Connect with us

Sports

Fixing what’s wrong with Liverpool, Barcelona, Juventus, more

Published

on

Fixing what’s wrong with Liverpool, Barcelona, Juventus, more


Everybody has an opinion, especially when it comes to Liverpool. The defending Premier League champions have lost five of six in league play to fall to eighth in the table, and they’ve lost seven of 10 in all competitions.

Mohamed Salah is suddenly looking his age, expensive signing Florian Wirtz isn’t producing and expensive signing Alexander Isak has struggled with both fitness and finishing, the Premier League might be evolving more quickly than manager Arne Slot, the customary players-only meeting didn’t seem to accomplish much, and there are plenty of signs that players are still grieving and struggling with the summer death of teammate Diogo Jota.

It almost seems like regression is inevitable at times. Manchester City collapsed for most of the winter last season after winning the league in 2023-24, and following Liverpool’s best seasons under Jurgen Klopp, they had plenty of bumpy patches: two wins in seven, one in seven and two in eight in 2020-21 (after winning the Premier League) and one win in seven and zero in five in 2022-23 (after nearly winning the Treble). But with struggle comes a chorus of famous former players. It’s “crisis time,” per Roy Keane. It’s “crisis mode,” per Jamie Carragher. They don’t have leadership, per Wayne Rooney. The toxicity of the situation can become all-consuming. Everything is bad, nothing is working, nothing is salvageable.

A week of World Cup miracles: Best stories, celebrations from qualifying
Ian Darke’s Premier League stars: Haaland, Caicedo, Zubimendi
Modern classics: 25 of the best kits from the 21st century

Here’s where stats can offer some clarity. What’s actually going wrong — or at least, most wrong — at Anfield? What do Slot and Liverpool need to most urgently address to steer out of the skid? And while we’re here, what do stats say about some of Europe’s other struggling squads?

Let’s find out.


Liverpool logoLiverpool

Current Premier League standing: eighth (1.64 points per game, down from 2.21 last season)

Biggest statistical weakness: defense. It’s always been about the defense. To be sure, the attack has regressed despite Liverpool spending hundreds of millions of pounds on some of the brightest attacking talent in the world. They were comfortably first in goals scored and xG created last season, and now they’re sixth in both categories. But they’re ninth in xG allowed (13.9) and 12th in actual goals allowed (17), and that’s what most needs addressing.

From a pressure standpoint, Liverpool are hitting the same notes as last season. They rank sixth in the league in passes allowed per defensive action, second in combined progressive passes and progressive carries allowed and third in high turnovers forced; last year they were fourth, third and sixth, respectively. But they’re bombing in two categories: transition defense and set pieces. They were fourth in xG allowed from counterattacks last season, and they’re currently 17th, allowing 87% more per match.

Perhaps predictably, they’ve fallen from third to eighth in xG allowed per shot. Meanwhile, after allowing just nine goals from set pieces last season (eighth in the league), they’ve already allowed a shocking seven this season (18th), including three from long throws.

Combine that with a downturn in goalkeeper performance. In terms of goals prevented* they’ve gone from +0.10 per match from Alisson and Caoimhín Kelleher last season to -0.26 per match from Alisson and Giorgi Mamardashvili this season — and you get a pretty clear picture. Liverpool have allowed at least two goals in seven of 11 league matches, and while they won the first two such matches with late heroics, they’ve lost the past five.

When they allow one or fewer goals, they’re a perfect 4-for-4 in the wins department. But they’ve managed to do so only four times.

(*Goals prevented is a StatsPerform measure that compares the postshot xG value of your opponents’ shots on target to the number of actual goals you allow.)

play

1:59

Nicol: Arne Slot should bench Mohamed Salah

Steve Nicol explains why he thinks Liverpool’s Arne Slot should bench Mohamed Salah.

Critiques about the attack have always been correct to some degree. Salah has only four goals (three, minus one penalty) and two assists in 11 league matches when, at the same time last season, he had eight and six, respectively. Meanwhile, both Isak and Wirtz have been cursed by the xG gods. Wirtz has attempted shots worth 1.3 expected goals and completed passes worth 1.2 expected assists but has zero actual goals or assists, while Isak, managing only 253 league minutes thus far, has attempted shots worth 0.9 xG with no goals.

That part will change. But Liverpool’s defense is more of a structural problem.


Current LaLiga standing: second (2.33 points per game, up from 2.32)

Biggest statistical weakness: continuity. Of the nine teams in this piece, eight have regressed in terms of domestic points per play. Barcelona are actually doing just fine in that regard — they’re on the same pace as last season, when they won LaLiga. Their Champions League form has been dented by a loss to Paris Saint-Germain and a wild 3-3 draw at Club Brugge, but their main problem domestically has been the fact that Real Madrid appear to have improved quite a bit: After netting 84 points last season, Barca’s hated rivals are on pace for 98. That will certainly dampen the vibes.

You know what else will? Injuries.

Lamine Yamal (second in last year’s Ballon d’Or voting) played 83.7% of Barca’s LaLiga minutes last season and is at 58.6% in 2025-26. Raphinha (fifth), meanwhile, has gone from 83.2% to 35.6%, and Robert Lewandowski (17th) has gone from 78.4% to 41.6%. These three were unreal last season, combining for 89 goals and 44 assists in all competitions. About one-third of the way through 2025-26, they’re at 16 and seven, respectively. Players like Fermín López (six goals and four assists), Ferran Torres (seven and one) and loanee Marcus Rashford (six and seven) have held things down, but Barca’s attack has gone from otherworldly to merely very good.

play

1:49

Yamal situation ‘playground stuff’ from Barcelona and Spanish FA

Julien Lauren believes the Lamine Yamal situation could be “easily figured out” if both Barcelona and the Spanish FA “speak to each other” to sort it out.

In a roundabout way, maybe this is encouraging. Barca are hitting similar notes as last season despite a total lack of continuity up front. For that matter, they’ve gotten fewer minutes from injury-prone midfielders Pedri and Gavi as well, and after seven players played at least 70% of league minutes last season, they’re at only five so far this year.

Of course, Real Madrid have suffered their own injury issues and are still setting a higher bar; Barca aren’t keeping up. And while domestic opponents haven’t been able to adjust particularly well to Hansi Flick’s high defensive line in their second year of exposure to it, it has been an issue in the Champions League, where they’re 30th out of 36 teams in xG allowed per shot, 22nd in xG allowed from counterattacks and 18th in goals allowed.

Still, getting and keeping the right personnel on the pitch would help immensely. Unfortunately, that’s something over which you don’t have a ton of control.


Current Premier League standing: 14th (1.09 points per game, down from 1.74)

Biggest statistical weakness: goals. A pretty important stat. Newcastle play a more direct style than most of England‘s richest clubs, and it has generally served them pretty well. If done well, you won’t attempt as many shots as your possession-hungry peers, but you’ll attempt as many or more good shots. Newcastle averaged 2.4 shots per game worth at least 0.2 xG; only Liverpool averaged more. They attempted 26.9% of their shots with fewer than two defenders between the ball and goal, lowest in the league.

This season, following a well-publicized and stretched-out divorce with Isak, they added forwards Nick Woltemade and Yoane Wissa before the transfer deadline. Woltemade has had some bright, creative moments, scoring six goals in all competitions (far more than Isak, if nothing else). But he’s averaging 1.6 shots per 90 minutes in all competitions — dreadfully low for a center forward — and Wissa has yet to play because of injury. Consequently, despite solid work from left-sided attackers Anthony Gordon and Harvey Barnes (eight goals and three assists in all comps), Newcastle’s attack has disappeared.

When your attacking numbers are far closer to West Ham’s than Arsenal‘s, something has gone awry. Newcastle have scored just 11 goals in league play (17th), and while they’ve probably been privy to some bad finishing luck, they’re just 12th in xG created, too. They’re averaging just 1.5 shots per game worth at least 0.2 xG (10th), and only 20% of their shots have been attempted with fewer than two defenders in the way (10th). Despite their attempted directness, they’re allowing more counterattacking opportunities than they’re creating.

Injuries are playing a role here — only four players have seen the pitch for more than 71% of Newcastle’s league minutes, and 21 have started at least once. But injuries are playing a role for lots of teams, and Newcastle are currently far closer to the relegation zone (two points above) than they are to a spot in the top five (six points behind).

Unless the attack peps up a bit, making up ground will be awfully difficult.


Current Serie A standing: sixth (1.73 points per game, down from 1.84)

Biggest statistical weakness: shot quality. Like plenty of fired managers, Igor Tudor was done in at least a bit by some bad bounces. In his last four matches in charge at Juventus, against a solid run of opponents (AC Milan, Como, Real Madrid and Lazio), his charges allowed just four goals. But they scored zero despite creating shots worth 4.4 xG. While they probably deserved four or five points from those matches, they managed only a 0-0 draw with Milan.

In their first four matches without Tudor — one with interim Massimo Brambilla, three with new hire Luciano Spalletti — both the schedule and the xG gods eased up. Against Udinese, Cremonese, Sporting CP and Torino, Juve scored six goals and managed two wins and two draws. But they still suffered from poor finishing — those six goals came from shots worth 7.9 xG — and their shot quality still lacked a bit. For the season they rank just 16th in Serie A in xG per shot (0.12).

Forwards Dusan Vlahovic, Jonathan David and Loïs Openda, who are paid millions of euros to put the ball in the net, are attempting just 3.5 shots per 90 minutes between them, and even worse, they’re averaging just 0.11 xG per shot. Juve’s creative players — mainly Kenan Yildiz and Andrea Cambiaso — have not been able to get them involved, and with just four goals from their 5.7 combined xG, they haven’t finished the opportunities they’ve gotten either.

Juve are in decent shape overall: Thanks primarily to wins over lower-rung opponents, they’re only three points outside Serie A’s top four. The early signs under Spalletti have been encouraging, but until their scorers both earn and finish better scoring opportunities, climbing the table will be difficult.


Current LaLiga standing: eighth (1.42 points per game, down from 1.84)

Biggest statistical weakness: defensive regression to the mean. They play a reliable style of ball in Bilbao: Defend first, defend second, defend third, and maybe score a goal on the counter at some point. They haven’t allowed more than 50 goals in a LaLiga season since 2012-13, and they’ve allowed under 40 in four of the last six years.

Last season, however, they were a little too good in this regard. Giving up just 29 goals in 38 matches allowed them to finish fourth and earn their first Champions League bid in 11 seasons. But these 0.76 goals per match (first in the league) came from an average of 1.01 xG (second); even by the standards of Athletic and goalkeeper Unai Simón, that’s too much of a disparity. And sure enough, the xG gods have come for what they’re owed this year. They’re allowing lower overall shot quality — 0.85 xG per match (first) — but opponents are turning that into 1.1 goals (fifth).

The attack, meanwhile, has been beset by injuries. Primary attackers Iñaki Williams (only 62.7% of minutes this season), Nico Williams (49.7%) and Oihan Sancet (39.5%) aren’t seeing much of the pitch, and Athletic have scored just four open-play goals in 12 league matches. They’re seventh in the league, already eight points off the top-four pace, and Champions League play hasn’t gone any better. They beat Qarabag but have lost three other matches by a combined 8-1.

Randomness isn’t fixable, unfortunately, and if they continue defending well, their league form should stabilize. But a return to the Champions League next season is looking unlikely.


Current Serie A standing: 13th (1.18 points per game, down from 1.95)

Biggest statistical weakness: absolute offensive stagnation. Replacing Roma-bound Gian Piero Gasperini was always going to be a tall task. With his swashbuckling attacking identity, his Atalanta teams overachieved against their spending numbers for many times in recent seasons, and manager Ivan Juric came into the job with a high bar to clear. That Atalanta have lost only three of their 15 matches in all competitions certainly suggests things could be going worse, but settling for an incredible eight draws in that span held them back, and two of those three losses came in the first nine days of November. On the 10th day, Juric was fired.

Juric’s Atalanta matched Gasperini’s shot volume — they were fifth in Serie A in shots per possession last season, and they’re fifth again this year — but the good shots have vanished. They’ve fallen from third to 12th in xG per shot. Lower shot quality can produce streakiness, and in their past eight matches in all competitions they’ve managed just four goals from shots worth 11.2 xG. Take Lazar Samardzic‘s two goals out of the equation, and everyone else has two goals from 10.6 xG.

That is, of course, unsustainably terrible, and new hire Raffaele Palladino, most recently of Fiorentina, will likely enjoy a new-manager bump simply thanks to progression toward the mean. But as with Juve, shot quality desperately needs to improve, and unlike Juve, they’re now nine points off the top-four pace.


Current Premier League standing: 19th (0.82 points per game, down from 1.71)

Biggest statistical weakness: set pieces and no margin for error. Looking at full-season stats for a team that has already careened from a successful counterattacking manager (Nuno Espirito Santo) to a possession-and-pressing guy (Ange Postecoglou) back to a counterattacker (Sean Dyche) is probably a fool’s errand, and it’s probably not surprising to learn that looking at Forest’s full-season numbers offer us almost no hint of style or quality.

That said, set pieces have been a rampant problem this season, and they haven’t improved so far in Dyche’s short tenure. They were a life hack for Forest’s rousing seventh-place finish (and Champions League near-qualification) last season — they scored 17 set-piece goals (first) and produced a +8 scoring margin from them (third). This season, they’ve scored just two set piece goals (17th) and allowed nine (20th) for a minus-7 margin (also 20th).

play

1:03

Dyche frustrated at lack of VAR intervention vs. Man United

Sean Dyche reacts to Nottingham Forest’s 2-2 draw vs. Manchester United in the Premier League.

In Dyche’s three league matches, they’re one of only seven teams to score zero times, and they’ve allowed three, including both goals in a 2-2 draw with Manchester United. The simple fact that they’ve earned four points and scored five goals suggests solid improvement under Dyche, but this aspect is still dragging them down, and they still have the second-fewest points in the league — behind even Nuno’s new team, a previously hapless West Ham.


Current Bundesliga standing: 17th (0.50 points per game, down from 1.53)

Biggest statistical weakness: a total lack of shot attempts. With the endlessly enthusiastic Bo Henriksen in charge, Mainz were the Bundesliga’s Nottingham Forest, positioned for a shocking Champions League berth last season until fading late. Like Athletic Club, they got as far as they did in part due to good fortune on defense — they were 10th in xG allowed (1.46 per game) but third in goals allowed (1.26) — and that allowed them to get by with an attack that was slightly above average at best. The defense has regressed a little (1.59 xG allowed), but the fortune has completely vanished (1.80 goals allowed).

You can get by in the Bundesliga with a mediocre defense, but it certainly exposes your attack. Without Eintracht Frankfurt-bound Jonathan Burkardt (18 goals from shots worth 14.8 xG last season), and with predictable regression to the mean from Paul Nebel (10 goals from 5.8 xG last year, one from 1.4 this year), Mainz are creating almost nothing on the attacking end. They are last in the league in shots per possession (0.08), and despite playing a pretty direct style, they’ve attempted only 14.5% of their shots with fewer than two defenders between the ball and goal (second worst).

Granted, this isn’t incredibly different from last season, when they ranked 17th in shots per possession. But now neither the defense nor Nebel is overachieving.

With an xG differential that ranks 11th in the league, they’re likely to eventually move up the table moving forward. Despite sharing the lowest point total in the league with Heidenheim, current Opta projections give them only a 13% chance of finishing in an automatic relegation spot. But good fortune covered up some weaknesses last year, and that fortune is well gone.


Fiorentina logoFiorentina

Current Serie A standing: 20th (0.45 points per game, down from 1.71)

Biggest statistical weakness: finishing (and set pieces). Stop me if you’ve heard this one before. A team that seemingly overachieved in the table last season isn’t getting the same breaks this time around.

Fiorentina finished sixth in Serie A in 2024-25, their best league campaign in nine years, but they did it with an unsustainably brilliant run of finishing: They scored 60 goals from shots worth only 49.7 xG, a 21% overachievement. Important creatives like left back Robin Gosens and midfielders Yacine Adli and Rolando Mandragora got in on the goal-scoring act a little too well, scoring 13 goals from shots worth 5.5 xG.

This season, with Adli off to Al Shabab, Mandragora and Gosens have scored a much more normal three goals from 2.7 xG, but the team’s overall finishing has vanished. Fiorentina have generated 15.5 xG (fifth) — they’re first in the league in xG per shot! — but have scored just nine goals (14th), a 42% underachievement. Star center forward Moise Kean is enduring an incredible slump, with two goals from shots worth 5.7 xG, and Fiorentina have endured a pair of 0-0 draws, a 1-1 draw, a 1-0 loss and three 2-1 losses. In one of those draws, against Torino, Kean somehow missed a tap-in header worth 0.98 xG.

Like Forest, Fiorentina have also collapsed in the set pieces department: They allowed seven set piece goals last season and have already matched that in 2025-26. Their underlying numbers are solid enough that they probably aren’t a genuine threat for relegation — Opta puts their odds at only 15% — but worse fortune, worse finishing and worse set piece defense have all but relegated them from a shot at another European competition next season.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Koepka: ‘Nervous’ about return, must rebuild ties

Published

on

Koepka: ‘Nervous’ about return, must rebuild ties


HONOLULU — Brooks Koepka is expecting a nervous energy when he returns to a regular PGA Tour event for the first time in four years at the Farmers Insurance Open.

Only some of that pertains to his golf.

How he is received — inside and outside the ropes — remains to be seen as the first player to be invited back to the PGA Tour after taking Saudi riches to defect to the LIV Golf League in 2022.

“I’ve got a lot of work to do with some of the players,” Koepka said in a telephone interview Monday. “There’s definitely guys who are happy, and definitely guys who will be angry. It’s a harsh punishment financially. I understand exactly why the tour did that — it’s meant to hurt. But it [his departure] hurt a lot of people.

“If anyone is upset, I need to rebuild those relationships.”

Koepka was allowed back under a one-time Returning Member Program that the PGA Tour board developed and approved last week. It applies only to players who have won a major or the Players Championship since 2022.

The penalty is a $5 million contribution to a charity the tour will help decide, no access to FedEx Cup bonus money in 2026, no sponsor exemptions to the $20 million signature events and, most importantly, no equity grants in the PGA Tour for the next five years.

The PGA Tour estimates, based on Koepka performing at the level allowed to win five majors, that the financial repercussions could be worth anywhere from $50 million to $85 million.

“There was no negotiating,” Koepka said about his conversation last week with Brian Rolapp, the CEO of PGA Tour Enterprises. “It’s meant to hurt — it does hurt — but I understand. It’s not supposed to be an easy path. There’s a lot of people that were hurt by it when I left, and I understand that’s part of coming back.”

For those not happy to see him return, Koepka said he looks forward to having private conversations outside the media.

“The first week I’ll be a little bit nervous,” Koepka said. “There’s a lot going on than just golf. I’ll be glad to put the first week behind me — dealing with the media, dealing with the players, and then getting some of those tougher conversations. But I’m looking forward to it.

“Am I nervous? Yes. Am I excited? Yes. In a weird way, I want to have those conversations.”

Jordan Spieth said Koepka just needed to be the same person who left.

“You’re not going to ask somebody to change to please other people,” Spieth said. “I don’t think he needs to play Monday pro-ams or walk along the range and shake everyone’s and say, ‘I’m sorry.’ He just comes back and plays really good golf. That’s good for everybody.”

The board, led by a majority of players, signed off on the plan. Koepka talked with Rolapp by phone Thursday evening, and he was at PGA Tour headquarters the next morning unaccompanied. He came in through a side entrance.

The 35-year-old Koepka, who is exempt the next three years from his 2023 victory in the PGA Championship at Oak Hill, will return at Torrey Pines on Jan. 29. He also said he would play the WM Phoenix Open, where he won his first PGA Tour title in 2015 and won again in 2021.

That might provide the first real test of how the public feels — a Saturday afternoon on the 16th hole of the TPC Scottsdale, the rowdiest in golf even for players the fans don’t really know.

“I can handle it,” Koepka said. “I enjoy the crowd, and hopefully everybody is happy to see me. They can’t be mad at me forever.”

So why the change?

Word first began to circulate in November that negotiations between Koepka and LIV Golf — he had one year left on his contract — were not going well. He had publicly complained last summer that LIV was not as far along as he would have liked.

And then Dec. 23 came the announcement from LIV of an “amicable” split, and Koepka reapplied for PGA Tour membership.

Koepka cited a knee injury that has taken a toll on his body and the desire to spend more time with his family as the reasons to join LIV. He cited the need to spend more time at home when he left LIV, particularly after his wife had a miscarriage last fall.

“I needed to be there with my family over the last few months. I needed to be closer to home,” Koepka said. “I was able to get out of the LIV contract, everything lined up perfectly and I was able to get back on tour.

“I’m happy and grateful it was able to come to this.”

Koepka has not spoken publicly about how much he was offered to play for LIV, except for saying it was nine figures on a 2023 podcast with boxer Jake Paul. Also unclear was how much he had to pay back by leaving one year early.

Now it’s about playing again on familiar turf with players he saw only four times a year at the majors. He is close with several players who live in South Florida. Others he will see for the first time in the locker room, on the range, on the first tee.

“There’s probably a mixed bag of ‘We’re happy you’re back, welcome home’ to ‘You shouldn’t be here.’ I understand everybody’s point of view,” Koepka said. “I was going to be sitting out possibly a year, and I’m extremely thankful the tour gave me this opportunity.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

College watchdog group nixed 500-plus NIL deals

Published

on

College watchdog group nixed 500-plus NIL deals


The College Sports Commission has rejected nearly $15 million in name, image and likeness agreements since it started evaluating them over the summer, representing more than 10% of the value of all the deals it has analyzed and closed.

The CSC released its latest statistics Monday, saying it did not clear 524 deals worth $14.94 million, while clearing 17,321 worth $127.21 million. All the data was current as of Jan. 1.

The numbers came against the backdrop of a “reminder” memo the commission sent to athletic directors last week, citing “serious concerns” about contracts being offered to athletes before they had been cleared through the commission’s NIL Go platform.

The CSC is in charge of evaluating all deals worth more than $600 that are offered by third-party businesses that are often affiliated with the schools recruiting the players.

“Without prejudging any particular deal, the CSC has serious concerns about some of the deal terms being contemplated and the consequences of those deals for the parties involved,” the Friday night memo said.

The CSC said primary reasons for deals not being cleared were that they lacked a valid business purpose; they didn’t directly activate a player’s NIL rights, instead “warehousing” them for future use; and that players were being paid at levels that weren’t “commensurate with similarly situated individuals.”

The memo reminded ADs that signing players to deals that hadn’t been cleared by the CSC left the players “vulnerable to deals not being cleared, promises not being able to be kept, and eligibility being placed at risk.”

Other statistics from the latest report:

There were 10 deals in arbitration as of Dec. 31, eight of which have since been withdrawn. All involved a resolved administrative issue at one school not named by the CSC.

• 52% of deals submitted to NIL Go were resolved within 24 hours.

• 73% of deals reached resolution within seven days following submission of all required information.

• 56% of the 10,848 athletes who have at least one cleared deal play football or men’s basketball.



Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Alonso wasn’t perfect, but sacking him ignores Madrid’s real problems

Published

on

Alonso wasn’t perfect, but sacking him ignores Madrid’s real problems


So, Xabi Alonso becomes the tenth permanent Real Madrid manager of Florentino Pérez’s 21-plus-year presidential reign to be sacked without even completing a year in charge.

Just when the 44-year-old Madrid playing legend seemed to have calmed the stormy waters that had threatened to overwhelm him since autumn, the biggest sin in the entire dictionary of Must Not Commit for Bernabéu managers, losing to Barcelona when a trophy is at stake, has cost him his job. Those around Alonso — who leaves with Madrid only four points off the top of LaLiga, safely in the UEFA Champions League top eight and with a nervy Copa del Rey tie at Albacete on Wednesday — will look back at the final moments of Sunday’s Supercopa final and think about Álvaro Carreras and Raúl Asencio, who each had point-blank chances to score and take the final to penalties.

Alonso, in retrospect, stands condemned, at least in the eyes of Pérez — the only person whose opinion matters when a coach’s fate is concerned — of several offenses.

First: The damage done to Alonso’s public reputation and club credibility when, on substituting Vinícius Júnior in the victorious Clásico last October, the Brazil international erupted in anger while showing disrespect for his manager. Even in victory, the player’s actions hogged the headlines because he screamed into the night air, “This is why I’m going to leave this team. This is why I’m leaving!”

Pérez wants Vinícius to renew his contract, at all costs. So although Alonso palpably repaired much of the damage with his 24-year-old star, and on Sunday helped him produce his best goal and best performance since Carlo Ancelotti left, it’s now clear that irreparable damage was done to Pérez’s view of his coach.

Second: Losing to Barcelona in a big final remains, it seems, a capital offense. Just as a reminder, it has been about five weeks since I wrote in this very space, “If the 44-year-old coach, who won all there is to win in his playing career and then made history by making Bayer Leverkusen Bundesliga champions for the first time, can beat Atlético Madrid in the Supercopa semifinal and either Barcelona or Athletic Club in the final, then he’ll finally be left alone to do his job until the end of the season. But to come home without a trophy? Alonso will almost certainly be sacked.”

Third: When Madrid played anodyne, point-dropping football against Rayo Vallecano, Elche and Girona, and then lost consecutively at home to Manchester City and Celta Vigo, there was a massive manhunt mounted, by the club and by the media, to find someone to blame. Correctly or not, and I think the answer is firmly “not,” it has been the coach — rather than the president or the players — who has been found guilty.

Fourth: Alonso, it must be said, hasn’t “played the game.” Managing upward is an increasingly key skill when you’re coaching at a big club — that’s true anywhere in the world, but particularly when your direct boss is the unaccountable Pérez.

Throughout his life, either as the son of the excellent player Periko Alonso; or while coming through the ranks at Real Sociedad; playing brilliantly for Liverpool, Madrid, Bayern Munich and Spain; or making history by taking Bayer Leverkusen to their best-ever trophy season; Xabi Alonso has been the man. Venerated, respected, ultra talented, backed, fêted, desired, rewarded and awarded deity status. Don’t take my word for it, just think how he’s regarded by Spain (European and world champion), at Liverpool (hero of the greatest match in their entire history), local boy made good at Real Sociedad, José Mourinho’s lieutenant at Madrid and Pep Guardiola’s chosen linchpin while winning trophy after trophy at Bayern. He simply didn’t need to kowtow to anyone. Ever.

It’s different at Madrid and, so, when his friend and mentor, Guardiola, used a vulgar expression in support of Alonso before City won at the Bernabéu in December, it went down very badly indeed when Alonso’s postmatch response, teased out by a journalist, seemed to be sympathetic to what City’s Catalan coach was suggesting about Alonso’s relationship with Pérez.

Until very recently, Alonso, never rude, was standoffish and cool with the assembled, hard-nosed, some would say Pérez-aligned media who turned up to news conferences six times a week at the Madrid training ground. He changed his stance when he knew he was fighting for his continued employment: He began to expand on answers, share a joke, become a bit more touchy-feely, and it was working. But he played that game a little too late.

It was extremely telling when Alonso suggested to his players on Sunday in Jeddah that they form a guard of honor for Barcelona’s victorious players (as Hansi Flick’s men had done for them while they walked up to get their losers’ medals), but Kylian Mbappé usurped him and fiercely gestured to the squad that he, not Alonso, had the final word and that no way would they be forming two lines and letting the Supercopa winners feel honored. Very, very damaging imagery.

What’s a little bit shocking is that the Spanish football media, having set the table for an Alonso sacking over and over again in November and December, were utterly caught by surprise. Even playing pretty moderately, in victory against Sevilla, Real Betis and Atlético, Madrid’s players were clearly pulling for their coach, they were building results — admittedly from a low base — and they were looking very like steering Los Blancos into the extremely valuable top eight of the Champions League with two winnable matches in their sights this month. Marca’s headlines this morning included “Xabi revives the Mourinho style” and “What a miss from Carreras in the 95th minute.” No blame thrown at the coach. Their famous columnist, Alfredo Relaño, stated, “Xabi Alonso lost the final but saved his situation.” The much more hawkish, Pérez-oriented Diario AS used “Only Raphinha was better than Madrid” as their match headline, and the self-confessed ultra-Madridista columnist Tomás Roncero’s column read “Nothing to reproach you over.”

One of the biggest signs, in my opinion, as to the general mood of this singular, polemic, but highly successful, billionaire president, and something that Alonso could have paid more attention to, is the name of the stadium.

For the longest time, it’s been called the Santiago Bernabéu in honor of the man previously regarded as the greatest leader in Real Madrid’s history. More and more, and often in formal terms, it’s being called “the Bernabéu” — a change that, in my view, will preface a gradual, strategic and corporate-driven moving of Pérez toward the top of the podium of all-time presidents. This 78-year-old has, gradually but consistently, aimed at moving beyond his “Primus inter pares” (“first among equals”) status to be regarded as the all-time greatest. His costly and, so far, not wholly successful redevelopment of the stadium was supposed to be the jewel in the crown but, for a host of reasons, hasn’t hit home with the power he expected it to. I think, a couple of months away from his 79th birthday, he feels that time is flying, and he has none to waste.

He needs, desires, more league wins, more Champions Leagues, fewer sights of Barcelona lifting trophies, less whistling and jeering when Madrid play at their imperious HQ. He craves the formation of a European Super League. Right now, he’s being thwarted in too many of those desires.

Those previous nine coaches he sacked only a few months into their reigns usually, it must be pointed out, made way for more successful, more glorious periods for the club as European and domestic trophies were stacked up and the best players actively chose to move to Real Madrid. This fact is incontestable.

President Pérez, in my opinion, has blamed the wrong man, has ignored the real problems and, now that he has passed the baton to Álvaro Arbeloa, he has perpetuated the real flaws rather than cured them in sacking Alonso. But he won’t care about that opinion and, in the past, his irresistible force has defeated any apparently immovable object. This time? I’m unconvinced.

Bad luck, Xabi. You only partially contributed to this situation. But, as you always said yourself, Real Madrid is different. Real Madrid is unique. Good luck with what comes next.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending