Connect with us

Business

Tata Trusts Meeting Turns Contentious Over Nominee Director Appointment At Tata Sons: Report

Published

on

Tata Trusts Meeting Turns Contentious Over Nominee Director Appointment At Tata Sons: Report


Last Updated:

The dispute traces back to October 2024, when the trustees appointed Noel Tata as chairman following the demise of Ratan Tata

Tata Trusts

Tata Trusts

Tempers flared during a meeting of Tata Trusts, as disagreements surfaced over the exercise of a key power—the appointment of a nominee director on the board of Tata Sons—and the broader question of how the charities should exert control over India’s largest diversified business conglomerate, valued at more than Rs 27 lakh crore, The Economic Times reported.

The dispute traces back to October 2024, when the trustees appointed Noel Tata as chairman following the demise of Ratan Tata, the group patriarch. At that time, the trustees resolved that Trust-nominated directors on Tata Sons’ board would require renewal every year after turning 75. This put Vijay Singh, 77, a former defence secretary who has been a nominee director since 2013 and a Tata Trusts trustee since 2018, in line for annual reappointment.

According to the report, four trustees—Mehli Mistry, Pramit Jhaveri, Jehangir Jehangir, and Darius Khambata—opposed Singh’s reappointment. Singh later resigned from Tata Sons’ board. Noel Tata and Venu Srinivasan, also nominee directors, were present at the meeting. Singh did not participate since the agenda involved his own reappointment.

The power to appoint nominees is a crucial lever of influence for Tata Trusts. Under Article 121 of Tata Sons’ Articles of Association, nominee directors hold veto rights over key decisions. Differences deepened when the four opposing trustees sought to nominate Mehli Mistry in Singh’s place. Srinivasan and Noel Tata resisted, arguing that due process aligned with Tata values and institutional stature must be followed.

Officials close to the matter described the attempt as a power grab. “Any decision of such kind needs unanimity,” one senior official told ET. “This hostile manner is not the Tata way of doing things. There is an impasse now, with three trustees against four. For the moment, Tata Sons will have two Trust nominees until a solution is worked out.”

One possible resolution, according to people in the know, is to appoint a professional search firm to shortlist candidates, with trustees also free to apply for the role.

Underlying the tensions is a long-standing friction over information sharing. Tata Trusts—specifically the Sir Ratan Tata Trust and Sir Dorabji Tata Trust—hold 66% of Tata Sons’ equity. Trustees not serving on the board complain of inadequate communication from nominee directors, alleging they are kept in the dark about deliberations. Nominee directors, however, argue they can only share key developments without breaching their fiduciary responsibilities, as board members are bound by market regulator governance norms.

Another related debate concerns whether nominee directors should accept board fees from Tata Sons, since they are meant to act purely as overseers on behalf of the Trusts.

Meanwhile, the Tata Sons board also faces additional vacancies following the exits of Ralph Speth, Ajay Piramal, and Leo Puri, ET added.

Aparna Deb

Aparna Deb

Aparna Deb is a Subeditor and writes for the business vertical of News18.com. She has a nose for news that matters. She is inquisitive and curious about things. Among other things, financial markets, economy, a…Read More

Aparna Deb is a Subeditor and writes for the business vertical of News18.com. She has a nose for news that matters. She is inquisitive and curious about things. Among other things, financial markets, economy, a… Read More

News business Tata Trusts Meeting Turns Contentious Over Nominee Director Appointment At Tata Sons: Report
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users’ views, not News18’s. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Read More



Source link

Business

TikTok owner signs join venture agreements to avoid US ban

Published

on

TikTok owner signs join venture agreements to avoid US  ban


Peter Hoskins,Business reporterand

Lily Jamali,North America technology correspondent

Watch: TikTok owner signs agreements to avoid US ban

TikTok’s Chinese owner ByteDance has signed binding agreements with US and global investors for the majority of its business in America, TikTok’s boss told employees on Thursday.

Half of the joint venture will be owned by a group of investors, including Oracle, Silver Lake and the Emirati investment firm MGX, according to a memo sent by chief executive Shou Zi Chew.

The deal, which is set to close on 22 January, would end years of efforts by Washington to force ByteDance to sell its US operations over national security concerns.

It is in ​line with a deal unveiled in September, when US President Donald Trump delayed the enforcement of a law that would ban the app unless it was sold.

In the memo, TikTok said the deal will enable “over 170 million Americans to continue discovering a world of endless possibilities as part of a vital global community”.

Under the agreement, ByteDance will retain 19.9% of the business, while Oracle, Silver Lake and Abu Dhabi-based MGX will hold 15% each.

Another 30.1% will be held by affiliates of existing ByteDance investors, according to the memo.

The White House previously said that Oracle, which was co-founded by Trump supporter Larry Ellison, will license TikTok’s recommendation algorithm as part of the deal.

The deal comes after a series of delays.

In April 2024, during President Joe Biden’s administration, the US Congress passed a law to ban the app over national security concerns, unless it was sold.

The law was set to go into effect on 20 January 2025 but was pushed back multiple times by Trump, while his administration worked out a deal to transfer ownership.

Trump said in September that he had spoken on the phone to China’s President Xi Jinping, who he said had given the deal the go ahead.

The platform’s future remained unclear after the leaders met face to face in October.

The app’s fate was clouded by ongoing tensions between the two nations on trade and other matters.

“TikTok has become a bargaining chip in the wider US-China relationship,” said Alvin Graylin, a lecturer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

“With recent softening tensions, Beijing’s sign off on the structure and algorithm licensing now looks less like capitulation and more like calibrated de-escalation, letting both capitals claim a win at home.”

NurPhoto via Getty Images The TikTok logo appears on a smartphone screen, with the American flag on a computer screen in the background, in this photo illustration taken in Athens, Greece, on September 26, 2025NurPhoto via Getty Images

The White House referred the BBC to TikTok when contacted for comment.

Oracle and Silver Lake declined to comment. The BBC has contacted MGX for comment.

The deal drew critiques from Senate Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon, who said it wouldn’t do “a thing to protect the privacy of American user”.

Under the terms, TikTok’s recommendation algorithm is set to be retrained on American user data to ensure feeds are free from outside manipulation.

“It’s unclear that it will even put TikTok’s algorithm in safer hands,” said Sen Wyden.

He opposed the 2024 law, and was among the US lawmakers who lobbied to extend the TikTok deadline in January in a bid to give Congress more time to mitigate threats from China.

Some users also expressed caution at the prospect of new investors.

Small business owner Tiffany Cianci, who has more than 300,000 followers and nearly four million likes on the platform, said she hopes the incoming investors will maintain the same user experience for entrepreneurs like her.

“I hope small business owners are protected,” Ms Cianci said.

TikTok has said that more than seven million small businesses market their products and services on TikTok in the US.

“I reserve judgement on whether or not we have saved the app for those small business,” she added.

Ms Cianci said she chose TikTok for promotion because the platform offers profit-sharing on terms that are more favourable than what competitors like Meta offer.

Over the last year, Ms Cianci has been active in organising protests in Washington and on TikTok aimed at saving the app.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Japan inflation holds steady ahead of BoJ rate decision – The Times of India

Published

on

Japan inflation holds steady ahead of BoJ rate decision – The Times of India


Japan’s inflation rate held steady in November, official data showed Friday ahead of the Bank of Japan’s monetary policy decision which could see central bankers raise interest rates to their highest level in 30 years.The hike would be the first since January and could potentially exacerbate turmoil in debt markets.Yields on Japanese government bonds have risen in recent weeks on worries about Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s budget discipline, while the yen has weakened.The core consumer price index — which excludes volatile fresh food — rose three percent in November, the same rate as a month earlier, in line with market expectations.Takaichi, who formally took power in October, has promised to fight inflation as a major priority.Her government succeeded in getting parliament approval for an extra budget worth 18.3 trillion yen ($118 billion) this week to finance her massive stimulus package.She has long advocated for more government spending and easy monetary policy to spur growth.Since taking office, however, she has said monetary policy decisions should be left to the Bank of Japan (BoJ).The BoJ began hiking rates from below zero in March last year as figures signalled an end to the country’s “lost decades” of stagnation, with inflation surging.However, with worries about the global outlook and US tariffs growing, the bank paused its tightening measures at the start of 2025, with the last increase in January taking rates to their highest level in 17 years.The inflation figures for November showed rice prices up 37 percent year-on-year, the internal affairs ministry said. Rice prices have skyrocketed because of supply problems linked to a very hot summer in 2023 and panic-buying after a “megaquake” warning last year, amongst other factors.Japan’s economy contracted 0.6 percent in the third quarter, but BoJ governor Kazuo Ueda said last week that the impact of US tariffs was less than feared.“So far, US corporates have swallowed the burden of tariffs without fully passing (them) through to consumer prices,” Ueda told the Financial Times.At the same time, inflation has been above the BoJ’s target of two percent for some time.The majority of economists polled by Bloomberg expect the BoJ to raise its main rate from 0.5 percent to 0.75 percent, which would be the highest since 1995.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

The contactless payment change that could be good news for shoppers

Published

on

The contactless payment change that could be good news for shoppers


The City regulator is paving the way for shoppers to make larger contactless payments, moving beyond the current £100 transaction limit for physical cards.

Under new plans from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), set for next year, banks and payment providers with robust fraud controls will gain autonomy to establish their own payment thresholds.

These regulatory changes are scheduled to commence on March 19, though individual firms will decide when to adopt the flexibility.

Firms that go ahead with the changes will need to communicate them clearly to their customers, the regulator said.

The aim is to allow firms to better respond to changing consumer demands, inflation and new technology.

Firms are also being encouraged to let customers set their own limit, or turn contactless off altogether, as many high street banks already do.

The popularity of contactless payments has surged over the years, with contactless card transactions limits having previously been increased in a series of steps.

According to consumer spending data from Barclays, 94.6 per cent of eligible in-store card transactions were contactless in 2024.

Last year, there were 10 times as many contactless transactions per month than there were in 2015, according to Barclays.

Get a free fractional share worth up to £100.
Capital at risk.

Terms and conditions apply.

Go to website

ADVERTISEMENT

Trading 212 logo

Get a free fractional share worth up to £100.
Capital at risk.

Terms and conditions apply.

Go to website

ADVERTISEMENT

As well as a £100 limit for a single contactless card transaction, there is also a cumulative total of £300 in contactless transactions, or no more than five consecutive contactless transactions, since the last application of “strong customer authentication” to verify a payment was made.

Under the rule change, firms will also have the flexibility to consider changing the cumulative contactless approach if they want to.

The popularity of contactless payments has surged over the years
The popularity of contactless payments has surged over the years (Getty/iStock)

The FCA believes the option of greater flexibilities will incentivise firms to step up their fraud prevention, giving consumers greater protection.

Existing protections will remain in place, meaning consumers must be reimbursed in unauthorised fraud cases, such as if their card is lost or stolen.

The review of the contactless card limit was one of around 50 measures the regulator outlined in a letter to Prime Minster Sir Keir Starmer in January to help support economic growth.

The proposals were out for consultation until October 15. The regulator has previously said that, based on industry feedback, it anticipated most firms would continue to implement the £100 limit for the time being.

David Geale, executive director of payments and digital finance at the FCA, said: “Contactless is people’s favoured way to pay. We want to make sure our rules provide flexibility for the future, and choice for both firms and consumers.”

Kate Nicholls, chairwoman of UKHospitality, said: “Making life easier for consumers is a positive for any hospitality and high street business, and I’m pleased the FCA is bringing forward this change.

“Contactless has increasingly become the preferred payment method of choice for many people and lifting the limit can mean quicker and easier experiences for consumers. While many people still prefer to use cash or chip and Pin, this change adds much-needed flexibility for providers and consumers.”

Jana Mackintosh, managing director of payments and innovation at UK Finance, said: “We welcome the FCA’s move to give banks and payment providers greater flexibility over contactless limits in the future.

“Contactless is a very popular and secure way to pay.

“While we do not expect to see any immediate change to the £100 contactless limit, any changes made in the future will be done carefully and ensure strong security and fraud controls remain in place.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending