Connect with us

Tech

Trump Doesn’t Need the Proud Boys Anymore

Published

on

Trump Doesn’t Need the Proud Boys Anymore


Whether it was protesting Covid lockdowns, attending school board meetings, or facing off against Black Lives Matter protesters, the far-right Proud Boys were always on hand to support Donald Trump’s first term in office.

When Trump left office in 2021, the group’s leaders languished in jail for their role in the January 6 attack on the Capitol. With reported infighting destabilizing the movement, it looked like the group’s glory days were behind it.

But Trump’s return a year ago, and his release of all January 6 prisoners, signaled that a Proud Boy comeback could be in the cards. And while there have been intermittent signs that the group could return to the levels of activity of its heyday, the reality is that Trump’s militarization of the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency and the Border Patrol, together with the administration’s embrace of white nationalist rhetoric, has left the Proud Boys without a role to play. There is little incentive for Proud Boys to leave their homes when heavily armed representatives of the Trump administration are already picking fights with left-wing protesters.

Never has that been more evident than over the course of the last week, as anti-ICE protesters have flooded the streets of towns and cities across the country since a masked federal agent shot and killed Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis.

Instead of taking to the streets to face down the protesters and defend Trump’s hard-line immigration crackdown, the Proud Boys have been relegated to posting incendiary memes while promising to provide personal security for right-wing influencers who track every part of ICE’s anti-immigrant raids.

A WIRED review of hundreds of Telegram channels run by Proud Boy chapters across the country, as well as other far-right extremist and militia groups, reveals that there are no public calls for members to mobilize and defend ICE from the protesters.

Instead, members of the Telegram channels are posting deeply misogynistic and homophobic images, videos, and AI-generated content featuring Good and her wife, with one extremist expert telling WIRED that the channels in recent days have been almost giddy in response to the shooting.

“They are very enthused about what’s happening, because for many of them, [ICE and the DHS are] following what their blueprint would have been anyway,” says Wendy Via, cofounder and president of the Global Project Against Hate and Extremism, adding that there is no reason why the Proud Boys need to be on the ground. “When you’ve got law enforcement that seems so willing to abuse their powers, why get in trouble.”

The Proud Boy channels, in between celebrations of Good’s death, are also praising the work of ICE in the city.

“You’re an ICE agent in Minneapolis. Five and a half years after George Floyd, in the same city, you subdue a prisoner with your knee. Imagine being that based,” a member of a North Carolina chapter of the group known as the Cape Fear Proud Boys wrote in a Telegram post this week.

There have been some promises of action, however. After right-wing influencers Nick Sortor and Cam Higby claimed to have been attacked while filming content in Minneapolis this week, former Proud Boys leader Enrique Tarrio claimed he wanted to help. “I reached out to both [Nick] and Cam with an offer for personal detail,” Tarrio, who was convicted of seditious conspiracy and sent to prison over his role related to the January 6 riots at the Capitol, wrote on X on Monday. Tarrio still claims to lead the Proud Boys. “Waiting for a reply. We have a great solution for both of them,” he added.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

London’s Tube network extends 4G/5G connectivity | Computer Weekly

Published

on

London’s Tube network extends 4G/5G connectivity | Computer Weekly


One of the places in the UK capital where mobile connectivity is strongest is up to 30m underground, as more stations and tunnelled sections of the Tube network across London now have 4G and 5G mobile coverage as part of the ongoing development project between Transport for London (TfL) and Boldyn Networks.

TfL carries up to four million passengers a day on the London Underground network, and renewing and preparing the communications network for the future has long been regarded as essential to maintain and improve critical infrastructure. Before it carried out its first expansion work, TfL noted that legacy systems can slowly become unreliable and disrupt services, leading to delays and an overall negative impact on passenger journeys.

All of the three mobile network operators – VodafoneThree, EE and Virgin Media O2  – are taking part in the roll-out, as part of the Mayor of London’s and TfL’s stated commitment to bring mobile connectivity to the whole of London’s transport network.

The expanding coverage will host the new Emergency Services Network (ESN) which, when fully operational, is designed to give first responders immediate access to life-saving data, images and information in live situations and emergencies on the frontline.

Boldyn Networks was awarded a 20-year concession by TfL in June 2021 to deliver high-speed mobile connectivity across the entire London Underground network, creating a backbone of mobile and digital connectivity across the network to all ticket halls, platforms and tunnels on the Tube network, with total network coverage targeted for some time in 2026.

Around 400 engineers are regularly working on the project overnight, delivering the project during the limited overnight engineering hours on the Tube network. Boldyn is also committed to installing a fibre backbone across the capital to improve connectivity both above and below ground.

TfL and Boldyn are working to introduce high-speed 4G and 5G mobile coverage across the whole Tube, Docklands Light Railway (DLR), Elizabeth line network, and the Windrush line between Highbury & Islington and New Cross. Following full interoperability testing being completed across all Tube lines in 2025, design and initial testing work is now underway on the Windrush line and DLR, ahead of the tunnelled sections and stations getting coverage later in 2026.

Alongside the whole of the Elizabeth line, which was completed in December 2024, 62 out of 121 Tube stations which are located “underground” now have begun receiving mobile coverage in their ticket halls, corridors and platforms. Key stations including Euston Square, Cannon Street and Battersea Power Station have recently gone live with 4G and 5G mobile coverage, with more – including King’s Cross St Pancras, Gloucester Road, Warwick Avenue and Vauxhall – set to go live in the next few months.

TfL also revealed that work to extend coverage in the tunnels along Tube lines was continuing to “make good progress”, with the first sections of the Circle and District line between Blackfriars and Cannon Street, and between Notting Hill Gate and Bayswater, now live. TfL and Boldyn are working to introduce more sections as quickly as possible during 2026 and they expect “the vast majority” of the Northern and Metropolitan lines to have coverage in the tunnels by end of summer 2026.

Work to deliver mobile coverage across the whole Tube network will continue throughout 2026, with work focusing on sections of the Circle and District line, where a number of stations already have limited mobile coverage due to being closer to the surface, as well as along the Victoria, Jubilee, Bakerloo and Piccadilly lines. Installation work will also continue along sections outside of Central London, and where smaller tunnelled sections need to be treated individually.

Installation work is already taking place alongside the planned escalator works at Cutty Sark Docklands Light Railway station to help ensure that customers can benefit from mobile coverage at this station as quickly as possible.

Alongside installing mobile coverage across the Tube, TfL and Boldyn are also working to install small-cell mobile technology on TfL assets, such as lighting columns, to enhance mobile connectivity in high-footfall urban areas. Some of the capital’s busiest areas such as King’s Cross, Waterloo, London Bridge, Old Street, The Shard and Hyde Park Corner already have such connectivity.

Commenting on the network and the aims of the project as a whole, Isabel Coman, director of engineering and asset strategy at TfL, said: “It’s great to see further progress in our goal to introduce high-speed mobile coverage across our Tube network…We are on a clear path towards having 4G and 5G mobile coverage across the whole network by the end of 2026. Engineers are working hard overnight during the limited engineering hours to deliver this programme.”

Boldyn Networks UK & Ireland chief operating officer Nick Hudson added: “Our long-term partnership with TfL to extend reliable 4G and 5G mobile coverage across the London Underground is grounded in improving everyday journeys for millions of people. A project of this scale demands extraordinary engineering effort and close-knit collaboration with TfL, with work often carried out overnight in one of the world’s most complex transport networks.

“We’re immensely proud of what’s been achieved so far, and each section completed brings us closer to our goal of creating a more connected London for those who visit the city and those who call it home.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Microsoft urges tech rivals to cover datacentre expansion-related power costs to protect consumers | Computer Weekly

Published

on

Microsoft urges tech rivals to cover datacentre expansion-related power costs to protect consumers | Computer Weekly


Microsoft is calling on more technology companies to “pay their own way” when covering the electricity costs associated with running artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure and datacentres, rather than expect consumers to foot the bill.

The software giant’s vice-president and chair, Brad Smith, said Microsoft has vowed to “pay our way” to ensure its datacentres do not increase the electricity bills of everyday consumers, and that other tech firms should follow suit as well.

Expanding on this point, he said the US has an ageing electricity transmission infrastructure that is already straining under the weight of the demands put on it, with upgrades hampered by supply chain constraints on transformers and high-voltage equipment.

The impact of the latter is making it difficult to boost the transmission capacity of existing electricity networks, and building new ones can take up to a decade due to “permitting and siting delays”, said Smith, in a blog post.

“Some have suggested that AI will be so beneficial that the public should help pay for the added electricity the country needs for it … but we disagree with this approach,” he continued.

“Especially when tech companies are so profitable, we believe that it’s both unfair and politically unrealistic for our industry to ask the public to shoulder added electricity costs for AI. Instead, we believe the long-term success of AI infrastructure requires that tech companies pay their own way for the electricity costs they create.”

According to Smith, this approach will be needed to ensure the US and its AI infrastructure can tap into a “rapidly growing supply of electricity” and retain its leading position in the field of AI.

Stated goal

As detailed in the blog post, Smith went on to share examples of how Microsoft is already working with utility providers and public bodies to ensure the energy consumption habits of its datacentres do not financially burden local communities. “Our goal is straightforward: to ensure that the electricity cost of serving our datacentres is not passed on to our residential customers,” he said.

To guard against this, Smith said the company is asking utility providers to set higher energy rates for the company to cover the electricity costs of the datacentres it builds, owns and operates.

“In some areas, communities are already starting to benefit from this approach,” he said. “As part of our datacentre investment in Wisconsin, we are supporting a new rate structure that would charge ‘very large customers’, including datacentres, the cost of the electricity required to serve them.

“This protects residents by preventing those costs from being passed on, [but we] recognise the need to ensure that datacentre communities benefit everywhere,” said Smith. “We believe this approach can and should be a model for other states.”

The company is also committing to working with local utility providers, and paying for electricity capacity and support for grid infrastructure upgrades for its datacentre expansion plans. “We’ll [also] pursue innovation to make our datacentres more efficient … [by] using AI to reduce energy use and improve the performance of our software and hardware in the design and management of our datacentres,” he said.

“And we are collaborating closely with utilities to leverage tools like AI to improve planning, get more electricity from existing lines and equipment, improve system resilience and durability, and speed the development of new infrastructure, including nuclear energy technologies,” added Smith.

“By embedding these innovations into datacentres and by collaborating directly with local utilities, communities gain access to systems that are more efficient, more reliable and better prepared to support growth without increasing costs for households.”

National energy security and supply

The impact the growing demand for power-hungry AI datacentres is having on national energy security and supply is also a top-of-mind concern for the UK, and has been for some time, with the National Grid rolling out a series of initiatives to address the issue.

In line with Microsoft’s proposals, Computer Weekly has also covered cases of datacentre operators committing to financing electricity grid and substation upgrades in areas where they want to build facilities as part of their planning applications.

In the US, though, Microsoft’s blog emerged within days of a social media post being published by US president Donald Trump that stated his administration is working with “major American technology companies” to ensure US citizens “never” have to pay higher electricity bills because of datacentres.

In the post, he said his team has already been working closely with Microsoft on this matter to “ensure that Americans don’t ‘pick up the tab’” for its datacentre energy consumption habits. “The big technology companies who build [datacentres] must pay their own way,” added Trump.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

UK government backtracks on plans for mandatory digital ID | Computer Weekly

Published

on

UK government backtracks on plans for mandatory digital ID | Computer Weekly


The digital identity sector has welcomed the UK government’s decision to backtrack on plans to make its national digital ID scheme mandatory for right-to-work checks – in effect, removing any compulsory aspect of the proposed scheme.

Less than a week after the Cabinet Office promoted MP Josh Simons to become minister for digital government, in charge of the digital ID policy, it has now removed the most controversial aspect of the proposals announced by prime minister Keir Starmer in September last year.

Starmer launched the national digital ID scheme by pitching it as a means to control undocumented immigration, through making use of a government app mandatory when employers conduct right-to-work checks.

The plan brought an instant backlash from civil rights groups and privacy campaigners, as well as widespread criticism from the tech sector, where digital identity providers have been encouraged for many years to go through a rigorous compliance process to achieve accreditation on a government-approved register of digital verification services. Startups and investors feared the impact of an official government digital ID app on their prospects for developing and growing the market in the UK.

Since then, the government has gradually changed its rhetoric, moving away from the contentious focus on undocumented immigration and attempting to present its plans as a way to make digital public services more modern and efficient.

An online petition calling for government to halt plans for the online identity programme received more than three million signatures, prompting a debate in Parliament where MPs from all parties laid out their concerns.

As a result, the government has now removed the compulsory element of the proposed scheme in advance of a consultation on national digital ID, which is due to commence soon. Use of some form of digital proof of identity will still be mandatory for right-to-work checks, but the government digital ID app will only be one option for doing so.

A government spokesperson said: “We are committed to mandatory digital right-to-work checks. Currently right-to-work checks include a hodge-podge of paper-based systems with no record of checks ever taking place. This is open to fraud and abuse.

“We have always been clear that details on the digital ID scheme will be set out following a full public consultation which will launch shortly. Digital ID will make everyday life easier for people, ensuring public services are more personal, joined-up and effective, while also remaining inclusive.”

Private sector leaders in the digital ID sector hope the move will allow the wider market to flourish and bring more choice for citizens in how and where they use such technology.

“Sanity has prevailed. This is a necessary reset. Let’s hope we can now shift the narrative and focus on the social, economic and practical benefits that voluntary digital ID will bring to UK citizens and residents,” said Richard Oliphant, an independent legal consultant and expert on digital identity.

Robin Tombs, CEO of Yoti, which has more than seven million users of its digital ID app, said: “The mandatory messaging provoked a strong backlash from many opponents and has increasingly risked sabotaging the value of the upcoming public consultation.

“The government team now has the opportunity to engage in a more productive, less contentious discussion focusing on improving access to public services for citizens who want to use a government, or certified private sector, digital ID.”

David Crack, chair of the Association of Digital Verification Professionals, added: “A warm welcome for this news which was always going to come. Congratulations to the government in making this known early. Now we can get on to discussing what type of digital ID the country needs and how we can all gain control of our data.”

According to figures from the independent Office for Budget Responsibility, the government scheme was expected to cost £1.8bn over the next three years – although Emran Mian, permanent secretary at the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, told MPs in December that was “not a figure [the government] recognises”.

Private sector concerns about the government proposals led to a showdown meeting in December between industry representatives and the prime minister’s chief secretary, Darren Jones, who was given overall policy responsibility for digital ID, in an attempt to ease fears. Jones stressed that no firm decisions had been made and that government wanted to use the consultation process to determine the best approach to take.

Further concerns over the scheme came from its reliance on the existing One Login single sign-on system used for logging in to many online public services. Computer Weekly last year revealed a series of serious security and data protection concerns around the One Login system.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending