Connect with us

Business

Supreme Court sceptical of Trump firing of Lisa Cook

Published

on

Supreme Court sceptical of Trump firing of Lisa Cook


Natalie ShermanBusiness reporter

Getty Images Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook delivers remarks during an event organized by the Psaros Center for Financial Markets and Policy at the Georgetown University's McDonough School of Business at the university on November 20, 2025 in Washington, DCGetty Images

US President Donald Trump appeared on course for a setback at America’s top court on Wednesday over his unprecedented move to fire a central bank governor.

Supreme Court justices from the left and right asked why they should speed through such an impactful decision, citing concerns about process and implications for central bank independence and the wider economy.

Trump in August said he was removing Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook, accusing her of engaging in mortgage fraud, which she has denied.

Cook has argued she did not receive due process to dispute those claims, which Fed defenders say were a pretext to allow Trump to assert more control over the bank.

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, a conservative who was appointed by Trump, was among the justices to express sympathy with Cook’s arguments, asking: “What’s the fear of more process here?”

He later warned the administration’s interpretation of the law would “weaken, if not shatter, the independence of the Federal Reserve”.

‘Quite a big mistake’

By law, a president can only remove governors of the Federal Reserve “for cause”.

That requirement was intended to shield the central bank from political pressure and allow it to make policy independently.

The White House contends it has met that bar, accusing Cook of filing mortgage forms claiming two different principal residences at the same time. Banks typically offer lower interest rates for primary homes.

The Trump administration has asked the court to allow the president to remove Cook, a move lower courts had blocked while the case played out.

“Even if it’s inadvertent or a mistake, it’s quite a big mistake,” said solicitor general D John Sauer, who was arguing the case for the administration.

He said such conduct could undermine confidence in the bank and that courts were bound to defer to the president’s judgement when it comes to finding a cause.

He dismissed questions about process, noting that Trump had alerted Cook to the issue on social media before formally firing her.

“There was a social media post,” he said. “And the response was defiance.”

‘Nothing criminal whatsoever’

Cook has denied committing fraud.

In a November letter to the Justice Department, her lawyers said the claims were based on “cherry-picked, incomplete snippets of the full documents”.

They said there was “one stray reference to primary residence” in a mortgage application for an apartment in Alabama, but noted that the file also contained “truthful and more specific disclosures about the property’s use”.

“There is no fraud, no intent to deceive, nothing whatsoever criminal or remotely a basis to allege mortgage fraud,” her lawyers wrote.

Arguing on behalf of Cook, Paul Clement said people in her position should have the chance to present their evidence and be shielded from having a decision made in advance.

He said the administration’s interpretation of the law would make the protection that Congress intended by inserting the “for cause” requirement “toothless”.

Some justices indicated that they shared those concerns.

The “position that there’s no judicial review, no process required, no remedy available, very low bar for cause that the president alone determines – that would weaken if not shatter the independence of the Federal Reserve,” Kavanaugh said.

The lawsuit is seen as high stakes, given swirling debate about Trump’s efforts to influence the Fed, which he wants to lower interest rates more aggressively to boost economic growth.

Federal Reserve chairman Jerome Powell was among the officials expected to attend. He is facing his own criminal probe related to cost overruns during renovations of Fed properties – concerns he has called “pretexts”.

In other recent cases, the Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, has allowed the White House to proceed with firings.

But it has signalled that it views the Federal Reserve, which was designed to set policy independently from the White House, as different.

In a statement after the hearing, Cook’s lawyers said they were “hopeful” the court would recognise the importance of the Fed being able to operate free from political interference.

In her own statement, Cook said: “This case is about whether the Federal Reserve will set key interest rates guided by evidence and independent judgment or will succumb to political pressure.

“For as long as I serve at the Federal Reserve, I will uphold the principle of political independence in service to the American people.”

Several justices, including conservatives, indicated they were hesitant to greenlight Cook’s removal without courts having resolved issues like whether the mortgage filings, which were made before Cook was appointed, would meet the bar for a “for cause” firing.

“We know that the independence of the agency is very important and that that independence is harmed if we decide these issues too quickly and without due consideration,” said Justice Sonia Sotomayor, a liberal. “So to me, waiting to have at least the lower courts look at these issues first makes the most sense.”

“Is there any reason why this whole matter had to be handled by everybody… in such a hurried manner?” asked Justice Samuel Alito, a conservative.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett, another Trump appointee, pressed Sauer to explain what harm the president would suffer by waiting, noting that the court had been warned of potentially dire economic consequences of a decision that could weaken belief in the central bank’s independence.

“There’s a risk,” she said. “Doesn’t that counsel… caution on our part?”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Govt orders faster city gas project clearances, hikes commercial LPG allocation to ease supply stress – The Times of India

Published

on

Govt orders faster city gas project clearances, hikes commercial LPG allocation to ease supply stress – The Times of India


The government has stepped up efforts to streamline gas distribution and ease supply pressures, directing faster processing of city gas projects while increasing allocations of commercial LPG to key sectors amid a challenging geopolitical environment.The Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation (PESO) has instructed its offices to dispose of City Gas Distribution (CGD) applications within 10 days, aiming to accelerate the rollout of piped natural gas (PNG), an official statement said.Commercial LPG consumers in major cities and urban areas have also been advised to shift to PNG as part of a broader strategy to reduce dependence on liquefied petroleum gas. Domestic LPG supply remains stable, with no reported dry-outs at distributorships and normal delivery patterns across the country, the statement said, adding that most deliveries are being carried out through the Delivery Authentication Code (DAC) while panic bookings have subsided, PTI reported.On the commercial LPG front, the government has progressively increased allocations. After restoring 20 per cent supply earlier, an additional 10 per cent allocation linked to PNG expansion reforms was announced on March 18. A further 20 per cent allocation was cleared on March 21, taking total commercial LPG supply to 50 per cent.The latest increase prioritises sectors such as restaurants, dhabas, hotels, industrial canteens, food processing units, dairy operations, community kitchens and subsidised food outlets run by state governments and local bodies. Provision has also been made for 5 kg cylinders for migrant workers.Around 20 states and Union Territories have implemented the revised allocation guidelines, while public sector oil marketing companies are supplying commercial LPG in the remaining regions. In the past eight days, about 15,440 tonnes of LPG have been lifted by commercial entities.Educational institutions and hospitals continue to receive priority, accounting for nearly half of the total commercial LPG allocation. Despite global uncertainties affecting supply, the government indicated that domestic availability remains under control while efforts continue to transition urban consumers towards PNG.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

UK inflation steady but experts warn of cost-of-living ‘twist’ in months ahead

Published

on

UK inflation steady but experts warn of cost-of-living ‘twist’ in months ahead


Experts have warned of another “twist” to the cost-of-living story in the months ahead, as war in the Middle East is set to send energy bills soaring.

The rate of Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation has been gradually easing back towards the Bank of England’s two per cent target level since last summer.

Some analysts are expecting CPI to have held relatively steady in February, or dipped slightly, from the three per cent level recorded in January.

Official figures for last month will be published on Wednesday.

Economists for Deutsche Bank and Pantheon Macroeconomics said they are anticipating CPI to hold steady at three per cent in February, with lower fuel and services inflation being offset by higher clothes prices and air fares.

Edward Allenby, senior economist for Oxford Economics, said he thinks CPI inflation fell to 2.8 per cent in February, largely thanks to a predicted fall in petrol prices and slower inflation in the services sector.

Analysts for Barclays said they are expecting the headline rate to dip to 2.9 per cent, also partly because of lower pump prices during the month.

But Sanjay Raja, Deutsche Bank’s chief UK economist, said the inflation outlook has “rarely been more uncertain than it is now”.

He wrote in a research note: “We expect the UK’s disinflation story will take another twist on its (eventual) way down to target.

“The good news is that CPI is still expected to slide down in the coming months.

“The bad news? Higher energy prices appear poised to lift CPI meaningfully over the summer, adding yet another hump in the inflation profile.”

The Bank of England raised its inflation forecasts for the months ahead on Thursday
The Bank of England raised its inflation forecasts for the months ahead on Thursday (PA)

Economists have been ripping up previous projections in recent days and warning that the US-Israel war with Iran has muddied the outlook for the economy.

The Bank of England said on Thursday that recent increases in wholesale energy costs would delay the return of CPI inflation to target, as it was already seeing higher fuel prices.

It is now expecting inflation to be around three per cent in the second quarter of 2026, up from the 2.1 per cent that had been forecast in February.

The central bankers stressed that the situation is volatile and events over the next six weeks could shed light on the scale of the disruption and impact on prices.

Economists have weighed in with their own projections of where inflation could go if things persist.

Mr Allenby said he is now expecting CPI inflation to exceed four per cent during the second half of 2026.

“Under our updated assumptions, we now anticipate a much sharper rise in petrol prices, while higher wholesale gas prices cause a 19 per cent increase in the Ofgem energy price cap in July,” he said.

Pantheon Macroeconomics agreed that, if the latest spike in gas prices is sustained, then CPI could be headed to four per cent later this yar.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Sky‑high losses: Iran war drives airlines to biggest crash since Covid – $50bn gone – The Times of India

Published

on

Sky‑high losses: Iran war drives airlines to biggest crash since Covid – bn gone – The Times of India


Global airlines have suffered their worst financial shock since the COVID‑19 pandemic as the ongoing war involving US Israel and Iran has disrupted industry operations, wiping more than $50 billion off the market value of the world’s largest carriers amid rising fears of fuel shortages.The conflict, now entering its fourth week, has grounded flights, disrupted key Gulf hub airports and driven jet fuel prices sharply higher, compounding pressure on an industry that was rebounding strongly following pandemic‑related losses.According to Financial Times calculations, the 20 largest publicly listed airlines have collectively lost about $53 billion in market capitalisation since the war began. In response, airline executives have warned of a potential rise in ticket prices as carriers seek to protect shrinking profit margins.Jet fuel, which accounts for roughly a third of operating costs for airlines, has doubled in price since the United States and Israel launched attacks on Iran at the end of February. Many carriers had hedged against fuel price swings, but the rapid rise is expected to force airlines to pass on costs to passengers.“Fuel spiked quite heavily after the Ukraine invasion in 2022 as well, but this has gone further north,” easyJet chief executive Kenton Jarvis told FT, describing the current crisis as the most significant upheaval since the pandemic closed global skies in 2020.Executives also point to broader structural challenges, including the risk that sustained high fares may dampen demand. Carsten Spohr, CEO of Lufthansa, said higher ticket prices were unavoidable but expressed concern that they could weaken long‑term demand. “Our average profit is about €10 per passenger, there’s no way you can absorb the additional cost,” he said.In addition to passenger traffic pressures, airlines are preparing contingency plans for possible jet fuel shortages. Air France‑KLM CEO Ben Smith said the carrier is drawing up measures to cope with potential supply squeezes, including scaling back services on some Asian routes.The crisis has hit Middle Eastern carriers particularly hard. Carriers such as Emirates, Etihad and Qatar Airways have had to sharply reduce schedules due to airspace closures and a collapse in regional tourism, industry officials say. Despite the severity of the current disruption, Willie Walsh, head of the International Air Transport Association (IATA), noted that it still falls short of the pandemic’s impact but is reminiscent of the downturn in transatlantic demand after the 9/11 attacks, according to FT.

Poll

What should airlines prioritize during the current crisis?

The conflict’s ripple effects are also visible in cargo operations, as freight traffic shifts from disrupted shipping routes to air cargo, straining airport facilities. At Geneva airport, for example, freight re‑routing has led to overflow onto services bound for Paris.Industry observers remain hopeful that airline valuations and demand will rebound once the conflict abates. “The share price has moved against all airlines since the start of the conflict,” Jarvis said, adding that short sellers would likely close positions quickly if a ceasefire is announced.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending