Business
Govt shelves proposal to revoke APL agreement | The Express Tribune
ISLAMABAD:
The government has dropped a proposal to unilaterally terminate the implementation agreement with Asia Petroleum Limited (APL), which may dent foreign investor confidence, and has decided to come up with an alternative use of strategic pipelines through a third entry point for white oil imports into the country.
The government believes that this option will be a win-win situation for both parties. The Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) has also constituted a high-level committee to finalise terms and conditions for the alternative use of the pipelines by January 31, 2026.
APL, set up with the World Bank’s assistance in 1994 as a public limited company, owns and operates an 82km-long, 14-inch diameter pipeline system with throughput capacity of 3.2 million metric tons per annum.
The pipeline was commissioned to supply furnace oil to the Hub Power plant. APL is a joint venture between Pakistan State Oil (PSO – 40% shares), Infraone Limited, Hong Kong (20% shares), Independent Petroleum Group, Kuwait (12.5% shares) and Weco International (12.5% shares).
An implementation agreement between APL and the government of Pakistan was executed on June 28, 2009, effective from November 2, 1996 to March 30, 2027. Under the agreement, the government guarantees a minimum throughput of 1.5 million metric tons per annum at $12.13 per ton for the first 10 years and thereafter $6.99/ton.
Three options were submitted to the ECC in a recent meeting for taking a decision. The committee was informed that the National Task Force – Implementation of Reforms (Power Division) in its meeting dated October 28, 2024, which was attended by PSO MD, APL CEO and DG (Oil), had given its recommendations.
The task force recommended to unilaterally terminate the implementation agreement with APL, with effect from October 1, 2024. “This option minimises legal exposure and execution risk while remaining in line with the existing contractual framework till March 2027. It spreads payment burden across quarterly installments instead of equitable lump-sum termination payments.”
To strengthen investor confidence, it was recommended to develop alternative uses of strategic pipelines, enabling a third entry point for white oil imports into the country.
The ECC was further told that unilateral termination entails higher immediate fiscal outflows, coupled with potential litigation costs, reputational damage and adverse signals to foreign investors. It was requested to approve any of the options and it may also allow a supplementary grant for payment of APL dues.
The Law Division, in its earlier comments, had advised the Petroleum Division to secure the consent of all parties involved, in line with the recommendations of the National Task Force. The Attorney General of Pakistan had no objection and supported the second option. The Ministry of Planning gave its backing to the third option.
The Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) and PSO, under the ambit of the National Task Force, had decided to finalise a way forward by January 31, 2026. The ECC recommended that the petroleum and power ministers may hold discussions and suggest an alternative use of the unutilised pipeline.
The ECC considered a summary submitted by the Ministry of Energy (Petroleum Division) titled “Future of Asia Petroleum Limited Pipeline” and approved the alternative use of the pipeline for fuel supply.
The ECC also constituted a committee consisting of representatives of the Petroleum Division, Finance Division, Law & Justice Division, SIFC, PSO and National Task Force. The committee will negotiate the terms of the implementation agreement, including the guarantee agreement and the Letter of Agreement with APL, decide the ownership of the fuel in pipeline and submit a way forward for ECC’s consideration by January 31, 2026.
The ECC also gave directives that the minister of petroleum and the minister of power may engage in discussions and suggest an alternative use of the unutilised pipeline.
Business
Ads for British beef and milk banned following Chris Packham complaint
Two ads promoting British beef and milk have been banned after television presenter and environmental campaigner Chris Packham complained that they misled consumers about the products’ carbon footprints.
Both ads for the Agriculture and Horticulture Development Board’s (AHDB) Let’s Eat Balanced campaign used the carbon footprint of British beef and milk to promote the products, firstly stating: “British beef not only tastes great, but has a carbon footprint that’s half the global average*.”
The asterisk linked to text that stated: “Full lifecycle emissions of CO2 eq (carbon dioxide equivalent) per kg of beef.”
The ad for milk stated: “British milk not only tastes good, but is also produced to world-class standards, and has a carbon footprint a third lower than the global average.”
Packham complained to the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) that the ads, and specifically the carbon footprint claims, were misleading as they did not reflect the full environmental impact of British meat and dairy.
The AHDB said the ads’ mention of carbon emissions would be understood in relation to the environmental impact of beef and milk that occurred between the “cradle-to-retail” stages.
But the ASA said the average consumer “being reasonably well-informed, observant and circumspect” would understand the claims to apply beyond the retail stage and include actions such as cooking and wastage.
The ASA said: “While we acknowledged the potential difficulties in producing post-retail emissions data, the claims in the ads suggested those emissions were included and we therefore expected the evidence provided to also include them.
“We therefore concluded that the evidence presented was insufficient to support the full life-cycle claims in the ads, which was how the average consumer was likely to interpret them.
“We reminded AHDB that environmental claims should be based on the full life cycle unless the ad stated otherwise.”
AHDB’s director of communications and market development, Will Jackson, said: “Let’s Eat Balanced is doing what it was designed to do, providing clear, factual, evidence-led information about British food, nutrition and farming standards.
“Since the investigation began, we have conducted independent consumer research which found that the majority of respondents interpreted these adverts as relating to the production phase only, from farm to retail.
“This research provides important insight into consumer understanding and supports our belief that consumers were not misled by the information we shared in these two specific adverts.”
Business
Gen Z pros embrace ‘portfolio careers’ as side hustles surge – The Times of India
BENGALURU: India’s Gen Z workforce is embracing what experts describe as “portfolio careers” – balancing multiple professional identities and income streams simultaneously. New research from LinkedIn shows that 75% of Gen Z entrepreneurs in India now manage multiple income streams, significantly higher than the 62% among Gen X entrepreneurs. The findings point to a growing preference among younger professionals for flexibility, autonomy and diversified sources of income. “We’re also seeing the rise of the ‘portfolio era’, with more professionals creating multiple income streams and redefining what a career can look like. This shift is making entrepreneurship more accessible than ever before,” said LinkedIn India country manager Kumaresh Pattabiraman.Rather than depending on a single full-time role, many professionals are simultaneously building businesses, freelancing, consulting, creating online content and monetising specialised skills through digital platforms. The trend comes amid a broader rise in entrepreneurial activity in India. LinkedIn recorded a 104% year-on-year increase in members adding “Founder” to their profiles – the highest growth among all global markets.AI is also emerging as a major enabler of this shift. The report found that 85% of Gen Z entrepreneurs consider AI and digital tools important to their business operations.
Business
Elon Musk said control of OpenAI should go to his children, Sam Altman tells jury
Sam Altman said Elon Musk tried many times for total control of OpenAI, which he’s now suing.
Source link
-
Tech1 week agoDHS Demanded Google Surrender Data on Canadian’s Activity, Location Over Anti-ICE Posts
-
Business1 week agoHeineken plans huge investment in hundreds of UK pubs ahead of World Cup
-
Tech5 days agoA new frontier: Identity stack evolves for agentic systems | Computer Weekly
-
Tech4 days ago‘Orbs,’ ‘Saucers,’ and ‘Flashes’ on the Moon: Pentagon Drops New UFO Files
-
Business1 week agoIndia among most resilient large EMs, better placed for future global shocks; policy reforms & strong buffers help: Moody’s – The Times of India
-
Tech5 days agoWhat Microsoft Executives Really Thought About OpenAI in 2018
-
Fashion5 days agoNew orders in German manufacturing up 5% MoM in Mar 2026: Destatis
-
Sports5 days agoShaheen Afridi achieves landmark feat during opening Test against Bangladesh
