Connect with us

Business

Walton family fortune: How America’s richest family manages their wealth

Published

on

Walton family fortune: How America’s richest family manages their wealth


Rob Walton, left, Walmart retired chairman of the board, and Walmart board member Steuart Walton listen at the Walmart annual formal business and shareholders meeting in Rogers, Arkansas, on May 30, 2018. Walmart shareholders from around the world can attend meetings throughout the week.

Rick T. Wilking | Getty Images

A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

Walmart stock has soared 25% this year, putting America’s largest retailer on track to a $1 trillion market cap. At the center of the stock windfall is the Walton family, worth $482 billion by Bloomberg’s estimate, and their personal investment firms.

None of the Waltons — the surviving children and grandchildren of late Walmart founder Sam Walton — work directly for the retailer, though one serves on Walmart’s board and an in-law chairs it. But the family still holds a 45% stake in Walmart, and since the start of 2020, the Waltons and their family trust have sold $25.3 billion in Walmart stock, according to Smart Insider.

As America’s richest family has gotten richer, the Waltons have put their growing wealth in the hands of a network of family offices to make investments and launch foundations.

Walton Enterprises, the family office that holds most of their Walmart shares, acts as the central hub for the family’s investments and philanthropy. The rest is held in a family trust that is managed by Walton Enterprises. The firm declined to comment for this story.

Walton Enterprises flies under the radar. Few of its investments are disclosed, but public records reveal real estate developments and a $4.4 billion stock portfolio with a conservative mix of ETFs and bond funds. 

Buzzy bets on sports teams, artificial intelligence startups and clean energy are left to the family members and their individual family offices. For instance, Rob Walton, son of founder Sam, bought the NFL’s Denver Broncos for $4.65 billion in 2022 and is worth $137 billion per Bloomberg. Part of his wealth is managed by private equity firm Madrone Capital Partners, which is the largest shareholder of ticket reseller StubHub. His nephew Lukas Walton, worth $48 billion, has made $15 billion in impact investments over the last decade or so, ranging from sustainable fuel made from sewage to bonds that fund ocean conservation, according to his family office Builders Vision.

Yet even as they build out their own teams and infrastructure, the Waltons continue to rely on Walton Enterprises for much of their wealth management and philanthropy needs. 

Experts say this “hub and spoke” model allows the family to benefit from the economies of scale created by their pooled investments, while also enabling family members to pursue their own projects. 

The family is able to access top-tier private equity and venture capital funds more easily than they would with individual smaller allocations, according to an advisor familiar with the firm’s operations.

“It’s amazing what a billion dollars won’t buy you,” said the advisor, who spoke anonymously due to restrictions from their employer.

It’s a model more ultra wealthy families are adopting as they seek to leverage their wealth and access to top investment opportunities, while also accommodating the different priorities of the next generation. 

Scott Saslow, a family office consultant and principal, said he sees more families using this strategy and employs it himself. He shares the costs of some services like accounting with siblings but manages his own sustainability investments.

“I think it works best, honestly, when everyone is open about when it makes sense to use central resources and when it doesn’t,” Saslow said. “Families are increasingly finding ways to draw the next gen in and not be too paternalistic.”

Gregg Lemkau, co-CEO of bank and investment advisory firm BDT & MSD Partners, said 39-year-old Lukas Walton, in particular, is part of a growing cohort of next-generation heirs who are forging a path outside the family business.

“Lukas Walton has really poured his passion into impact,” Lemkau told CNBC. “And with Builders Vision, which has massive scale and impact on oceans and the planet and agriculture, [Lukas] is really having a differentiated impact on something that was passionate to him.”

Similarly, Lukas Walton’s cousins, Tom Walton and Steuart Walton, through their firm RZC Investments, have backed a new mountain biking park near the family’s hometown of Bentonville, Arkansas (also home to Walmart’s headquarters). Cousin Ben Walton and his wife, Lucy Ana, use Zoma Capital to support water scarcity and economic development initiatives in Colorado and Chile.

Lukas Walton’s mother, Christy, invests in conservation efforts through her family office, Innovaciones Alumbra. Also known as iAlumbra, the family office oversees an impact fund that supports ocean health, a charitable foundation and eco-friendly ranches. Christy, the widow of Sam’s son John, is worth an estimated $22.4 billion, according to Bloomberg.

Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

In some ways, Walton Enterprises is more similar to a multifamily office that happens to service members of one family than a traditional single-family office. Sharing a family office allows the Waltons to distribute the costs of services like tax accounting and property management while using their personal firms to service their individual needs.

It’s a model pioneered by the Rockefellers. Since Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller established his family office in the 1880s, his descendants started their own firms for investing and philanthropy like Venrock and Rockefeller Brothers Fund.

That said, it comes with many challenges, especially as families move from the second generation to the third, according to family-office consultant Dennis Jaffe of BanyanGlobal Family Business Advisors. While second-generation family members grew up in the same household and likely share similar values, the third generation can be more distant and disparate in their interests. 

“To keep the family together from the third generation on, you have to invest time, money and energy to make it happen. You have to want to do it,” said Jaffe, who has not worked with the Waltons. “I mean, sometimes these are difficult people and to add to all that, they marry people who sometimes can be even more difficult.”

A growing number of high-net-worth families are facing this challenge as wealth transfers from one generation to the next, Jaffe said. A family’s third generation may feel pressured to keep the family office structure intact but may want to make different investment choices, such as seeding AI startups and divesting from oil, he said.

Jaffe, who has studied 100-year-old families, said most families find compromises between letting the next generation take the reins and squashing their individuality. For example, rather than starting a new family office for a third-generation heir, which is costly, they may opt to create an investment fund for them to run, he said.

As for the Waltons, the next generation is slowly gaining more authority. The grandchildren were given voting rights over the family’s Walmart holdings a year ago. Some have also taken over the family foundation’s board, and the $8.6 billion philanthropy’s causes have shifted leftward.

“The next generation, when they have great amounts of wealth, are less concerned with how to make more wealth, and more concerned with the issue of, what do we do with it,” Jaffe said. “It’s not necessarily a political shift as it is a different level of looking at the world. You’re looking ahead. If you’re an elder, you’re looking at what you’ve done and celebrating yourself to a certain degree and feeling very satisfied, very confident.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Wessex Water to pay £11m towards wastewater upgrades after Ofwat investigation

Published

on

Wessex Water to pay £11m towards wastewater upgrades after Ofwat investigation



Wessex Water will pay £11 million toward upgrades after the industry watchdog found it failed to properly manage its wastewater network.

The water company, which serves around 2.9 million customers in the South West, was made to pay the enforcement package by regulator Ofwat.

By agreeing to the extra investment in its network, the firm avoids having to pay a fine.

It will be paid for by shareholders and not through customer bills, the watchdog confirmed.

Wessex Water failed to operate, maintain and upgrade its network to ensure it could cope with flows of sewage and wastewater, Ofwat found in its investigation.

The investment package will go towards a series of upgrades, including helping private landowners to seal their sewer pipes to avoid unnecessary groundwater reaching its network, and bringing forward investment into reducing spills at specific storm overflow areas.

Money will also be spent on installing monitoring equipment and helping customers to sustainably manage rainwater at their properties.

Ofwat said Wessex was the sixth case it had completed in its wider wastewater investigation, which has resulted in £250 million in fines and enforcement packages.

Lynn Parker, senior director for enforcement at Ofwat, said: “These cases are a crucial part of holding water companies to account and driving the transformation of the water sector that the public wants to see.”

Wessex Water had said it “regrets the impact our wastewater performance has had on customers and the environment”.

The company said the investment package “will tackle the problem directly” and that it was planning to invest £300 million in its sewerage infrastructure by 2030.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

India Inflation To Remain Benign In FY27, Another Rate Cut Only If Growth Requires It: Report

Published

on

India Inflation To Remain Benign In FY27, Another Rate Cut Only If Growth Requires It: Report


New Delhi: Well stocked granaries, low oil prices and longer-lasting drivers of core disinflation are likely to keep India inflation benign in FY27 as well, according to a new report. 

HSBC Global Investment Research said in its report that “we do not forecast more RBI repo rate cuts, but the risks, if any, are of more easing, if growth disappoints”.

November CPI inflation came in at 0.7 per cent (on-year), in line with market expectation. Despite a sequential uptick of 0.4 per cent (on-month), the annual prints remained depressed due to base effect.

Add Zee News as a Preferred Source


Excluding gold, headline CPI remained in deflation (-0.1 per cent in November compared to -0.6 per cent previously).

“Deflation in food prices continued for a third month in annual terms. Sequentially, food prices rose 0.5 per cent on-month after two months of contraction. Vegetables prices picked up after falling for two straight months along with a rise in the prices of protein items like egg, meat and fish,” said the report.

“Gold prices kept core inflation elevated. With a weight of 1.1 per cent in the CPI basket and prices up 59 per cent in November, gold alone explains c63bp of CPI inflation. Our preferred definition of core (excluding food, energy, housing and gold) had been steady at 3.2 per cent y-o-y in 3Q25, and has now fallen to 2.5 per cent in November,” said the report.

Following a sharp fall in October, November goods inflation remained benign.

According to the report, strong cereal production, well-stocked granaries, and winter disinflation are likely to help keep a lid on food inflation over the near future.

“And it is not just easing food prices. The high base of last year is likely to keep CPI inflation soft for the next few months. Global oil prices, too, have been low, and cheaper imports from China will likely keep core inflation soft for a prolonged period,” it noted.

The RBI has lowered H1 FY27 inflation forecast by 50 bp (4.5 per cent previously to 4 per cent now).

“However our forecasts are 50 bp lower than the RBI’s (at 3.5 per cent). If we are correct, and the RBI eventually makes further downward adjustment to inflation, there would be space to ease further, if growth requires it,” said the report.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Ben & Jerry’s: Row deepens as three board members removed

Published

on

Ben & Jerry’s: Row deepens as three board members removed


Three members of Ben & Jerry’s independent board will no longer be eligible to serve in their roles, after the ice cream company introduced a new set of governance practices.

These include a nine-year limit set on board members’ terms. Chair Anuradha Mittal, who earlier said she had no plans to resign under pressure, is among those affected.

The move was criticised by the company’s co-founder Ben Cohen, who called it a “blatant power grab designed to strip the board of legal authority and independence”.

His remarks are the latest in a long-running row between Ben and Jerry’s and its owner over the Cherry Garcia maker’s social activism and the continued independence of its board.

The BBC understands that Ms Mittal will leave the company immediately, while board members Mr Dodson and Ms Henderson will go at the end of this year.

“Anuradha Mittal, Daryn Dodson, and Jennifer Henderson have served this company with integrity and courage. Over many years, they helped the board make bold, often difficult decisions to uphold Ben & Jerry’s social mission,” said Mr Cohen.

Ben & Jerry’s said the move is aimed “to preserve and enhance the brand’s historical social mission and safeguard its essential integrity.”

The Vermont-based firm is now owned by The Magnum Ice Cream Company, after a spinoff from Unilever last week that created the world’s largest standalone ice cream maker.

A spokesperson for Magnum said the firm wanted to build and strengthen Ben & Jerry’s “powerful, non-partisan values-based position in the world”.

But Ben & Jerry’s would be destroyed as a brand if it remains with Magnum, Mr Cohen told the BBC.

Ben & Jerry’s was sold to Unilever in 2000 in a deal which allowed it to retain an independent board and the right to make decisions about its social mission.

Since the sale there have been deepening clashes between the Vermont-based brand and Unilever, with this conflict now inherited by Magnum.

In 2021, Ben & Jerry’s refused to sell its products in areas occupied by Israel, resulting in its Israeli operation being sold by Unilever to a local licensee.

Co-founder Jerry Greenfield left Ben & Jerry’s in September after almost half a century at the firm, deepening a dispute with parent company Unilever.

In a letter shared on social media by Mr Cohen, Mr Greenfield said Ben & Jerry’s had lost its independence after Unilever put a halt to its social activism.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending