Business
‘Zero faith’: If Trump’s tariffs are overturned, how easily will businesses get back billions in refunds? It could be a nightmare! – The Times of India
Donald Trump administration’s tariff collections – running into billions of dollars – is threatened in case the Supreme Court decides to strike down the US President’s tariff policies. Trump himself has warned that any decision against his tariff policies would spell disaster.Businesses, which have paid huge amounts in the last few months due to country-based tariffs, believe that getting back refunds in case the tariffs are deemed illegal by the Supreme Court, would be a nightmare.
Tariff refund nightmare
To begin with, this would create administrative challenges involving extensive refund processing. If these nation-specific tariffs are ruled unlawful, the United States might need to return most of the $165 billion in customs duties collected in the current fiscal year to the businesses that paid them, according to a Bloomberg report.However, obtaining refunds will be complicated; reimbursements typically come via paper cheques through a slow process, and whilst the government could expedite mass repayments, experts believe this is doubtful.“The customs authorities won’t simply distribute refunds to importers freely,” Lynlee Brown, global trade partner at EY was quoted as saying by Bloomberg.The uncertainty surrounding the potential refund process exemplifies the broader confusion that businesses and financial markets have experienced since the implementation of Trump’s tariff policies.Several importers have abandoned expectations of receiving reimbursements, even if the court rules in their favour.“I have zero faith we’d ever get anything. Just zero,” expressed Harley Sitner, who owns Peace Vans, a Seattle-based classic camper van repair and restoration business.
More than half of tariff revenue at risk of refund
Sitner told Bloomberg that the unpredictability of Trump’s trade policies is more problematic than the actual tariff payments, which he views as irretrievable expenses. Following unexpected tariff charges ranging from $221 to $17,000, sometimes arriving months after receiving goods, Sitner has discontinued importing international inventory.“Just yesterday we got a small shipment from Germany worth $2,324 and it came with a $1,164 tariff charge. We can’t back out,” Sitner stated.Various customs brokers report being approached by Wall Street organisations interested in purchasing rights to potential refunds, offering importers an opportunity to recover a portion of their possible entitlements.The significant increase in customs duties – a rise of $95 billion compared to the previous year – is primarily attributed to Trump’s import tariffs affecting multiple economies, which became effective in August, as analysed by Bloomberg Economics. Two lower judicial bodies have ruled that Trump lacked the authority to implement tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.Should the Supreme Court uphold these earlier decisions, approximately 50% of the customs duties collected by the United States this year could be subject to refund. However, the process for businesses to reclaim these funds remains uncertain. Despite the government shutdown, tariff-related operations have largely continued uninterrupted.The United States Customs and Border Protection regularly processes refunds for importers in cases of overpayment or regulatory changes, with the Treasury Department issuing the payments. However, this reimbursement process is not automatically initiated.In line with statutory requirements, importers and their customs brokers must adhere to precise timelines and documentation procedures to maintain eligibility for refunds. Currently, the system predominantly relies on paper cheques for disbursement.Despite the Treasury’s directive from the Trump administration to discontinue cheque payments by September 30, the Customs and Border Protection (CBP) only initiated its first phase last Tuesday in what will be an extended implementation process. The system’s completion before any court decision appears unlikely without accelerated efforts.Tom Gould, a customs consultant from Seattle, suggests that potential refunds might result in “it’s possible that we’ll see millions and millions of paper checks being mailed out because each shipment, each customs entry, will have its own.”The process could be problematic. According to the Bloomberg report, due to regulatory requirements, customs refunds are exclusively sent to sanctioned domestic banks in dollars, requiring foreign importers to receive their refunds through international postal services or utilise a broker’s account within the United States.Worryingly, there has been a series of stolen cheque incidents in recent years. According to Gould, refund cheques were intercepted during postal delivery and traded on the dark web before being encashed.The administration possesses various options to expedite refunds, including automated processing of claims using existing system data. CBP has previously implemented refund rationalisation measures.Customs officials developed a framework to facilitate refund disbursement for items eligible under duty exemptions through the Generalised System of Preferences. Despite Congress allowing this programme to expire multiple times since the 1980s, it was subsequently renewed retroactively.Importers would input specific codes indicating GSP eligibility, even during programme inactivity. Gould suggested that the agency could similarly analyse internal data to identify IEEPA code-related tariff payments.Alternative procedures exist, though they might be complex. Legal experts indicate individual importers could be compelled to initiate separate legal proceedings to recover their funds.The authorities might require submission of protests or post-summary amendments, accompanied by comprehensive payment documentation and importer records, despite the government already possessing this information.EY’s Brown recommends importers maintain complete records from CBP’s Automated Commercial Environment platform, documenting entry dates and deadlines systematically to enhance refund possibilities.Despite potential simplified procedures by CBP, the complex nature of financial transactions within supply chains presents additional challenges.For shipments managed through commercial carriers like FedEx Corp. and United Parcel Service Inc., who handle documentation and tariff payments, CBP would direct refunds to the registered importer – the courier service rather than the goods’ owner.This arrangement could generate complications between the actual importers and courier services, creating another obstacle for businesses seeking reimbursement.
Tariff collections: Trump admin may not let go easily
Trump has valued the tariff income, declaring it has restored national wealth. He and his supporters have suggested various uses for these funds, including reducing national debt, supporting struggling agricultural sectors, and potentially distributing payment cheques to US citizens.This suggests the Trump administration will be reluctant to release these funds if the tariffs are invalidated, and they are likely to swiftly implement new levies using alternative legal frameworks should this occur. The Supreme Court is scheduled to review arguments in November regarding this matter.
Business
Labour codes to usher in uniformity, clarity – The Times of India
In a landmark move set to reshape India’s labour landscape, govt notified the implementation of all four labour codes, bringing into effect one of the most ambitious labour reforms in the country’s post-independence history. The rollout marks the realisation of “One India, One Law”- a unified labour framework that replaces a century of fragmented statutes with a consolidated, modern regulatory system. The four legislations cover various aspects of wages, social security, occupational safety, health and working conditions and employee relations aspects.Together, these codes subsume 29 central labour laws into a single legal structure aimed at improving transparency, reducing compliance complexity and enabling uniformity across states. Under the earlier system, overlapping definitions, varying state amendments and multiple registrations created operational hurdles for both employers and workers. The new framework introduces standardised definitions, rationalised thresholds and digitised processes intended to streamline compliance across the country.While the codes are now in force nationwide, supporting rules under both central and state jurisdictions are still to be notified. The press release issued by govt clarifies that they would engage with the public and stakeholders in the development of rules, regulations, and schemes under the new codes. Additionally, to ease the transition, the release confirms that the relevant provisions of existing labour laws will remain in force during the transition period.Changes for industryThe implementation of the labour codes will fundamentally reshape workforce management across industries. By introducing a uniform definition of wages, organisations will face greater clarity in benefit calculations for gratuity, ESI, leave encashment, overtime and statutory bonus, reducing litigation risk but potentially increasing employment costs. This change demands a thorough review of salary structures and payroll systems to ensure compliance. Additionally, the broader definition of ‘worker’ will extend entitlements such as overtime, leave encashment, and retrenchment compensation to a wider employee base, requiring companies to reassess classifications and related policies.Changes for workersFor workers-particularly those in the unorganised, gig and platform sectors-the reforms mark an unprecedented expansion of protections. The code on wages ensures a statutory minimum wage for all categories of workers and prohibits gender-based wage discrimination. The Social Security Code extends benefits to gig workers, platform workers and fixed-term employees for the first time. A national database of unorganised workers and a dedicated Social Security Fund aim to enable targeted delivery of welfare benefits. The OSH Code enhances workplace safety norms, regulates working conditions and ensures portability of benefits for migrant workers.A new chapter for India’s labour ecosystemThe enforcement of the labour codes marks a pivotal moment in India’s economic reform journey. If implemented effectively, the unified framework promises greater transparency, stronger worker protections and a more predictable regulatory environment for businesses. While final state rules and clarifications are awaited, Friday’s notification marks the beginning of a new chapter – one where India’s labour laws, finally, speak in a single, coherent voice.(The writer is partner, people advisory services – tax, EY India)
Business
Video: What the Jobs Report Tells Us About the Economy
new video loaded: What the Jobs Report Tells Us About the Economy
By Lydia DePillis, Claire Hogan, Stephanie Swart, Gabriel Blanco and Jacqueline Gu
November 21, 2025
Business
Cambridge shelter resident says Budget must focus on housing
A man experiencing homelessness said he hoped the government would focus on increasing accessibility to housing in its upcoming Budget.
Josh, 26, who is currently a resident at the night shelter Jimmy’s in Cambridge, said the availability of council housing and “move-on housing” – shared accommodation where people can receive support – was important.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves will deliver Labour’s second budget on 26 November.
Cambridge City Council received 1,139 homelessness applications between April 2024 and March 2025, which was a 13% rise on the previous year.
Josh said his focus was to get back into work after he completed his electrician qualifications, which he said were “just as hard as a degree in my opinion”.
He would like to see the Budget include more opportunities for continuing apprenticeships and more financial support for necessities such as course books.
Josh said he recently received a government grant to pay for essential job hunting equipment, such as a mobile phone, boots and suitable clothing.
He added that he would support a rise in taxes if they were spent on investing in public services, “especially the train lines into London”.
Andrew works in the security sector and lives in Peterborough in a home owned by the charity Hope Into Action.
The charity, which was set up in the city 15 years ago, owns 130 houses across the UK.
Andrew has beea living in one of the charity’s properties for two years, after experiencing homelessness for about “three or four months”.
“The charity saved my life,” he said.
He said renting in the private sector “can be expensive” but that people themselves have “got to budget as much as possible”.
Applications for housing to Peterborough City Council are also rising.
In 2024, it was contacted by 3,654 households facing homelessness, which was an 11% jump on the previous year.
And since 7 April this year, there have already been 2,333 approaches – an average of 70 a week.
The authority received nearly £1m last month to help tackle rough sleeping in the city.
Andrew said he recognised that public services needed to be paid for and that if tax rises needed to happen to pay for them then “you’ve got to make good” yourself.
HM Treasury was contacted for comment.
-
Tech7 days agoNew carbon capture method uses water and pressure to remove CO₂ from emissions at half current costs
-
Politics1 week agoBritish-Pakistani honoured for transforming UK halal meat industry
-
Business7 days agoThese 9 Common Money Mistakes Are Eating Your Income
-
Sports6 days agoTexas A&M officer scolds South Carolina wide receiver after touchdown; department speaks out
-
Fashion1 week agoAfter London, Leeds and Newcastle, next stop Glasgow for busy Omnes
-
Business1 week agoWhat’s behind Rachel Reeves’s hokey cokey on income tax rises?
-
Tech1 week ago$25 Off Exclusive Blue Apron Coupon for November 2025
-
Sports1 week agoApple scrapping MLS Season Pass service in ’26
