Connect with us

Business

The British business winners and losers after US £150bn investment pledge

Published

on

The British business winners and losers after US £150bn investment pledge


Donald Trump’s UK state visit coincided with an announcement that US firms will invest round £150 billion into the UK.

The trip comes amid a key period for global trade, after the US president’s tariff plans led to significant trade tensions earlier this year.

Firms in some sectors have announced fresh commitments to pump billions into the UK, in a potential boost for Chancellor Rachel Reeves.

However, some industries criticised a lack of trade deal support and tough investment conditions in the UK.

So, which sectors have been winners and losers this week:

Winners

Tech

Trump and Starmer held a joint press conference at Chequers on Thursday (LEON NEAL/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Technology firms have been at the forefront of the major investment deals into the UK.

On Wednesday, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Mr Trump announced a “tech prosperity deal” will see the UK and US co-operate in areas including artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing and nuclear power.

America’s top technology companies announced £31 billion of investment alongside the announcement.

These included a commitment by Microsoft to invest £22 billion in the UK to fund an expansion of Britain’s AI infrastructure and the construction of the country’s largest AI supercomputer.

Nvidia boss Jensen Huang hailed a “big week for AI in the UK” as the US chip giant committed to supporting the development of the supercomputer.

The firm agreed to deploy 120,000 advanced processors across the UK to help improve infrastructure across the British AI sector.

Google committed £5 billion of investment, focusing on improvements in research and development and AI infrastructure.

There was also a raft of smaller investments by tech companies including AI cloud computing company CoreWeave, Salesforce and AI Pathfinder.

Defence

US software company Palantir announced plans to invest £1.5 billion in the UK’s defence sector, with funding going into the development of artificial intelligence-powered capabilities to speed up decision making, military planning and targeting.

Defence Secretary John Healey said the investment was a “major vote of confidence” for the UK.

Palantir said it plans to establish the UK as its European headquarters for defence, creating 350 “high-skilled” new jobs.

Defence Secretary John Healey and the CEO of software company Palantir Technologies Alex Karp signed a £1.5 billion investment deal on Thursday

Defence Secretary John Healey and the CEO of software company Palantir Technologies Alex Karp signed a £1.5 billion investment deal on Thursday (Lucy North/PA Wire)

Manufacturing and R&D

There were a number of investments such as £3.9 billion from Prologis to drive growth in life sciences and advanced manufacturing.

US engineering firm Stax committed £37 million to expand its operations and pioneer emission-reducing technology used at ports.

Infrastructure

Private equity giant Blackstone said it plans to invest around £100 billion into assets in the UK over the next decade, in the single largest investment commitment.

This includes £10 billion of previously announced investment into its UK data centres.

Nuclear engineering company Amentum confirmed a £150 million investment in the UK and said it plans to create more than 3,000 new jobs, to increase its UK workforce by over 50 per cent over the next four years.

X-Energy and Centrica also said they plan to build up to 12 advanced modular reactors.

Losers

Steel

The steel industry was among the main sectors left disappointed by the president’s visit.

Plans for US tariffs on UK steel exports to be scrapped have been shelved, with the UK pausing its push to bring the levy down to zero.

UK steel exports to the US currently face a 25 per cent tariff, compared with 50 per cent for other nations.

Earlier this year, the UK and the US agreed for some UK steel to be exempt from tariffs.

Gareth Stace, director-general of industry trade association UK Steel, said it was “disappointing”.

Pharmaceuticals

As part of investments between the countries, UK pharmaceutical giant GSK revealed plans to put nearly £22 billion into US R&D and manufacturing over the next five years.

The government said the deal will “strengthen UK-US life sciences ties” but it comes amid a challenging backdrop for investment for the sector in the UK.

Last week, US-based Merck said its UK operation will scrap plans for a £1 billion site in Kings Cross, which had been due to open in 2027.

Bosses blamed the government for paying too little for medicines and not investing enough in the sector, as it confirmed the move, which will impact around 125 jobs.

Days later, AstraZeneca announced it had paused plans to invest £200 million at a Cambridge research site in the latest major blow for the sector.

Industry bosses told MPs this week that the “difficult” environment in the UK and pressure on pricing had made the UK a less attractive investment environment than other countries such as the US.

Mr Trump told reporters on Thursday that pharmaceutical firms were coming back to the US from other countries.

“Car companies are moving in, AI is moving in, everybody’s coming in… The drug companies are coming back, they all want to be there – they sort of have to be there – but they all want to be there.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Trump Might Welcome Chinese Investment, but America Is Wary

Published

on

Trump Might Welcome Chinese Investment, but America Is Wary


A hallmark of President Trump’s second term has been his penchant for negotiating economic deals with countries that pledge to invest trillions of dollars in the United States

“It’s now pouring in from all parts of the world,” Mr. Trump said during a speech last fall in which he boasted of nearly $20 trillion of foreign investment.

The meetings this week between Mr. Trump and China’s leader, Xi Jinping, in Beijing are expected to include talks over purchases of American farm products and planes and the possibility of expanding access for American companies into China’s vast consumer market.

There has also been speculation that Mr. Trump and his advisers are seeking a major investment from China. But such a pledge could be complicated by deep distrust in the United States toward Chinese firms, which many workers blame for the hollowing out of American manufacturing.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent acknowledged the challenge in an interview on CNBC on Thursday, explaining that the United States and China were working to develop an investment board that would determine what sectors were acceptable for Chinese investment. That would essentially provide China with guidance on how to invest in the United States without its transactions being blocked by the Committee on Foreign Investment, an interagency group that reviews foreign investment and is led by Mr. Bessent.

“Look, there are plenty of things that the Chinese could invest in in the U.S.,” said Mr. Bessent, who is in Beijing with Mr. Trump.

Chinese investment in the United States has declined sharply in recent years amid tougher investment screening standards nationally and at the state level.

That sentiment could ultimately clash with Mr. Trump’s transactional instincts and his desire to return home with a big-ticket win.

“If Trump were to be committed to a major investment deal with China, there’s still a challenge of implementation,” said Kyle Jaros, an expert on U.S.-China ties at the University of Notre Dame. “It would take real follow-through to overcome a lot of the political and regulatory barriers that are in place right now.”

According to a report published last month by the research firm Rhodium Group, less than $3 billion of Chinese investment in the United States was announced in 2025. That was the lowest on record, with investment peaking at around $45 billion in 2016.

The United States has imposed tight restrictions on Chinese investment out of national security concerns, making it difficult for Chinese firms to build factories near military facilities. Some states also have enacted restrictions on Chinese purchases of real estate and farmland.

China’s clean energy technology, such as electric vehicles and batteries, has also faced challenges in the United States because of political backlash. There was a surge of Chinese investment in those sectors after clean energy and tax legislation was passed under the Biden administration in 2022, but according to Rhodium, more than half of those investments have been canceled, paused or delayed.

A $2.4 billion electric vehicle battery factory that the Chinese company Gotion was building in Michigan was canceled last year after the community there protested and mounted legal challenges to stop the project.

Other types of Chinese investment have also stirred controversy. That includes the recent purchase by Nongfu Spring, a Chinese bottled water company, of a warehouse in New Hampshire that it wants to turn into a bottling facility. The purchase was reviewed last year by the state’s attorney general.

After the inquiry found that there was no wrongdoing associated with the transaction, Gov. Kelly Ayotte of New Hampshire issued executive orders to block China, Russia and Iran from getting access to data or purchasing land or property in the state. “Foreign adversaries like China should not be doing business in New Hampshire,” said Ms. Ayotte, a Republican.

There continues to be deep skepticism within the U.S. automobile industry about competition from China. Last month, a group of American steel associations sent a letter to top Trump administration officials urging them to keep Chinese car manufacturers out of the United States.

“As representatives of our nation’s manufacturing sector, we urge you to ensure American competitiveness by not surrendering access to the U.S. auto market to the Chinese Communist Party,” they wrote. “Additionally, allowing Chinese companies and Chinese autos into the U.S. would create consequential, unacceptable national security risks.”

Agriculture also remains a contentious issue. The chairman of the House select committee on China, Representative John Moolenaar, a Republican from Michigan, introduced new legislation this month that would ban China from acquiring U.S. farmland.

“Food security is national security, and we cannot allow foreign adversaries like China to buy up American farmland near our most sensitive military and critical infrastructure sites,” Mr. Moolenaar said.

The bipartisan bill would create a requirement for the federal government to review Chinese deals involving ports and telecommunications infrastructure. It would also apply to purchases made by investors from Russia, Iran and North Korea

Michael Pillsbury, a China scholar who has served as an outside adviser to the Trump administration, said that the president’s advisers were concerned about Chinese investments in sensitive sectors such as semiconductors, artificial intelligence, biotechnology, aerospace and critical minerals. It has been a challenge, he said, to come up with a “white list” of sectors that could be considered safe.

“The red lines have moved back and forth as the nature of technology has changed,” Mr. Pillsbury said.

He added that while Mr. Trump is eager to announce a $1 trillion Chinese investment pledge, he is mindful not to incite political backlash.

“I think there’s been an effort by the administration to avoid getting into a fight with the China hawks,” Mr. Pillsbury added.

Ahead of Mr. Trump’s trip to China, a White House official downplayed the idea that the administration was seeking to create a new $1 trillion Chinese investment program. The White House continues to be focused on pushing China to increase its purchases of American farm goods, which it boycotted for much of last year when trade tensions flared.

Despite the anticipation of a Chinese investment pledge, the details and follow-through will be important.

While Mr. Trump has said that foreign investments have topped $20 trillion, according to the White House’s own investment tracker, U.S. and foreign investment pledges made during Mr. Trump’s second term total $10.6 trillion. Foreign leaders appear to have learned that they can win favor with Mr. Trump by promising whopping investment pledges that they might not fulfill.

“The devil is in the details,” said Philip Ludvigson, a partner in King & Spalding who specializes in national security risks and foreign investment, “about not only where the investment goes but also whether it happens at all.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

‘Cheaper’ funeral option left Somerset man unable to say goodbye

Published

on

‘Cheaper’ funeral option left Somerset man unable to say goodbye



Ed Cullen says his mum had an unattended cremation which saved money but was “devastating” for him.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Trump brought top CEOs to Beijing but few big deals emerge

Published

on

Trump brought top CEOs to Beijing but few big deals emerge



There were plenty of choreographed ceremonies but no sweeping trade breakthrough as Trump met Xi in Beijing.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending