I’m torn on the price of the Movestyle, though. I love how affordable it is at $580, putting it within a more mainstream budget than I would have assumed. On the other hand, this is a very unique product, and I think higher-end specs might have been a better choice. This is a VA panel rather than IPS, and that means the color accuracy and saturation are OK, but not the best. Although it’s only rated for up to 250 nits of brightness, it topped out at 310 nits when measured against my colorimeter. But it’s not terribly bright, which could be a problem in a brightly-lit room. The display quality isn’t horrible, and this monitor isn’t made for professional video work.

And yet, in terms of the viewing experience, it doesn’t feel all that high-quality, either. For a similar price, you can get a more capable OLED monitor that’s brighter, faster, more colorful, and capable of HDR. But that doesn’t come with the adjustable, rolling stand. An even higher-end monitor would increase the price by at least a few hundred dollars. The lack of a touchscreen feels like a missed opportunity, too, especially since this could easily be used next to a desk or in a kitchen. There are just some cases where using your fingers is easier than using a remote.

Interestingly, Samsung does sell a more premium Movingstyle monitor that’s even touchscreen-enabled and has a higher refresh rate of 120 Hz for gaming. But it’s a smaller 27-inch panel, comes with a lower-resolution 1440p display, and costs significantly more at $1,200. Whew. Another handy feature of the pricier model is a built-in battery. That means when the cord is unplugged, it doesn’t just immediately die. Speaking of the length of the cord, that does end up being one of the limitations of this design as a whole.

In a lot of ways, that more expensive model feels like what a Movingstyle monitor should be. For my purposes, the larger 32-inch 4K panel matches my needs better.

LG has its own version of this that moves in that direction, the LG Smart Monitor Swing. It comes with a 4K panel, measures 32 inches, and has a screen that can handle touch inputs. At $1,000, it’s priced in between the two Movingstyle monitors. For Samsung, perhaps the solution would be to sell the adjustable stand separately, which would give you the ability to pair it with whatever monitor you want.

Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.

Even though it said the financial year saw increased demand for its next-generation products and networks, the UK’s leading telco, BT, has announced a fiscal year 2026 with noticeable falls in revenue and broadband customers, offset by a modest gain in profitability.

For the full financial year to 31 March 2026, BT reported revenues of £19.7bn, down by 3% compared with the previous financial year, with adjusted revenue of £19.6bn, slipping by 4%. These figures were driven by lower international revenue, including divestments, declines in handset trading and declines in adjusted UK service revenue.

Adjusted UK service revenue was £15.4bn, down by 1% compared with fiscal 2025, mainly driven by lower voice volumes, offset by Consumer Price Index-linked price increases and an improved broadband fibre-to-the-premises (FTTP) mix in its Openreach broadband provision division.

The lower revenue was offset by strong cost transformation and cost control, according to BT, leading to adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation (EBITDA) of £8.2bn, flat year-on-year, excluding divestments. Like-for-like adjusted EBITDA was up by 1%. Reported profit before tax was £1.4bn, up 8%, with the increase said to be primarily driven by lower specific items, lower depreciation and amortisation, offset by a higher finance expense.

During the course of the year, and as part of its long-standing transformation plan, BT realised £580m in gross annualised cost savings, at a cost to achieve of £336m, taking total savings over two years to £1.5bn at costs of £800m. It said that it also realised year-on-year reductions in energy usage in its networks of 6%, in total labour resource of 7% to 108,000 and in Openreach repair volumes of 18%. The company’s overall transformation plan target has been raised to £3.7bn from £3bn, and the programme has been extended by a year to 2030, at a cost to achieve of £1.4bn from £1bn.

Among the officially selected highlights of the year, BT said it had reached a record FTTP build of 4.8 million premises passed in the year, achieving the accelerated target set in 2025 and the fastest build in Europe.

At the end of the year, BT’s FTTP footprint stood at 23 million premises, which is more than two-thirds of all UK premises, 6.3 million of which were in rural locations. It was on track to reach its stated target of hitting 25 million premises by December 2026.

The results also showed record customer demand for Openreach FTTP, with 2.2 million net adds in the year, bringing total premises connected to 8.8 million and take-up among all major fibre providers to over 38%. Higher FTTP take-up, speed mix and price increases saw Openreach broadband grow its average revenue per user by 4% on an annual basis to £16.7.

However, FTTP growth contrasted with overall broadband performance. Openreach broadband line losses amounted to 203,000 in the fourth quarter, giving full-year losses of 825,000. This, noted BT, was slightly better than its near 850,000 guidance, supported by expanded and accelerated build. However, BT also expects customer losses of around 800,000 over the course of the next financial year.

In the realm of mobile, the company boasted that its EE subsidiary remains the UK’s best mobile network, and its 5G+ population coverage increased to 73% from 43% at the end of fiscal 2025. The EE 5G base reached 14.5 million by 31 March, up 10% year-on-year.

BT’s business division achieved what was described as “significant” new connectivity and security wins, including those with BAE Systems, NIE Networks and easyJet. It is also partnering with Nscale to deliver sovereign AI datacentres in the UK.

Summing up her company’s performance over the course of the year, BT chief executive Allison Kirkby called the financial year 2026 another year of strong delivery against the company’s strategy.

“We are building the UK’s digital backbone even faster and further, connecting the country like no one else and accelerating our transformation – and we know there is much more we can do, as we create a better BT for all of us,” she remarked.

“We have delivered on our financial guidance, and we are transforming ahead of plan, offsetting headwinds while successfully competing…We’re announcing an increased full-year dividend of 8.32 pence per share and an updated dividend policy, and we are reiterating our guidance of sustained growth, including cash flow inflection to c. £2bn in FY27 and to c. £3bn by the end of the decade.”

Three months ago, OpenAI cofounder Greg Brockman told me his concerns about a mounting public relations crisis facing artificial intelligence companies: Despite the popularity of tools like ChatGPT, an increasingly large share of the population said they viewed AI negatively. Since then, the backlash has only intensified.

College commencement speakers are now getting booed for talking about AI in optimistic terms. Last month, someone threw a Molotov cocktail at OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s San Francisco home and wrote a manifesto advocating for crimes against AI executives. No one has more to lose from this reputation crisis than OpenAI.

The person tasked with trying to fix it is Chris Lehane, OpenAI’s chief of global affairs and a veteran political operative. I sat down with him this week to discuss what I’d argue are his two biggest challenges yet: convincing the world to embrace OpenAI’s technology, while at the same time persuading lawmakers to adopt regulations that won’t hamper the company’s growth. Lehane views these goals as one in the same.

“When I was in the White House, we always used to talk about how good policy equals good politics,” says Lehane. “You have to think about both of these things moving in concert.”

After working on crisis communications in Bill Clinton’s White House, Lehane gave himself the nickname “master of disaster.” He later helped Airbnb fend off regulators in cities that viewed short-term home rentals as existing in a legal gray area, or as he puts it, “ahead of the law.” Lehane also played an instrumental role in the formation of Fairshake, a powerful crypto industry super PAC that worked to legitimize digital currencies in Washington. Since joining OpenAI in 2024, he’s quickly become one of the company’s most influential executives and now oversees its communications and policy teams.

Lehane tells me public narratives about how AI will change society are often “artificially binary.” On one side is the “Bob Ross view of the world” that predicts a future where nobody has to work anymore and everyone lives in “beachside homes painting in watercolors all day.” On the other is a dystopian future in which AI has become so powerful that only a small group of elites have the ability to control it. Neither scenario, in Lehane’s opinion, is very realistic.

OpenAI is guilty of promoting this kind of polarizing speech in the past. CEO Sam Altman warned last year that “whole classes of jobs” will go away when the singularity arrives. More recently he has softened his tone, declaring that “jobs doomerism is likely long-term wrong.”

Lehane wants OpenAI to start conveying a more “calibrated” message about the promises of AI that avoids either of these extremes. He says the company needs to put forward real solutions to the problems people are worried about, such as potential widespread job loss and the negative impacts of chatbots on children. As an example of this work, Lehane pointed to a list of policy proposals that OpenAI recently published, which include creating a four-day work week, expanding access to health care, and passing a tax on AI-powered labor.

“If you’re going to go out and say that there are challenges here, you also then have an obligation—particularly if you’re building this stuff—to actually come up with the ideas to solve those things,” Lehane says.

Some former OpenAI employees, however, have accused the company of downplaying the potential downsides of AI adoption. WIRED previously reported that members of OpenAI’s economic research unit quit after they became concerned that it was morphing into an advocacy arm for the company. The former employees argued that their warnings about AI’s economic impacts may have been inconvenient for OpenAI, but they honestly reflected what the company’s research found.

Packing Punches

With public skepticism toward AI growing, politicians are under pressure to prove to voters they can rein in tech companies. To combat this, the AI industry has stood up a new group of super PACs that are boosting pro-AI political candidates and trying to influence public opinion about the technology. Critics say the move backfired, and some candidates have started campaigning on the fact that AI super PACS are opposing them.

Lehane helped set up one of the biggest pro-AI super PACs, Leading the Future, which launched last summer with more than $100 million in funding commitments from tech industry figures, including Brockman. The group has opposed Alex Bores, the author of New York’s strongest AI safety law who is running for Congress in the state’s 12th district.