fatal, though, because we’ve been planning for it. I think there’s combinations of people that together can create the same outcome.”
The CEO of a commercial bank and former JPMorgan executive, who described Dimon as a mentor, also said he didn’t think Dimon would step down soon.
“Jamie’s never going to quit,” said the CEO, who asked for anonymity to speak candidly. “What else would he do where he’s as important as he is now? His friends are all people from work. He loves it.”
Still, beyond the day-to-day management of a company with 318,000 employees, Dimon seems intent on setting up JPMorgan for a future without him.
Legacy values
In recent months, Dimon oversaw the completion of the bank’s new $3 billion headquarters in midtown Manhattan and announced a $1.5 trillion initiative to bolster industries crucial to U.S. interests.
And, perhaps most crucially, he continues to instill his values into the firm’s management team.
Last year, at a conference for JPMorgan’s top 400 executives, Dimon rattled off a list of once-great companies that died though mismanagement. Finance is especially prone to this threat, because of the temptation to manipulate numbers for short-term gain, he said.
“Travelers blew up. Citi blew up, twice. Bear Stearns failed, Lehman failed, I’m here because Bank One screwed up a bunch of businesses,” Dimon said, referring to a predecessor firm to JPMorgan.
“If you look at these things, it’s complacency, it’s bureaucracy, it’s arrogance. A lot of it is dishonest numbers. Failure to set standards,” Dimon said. “These are the cancers that kill companies.”
Nobody knows when Dimon’s last day as CEO will come, except to know that it is approaching. After adjusting his standard 5-year retirement answer to hint at a sooner departure, Dimon hasn’t advanced that clock any further.
“As great as he is, he can’t do this forever,” said Barclays banking analyst Jason Goldberg. “Every day that passes, you’re a day closer to the end.”
— CNBC’s Gabriel Cortes contributed to this report.
Business
Electricity tariff to go down by 93 paisas – SUCH TV
The federal government slashed electricity prices by 93 paisa under the head of fuel adjustment charges (FCA) with effect from November 2025, but kept the basic tariff unchanged.
According to details, the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (NEPRA) also endorsed the decision of the federal government.
A notification has already been issued in this regard to LESCO and all other electricity supply companies.
The relief will be notified to consumers in the electricity bills and units used in November.
Govt decides not to change the basic tariff
The federal government decided to keep the basic tariff of electricity unchanged.
Earlier, NEPRA sent a summary to cut basis electricity tariff by 62 paisa per unit.
NEPRA fixed the basic electricity tariff for 2026 at Rs33.38 per unit. NEPRA conducted a hearing of the case regarding the imposition of an equal electricity tariff across the country.
Power Division submitted the equal electricity tariff application for 2026. NEPRA approved the cut in electricity tariff and forwarded the approval to the federal government.
NEPRA approved a reduction in the electricity tariff by 62 paisa. Power Division said that the federal government is also giving a subsidy on electricity.
The officials said that the prices of electricity is unchanged. The National grid have an installed capacity of 36,397 megawatts.
Power Division officials said that only dependency on imported fuel is only 26 percent.
The federal government is giving Rs629 billion in subsidies to electricity consumers.
-
Politics5 days agoUK says provided assistance in US-led tanker seizure
-
Entertainment1 week agoMinnesota Governor Tim Walz to drop out of 2026 race, official confirmation expected soon
-
Entertainment5 days agoDoes new US food pyramid put too much steak on your plate?
-
Entertainment5 days agoWhy did Nick Reiner’s lawyer Alan Jackson withdraw from case?
-
Sports1 week agoVAR review: Why was Wirtz onside in Premier League, offside in Europe?
-
Business5 days agoTrump moves to ban home purchases by institutional investors
-
Sports1 week agoFACI invites applications for 2026 chess development project | The Express Tribune
-
Business1 week ago8th Pay Commission: From Policy Review, Cabinet Approval To Implementation –Key Stages Explained
