Waiting until water damage occurs is expensive. But it also doesn’t make financial sense to replace pipes too early. We looked into the best time to do it.

Many housing and condominium associations must decide whether to replace water and sewage pipes. The risk of water leakage needs to be weighed against the costs of fully or partially upgrading the pipe system. A systematic lifespan assessment can provide the board with a good basis for making the decision.

Leaks in water and sewage systems can occur in different ways, and the consequences vary depending on the location of the leak and which materials are affected.

• A leak in a hidden installation on a high floor can cause more damage than a leak in the basement.
• If the water supply is interrupted, several residential units could be result in extensive water damage. In the worst case, the homes would need to be rehabilitated, and the residents would have to move out while the damage is repaired.
• Small leaks are not always detected immediately, but over time can lead to significant damage, such as rot, mold and odor, as well as swelling and salt migration in structures.

Finding the right time for a complete or partial replacement of the water and sewage system is therefore both financially and practically worthwhile.

Researchers at SINTEF have been assessing the condition and remaining life of pipe systems for over 20 years, and we are regularly contacted by condominium owners who wonder whether and when they should replace their pipework. We conduct inspections and laboratory tests to assess the condition of the water and sewage system. Our assessments and recommendations are summarized in a report.

How we calculate condition and remaining lifespan

Age is a simple indicator for assessing the remaining life of pipes, and lifespan tables published by the SINTEF Byggforskserien (Building Research Design Guides) provide helpful guidance. However, age alone does not take into account factors such as load, temperature or water quality.

A more accurate assessment of the condition of pipes requires material samples and laboratory analysis (Norway’s NS 3424 standard, level 3). Remaining life is calculated based on the corrosion rate and remaining material thickness. However, such a calculation assumes that this rate is uniform. Changes in water quality and use can affect the corrosion rate, and the calculated remaining life is therefore only indicative.

It is also important to be aware that couplings and valves may have a shorter lifespan than pipes, and that hidden joints increase the risk of damage.

Material samples from critical points in the pipe system provide the best basis for a reliable assessment. Good sampling points can be easily identified if we have access to accurate and up-to-date drawings of the building and the pipe system.

Are the maps and terrain in sync?

However, it is not always practical to retrieve all samples, which might be hidden behind recesses in a bathroom, for example. In addition, the drawing may be outdated, and changes to the installation may have been made without being documented.

An inspection is therefore useful for assessing the correspondence between the drawings and actual installation. At the same time, a cost/benefit assessment should be made for each material sample. If the location for sampling is not easily accessible, the cost will be high.

The frequency of damage should also be included in the assessment. If several leaks have recently occurred, it would be natural to consider replacing the entire pipe system, even if the age indicates that the pipes could last longer. Previous replacements might have led to a confusing system with varying material quality and age.

Upgrade plan and prioritization

Once the condition and remaining life have been assessed, a decision must be made as to which measures should be implemented—and when. We recommend creating an upgrade plan in which necessary measures are prioritized based on technical condition, damage history and overall assessment.

Upgrade measures on the pipe system should be considered in connection with the condition of the wet rooms to avoid extensive demolition work. If the installations are generally in good condition, local repairs may be appropriate. In the event of a high risk of leakage due to varying quality of the wet room installations, or in the event of extensive wear, replacing the entire system may be more appropriate.

Coordinated rehabilitation includes replacing water and sewage pipes, sealing layers, drains, surfaces and electrical installations. The work involves noise and dust, especially during the demolition phase, and the bathroom will typically be out of service for 4–6 weeks. However, the result is a comprehensive system without weak interfaces.

Relining is a method for extending the service life of sewage pipes. Epoxy is applied to the inside of the pipes either by spraying or as a fiber stocking saturated with epoxy. This method can be considered if the water pipes have a longer remaining life than the sewage pipes. It requires less intervention and shorter downtime, but can still involve more difficult work if the drains have to be replaced.

Extensive work and significant costs are usually associated with maintaining and rehabilitating water and sewage systems in housing and condominium associations. A thorough life cycle assessment provides increased security that the chosen solution is correct, and it forms a solid basis for a predictable and effective maintenance plan.

Comparing Our Favorite Smart Displays

More Smart Displays We Like

Echo Hub for $180: The Echo Hub isn’t exactly a smart display. It lacks powerful speaker capabilities and doesn’t have a camera for calls or Amazon’s Drop-In video call feature. Instead, it focuses entirely on being a smart home dashboard with built-in Alexa, plus features like widgets and the photo frame. I think it takes the best, most easily used features of a smart display and cuts out the rest. But if you want a good speaker, don’t choose this one.

Echo Show 5 (3rd Gen, 2023) for $90: The smaller and cheaper third-gen Echo Show 5 has a 5.5-inch screen that works best on a desk or a bedside table. We think it’s a bit too small for the kitchen or living room, but that depends on how you plan to use it.

Echo Show 15 for $300: This is the largest of them all, with a 15.6-inch display, and it has customizable widgets so you can have smart-home device controls and calendar reminders available whenever. It’s made to be mounted on your wall like a TV (a stand is sold separately), and the Show 15 pairs with a Fire TV remote (you can use the app) to use the streaming features. With the new Alexa+ I’ve found myself liking it a lot more, and it’s much less distracting than the rotating slideshows you get on smaller Echo Shows. It’s a splurge, though, and I still wish the streaming capabilities were better.

Google Nest Hub for $100: Google’s second-gen Nest Hub is a great option if you don’t need a camera and don’t mind a smaller 7-inch screen. It has a wake-up alarm that emulates the rising sun for gentler mornings, though it’s not bright enough to qualify as a sunrise alarm clock. It also has sleep-tracking tech to track your sleep quality, though the quality of the results isn’t great. It also supports gestures—like playing or pausing a video with a hand movement—by using unique radar tech.

Google Pixel Tablet for $499: This tablet doubles as a smart speaker when placed on its speaker dock. It works well, but it’s not currently slated to get Google’s new assistant, Gemini for Home. If that changes, we’ll go back to recommending it. But we’re not sure it will: availability has been limited for the speaker base, and could point to this device being discontinued altogether.

Smart Displays to Skip

We don’t like every smart display. Here are the ones we’re skipping after trying them out.

Echo Show 10 (3rd Gen, 2021) for $250: This smart display is situated on top of a large cylindrical speaker, which makes it sound great. The screen physically swivels to follow you around the room as you use it, keeping you in frame while you video chat or keeping your streamed workout video in your line of sight as you move about. Because the screen moves around so much, you may have trouble positioning it in tighter spaces—especially in corners. It’s a unique model, and is still out of stock like it was this summer. I suspect the upcoming new Echo Show 11 ($220) might replace it, since it has a similar design (but leaves out the movement gimmick).

Third-Party Google Displays: Google is no longer updating software for some of the third-party smart displays we used to recommend in this guide. If you have one, it will still work, but some features will likely suffer or disappear entirely as time passes. This seems to be the fate of most third-party Google smart displays, which is why we don’t recommend them anymore. Google did say they’ll be working with partners to bring Gemini for Home to third-party devices, so we’ll see how that pans out.

What About Alexa+ and the New Echo Shows?

Amazon has been randomly rolling out its new version of Alexa, named Alexa+, in early access since the spring. This second generation of the Alexa voice assistant is more conversational, able to execute complex tasks and learn new information, and can be much more personalized. That’ll be due to its being powered by generative AI. Check out our hands-on with early access Alexa+ for more more about our experience.

Unlike the current Alexa, once it’s fully available, it’ll cost $20 a month or be free if you have an Amazon Prime membership. This is a big jump from the free assistant, but you can keep the current Alexa for free if you don’t wish for another subscription or have an Amazon Prime membership. Right now, it’s also only available in early access for Echo Show devices. You can sign up here for the wait list.

Alexa+ will be immediately available on its newest devices coming this fall, however. There will be two new smart displays, the Echo Show 8 (4th Gen) and Echo Show 11, and two new smart speakers, the Echo Dot Max and Echo Studio (2nd Gen). We’re curious how the new models will compare to our current favorites, and we will update this guide once we test them.

It’s also important to note that Alexa+ has forced a privacy change for all Echo devices. Echo devices used to be able to process voice recordings locally on your device, but the “Do Not Send Voice Recordings” privacy feature was killed in March. Now all voice recordings will be sent to Amazon to be processed in order to make Alexa+ function, but even if you don’t end up using Alexa+, the feature is gone.

What About Gemini for Home and Google’s Smart Displays?

Amazon isn’t the only one rolling out a new version of its assistant. Gemini for Home is Google’s similarly AI-powered smart assistant that will replace Google Assistant in just about all of its available speakers. Unlike Amazon’s new assistant, Gemini for Home will be free, but Google is changing its Nest Aware subscription to become a subscription that’s both for video storage and for more powerful assistant features.

Google is also rolling out a new speaker in the spring, but no new smart display is slated yet. The new assistant will come to all of Google’s existing lineup except for the Google Pixel Tablet, which we no longer recommend since it’s not currently planned to get support with the new assistant. Google did say they plan to work with third-party partners to bring Gemini for Home to more devices, so we might see new third-party displays that we can recommend again. We’ll update this guide as we learn more, but for now, Google’s Nest Hub Max and Nest Hub are the best smart displays to purchase if you want access to Google’s new assistant.

FAQs

Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.

A trial involving five major carmakers opens at London’s High Court Monday, marking the latest chapter of the dieselgate emissions scandal that has rocked the auto industry for a decade.

The High Court will decide in a three-month trial whether systems installed in Mercedes, Ford, Peugeot-Citroen, Renault and Nissan diesel vehicles were designed to cheat clean air laws.

The trial of the five lead defendants will set a precedent for other manufacturers, potentially paving the way for billions of pounds in compensation.

The claims were brought on behalf of 1.6 million motorists against 14 carmakers, including Jaguar Land Rover, Toyota, Vauxhall-Opel and BMW, among others.

Martyn Day, lawyer at Leigh Day representing the claimants, said the case impacts “nearly all the manufacturers in this country.”

“It is a huge case for the British public,” he told AFP, adding that it could lead to “serious amounts of compensation.”

The dieselgate scandal first erupted in September 2015, when German automaker Volkswagen admitted to fitting millions of vehicles with software to make engines appear less polluting in regulatory tests than in real driving conditions.

It caused waves in the global car industry, ensnaring several other top carmakers and leading to legal action in multiple countries.

Pollution

The court in London will examine evidence to determine whether major carmakers installed so-called defeat devices in cars to reduce nitrogen oxide readings in order to cheat emissions tests.

The five lead defendants deny that their systems were designed to circumvent the tests.

The vehicles “looked less polluting during the testing, but as soon as you were outside the testing regime, those emission levels went massively up,” Day told AFP.

Adam Kamenetzky, one of the claimants, said he felt “defrauded” after he bought a Mercedes SUV in 2018 on the belief that it was less polluting than other models.

“We live in a built-up neighborhood in London where there are children with lungs that can be harmed immeasurably by the emissions that these cars are producing,” he told AFP.

But it will take some time for any possible compensation to reach claimants like Kamenetzky.

The trial beginning Monday must first determine whether carmakers are liable, before a separate compensation phase can follow next year.

German automaker Mercedes and US carmaker Ford both rejected the claims as having “no merit,” while Japan’s Nissan declined to comment.

French manufacturers Renault and Stellantis, parent of Peugeot and Citroen, both said the vehicles they sold were compliant with regulations at the time.

When the High Court in 2020 found Volkswagen had used defeat devices to cheat emissions tests, the German automaker settled out of court, paying £193 million ($259 million) to 91,000 British motorists.

Overall, to date, Volkswagen has had to pay more than 32 billion euros ($37 billion) in penalties over the scandal, mostly in the United States.

© 2025 AFP