Business
Privatisation of state enterprises | The Express Tribune
Answer to dilemma is sure-fire sale of bankrupt SOEs in unchaotic and transparent manner
BRUSSELS:
Rule number one is that the role of government is to govern and not run a business. State-owned enterprises (SOEs) have been a huge drain on Pakistan’s fiscal solvency since decades. Staggering losses over the years and the accumulated liabilities absorbed by the national exchequer (read: taxpayers) through subsidies, guarantees and debt have suffocated Pakistan.
Total SOEs’ liabilities have climbed to Rs9.6 trillion, roughly half of the annual federal budget. Unfunded pension obligations alone stand at Rs2 trillion. Out of the Rs13 trillion collected in federal taxes, about Rs2.1 trillion was redirected towards SOEs in 2025 just to keep them afloat. With mounting losses and negative equity of these white elephants, a comprehensive plan for wholesale privatisation of SOEs needs to be developed and, more importantly, implemented on an urgent basis. Yet the current government, like those before it, keep procrastinating the urgent need to privatise these entities.
So, the question to ask is why? The most obvious answer is “retaining control” not for economic rationalisation but for political control. It is the political leadership and state bureaucracy that “throw a monkey wrench” into any plans for privatisation.
Their combined objective is not to increase their economic value but to use them as tools to maintain a patronage system to reward loyalists to SOE boards that exist in name but lack authority, a management that has never run a private business, a bloated employment with excess wages and benefits.
The subordination of economic efficiency to their self-interests inevitably means an incentive to “drag their feet” and/or backtrack on reforms. Bureaucratic inertia and political reluctance, coupled with resistance from vested interests, continues to stall meaningful change, adding to the burden of taxpayers.
The annual report on the federal SOEs (2024-2025) by the Central Monitoring Unit (CMU) in the Ministry of Finance highlights the deep-rooted problems of the public sector to the poor leadership that is unable to run it as a viable commercial enterprise. The CMU recommendations – stronger boards, timely audits, better disclosure and performance-based accountability – are not new.
The CMU fails to understand the nature of business. SOEs cannot function as a sustainable business, any effort to restructure with half measures or cosmetic changes will only give the same results and be an arduous exercise in futility. Private sector businesses with their boards, management and employees are beholden and answerable to their shareholders. Financial health of these companies are annually scrutinised to improve performance and increase economic value.
SOEs on the other hand are beholden and answerable to politicians and bureaucrats, who care less about financial health because it’s not their money on the line, it’s the taxpayers’ money and it is they who “bear the brunt” of these massive losses.
So, what’s the answer to this dilemma? Nothing but a sure-fire sale of these bankrupt SOEs must be done urgently in an unchaotic and transparent manner. Questionable opaque methods of transferring the assets of struggling or bankrupt SOEs to private entities, foreign or domestic, must be avoided. The exit of these SOEs will create opportunities for the private sector to eclipse the state sector as the most important engine of growth, productivity, and job creation in finance, energy, utilities, transport, manufacturing and mining.
Revenues from the privatisation sales will go a long way to help Pakistan’s fiscal quandary, but even more. So the removal of these businesses from Pakistan’s ownership ledgers eases the headache for the government to oversee their operations so that it can focus on governance and utilise a significant portion of public resources on development, education and healthcare rather than keeping these loss-making state entities alive.
The writer is a philanthropist and an economist based in Belgium
Business
Delay in FSSAI finalising front of pack labelling rules unusual by its own norm – The Times of India
While the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has claimed in the Supreme Court that the framing of front-of-pack labelling (FOPL) regulations would take longer and sought more time, a look at several regulations framed by the authority in the last ten years shows that the average time taken to frame one or make amendments to existing ones has been about two years. In the case of the FOPL, the process has been dragging on for about a decade.After framing guidelines in 2014 which included front-of-pack labelling specifying how much fat, sugar or salt a packaged food contained, when the FSSAI put it in the public domain in 2015, it had stated that the guidelines would be “converted into regulation in due course after following the process of inviting suggestions and comments, suggestions etc. from various stakeholders”. FSSAI put out the draft Food Safety and Standards (Labelling and Display) Regulations, 2018 in public domain in April 2018. However, since then there have been half a dozen stakeholder consultations and more drafts put out, but no regulation in sight yet.In response to a public interest petition in the Supreme Court seeking directions to FSSAI to make FOPL regarding high fat, sugar and salt mandatory for packaged foods, the court has been monitoring the process even as the authority has been seeking repeated extensions. In its latest affidavit in court, the FSSAI laid out a long process before the Supreme Court.It told the court that it is “contemplating” a tabular or pictorial representation to reflect high fat sugar or salt on front of pack labelling. It stated that it is a complex matter “requiring further consultation and examination” and hence stakeholder consultation is proposed before deciding on the modalities of FOPL. The latest stakeholder consultation had over 60 food industry and industry association representatives and just two public health experts representing civil society or public health interest.There remain several steps:1. After stakeholder consultations a draft amendment will be prepared2. Draft amendment will be placed before scientific panel (consist of nine eminent food scientists from different government organizations/institutions). Scientific committee comprising of chairpersons of the 21 scientific panels and six independent members, FSSAI and Health ministry “for due consideration”3. To include amendment in the regulation a draft regulation including the proposed amendment/s is placed before the scientific panel concerned4.Recommendations of the scientific panel will be placed before the scientific committee5. On endorsement of the scientific committee it will be placed before FSSAI for approval and if there are substantial changes in the notified draft regulation, another draft regulation will have to be notified6. Once approved by FSSAI, the draft or final regulation is sent to health ministry7. After ministry approval, if it is a draft regulation, it has to be notified in the gazette for public comments giving 60 days’ time and the entire process spelt out above is repeated before it is finally notified.8. In case what the health ministry approves is the final regulation, it has to be sent to the legislative department of the law ministry for vetting followed by approval of the health ministry. The approved final regulation is published in the Gazette of India for implementation.In short, the FSSAI stated in court that the regulation is far from becoming a reality any time soon. However, the longest time FSSAI has taken for framing any of the existing regulations or amendments has been over three years. The only other regulation that the FSSAI has not framed even after seven years is the Food Safety and Standards (Genetically Modified and Engineered Foods) Regulations which have been in the works since 2019.Average time to bring in various regulations/amendments to regulations
| New regulations | Draft notified in the gazette | Put in public domain for feedback from stakeholders | Date of gazette notification | Gap between draft and final notification |
| Food Safety and Standards (Health Supplements, Nutraceuticals, Food for Special Dietary Use, Food for Special Medical Purpose, Functional Food and Novel Food) Regulations, 2016. | Jul 30, 2015 | Sep 11, 2015 | Dec 23, 2016 | 17 months |
| Food Safety and Standards (Alcoholic Beverages) Regulations, 2018 | Sep 5, 2016 | Sep 9, 2016 | Mar 19, 2018 | 18 months |
| Food Safety and Standards (Fortification of Foods) Regulations, 2018 | Dec 23, 2016 | Jan 3, 2017 | Aug 2, 2018 | 19 months |
| Food Safety and Standards (Organic Foods) Regulations, 2017 | Jun 19, 2017 | Jun 22, 2017 | Dec 29, 2017 | 6 months |
| Food Safety and Standards (Advertising and Claims) Regulations, 2018 | Mar 13, 2018 | Mar 23, 2018 | Nov 19, 2018 | 8 months |
| Food Safety and Standards (Packaging) Regulations, 2018 | Mar 19, 2018 | Apr 2, 2018 | Dec 24, 2018 | 9 months |
| Regulation amendments | ||||
| Food Safety and Standards (Contaminants, toxins and Residues) First Amendment Regulations, 2024 | Aug 20, 2020 | Aug 26, 2020 | Oct 17, 2024 | 26 months |
| Food Safety and Standards (Packaging) First Amendment Regulations, 2025. | May 17, 2022 | May 24, 2022 | Mar 28, 2025 | 34 months |
| Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) First Amendment Regulations, 2024. | May 25, 2022 | May 31, 2022 | Oct 21, 2024 | 29 months |
| Food Safety and Standards (Food Products Standards and Food Additives) First Amendment Regulations, 2025 | Oct 31, 2022 | Nov 3, 2022 | Jul 10, 2025 | 32 months |
| Food Safety and Standards (Prohibition and Restrictions on Sales) first Amendment Regulations, 2024 | Apr 27, 2023 | Apr 28, 2023 | Oct 17, 2024 | 18 months |
Business
Inflation holds at 3% in ‘calm before the storm’ of Iran war
UK inflation held steady at 3% in February before the impact of an energy shock linked to war in the Middle East, official figures have revealed.
Economists have said data showing flatlining inflation highlights “the calm before the storm”, with inflation expected to accelerate again in the coming months.
The rate of Consumer Prices Index (CPI) inflation was unchanged from the level reported in January, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) said.
It was in line with predictions from economists.
However, the steady picture for inflation does not yet reflect the impact of the conflict in the Middle East on the cost of living, with the first attacks taking place at the very end of February.
Oil and gas prices have jumped in recent weeks due to the conflict and other goods prices could also be affected by disruption to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz.
Economists said inflation could lift as high as 4% in the third quarter of 2026 due to the projected surge in energy costs.
ONS chief economist Grant Fitzner said: “After last month’s slowdown, annual inflation was unchanged in February as various price movements offset each other.
“The largest upwards driver was the price of clothing, which rose this month but fell a year ago.
“This was offset by falls in petrol costs, with prices collected before the start of the conflict in the Middle East and subsequent rise in crude oil prices.”
The February data showed clothing and footwear prices contributed to inflation, with prices up 0.9% for the month – its highest level since March 2025 – after previously staying flat in January.
However, this upward impact on inflation was cooling inflation in other areas.
Inflation across the services sector eased slightly to 4.3% for the month, dipping to its lowest level for almost four years.
Slower alcohol and tobacco price rises were also a drag on inflation, easing to 3.6% for the month – the lowest since February 2022.
The slowdown was driven by falling inflation for the prices of beers, wines and spirits over the month.
Elsewhere, motor fuel inflation also eased back, with the average price of petrol falling by 1.6p per litre between January and February.
However, petrol and diesel prices have risen significantly since the latest data after the price of crude oil jumped due to the conflict in the Middle East.
Economists said on Wednesday that inflation is now set to accelerate over the coming months as the impact of the conflict feeds into the price of goods.
Stuart Morrison, research manager at the British Chambers of Commerce, said: “For businesses across the UK, today’s inflation data represents the calm before the storm.
“UK firms are particularly exposed to the economic impact of the crisis in the Middle East as our electricity prices are tightly tethered to global gas prices.
“This will feed directly into higher costs and renewed inflationary pressure in the months to come.”
Luke Bartholomew, deputy chief economist at Aberdeen, said: “Today’s inflation report is little more than a relic of the world before the Iran conflict.
“While the February report was broadly in line with expectations, and confirms that inflation was on a path back to 2%, the outlook for inflation has radically changed.”
Experts also indicated previous expectations that interest rates would be cut further this year have been scuppered, with many predicting the Bank of England will continue to hold them at 3.75% in an effort to diminish further price rises.
Matt Swannell, chief economic adviser to the EY ITEM Club, said: “With the growth outlook weak, unemployment high and rising, and policy already restrictive, we think a prolonged hold for bank rate is the most likely outcome.”
Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: “In an uncertain world we have the right economic plan, taking a responsive and responsible approach to supporting working people in the national interest.
“We’re taking £150 off energy bills and providing targeted support for those facing higher heating oil costs.
“We’re also acting to protect people from unfair price rises if they occur, bring down food prices at the till, and cut red tape to boost long-term energy security – building a stronger, more secure economy.”
Business
Gold surges in global and Pakistani markets; silver also rises – SUCH TV
Prices of gold and silver witnessed a significant increase in both the global market and Pakistan’s local bullion market, reflecting continued volatility in precious metals.
According to market data, the price of one tola of gold surged by Rs15,200, reaching Rs479,262, while the rate for 10 grams of gold increased by Rs13,031 to settle at Rs410,889.
In the international market, gold prices also recorded a substantial rise, climbing by $152 to reach $4,565 per ounce, indicating strong global demand and investor interest in safe-haven assets.
Meanwhile, silver prices followed a similar upward trend, with one tola increasing by Rs370 to reach Rs7,824 in the local market.
Market analysts attribute the rise in prices to ongoing global economic uncertainties and increased demand for precious metals as a hedge against inflation and currency fluctuations.
-
Fashion1 week agoSales at US apparel, clothing accessories stores up 4% YoY in Jan 2026
-
Tech1 week agoJustice Department Says Anthropic Can’t Be Trusted With Warfighting Systems
-
Sports1 week agoPCB files complaint over allowing Bangladesh to take review on penultimate ball – SUCH TV
-
Business1 week agoStocks and pound rise as US rate call approaches
-
Entertainment7 days agoVal Kilmer revived 1 year after death through AI
-
Sports1 week agoMarch Madness 2026 – How to watch in SA, start time, schedule, TV channel for NCAA championship basketball tournament
-
Business1 week agoBrits cashing in jewellery as gold price hits record high
-
Sports1 week agoWBC championship: USA-Venezuela preview, live updates, analysis
