Connect with us

Business

With Trump’s tax bill set to dent giving by the wealthy, can middle-class donors make up the difference?

Published

on

With Trump’s tax bill set to dent giving by the wealthy, can middle-class donors make up the difference?


A woman puts money into a Salvation Army red kettle outside of Giant Supermarket in Alexandria, Virginia on November 22, 2023.

Eric Lee | The Washington Post | Getty Images

A version of this article first appeared in CNBC’s Inside Wealth newsletter with Robert Frank, a weekly guide to the high-net-worth investor and consumer. Sign up to receive future editions, straight to your inbox.

New tax laws risk reducing charitable giving by the wealthy next year, economists and academic experts say, leaving less-wealthy Americans to make up the difference.

Under President Donald Trump’s “big beautiful bill,” signed into law in July, several tax benefits for wealthy donors will be reduced. Top earners will also have their effective tax benefit cut from 37% to 35%. The Indiana University Lilly Family School of Philanthropy estimates this cap alone will reduce giving by $4.1 billion to approximately $6.1 billion annually. 

In addition, the bill also limits tax incentives for itemizers, who will only be able to deduct donations in excess of 0.5% of their adjusted gross income.

At the same time, the bill also creates new incentives for middle- and lower-income filers to give. Starting next year, roughly 140 million taxpayers who do not itemize will still be able to deduct up to $1,000 in cash donations per filer. About 90% of taxpayers take the standard deduction since it was raised in 2017 during the first Trump administration.

While the tax changes may help broaden the base of giving, making it less dependent on the ultra-wealthy, experts are skeptical that the math will balance out.

Elena Patel, co-director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, told Inside Wealth she is not optimistic that middle- and lower-income donors will be able to make up the shortfall as top earners give less.

“The nonprofit sector says that every dollar matters, and so incentivizing small donations from every household could have a meaningful impact for certain kinds of organizations. But the truth is that those kinds of contributions, however, just are not the bulk of charitable giving in the charitable sector,” she said. “That 2-percentage-point reduction [for top earners] might not seem like a big deal, but you have to keep in mind the scale of gifts that are being given among the highest-net-worth individuals in the United States.”

What the ‘K-shaped’ economy means for philanthropy

Charitable giving by American households continues to rise, reaching $392.45 billion last year, per the latest report by the Lilly School of Philanthropy for Giving USA. That’s up 52% since 2014. 

But while donations are increasing, fewer Americans are giving as wealthy donors make up an increasing share of philanthropy, according to the university’s research.

Amir Pasic, dean of the Lilly School of Philanthropy, said incentivizing Americans of all income levels to donate is valuable in and of itself. 

“We’ve had this general problem of dollars going up but the number of donors going down. This is a positive development because this could really increase the number of donors,” he said.

However, Pasic said, financial stress has limited everyday donors’ ability to give, while wealthier ones have been donating more. The share of Americans who donate dropped from 66.2% to 45.8% between 2000 and 2020, according to the university’s research. 

“Economic uncertainty is always worrisome for people’s giving planning,” Pasic said.

This lopsided, or “K-shaped,” economy shows signs of getting worse amid tariff hikes and inflation. Lower- and middle-income consumers are spending less on everything from McDonald’s burgers to flights, while wealthier Americans flex their spending power.

Will the new deduction move the needle?

Economist Daniel Hungerman said he questions whether the new deduction would spur a substantial number of donations or mainly reward taxpayers who would have given anyway. 

While the new deduction is larger, at $1,000 per single filer and $2,000 for married joint filers, a similar legislative effort in the ’80s failed to move the needle on charitable giving, he said. A temporary $300 deduction in 2020 spurred by the Covid pandemic only increased charitable donations by 5%, according to the Tax Foundation.

Trump’s tax bill also permanently raises the standard deduction, which significantly dampens charitable giving, Hungerman said. His study estimated that the higher deduction led to a permanent annual drop of $16 billion after the 2017 reforms.

However, raising the cap on the federal deduction for state and local taxes (better known as SALT) may provide some relief, he said. More taxpayers in high-cost states will benefit from itemizing, which encourages donations.

Hungerman said encouraging everyday donors to get in the habit of giving now could lead to higher levels of donating later if they increase their wealth.

“Maybe what is even more compelling to me is the long game, if we can send a message that everybody should give like this, and we change some of these people’s giving behavior,” he said. “Somewhere out there is the Bill Gates of tomorrow.”

Get Inside Wealth directly to your inbox

What donors can do now

Currently, taxpayers who plan to take the standard deduction would benefit from waiting until 2026 to make donations. However, itemizers and high-income donors will get more bang for their buck by giving before the end of the year.

Robert Westley, senior vice president and regional wealth advisor at Northern Trust, said he is recommending that clients accelerate their donations to this year if they were planning to donate over the next four years.  

Filers can only deduct up to 60% of their adjusted gross income for cash donations to public charities per year. The percentage drops to 30% for contributions of long-term appreciated assets like stock or real estate.

However, taxpayers can generally carry forward excess deductions over five years, he said. Still, it’s unclear how much bang they will get for their buck as the IRS has yet to specify whether excess deductions will be subject to the new floor and ceiling on charitable deductions, according to Westley.

For donors who want to give more now but are unsure of how to do so, he said he suggests giving to a donor-advised fund, or DAF. With a DAF, donors get an upfront deduction but can wait to allocate those funds to specific charities. For donors wanting to offload appreciated assets, it is much simpler to donate stock to a DAF than directly to a nonprofit.

Given this year’s stock run up, Westley said many of his clients are looking to donate appreciated stock, especially in tech, to offset gains as well as rebalance their portfolios.

“Their equities have appreciated, and some of them might now represent a higher percentage of the portfolio than their target asset allocation,” he said. “When you donate those risk assets to charity, you get the tax benefit, you don’t realize the gain, and when it’s done you’ve lowered your risk-asset allocation.”

Lawyers and tax planners are still waiting for guidance from the IRS on a bevy of issues stemming from the changes. For instance, it’s still unclear whether deductions will be capped for non-grantor trusts that make charitable donations, according to Westley.

But high-income donors still have many tools at their disposal, he said. Top earners who are 73 and older can effectively reduce their taxable income dollar-for-dollar by giving their required minimum distributions from an IRA to charity. 

Westley said this tactic is popular among his retirement-age clients and likely to become even more so with the raised SALT cap. Filers can lower their income to qualify for the enhanced SALT deduction, which maxes out at $40,000 for taxpayers with incomes of $500,000 or less.

“You’re not even dealing with any of the itemized deduction rules,” he said. “There’s no ceiling on the tax benefit and there’s no floor or hurdle to get over for the deduction.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

India’s $5 Trillion Economy Push Explained: Why Modi Govt Wants To Merge 12 Banks Into 4 Mega ‘World-Class’ Lending Giants

Published

on

India’s  Trillion Economy Push Explained: Why Modi Govt Wants To Merge 12 Banks Into 4 Mega ‘World-Class’ Lending Giants


India’s Public Sector Banks Merger: The Centre is mulling over consolidating public-sector banks, and officials involved in the process say the long-term plan could eventually bring down the number of state-owned lenders from 12 to possibly just 4. The goal is to build a banking system that is large enough in scale, has deeper capital strength and is prepared to meet the credit needs of a fast-growing economy.

The minister explained that bigger banks are better equipped to support large-scale lending and long-term projects. “The country’s economy is moving rapidly toward the $5 trillion mark. The government is active in building bigger banks that can meet rising requirements,” she said.

Why India Wants Larger Banks

Add Zee News as a Preferred Source


Sitharaman recently confirmed that the government and the Reserve Bank of India have already begun detailed conversations on another round of mergers. She said the focus is on creating “world-class” banks that can support India’s expanding industries, rising infrastructure investments and overall credit demand.

She clarified that this is not only about merging institutions. The government and RBI are working on strengthening the entire banking ecosystem so that banks grow naturally and operate in a stable environment.

According to her, the core aim is to build stronger, more efficient and globally competitive banks that can help sustain India’s growth momentum.

At present, the country has a total of 12 public sector banks: the State Bank of India (SBI), the Punjab National Bank (PNB), the Bank of Baroda, the Canara Bank, the Union Bank of India, the Bank of India, the Indian Bank, the Central Bank of India, the Indian Overseas Bank (IOB) and the UCO Bank.

What Happens To Employees After Merger?

Whenever bank mergers are discussed, employees become anxious. A merger does not only combine balance sheets; it also brings together different work cultures, internal systems and employee expectations.

In the 1990s and early 2000s, several mergers caused discomfort among staff, including dissatisfaction over new roles, delayed promotions and uncertainty about reporting structures. Some officers who were promoted before mergers found their seniority diluted afterward, which created further frustration.

The finance minister addressed the concerns, saying that the government and the RBI are working together on the merger plan. She stressed that earlier rounds of consolidation had been successful. She added that the country now needs large, global-quality banks “where every customer issue can be resolved”. The focus, she said, is firmly on building world-class institutions.

‘No Layoffs, No Branch Closures’

She made one point unambiguous: no employee will lose their job due to the upcoming merger phase. She said that mergers are part of a natural process of strengthening banks, and this will not affect job security.

She also assured that no branches will be closed and no bank will be shut down as part of the consolidation exercise.

India last carried out a major consolidation drive in 2019-20, reducing the number of public-sector banks from 21 to 12. That round improved the financial health of many lenders.

With the government preparing for the next phase, the goal is clear. India wants large and reliable banks that can support a rapidly growing economy and meet the needs of a country expanding faster than ever.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Stock market holidays in December: When will NSE, BSE remain closed? Check details – The Times of India

Published

on

Stock market holidays in December: When will NSE, BSE remain closed? Check details – The Times of India


Stock market holidays for December: As November comes to a close and the final month of the year begins, investors will want to know on which days trading sessions will be there and on which days stock markets are closed. are likely keeping a close eye on year-end portfolio adjustments, global cues, and corporate earnings.For this year, the only major, away from normal scheduled market holidays in December is Christmas, observed on Thursday, December 25. On this day, Indian stock markets, including the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) and National Stock Exchange (NSE), will remain closed across equity, derivatives, and securities lending and borrowing (SLB) segments. Trading in currency and interest rate derivatives segments will continue as usual.Markets are expected to reopen on Friday, December 26, as investors return to monitor global developments and finalize year-end positioning. Apart from weekends, Christmas is the only scheduled market holiday this month, making December relatively quiet compared with other festive months, with regards to stock markets.The last trading session in November, which was November 28 (next two days being the weekend) ended flat. BSE Sensex slipped 13.71 points, or 0.02 per cent, to settle at 85,706.67, after hitting an intra-day high of 85,969.89 and a low of 85,577.82, a swing of 392.07 points. Meanwhile, the NSE Nifty fell 12.60 points, or 0.05 per cent, to 26,202.95, halting its two-day rally.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

North Tyneside GP says debt stress causing mental health issues

Published

on

North Tyneside GP says debt stress causing mental health issues


A GP says patients are presenting with mental health problems because of stress they feel over their levels of personal debt.

According to Citizens Advice, north-east England has the second highest number of people who require professional assistance with debt problems – only London is higher.

Debt charity StepChange said in 2024 the highest concentration of their clients were in the North East, with 37 clients per 10,000 adults.

Dr Kamlesh Sreekissoon, who works as a GP in North Tyneside, said people were juggling “three or four jobs” in the build up to Christmas in order to manage and subsequently struggling with their mental health.

The most common reason for personal debt as reported by Stepchange’s North East clients is a rise in the cost of living (19.3%) and a lack of control over finances (19%).

Both these statistics outstrip the UK figures of 17.7% and 17.9% respectively.

Citizens Advice said thousands of people were falling deeper into debt to meet the cost of basic essentials such as food and fuel, rather than luxuries, but that people also felt under pressure to provide for Christmas.

Dr Sreekissoon said the stress caused by the debt people faced was compounded by issues relating to their family situations.

“At this time of year you will see people juggling three or four jobs, also after caring for elderly relatives, parents, [they’re] stressed out and unfortunately struggling with their mental health,” said Dr Sreekissoon.

He said the debt his patients described was not caused by buying unnecessary things, but by simply struggling to make ends meet.

“It’s more the basics,” he said. “I see people taking on working long hours, doing two or three jobs, and just being kind of stretched out, not being able to see their kids, and that just burns people out which is really sad to see”.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending