Business
This Indian-Origin Harvard Student Took Mark Zuckerberg To Court For ‘Stealing’ His Facebook Idea
Last Updated:
Divya Narendra and the Winklevoss twins accused Mark Zuckerberg of idea theft over HarvardConnection, leading to a $65 million settlement and inspiring ‘The Social Network’ film
Facebook grew at breakneck pace, spreading from Harvard to universities across the United States and then to the wider world.
Long before Facebook became a global habit, a small group of Harvard students believed they had spotted a gap in the internet. Among them was Divya Narendra, a New York-born Indian-origin student who later accused Mark Zuckerberg, now the face of the world’s biggest social network, of running away with their idea.
What followed was one of the most closely-watched legal tussles in the history of the tech industry.
In the early 2000s, when broadband internet was still a novelty and students largely relied on email, Narendra and his friends, the twins Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, began work on a project called HarvardConnection (later renamed ConnectU). The idea was simple yet radical for its time; a closed online network where Harvard students could create profiles, discover classmates and build social connections.
Narendra, the son of doctor parents and a standout student through school, had secured admission into Harvard after studying at some of New York’s top institutions. At Harvard, the trio quickly bonded, and as the project took shape, they began looking for a gifted programmer to bring the platform to life.
According to court filings later made public, the group approached Mark Zuckerberg, then an undergraduate known on campus for his coding skills. Emails exchanged between the parties, many of which later surfaced in legal documents, showed detailed discussions about the proposed network, its scope and its expansion beyond Harvard.
Narendra and the twins believed Zuckerberg would help write the code. Instead, they alleged, communication slowed, replies tapered off, and on February 4, 2004, Zuckerberg launched ‘TheFacebook’, a site that bore striking similarities to their concept.
News of the launch spread rapidly across the campus. Shocked by what they believed was a case of idea theft, the trio complained to Harvard authorities and eventually took the matter to court.
A Legal Battle That Gripped The Tech World
The dispute ran from 2004 to 2008, with Narendra and the Winklevoss brothers accusing Zuckerberg of breaching an oral agreement and misappropriating their concept. Facebook, meanwhile, grew at breakneck pace, spreading from Harvard to universities across the United States and then to the wider world.
In 2008, the parties reached an out-of-court settlement reportedly valued at $65 million, a mix of cash and Facebook stock. Although Zuckerberg did not admit wrongdoing, the settlement was widely seen as acknowledgement that the complainants had a legitimate case.
The legal clash later formed a key plotline in the Oscar-winning Hollywood film ‘The Social Network’, where Narendra’s character featured prominently. He has since said that while the film dramatised events, it helped spotlight the Indian-origin role in Facebook’s origin story.
Life After Facebook, And Another Startup Story
Far from being defined by the controversy, Divya Narendra chose to move forward. He completed advanced degrees in finance and law before launching SumZero in 2008, a professional network for serious investors and analysts to share research and insights.
Unlike Facebook, SumZero caters to a niche audience of finance professionals. Today, the platform counts thousands of vetted members and is valued in the millions, making Narendra a significant name in the investment-tech space.
The Facebook episode continues to be debated in Silicon Valley circles as a cautionary tale about intellectual ownership, trust and the fine print of informal agreements in the startup world.
December 30, 2025, 17:32 IST
Read More
Business
Pakistan Surviving On IMF Reviews But Economy Remains Vulnerable As Ever: Report
New Delhi: Pakistan is witnessing the institutionalisation of a “survivalist” economy where every policy choice is dictated by the need to pass the next International Monetary Fund (IMF) review, regardless of whether that policy erodes the tax base for the next decade, while the economy remains vulnerable as ever — headed nowhere except, most likely, into another IMF programme, as per a news report.
The report in Business Recorder by Shahid Sattar reveals that Pakistan suffers from a chronic twin deficit: a fiscal gap (spending more than it collects) and a balance of payments crisis (consuming more foreign exchange than it earns).
“For fifty years, our imports have hovered at double the rate of our exports as a percentage of GDP. Simply, Pakistan is a country that has failed to produce,” it added.
The report argued that the fundamental flaw in the IMF’s approach is a “dogmatic adherence to revenue extraction at the cost of value creation”.
“By forcing the government to meet rigid fiscal targets, and through any means necessary at this point, the Fund has encouraged policies that stifle the very export-led growth required to break the debt cycle,” it further stated.
The historic economic model of state patronage was flawed and resulted in suboptimal allocation of resources.
“But there is a difference between weaning an addict off drugs and starving a healthy person. The IMF programme appears unable to distinguish between withdrawing support and subsidies, and actively destroying the ecosystem required for legitimate businesses to function,” the report further argued.
On paper, the IMF deals with the Finance Minister and the Governor of the State Bank. Technically, all policies within the Letter of Intent are the government’s own ideas.
“In reality, the programme reflects the behest of those holding the greatest political and economic leverage. When policies fail, the IMF claims the government designed them; the government claims the IMF demanded them. This ambiguity serves everyone but the country and its citizens,” the report lamented.
“Unless we reclaim our policymaking from the narrow, revenue-centric confines of IMF programmes, we are not just managing a crisis but rather our own decline,” it added.
Business
Revised ITR Window Closed! Here’s What You Can Do Now To Claim Your Refund
New Delhi: Missed the December 31 deadline to file a revised or belated income tax return for FY 2024–25? Don’t panic just yet. While the window to revise your ITR has officially closed, it doesn’t mean your tax refund is gone for good. The rules simply take a different turn now and there’s still a way you may be able to claim what’s rightfully yours.
What happens after the December 31 deadline?
Up to December 31, taxpayers still had the option to file a belated return if they missed the original due date or submit a revised return to fix mistakes in an already filed ITR. However, once the calendar turned to January 1, both these options were shut for AY 2025–26. This means you can no longer file or revise your return now even if the Income Tax Department has not yet processed your earlier filing.
Is your tax refund still safe?
Yes, there’s some good news here. If you have already filed your ITR within the due date and are eligible for a refund, you can still receive it even after December 31. The Income Tax Department can process returns and release refunds later as well. That said, if there are mistakes in your return, the way to fix them now depends on what kind of error it is.
How can you claim your refund now? Here are the available options
Rectification request under Section 154 (most commonly used)
If your return has already been processed and you have received an intimation under Section 143(1), but the refund amount is incorrect or has been denied due to an error, you can file a rectification request. This option is useful when the issue is related to TDS or TCS mismatch, wrong tax or interest calculation, arithmetical or clerical mistakes, or incorrect carry-forward of losses. Rectification requests can be filed online through the income tax e-filing portal and remain available even after the December 31 deadline. For most taxpayers, this is the main route to claim or increase a refund in 2026.
Wait it out if your return is still under processing
If your ITR status shows “under processing”, there is no need to rush. The Centralised Processing Centre (CPC) has a fixed time limit to process returns and issue an intimation. If a refund is due and no discrepancies are found, it will be credited automatically along with applicable interest. In case the processing gets delayed beyond the allowed period, taxpayers can raise a grievance on the e-filing portal or through CPGRAMS.
Updated Return (ITR-U): Use with caution
From January 1 onwards, taxpayers can file an Updated Return (ITR-U), but this option has clear limitations. ITR-U can only be used to report additional income or correct under-reported income. It cannot be used to claim a new refund or increase an existing one. In fact, filing an ITR-U usually means paying extra tax along with interest, making it an unsuitable option for those hoping to get a refund.
Next steps to avoid missing your refund
Taxpayers should first check the status of their ITR on the income tax e-filing portal and keep an eye out for the intimation notice once it is issued. If you spot any mismatch or error affecting your refund, file a rectification request without delay. Also, make sure your bank account details are correctly entered and verified on the portal, as incomplete or unverified information can lead to unnecessary refund delays.
Business
China’s BYD set to overtake Tesla as world’s top EV seller
China’s BYD is set to overtake Elon Musk’s Tesla as the world’s biggest seller of electric vehicles (EVs), marking the first time it has outpaced its American rival for annual sales.
On Thursday, BYD said that sales of its battery-powered cars rose last year by almost 28% to more than 2.25 million.
Tesla, which is due to reveal its total sales for 2025 later on Friday, last week published analysts’ estimates suggesting that it had sold around 1.65 million vehicles for the year as a whole.
The US firm has faced a tough year with a mixed reception to new offerings, unease over Musk’s political activities and intensifying competition from Chinese rivals.
Chinese firms such as Geely, MG, and BYD – now the country’s largest electric car company – have put pressure on Western rivals by pricing their vehicles below established brands.
In October, Tesla responded by launching lower-priced versions of its two best selling models in the US in a bid to boost sales.
Musk, who is already the world’s richest man, is tasked with significantly boosting Tesla’s sales and stock market value over the next decade to secure a record-breaking pay package. The deal, which was approved by shareholders in November, could see him getting a payout of as much as $1tn (£740bn).
As part of the agreement, Musk also has to sell a million humanoid robots over the next ten years. Tesla has invested heavily in its “Optimus” product and self-driving “Robotaxis”.
Tesla sales slumped in the first three months of 2025 after a backlash against Musk’s role in US President Donald Trump’s administration.
Besides Tesla, the multi-billionaire’s business interests also include the social media platform X, the rocket firm SpaceX and the Boring Company, which digs tunnels.
Those commitments, along with running Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), led some investors to suggest that Musk was not focusing enough on Tesla.
Since then Musk has pledged to “significantly” cut back his role in the US government.
Despite BYD’s rise in recent years, its sales growth slowed in 2025 to the weakest rate in five years, in part due to fierce competition in China, its key market.
Still, BYD remains a global EV powerhouse as its prices often undercut rival carmakers.
The Shenzhen-based company’s rapid expansion – especially in Latin America, South East Asia and parts of Europe – comes despite many countries imposing steep tariffs on Chinese EVs.
In October, BYD said the UK had become its biggest market outside China. The firm said that its sales in Britain surged by 880% in the year to the end of September, driven by strong demand for the plug-in hybrid version of its Seal U sports utility vehicle (SUV).
-
Sports6 days agoBrooks Koepka should face penalty if he rejoins PGA Tour, golf pundit says
-
Business7 days agoGovt registers 144olive startups | The Express Tribune
-
Politics6 days agoThailand, Cambodia agree to ‘immediate’ ceasefire: joint statement
-
Politics6 days agoHeavy rains, flash floods leave Southern California homes caked in mud
-
Entertainment6 days agoSecond actor accuses Tyler Perry of sexual assault in new lawsuit
-
Fashion6 days agoClimate change may hit RMG export earnings of 4 nations by 2030: Study
-
Fashion7 days agoArea CG’s Fernando Rius says luxury is not about buying something expensive, it is about understanding the culture, history, and time invested
-
Entertainment7 days agoInside royal families most private Christmas moments
