Connect with us

Tech

The Best Floodlight Security Cameras for Your Home

Published

on

The Best Floodlight Security Cameras for Your Home


Consider These Floodlight Cameras

Photograph: Simon Hill

Reolink Elite Floodlight WiFi (Wired) for $230: Similar to our Reolink pick above, the difference with the Elite Floodlight is that it’s a fixed dual-lens camera designed to give you a wide 180-degree view (59 degrees vertically), rather than a pan-and-tilt camera. If you want a fixed camera to cover the entire side of a property, this could be a solid pick. It records up to 4K video at up to 20 frames per second, has a 105-decibel alarm, and supports dual-band Wi-Fi 6. The rest of the specs, including the two-panel, 3,000-lumen, adjustable temperature floodlight, match the TrackFlex above.

Google Nest Cam With Floodlight (Wired) for $280: This aging floodlight security camera might still be your best bet if you prefer Google Home and have a Nest doorbell. The limited 1080p resolution is mitigated by the high frame rate (30 fps), HDR, and decent 6X digital zoom. The two-panel floodlight can put out up to 2,400 lumens of warm (4,000K) light, and brightness is adjustable. Google’s AI detection is perhaps the smartest in the business, and this is a very reliable camera, but you must subscribe to make it worthwhile, as there’s no local recording option. Google Home Premium starts at $10 per month or $100 per year, but that covers all your devices. It might be best to wait, as Google recently released 2K Nest cameras, and there’s a decent chance it will update its floodlight camera soon.

Image may contain Brick Computer Electronics and Tablet Computer

Photograph: Simon Hill

Philips Hue Secure Camera for $130 and Discover Floodlight (Wired) for $160: Strictly speaking, these are two separate devices, but I used this setup at my old house, and it worked very well. If you’re invested in Hue lighting, the Discover Floodlight is one of my favorite outdoor lights and a versatile way to light up your space. It can put out 2,300 lumens, and you can tweak the temperature, color, and brightness easily in the Hue app, which also allows scheduling and animated scenes. Add a Philips Hue Secure Wired Camera and you can have it trigger the floodlight and any other Hue lights you have. It is only 1080p, but the wired camera worked well for me, triggering reliably, and Philips Hue now offers 24 hours of video history for free. But if you want the AI detection, back-to-back recording, activity zones, and 30 days of video history, you must subscribe for $40 a year for a single camera.

Arlo Pro 3 Floodlight Camera (Battery) for $250: An obvious pick for folks with an Arlo system, this battery-powered camera allows for a wireless install, though you will need to charge it. It offers up to 2K footage with HDR and Arlo’s excellent app and alert system, though you need an Arlo Secure plan ($10 per month or $96 a year for a single camera, $20 per month or $216 a year for unlimited cameras). The floodlight is a single panel that flanks the face of the camera and delivers up to 2,000 lumens. You can boost the brightness to 3,000 lumens and eliminate event recording delays with the Arlo Outdoor Charging Cable ($50), though you’ll need to run it to an outlet. Arlo has a newer, wired floodlight camera that I plan to test soon.

Eve Outdoor Cam (Wired) for $249: This stylish floodlight camera can replace an outdoor light to give you a motion-activated light (up to 1,500 lumens), 1080p video (157-degree field of view), and two-way audio. As a HomeKit camera, you will need an Apple HomeKit hub (Apple TV, HomePod, or iPad) and an iCloud+ storage plan. Sadly, the video and sound quality are only average. This camera also only works on 2.4-GHz Wi-Fi, and there’s no Android support.

Floodlight Cameras We Don’t Recommend

Toucan Security Floodlight Camera (Wired) for $80: You can plug this camera into an outlet, and it comes with an 8-meter waterproof cable. It has a motion-activated light (1,200 lumens), records 1080p video, and supports two-way audio. I found the footage quite detailed, but it struggled with direct sunlight. You can record locally on a microSD card (sold separately) and get 24 hours of free cloud storage, but it has limitations. Plans start from $3 per month. Even with motion detection set to the lowest sensitivity, this camera triggered too often during testing, and there’s no way to filter for people, so I got frequent false positives (blowing leaves, moths, and birds all triggered alerts).


Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

Police intercept evidence from Sky ECC cryptophone network ‘unreliable’, Antwerp court told | Computer Weekly

Published

on

Police intercept evidence from Sky ECC cryptophone network ‘unreliable’, Antwerp court told | Computer Weekly


A court in Belgium has refused to allow defence lawyers in a high-profile drugs case extra time after a forensic expert found that digital evidence obtained by police in a hacking operation against the Sky ECC encrypted phone network and relied on by prosecutors was “unreliable”.

The Antwerp Regional Court heard evidence from a British forensic expert that raised new doubts over the digital evidence supplied by Belgian police to prosecute multiple criminal cases linked to a high-profile drugs kingpin, Nordin El Hajjioui, who is accused of importing narcotics through Antwerp.

Defence lawyers presented evidence from forensic expert Duncan Campbell that found errors and inconsistencies in data analysed by Belgian investigators that had not been explained or highlighted to the court. His report suggested the data was processed by people who may not have understood how to process it correctly.

‘Identical’ datasets were not identical

The court heard that there were significant differences between datasets submitted in 2022 and 2025 that prosecutors had claimed were “identical”. It found that 108,000 messages had been added to the most recent dataset.

Prosecution claims that the new messages had only recently been decrypted did not stand up to scrutiny, as the unencrypted versions of the new messages did not exist in the original data, and a large proportion of the new messages had yet to be decrypted.

The court was told that the processes used to provide Sky ECC data to the court were not transparent or verifiable, and that there was no indication that police data analysis conformed with internationally accepted forensic standards.

The data files were not certified by digital fingerprints, file hashes or digital signatures which are used to verify that no accidental or deliberate changes could have been made to digital evidence.

Belgium developed web tool to analyse data

The Belgian police used previously undisclosed web software, known as Edge, developed by Belgium’s directorate for the fight against serious and organised crime (DJSOC) as a platform to analyse data from Sky ECC, it emerged.

According to Reisinger, Campbell’s analysis showed that the Edge tool was not fit for purpose, had produced significant errors, and did not produce evidence to the standard required for criminal trials.

Evidence presented in spreadsheets had gone through filtering processes, which had led to messages being duplicated or changed, or being linked to different Sky ECC identities or different times and content.

Defence refused raw intercept data

Defence lawyers said that to complete their investigation into the reliability of the data, they would need access to the raw intercepted data from Sky ECC and information about the chain of custody of the data, which has not been disclosed to the court by police.

“There are problems and we need to establish the reliability of the data. We asked for the raw data and an explanation from the police of the chain of evidence, but in the end, the court decided not to do it,” said Reisinger.

Prosecutors claimed that Campbell, who acted as an expert witness in trials against drug gangs that used the EncroChat encrypted phone network and produced joint reports with a forensic expert from the UK’s National Crime Agency, was not independent.

The court said it would take Campbell’s findings into consideration, but would not postpone the trial to allow further expert analysis of the reliability of the data.

French interception operation

The prosecution against El Hajjioui, known as Dikke Nordin, relies on messages intercepted by French, Dutch and Belgian police from a hacking operation into the Vancouver-based encrypted phone network, Sky ECC, in 2020.

The operation provided police with “real-time” access to messages exchanged between members of organised criminal groups, after they attached a “man-in-the-middle” server to the Sky ECC infrastructure at the OVH Datacentre in Roubaix, France (pictured above), to intercept messages and encryption keys.

Some 1,600 Belgian law enforcement officers took part in raids in March 2021 on premises linked to drugs, money laundering and bribery, after police infiltrated Sky ECC’s servers in France and decrypted “hundreds of millions” of supposedly encrypted messages.

Spain and Italy question Sky ECC reliability

The reliability of Sky ECC evidence was called into question last week by courts in Italy and Spain. The provincial court in València acquitted 14 people after finding that prosecutors could not rely on digital evidence to prove their case, unless the defence was provided with access to the raw intercepted Sky ECC data.

An Italian court separately ordered prosecutors to make raw intercept data available to defendants to allow them to conduct independent checks into the reliability of the evidence.

The case against Nordin El Hajjioui is due to resume tomorrow.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

How to Watch the 2026 Winter Olympics

Published

on

How to Watch the 2026 Winter Olympics


Whether you’re a hardcore athletics aficionado or just nurturing a newfound love of hockey thanks to Heated Rivalry, the 2026 Winter Olympics have what you’re looking for.

The Milano Cortina 2026 Winter Olympics will take place across Milan and Cortina, Italy, throughout the month of February. A few competitions start on February 4, but the opening ceremony will be held on February 6 at 2:00 pm ET and will feature performances by Mariah Carey and Andrea Bocelli. Following the events, there will be a closing ceremony on February 22 at 2:30 pm ET.

As in Olympics past, this year’s games will be televised in the US exclusively by NBC. You can watch if you have cable or satellite TV. Cable coverage will be across several NBC channels, including NBC local affiliates, CNBC, and the USA Network.

The Games will also be shown live on NBC’s streaming service Peacock Premium, which requires a subscription of $11 per month. If ads drive you bonkers, the ad-free Peacock Premium Plus costs $18 a month. (Set a calendar reminder to cancel the service after the Olympics if you’re not planning to keep watching Traitors.)

Peacock will also bring back its Olympics hub website, which may be the easiest way to find the events you’re looking for. You can search and bookmark sports or events ahead of time and get notifications for when they go live. This might be especially useful depending on what time zone you’re in, as the games are all taking place in northern Italy, which is in the GMT+1 time zone.

For a full overview of all the events, check out the official Olympics competition schedule. If you’d like to see each and every competition listed in order by event time, we have you covered.

Looking for events by sport? Below is a list of the big events for them all, along with links to the full schedules of every event.

Note: Unless specified otherwise, all times below are listed in US Eastern time.

Opening Ceremony

The three-hour-long opening ceremony will air on nearly every Olympic media outlet on Friday, February 6. Live coverage starts at 2 pm Eastern and 11 am Pacific.

Alpine Skiing

Full schedule

Training for alpine skiing starts on February 4, but the competitive events kick off with men’s downhill on February 7 at 5:30 am. The first medal event for women’s downhill is February 8.

Medal events occur nearly every day through February 18. Final medal games start with the first men’s slalom run on February 16.

Women’s final slalom runs start February 18.

Biathlon

Full schedule

Biathlon events are the closest thing the Olympic games get to a James Bond movie. Skiers zip across mountain trails and then stop to shoot a gun. What’s not to love?

You can watch all the excitement starting with a mixed relay 4 x 6 km on February 8.

All events are medal events and go until the men’s 1- km mass start on February 20 and women’s 12.5-km mass start on February 21.

Bobsleigh

Full schedule

Bobsleigh—no, not bobsled, you philistine—events start February 12. One of the three sliding sports, bobsleigh is a team of two to four people sitting upright in a sled with their heads poking out. (As opposed to luge and skeleton, in which athletes lay on their sleds without sides or backing.)

Training events start on February 12 at 6:50 am. There are four bobsleigh medal events, starting with heat four of the women’s monobob on February 16.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Building a Watch Collection on a Budget? Here’s Where to Start

Published

on

Building a Watch Collection on a Budget? Here’s Where to Start


You don’t need a four-figure Swiss movement to know what time it is—or look good doing it. One of the most wonderful things about “budget” watches today (although it’s kinder, or more appropriate, to say “affordable”) is that brands have learned to take design cues from luxury timepieces while quietly getting very good at the fundamentals: reliable movements, thoughtful materials, and proportions that don’t scream “cheap.” Take a look at the Orient in WIRED’s selection below as a prime example.

It could easily be argued that we’re in a golden age of affordable horology (see our full guide here for definitive proof), where, if you choose wisely, $350 or less can buy everything from a desirable dress watch, or a high-end collaboration, and even a supremely capable and classically chic diver. Pieces that will see you right from sunken wreck to boardroom table. And let’s not forget the retro allure of digital watches right now, either, with the Shark Classic not only being one of our favorites here, but at $70, it’s also the most affordable.

Moreover, should you decide to bag more than a few (and who could blame you at these prices?), we’ve even got the perfect carry case picked out: Nanuk’s IP67 waterproof and dustproof NK-7 resin $175 910 Watch Case (pictured above) with patented PowerClaw latching system—ideal for securing any timepiece collection, be it bargain or big budget.

Be sure to check out our other wearable coverage, including the Best Budget Watches Under $1,000, Best Smartwatches, Best Fitness Trackers, and Best Smart Rings.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending