Politics
Trump’s Tariffs Deemed Unlawful by Divided Appeals Court

On Friday, a divided U.S. appeals court ruled that the majority of tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump are illegal, delivering a major setback to one of his key international economic policy tools. The decision challenges Trump’s use of these levies to influence global trade relations and could have wide-ranging effects on U.S. trade agreements, affected industries, and supply chains. Legal experts note that the ruling may also set an important precedent for how future administrations implement tariffs and other trade measures.
The court allowed the tariffs to remain in place through October 14 to give the Trump administration a chance to file an appeal with the US Supreme Court.
The decision comes as a legal fight over the independence of the Federal Reserve also seems bound for the Supreme Court, setting up an unprecedented legal showdown this year over Trump’s entire economic policy.
Trump has made tariffs a pillar of US foreign policy in his second term, using them to exert political pressure and renegotiate trade deals with countries that export goods to the United States.
The tariffs have given the Trump administration leverage to extract economic concessions from trading partners but have also increased volatility in financial markets.
Trump lamented the decision by what he called a “highly partisan” court, posting on Truth Social: “If these Tariffs ever went away, it would be a total disaster for the Country”.
He nonetheless predicted a reversal, saying he expected tariffs to benefit the country “with the help of the Supreme Court”.
The 7-4 decision from the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, DC, addressed the legality of what Trump calls “reciprocal” tariffs imposed as part of his trade war in April, as well as a separate set of tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico.
Democratic presidents appointed six judges in the majority and two judges who dissented, while Republican presidents appointed one judge in the majority and two dissenters.
The court’s decision does not impact tariffs issued under other legal authority, such as Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminium imports.
‘UNUSUAL AND EXTRAORDINARY’
Trump justified both sets of tariffs – as well as more recent levies – under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
IEEPA gives the president the power to address “unusual and extraordinary” threats during national emergencies.
“The statute bestows significant authority on the President to undertake a number of actions in response to a declared national emergency, but none of these actions explicitly include the power to impose tariffs, duties, or the like, or the power to tax,” the court said.
“It seems unlikely that Congress intended, in enacting IEEPA, to depart from its past practice and grant the President unlimited authority to impose tariffs.”
The 1977 law had historically been used for imposing sanctions on enemies or freezing their assets.
Trump, the first president to use IEEPA to impose tariffs, says the measures were justified given trade imbalances, declining US manufacturing power and the cross-border flow of drugs.
Trump’s Department of Justice has argued that the law allows tariffs under emergency provisions that authorise a president to “regulate” imports or block them completely.
Trump declared a national emergency in April over the fact that the US imports more than it exports, as the nation has done for decades.
Trump said the persistent trade deficit was undermining US manufacturing capability and military readiness.
Trump said the February tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from crossing US borders, an assertion the countries have denied.
MORE UNCERTAINTY
William Reinsch, a former senior Commerce Department official now with the Centre on Strategic and International Studies, said the Trump administration had been bracing for this ruling.
“It’s common knowledge the administration has been anticipating this outcome and is preparing a Plan B, presumably to keep the tariffs in place via other statutes.”
There was little reaction to the ruling in after-hours stock trading.
“The last thing the market or corporate America needs is more uncertainty on trade,” said Art Hogan, chief market strategist at B. Riley Wealth.
Trump is also locked in a legal battle to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, potentially ending the central bank’s independence.
“I think it puts Trump’s entire economic agenda on a potential collision course with the Supreme Court. It’s unlike anything we’ve seen ever,” said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council.
The 6-3 conservative majority Supreme Court has issued a series of rulings favouring Trump’s second term agenda, but has also, in recent years, been hostile to expansive interpretations of old statutes to provide presidents newly-found powers.
The appeals court ruling stems from two cases, one brought by five small US businesses and the other by 12 Democratic-led US states, which argued that IEEPA does not authorise tariffs.
The Constitution grants Congress, not the president, the authority to impose taxes and tariffs, and any delegation of that authority must be both explicit and limited, according to the lawsuits.
The New York-based US Court of International Trade ruled against Trump’s tariff policies on May 28, saying the president had exceeded his authority when he imposed both sets of challenged tariffs.
The three-judge panel included a judge who was appointed by Trump in his first term.
Another court in Washington ruled that IEEPA does not authorise Trump’s tariffs, and the government has appealed that decision as well.
At least eight lawsuits have challenged Trump’s tariff policies, including one filed by the state of California.
Politics
Indian news channel hacked, airs pro-Pakistan slogans

Indian news channel ABP News was briefly taken off its regular transmission after it was hacked, during which pro-Pakistan slogans were aired on screen, according to monitoring of the broadcast.
During the incident, content related to the Pakistan Army was also aired on the Indian channel, replacing its scheduled programming.
The hacked transmission further showed excerpts from a speech by Chief of Army Staff (COAS) and Chief of Defence Force (CDF) Field Marshal Asim Munir.
The ABP News has 50 million subscribers on YouTube, with its channel posting 544,435 videos so far, along with 25,089 billion views. On X, the news channel has two million followers.
Politics
Oil Breakout: Crude Surges 13% Above $80 on Middle East War Fears

Global oil markets jolted sharply higher on Monday as escalating conflict in the Middle East triggered fears of supply disruption, pushing Brent crude up 13% to above $82 per barrel.
Futures for US benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI) also jumped nearly 10%, crossing $70 per barrel in early Asian trading.
The surge follows US and Israeli military strikes on Iran, raising concerns that shipping through the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz could be severely disrupted.
Strait of Hormuz in Focus
Roughly 20% of global oil supply transits through the Strait of Hormuz, making it one of the world’s most critical maritime chokepoints.
While the route is not completely shut, analysts warn that insurance premiums and security risks may effectively halt most commercial traffic.
Major shipping companies have already begun suspending fleet movements through the area.
According to analysts, a prolonged disruption could remove between 8 to 10 million barrels per day (bpd) from global supply — a shock that strategic reserves may struggle to offset.
Amena Bakr of Kpler said oil prices could climb toward $90 per barrel if tensions persist, while some experts caution that prices above $100 cannot be ruled out.
Inflation and Growth Risks
The spike in crude prices has reignited fears of global inflation, particularly in energy-importing nations.
Higher fuel, shipping, and transportation costs could ripple across supply chains, slowing economic growth.
The last time oil crossed $100 per barrel was during the early stages of the Russia-Ukraine war, triggering prolonged inflationary pressure worldwide.
Economists warn that if tensions continue for an extended period, the global economy could face renewed recessionary risks.
US Political Implications
Analysts note that elevated energy prices could pose political challenges in the United States ahead of mid-term elections, especially as President Donald Trump had pledged lower fuel costs.
Some observers suggest Iran may seek to keep crude prices elevated to exert economic pressure amid ongoing geopolitical confrontation.
What’s Next?
Markets remain highly sensitive to developments in the Gulf.
Any formal closure of the Strait of Hormuz or direct targeting of energy infrastructure could push prices significantly higher.
For now, volatility is expected to remain elevated as traders assess the risk of prolonged supply disruption.
Politics
Iran conflict spreads across region as US, Israel suffer losses

Iranian forces fired missiles and drones across the Middle East, killing people in Israel and the United Arab Emirates, in retaliation for the conflict that began Saturday with the death of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
The US military expanded targets across Iran on Sunday and said it destroyed the headquarters of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the elite unit tasked with preserving the theocracy in place since 1979.
“The IRGC no longer has a headquarters,” US Central Command said in a statement.
The Israeli military said it was carrying out “large-scale strikes” in the heart of Tehran on Monday and also bombing across Lebanon against Hezbollah, the armed Shiite Muslim movement closely tied to Iran’s Islamic republic.
An AFP journalist heard explosions in Beirut. Hezbollah, which was weakened by an earlier Israeli offensive, said in a statement that it had fired rockets and drones at Israel “in retaliation for the pure blood” of Khamenei.
Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have urged the overthrow of the government in Iran, the sworn foe of Israel and the United States since the 1979 Islamic revolution toppled the pro-Western shah.
Trump, speaking to the New York Times, said the United States and Israel could keep up the level of attacks for four to five weeks.
“It won’t be difficult. We have tremendous amounts of ammunition,” he said, adding he had a shortlist of three unnamed people he favoured to lead Iran after the war.
In a video address, Trump urged Iranian security forces “to lay down your arms and receive full immunity or face certain death.”
“It will be certain death,” he repeated. “It won’t be pretty.”
The Pentagon said that three US service members were killed in the operation and five seriously wounded in the operation it has called “Epic Fury.”
“Sadly, there will likely be more before it ends,” Trump said.
“But America will avenge their deaths and deliver the most punishing blow to the terrorists who have waged war against, basically, civilization.”
Trump, who campaigned denouncing foreign interventions, has done little to explain the case for war to the US public.
Hakeem Jeffries, the top Democrat in the House of Representatives, said the soldiers’ deaths were the result of a “reckless decision” and that there was no threat to “justify this type of pre-emptive military strikes.”
Attacks across Middle East
Iran’s surviving leaders have voiced defiance and said that counter-attacks were justified as self-defence.
In Israel, an Iranian missile attack killed at least nine people and injured dozens more in the central city of Beit Shemesh, after a death the previous day near Tel Aviv.
Three people were also injured on one of the main roads of Jerusalem.
President Masoud Pezeshkian, whose elected role is subordinate to that of the supreme leader, called Khamenei’s killing a “declaration of war against Muslims.”
“Iran considers it its legitimate duty and right to avenge the perpetrators,” Pezeshkian said.
Ali Larijani, the powerful head of Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, warned: “Today we will hit them with a force that they have never experienced before.”
Israel and the United States attacked Iran weeks after authorities ruthlessly crushed mass protests, killing thousands.
The demonstrations, initially sparked by economic anxiety but also including calls for greater social freedoms, were considered one of the most serious threats to the religious state.
Trump called on Iranians to rise up and said, “America is with you.”
Reza Pahlavi, the son of the late shah, cautioned Iranians to stay vigilant in the face of air strikes and await the right moment to return to the streets.
But he also urged “nightly chants” against the Islamic republic.
Cheers were heard as some Iranians celebrated reports of the death of Khamenei, but after state media confirmed his killing, pro-government demonstrations also formed, chanting “Death to America!”
Iran named Ayatollah Alireza Arafi to join Pezeshkian on an interim leadership council to lead the country while a permanent successor is found for the supreme leader.
Mixed support
While many in the Iranian diaspora cheered Khamenei’s death, anger was seen on the streets of Iran’s neighbor Pakistan where officials said 17 people were killed and protesters tried to storm the US consulate in Karachi.
World leaders have given a mixed reaction to the attack, which came two days after Iran and the United States held talks on Tehran’s nuclear program.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Sunday that he would let the United States use UK bases for “defensive” strikes but that his country — a steadfast partner in the US-led wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — “will not join offensive action now.”
Iran’s first retaliatory strikes on Saturday hit all the Gulf states apart from mediator Oman.
On Sunday, Oman’s commercial port of Duqm was hit by two drones, injuring a foreign worker, the Oman News Agency said.
Three ships were also attacked in the Strait of Hormuz on Sunday after Iran had previously declared the strategic waterway was closed, sending global oil prices spiking.
The Revolutionary Guards claimed to strike the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln, but the Pentagon said the “missiles launched didn’t even come close.”
Trump said that US military strikes had sunk nine Iranian naval vessels and partially destroyed its navy headquarters.
Iran’s retaliatory strikes in the Gulf have killed at least four people and wounded dozens of others.
Inside Iran, the Red Crescent in its last toll issued on Saturday evening said that strikes had killed 201 people and injured hundreds more.
Iran’s judiciary confirmed that Ali Shamkhani, a top adviser to Khamenei, and General Mohammad Pakpour, the head of Revolutionary Guards, were among those killed.
-
Business1 week agoEye-popping rise in one year: Betting on just gold and silver for long-term wealth creation? Think again! – The Times of India
-
Tech1 week agoThese Cheap Noise-Cancelling Sony Headphones Are Even Cheaper Right Now
-
Politics1 week agoPakistan carries out precision strikes on seven militant hideouts in Afghanistan
-
Sports1 week agoKansas’ Darryn Peterson misses most of 2nd half with cramping
-
Entertainment1 week agoViral monkey Punch makes IKEA toy global sensation: Here’s what it costs
-
Sports1 week agoHow James Milner broke Premier League’s appearances record
-
Entertainment1 week agoSaturday Sessions: Say She She performs "Under the Sun"
-
Sports1 week ago
Mike Eruzione and the ‘Miracle on Ice’ team are looking for some company
