Connect with us

Fashion

Why Chinese shoppers are choosing local luxury over LVMH and Gucci

Published

on

Why Chinese shoppers are choosing local luxury over LVMH and Gucci


By

Bloomberg

Published



November 17, 2025

When Bernard Arnault, one of the world’s richest men and chairman of LVMH, dropped by Shanghai in September, many assumed his itinerary would be routine: check in on Louis Vuitton, Dior, and the rest of his empire’s boutiques in China’s most prestigious malls. But instead, Arnault did something unexpected.

Icicle – Spring-Summer2026 – Womenswear – France – Paris – ©Launchmetrics/spotlight

He went shopping for Chinese brands.

At the new-age luxury shopping mall Qiantan Taikoo Li in Shanghai, Arnault stopped by Songmont, a minimalist leather goods label. There, he bought two handbags, according to people familiar with the situation who asked not to be named discussing a private matter.

He also went to another high-end mall and wandered into Laopu Gold, a homegrown jeweler that opened a store a few doors down from Cartier and Van Cleef & Arpels. He reportedly lingered for half an hour, muttering words like “exquisite” and “interesting.” It was a small gesture with big symbolism. Arnault, whose companies helped define modern luxury, was now browsing in boutiques that may represent its next chapter, at least in China.

The anecdote reflects how China’s $49 billion luxury market is changing fast. As the economy cools, spending on foreign premium brands has stalled. Instead, when Chinese consumers do splash out, they’re turning to homegrown labels. Their rise is redrawing the map of one of the world’s top luxury markets and forcing global players to take note.

Online retail platforms have been key to their growth. According to data compiled by BigOne Lab and analyzed by Bloomberg News, five domestic prestige brands in handbags, apparel, fragrance, cosmetics, and jewelry have outpaced seven foreign rivals in sales growth over the past two years. 

E-commerce sales at Laopu Gold have surged more than 1,000% during the first three quarters of this year compared with two years ago, while Songmont’s online bag sales have grown about 90%.

By contrast, Gucci’s online bag sales in China have slumped more than 50% and Michael Kors’ has dropped about 40%. Other Chinese labels – make-up brand Mao Geping Cosmetics, perfumier To Summer, and luxury clothing label Icicle – have pulled off similar feats in their categories. 

On Tmall, the country’s largest online retailer, revenues for some Chinese brands are on par or even higher than overseas ones: Laopu sold $630 million in its Tmall store over 12 months through to October, compared with $57 million for Van Cleef & Arpels, according to industry consultant Hangzhou Zhiyi Tech.  Mao Geping’s revenue was $125 million, more than doubling Bobbi Brown’s sales. For Laopu Gold, sales for both online and in-store jumped 250% in the first half of this year, after doubling in both 2023 and 2024, according to its financial results. Mao Geping Cosmetics, a homegrown beauty label named after its celebrity founder, reported double-digit revenue growth so far this year as well as in 2024. 

Meanwhile, Bain & Co. estimates that China’s luxury market, which is dominated by European giants like LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Kering SA, and Burberry Group Plc, shrank by as much as 20% last year, its steepest decline since at least 2011. Though there have been glimmers of recovery, executives talk about “caution” and “uncertainty.”  

China’s worsening economy has wrecked the appetite for global luxury brands. Demand that was supposed to return after the lifting of strict Covid restrictions has instead slumped for overseas firms. That disappointment has helped erase shares at key luxury houses, with LVMH down about 30% from their 2023 peak while Kering has plunged roughly 60% since its high in 2021 in Paris. In the US, Estee Lauder Companies Inc. shares are about 76% off their high in 2021. After spiking following the easing of Covid lockdowns in 2021, consumer spending in China has largely flatlined.

Representatives at LVMH, Kering, Channel, Richemont, Estee Lauder, Max Mara, Capri didn’t respond to requests for comment.

That’s leading shoppers to turn to domestic brands with their lower pricing. ICICLE’s cashmere and wool Aircoat is priced between about $1,123 to $2,808. Max Mara’s 101801 coat, often highlighted as comparable by Chinese consumers, costs more than $4,200. Songmont’s bucket bags, described by social media users as a dupe for Hermes’ Picotin Lock bags, sell for around $421, while the latter costs between $5,054 to $8,016.

It’s not just a China phenomenon. Shoppers globally have become more discerning, with consumers turning to labels that look premium at lower price points as they grow increasingly weary of spending on big name brands that keep raising prices. 

But what’s more surprising is that the price tag alone isn’t the deciding factor, said Jacques Roizen, managing director of China consulting at Digital Luxury Group. 

“Contrary to common perception, Chinese beauty brands aren’t competing on price – they’re building rich brand universes and prioritizing storytelling,” said Roizen. “For Western prestige beauty brands, the rise of local competitors should serve as both a wake-up call and a warning.”

That story is rooted in craft and cultural pride, and is resonating with younger Chinese shoppers who no longer see Western logos as tickets to sophistication. Instead, modern shoppers are hunting for items that feel more tailored to them, and many Chinese brands have turned that shift into their core identity. Labels like To Summer and Songmont draw deeply from local history, art, and everyday life. The message: modern luxury can be proudly Chinese. 

Songmont’s philosophy emphasizes “Eastern aesthetics,” with the designs of its stores reflecting Chinese calligraphy. To Summer builds scents around traditional ingredients like tea, osmanthus and preserved orange peel and uses porcelain made in Jingdezhen, China’s most important ceramics production center. ICICLE draws on the Confucian ideal of harmony and restraint. 

It’s a concept that Songmont’s founder Fu Song consciously designed from the start.

“We’ve positioned ourselves as a Chinese brand rooted in local culture,” she said. “In the global fashion conversation, there are still too few Chinese voices.”

The strategy works especially well online, with the marketing more attuned to local consumers. Songmont launched its own podcast focusing on the lives of urban women, which is resonating for its celebration of self-worth and diverse life values rather than social status, said BigOne partner Amber Zhang. The campaign struck deeper than those from global brands, she said.

For shoppers like Wan Yihuan, a 30-year-old Shanghai finance worker, that message hits home. Once a self-described Hermès and Tom Ford addict, she now carries a $210 Songmont hobo bag and wears Mao Geping makeup. “I fell into the trap of consumerism when I was younger,” she said. “Now I just want things I truly like.”

Among the new Chinese players, Laopu Gold stands out for its more-than 100% revenue growth in physical stores since early 2024, where Tiffany and Bulgari have seen double-digit declines, according to BigOne data. At Beijing’s exclusive SKP mall, Laopu Gold’s sales rose more than 200% in the first half of the year, according to a person familiar with the figure who declined to be named discussing a private matter. In October, it opened a store in Plaza 66, a glass-clad cathedral of luxury long dominated by European names, becoming the first domestic brand to establish a presence in all ten of China’s top-tier malls. 

It may seem strange to associate Made-in-China with luxury, a country where low-cost manufacturing helped drive its economy to the world No. 2 spot. But these domestic premium brands are challenging that perception with a slower and more premium manufacturing process that’s relayed to consumers through localized marketing campaigns. 

In 2013, ICICLE bought a garment factory that manufactures for Max Mara in China’s eastern Jiangsu province. Songmont uses full-grain top-layer cowhide and gold-plated hardware, crafted by artisans with decades of traditional sewing and craftsmanship experience from the founder’s hometown. Laopu Gold incorporates elaborate filigreed shapes and enamel glazes into its jewelry. Mao Geping, China’s answer to America’s Bobbi Brown, teaches makeup application on local models to millions of fans online. 

Their popularity is spreading outside China’s border. In London, 16-year-old Naomi Jiang now looks beyond marquee labels when buying handbags. Finding designer brands like Hermes overpriced, she chose Songmont for its design and value instead. “We’re getting a more diverse, higher quality selection of clothing,” she said.Executives at the Chinese brands, including Songmont, To Summer and Mao Geping, say they want to expand globally. The brands haven’t disclosed their overseas sales yet but analysts’ consensus is that the amount is likely still small.

“Chinese brands must look beyond China,” To Summer’s founder and chief executive officer Elvis Liu said.  “Why are global brands often better positioned in their competition against Chinese brands? Because they are backed by the global market. If you only have the Chinese market, it’s like you are a local brand and this will put you at a very disadvantageous position amid the competition.”

Still, obstacles loom. Few domestic brands have crossed the 10-billion-yuan  ($1.4 billion) annual revenue mark, said Michelle Cheng, retail analyst at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. “China’s market is huge, so you can hit 1 billion yuan with hot products, or even 3 to 5 billion,” she said. “But further growth depends on having a strong management team, talented staff, and long-term vision.”

The high sales growth figures also stem from a low base: the top 10 best selling brands in China’s personal luxury segment are all Western brands, accounting for 63%, or about $31 billion, in sales last year, according to Euromonitor International data. In contrast, no Chinese brands have more than 0.5% of the market share, the data showed.

The bigger risk may be psychological, with the same economic malaise that led to European brands’ sales waning potentially spreading to domestic brands too, said Cheng. “For luxury to truly grow, you need rising wages and a growing middle class, both of which are being challenged by ongoing economic headwinds,” she said.

Take Guo Wenjun, who once spent over $70,000 in a shopping spree – Rolex, Chanel, even a toddler-sized Armani jacket. Now, the 37-year old has a child in an expensive international school and feels job uncertainties are mounting. She’s turned to buying $7 tote bags and $4 T-shirts from budget shopping site 1688.com. 

“Luxury used to make me feel like a queen,” she said. “Now it no longer has that magic.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Fashion

The sneaker boom had a long run. Now some analysts say it’s over

Published

on

The sneaker boom had a long run. Now some analysts say it’s over


By

Bloomberg

Published



January 11, 2026

For nearly two decades, sports brands benefited as people swapped out dress shoes for sneakers when heading everywhere from the airport to fancy restaurants and even the office.

Nike

That’s been a boon for Adidas AG, Nike Inc. and Puma SE, which capitalized on consumers’ changing tastes by serving up snazzy, comfy kicks that people wanted to wear on and off the playing field. The rising demand for sports shoes also underpinned the rapid growth of challengers like Hoka and On Holding AG, which emerged in the wake of the financial crisis and quickly became popular brands.

Now the future of that longstanding sneaker boom is being called into question, most notably by Bank of America analysts led by Thierry Cota. They rocked the footwear world last week with a 61-page analysis concluding that the growth prospects for these sports brands are rapidly dimming.

They argue that the sporting goods sector had enjoyed a 20-year “upcycle” that lifted sneakers from less than a quarter of world footwear sales to at least a half — a trend that culminated during the Covid pandemic, when millions of people were suddenly working from home. “With this structural shift largely complete, prospects for future revenue growth are now significantly reduced,” the analysts said.

They accompanied that view with a rare “double downgrade” of Adidas, abandoning their “buy” rating and declaring the stock one of the least attractive in the industry. 

Their contention that the sneaker boom has passed its peak prompted a backlash from skeptics who say the casual footwear trend has room to run. Longtime industry analyst Matt Powell, an adviser at consulting firm Spurwink River, conveyed that sentiment on LinkedIn, where he posted a Barron’s article about the research and commented: “C’mon, man! No evidence of this.”

Adidas shares plunged as much as 7.6% in response to the downgrade on Tuesday, before recovering part of those losses by the end of the week.

Sneakers now make up about 60% of footwear sales in the US, according to Beth Goldstein, an analyst at Circana in New York. Sport shoes have won over the population as part of a wider societal push toward comfort, health and wellness, priorities that probably aren’t going to disappear anytime soon, she said. The US sneaker category grew 4% last year through November, while the fashion category dropped 3%, she added.

“The sneaker business is larger than ever,” she said. “I wouldn’t even call casualization a trend — it’s just a key consumer preference.”

Yet the sneaker makers have run into headwinds since the pandemic as they sometimes failed to keep up with shoppers’ fickle tastes, saw sales cool particularly in China, and faced the threat of US tariffs. Shares of Adidas are down by almost a third in the past year, and even On Holding’s stock is down by more than 10% in the period, despite strong revenue growth.

“We don’t believe the casualization trend is over — rather, it has stabilized, with wardrobes now more balanced,” said Poonam Goyal, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence.

“The category has moved beyond the pandemic-driven demand spike and is now operating in a more normalized environment.”

There are signs that sneakers are bleeding into the dress shoe category. In 2025, the top-traded loafer on Stockx, an online resale platform, was the New Balance 1906L, which looks like the offspring of a preppy boat shoe and a marathon trainer. It’s also common these days to see movie stars and fashion influencers donning spiffed-up, expensive versions of trainers, often in collaboration with luxury brands like Gucci and Moncler.

The analysts at Bank of America didn’t suggest that people are going to ditch their sneakers for patent leather oxfords anytime soon. Rather, they indicated that sporting goods — after booming during the pandemic — have since mid-2023 been growing at a slower-than-average pace compared with the past couple of decades.

While that typically could mean the industry is poised to take off again, no big rebound is apparent, the analysts argued. They cited data ranging from recent credit card purchases to sluggish sales figures from Asian footwear and apparel suppliers to less-than-bullish commentary from industry leaders regarding the outlook for 2026.

If the sporting goods industry grew by an average of about 9% a year since 2007, as millions of people traded in dress shoes for sneakers, the future annual expansion may only be about 4% or 5%, they suggested.

Their optimistic take is that the industry is in a prolonged slump because of consumers fearing economic conditions and recent stumbles at Nike. That could mean that the sneaker boom still has legs and will resurge as early as 2027. 

“The alternative is much worse and more likely, in our view,” the Bank of America analysts added. “The emergence of a new, less favorable long-term industry paradigm.”
 



Source link

Continue Reading

Fashion

As natural resources dwindle, luxury fashion must pursue sustainability says Square Management study

Published

on

As natural resources dwindle, luxury fashion must pursue sustainability says Square Management study


Published



January 11, 2026

Long defined by rarity, artisanal excellence, and desirability, the luxury sector now faces an unprecedented equation: how can it continue to create value without further increasing pressure on natural and social resources? This is the question addressed by the report “Business models for sustainable luxury,” published by the consultancy Square Management, which offers an in-depth analysis of the transformation of luxury business models through the lens of planetary boundaries.

Repair is one of the pillars of sustainable fashion – Shutterstock

The study’s first finding is that luxury occupies a strategic position in the ecological transition. With global sales of 364 billion euros in 2024 and considerable symbolic weight, it wields significant influence across the creative industries as a whole. Yet this influence plays out against a backdrop of multiple pressures: the growing scarcity of raw materials (gold, leather, cashmere); tighter regulation (the CSRD directive, the AGEC law, the Green Deal); the increasing integration of ESG criteria into financial valuation; evolving consumer expectations; and shifting cultural norms around consumption.

A strategy to be implemented globally

In the face of these shifts, the study shows that marginal adjustments are no longer enough and urges the luxury sector to undertake a profound transformation of its business models. To frame this reconfiguration, the report draws on the circular economy’s “9Rs” framework, which ranks sustainability strategies from the least to the most transformative, from recycling to calling into question overproduction.

The study highlights a wide variety of models already in play. The least ambitious strategies focus on waste-to-energy (Recover) or the recycling of raw materials (Recycle), with examples including Guerlain‘s refillable bottles and Prada‘s Re-Nylon line. More structurally significant are upcycling approaches (Repurpose, Remanufacture, Refurbish), which turn unsold items and dormant stock into creations with high symbolic value: Balenciaga, Jean Paul Gaultier, Coach, and Jeanne Friot exemplify this blend of circularity, creativity, and storytelling.

Reducing production and buying less: two key ideas for sustainability

Repair is a crucial lever. By extending product lifespans, it avoids the most emissions-intensive stages of the life cycle. Maisons such as Hermès, Chanel, and Cartier have made it a pillar of their client relationships, while platforms such as Tilli are helping to structure this practice at scale. Re-use and rental are also fast-growing markets, driven by younger generations: 65% of luxury consumers say they are interested in buying second-hand, according to the “True-Luxury Global Consumer Insights” report (BCG-Altagamma, 2023), a figure that is rising steadily.

When it comes to sustainability, the luxury industry must embrace its leadership role by fundamentally transforming the way it operates.
When it comes to sustainability, the luxury industry must embrace its leadership role by fundamentally transforming the way it operates. – Shutterstock

The most transformative models are those aimed at reducing production itself, namely Reduce, Refuse (superfluous purchases), and Rethink. On-demand manufacturing, pre-orders or limited production, as practised by Gabriela Hearst or MaisonCléo, help limit unsold stock while reinforcing exclusivity. Some houses go further still, committing to regenerative models: Kering invests in regenerative agriculture, while Chloé embeds social and environmental impact at the heart of every product as a mission-driven company. However, the report emphasises that these transformations face major obstacles.

The limits of the “do less harm” philosophy

Internally, many obstacles are cited to the introduction of circular models: complex logistics, high costs, cognitive resistance, and a cultural attachment to ownership. To overcome these, the study’s authors identify several key factors, including enhanced traceability (notably via blockchain), co-opetition between players to pool costs and, above all, the ability to reframe sustainable luxury symbolically, not as a renunciation, but as a new form of prestige.

The study also highlights a strategic shift: luxury can no longer settle for “doing less harm.” It is now expected to create positive, measurable, and shared value that is compatible with planetary boundaries. A transformation that profoundly redefines the very notion of desirability.

This article is an automatic translation.
Click here to read the original article.

Copyright © 2026 FashionNetwork.com All rights reserved.



Source link

Continue Reading

Fashion

Bangladesh garment exports fall in Nov 2025, up slightly in July-Nov

Published

on

Bangladesh garment exports fall in Nov 2025, up slightly in July-Nov



Woven garment exports slightly outpaced knitted garment exports in terms of growth. Knitwear exports (Chapter **) declined by * per cent to $*.*** billion, compared with $*.*** billion in the same period of fiscal ******. In contrast, woven apparel exports (Chapter **) rose by *.** per cent to $*.*** billion, up from $*.*** billion during July–November ****, EPB data showed.

Home textile exports (Chapter **, excluding ******) also expanded, increasing by *.** per cent to $***.** million from $***.** million in the same period of the previous fiscal. Taken together, exports of woven and knitted apparel, clothing accessories, and home textiles accounted for **.** per cent of Bangladesh’s total exports, which stood at $**.*** billion during the period. Growth in home textiles was supported by firmer demand for niche value-added products, along with Bangladesh’s competitive pricing amid rising production costs in rival sourcing countries.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending