Connect with us

Tech

All Hail the Surprisingly Versatile Packing Cube! These Are Our Favorites

Published

on

All Hail the Surprisingly Versatile Packing Cube! These Are Our Favorites


Other Great Packing Cubes

Photograph: Kat Merck

Hulken Schlep Stack for $95: This set of five cubes (three all-clear PVC, two with PVC lids only) is made to fit inside Hulken’s unique rolling carry-on tote. I liked the fact they nest for storage, and I loved being able to see the contents of each cube at a glance. The zippers have a leak-proof seal, which is a nice touch, though they did leak a little during my spill test. The cubes have a very structured shape, which makes sense in the lightweight Hulken tote but takes up too much real estate in a regular suitcase. And the three clear cubes were too small to store much of what I needed.

GoRuck Packing Cube for $20 (for 1, 10L flat): I loved the 15 x 10 x 3-inch size I tested of this rugged, 200-denier nylon cube with a mesh front. It fit almost anything I needed for any occasion, with a convenient carry handle and signature GoRuck American flag patch on the front. However, they are pricey, and unless you need them to match your GoRuck gear, there’s nothing about them that stands out above comparably priced cubes.

Amazon Basics for $24 (set of 4): This four-pack of cubes with sturdy-mesh windows and ripstop-like fabric was comparable in quality to brands four times the price. However, Bagsmart’s cubes cost less and are even sturdier, so they just edged these out for the top Amazon slot.

Image may contain Bag Backpack Accessories and Handbag

Courtesy of Dagne Dover

Dagne Dover Roma Packing Cubes From $30: When I first saw these shallow, all-mesh packing cubes with their stiff wire edging and little label windows, I admit I wasn’t initially impressed, given that they cost upwards of $30 per cube. But then I tested them. Not only do they hold more than they initially seem like they will, but I ended up loving how they kept their shape, allowing me to fit more in my bag and for my clothes to arrive at their destination perfectly wrinkle-free. The mesh is also breathable yet sturdy, private, and slightly padded, so I felt safe adding even hard items like jewelry. To be sure, these aren’t space savers, but if you want to ensure your items don’t move around or get overly squished or wrinkled, these are a great option, and they come in four stylish colors.

Away the Insider Packing Cubes for $45 (set of 4): I like that these come in 10 trendy colors, many of which match Away’s luggage. However, after testing over 20 different brands and types at various price points, these cubes just didn’t stand out. The material was very thin and was indistinguishable from those of some of the cheaper Amazon brands, and the zippers were unbranded and small.

Shacke Pak Packing Cubes for $27 (set of 6): These were pretty good quality for an Amazon brand; there’s a sturdy handle and the material is slightly thicker than other packing cubes at this price point. I like the mix of mesh for breathability and opaque fabric for privacy. They come in nine colors, but the colors are clownishly bright and the four-paneled mesh design reminds me of a jock strap. Shacke says it uses YKK zippers on all its packing cubes, but I peeled back the covering on the zipper and could not find a YKK insignia anywhere.

Image may contain Clothing Vest Coat Jacket Accessories Bag and Handbag

Photograph: Kat Merck

Calpak Packing Cubes Set for $68 (set of 5): This is the first set of packing cubes I ever owned, and it’s what kicked off my obsession with travel organization to begin with. There’s just something generally satisfying about the size and layout of these lightweight-polyester cubes with a mostly mesh front for visibility and breathability. There’s a little window where you can put a label for the contents (which is far more useful than you might think, especially when packing cubes are around the same size), and I love that they come in 18 different colors and prints.

Gorilla Grip Packing Cubes for $17 (set of 8): These were the least expensive packing cubes I tested, and unfortunately, it showed. The material was very thin, and the zippers were janky. I do like that they come with a shoe and laundry bag, however, and when not being used they fold down quite small. They come in a range of colors, with nice mesh panels, and the fabric is not totally see-through. Hand wash only.

Great Suitcases for Packing Cubes

Image may contain Baggage and Suitcase

Photograph: Kat Merck

Travelpro VersaPack+ Carry-On for $298: This expandable soft-sided spinner from luggage stalwart Travelpro (maker of our favorite budget carry-on) comes with two approximately 9″ x 2″ packing cubes on a divider that clips in or out. Thick straps in the main compartment can be cinched down to provide compression, and there’s also an included laundry bag and two shoe bags. I was actually quite impressed with how much I could fit into this carry-on, especially when using other compression packing cubes. Which is kind of necessary, as the included packing cubes hold little more than a few T-shirts and some underwear. Also be aware that when the bag is expanded, it’s still slightly front-heavy, even though it’s designed to be tip-resistant. A test of rolling it upright while running through the airport to catch the car rental shuttle found it does still have a tendency to tip over front-first.

Royce & Rocket Castle (With Packing Cubes) for $630: This bag is bound to be a godsend for anyone who’s ever ended a trip with half their suitcase contents on the floor from days’ worth of rummaging. It looks like a normal clamshell hard-side, but open it to reveal two fold-down shelves that are the perfect size if you use packing cubes. Royce & Rocket’s Castle comes in carry-on size, mid-size, or full-size with a matching set of packing cubes ($75 if you buy separately). Or, buy the suitcase alone and use your own packing cubes. (Though I have done this, and noted that only medium and small sizes will be able to fit.) Do note, however, that this shelf feature adds a considerable amount of weight to the bag. I tested the mid-size version, and when I went to weigh it at Alaska Airlines’ bag drop, I was shocked to find it was just a hair under the 50-pound weight limit, despite my only packing lightweight clothes and travel-sized toiletries.

Other Travel Accessories We Like

Best Packing Cubes for Every Kind of Trip  Tested and Reviewed

Photograph: Kat Merck

WanderFull HydroBag for $59: WIRED Reviews team members are no strangers to water bottle bags. Even though I’m a member of the Dehydrated Generation, I’ve become fully accustomed to having a water bottle nearby at all times. Unless I’m carrying a backpack, I am indeed carrying my Owala in a water bottle bag, especially when traveling. My favorite is from WanderFull, as the wide strap is comfortable enough for hikes and extra-long walks. If metallic green isn’t your jam, there are dozens of other fabrics, colors, and styles to choose from.

Calpak Luka Zippered Passport Wallet for $35: Whether you’re traveling internationally or just neglected to update your driver’s license before the US Real ID deadline (guilty), a passport wallet is a must. This stylish, puffy number from Calpak holds not only your passport, but cash, cards, and even your phone in a pocket on the front. The only down side is that it is quite large, about the size of a contemporary paperback book (7.5 x 5.5 inches), and it doesn’t have a handle or loop, so it is awkward to carry if you don’t have a purse large enough to accommodate it.

Aer Street Sling for $69: Many passport wallets, like the Luka above, are quite large. Unlike a belt bag, Aer’s unisex crossbody is tall, so it will fit any passport wallet that’s 8 x 5.5 inches or less. It’s a great option for anyone who still wants to travel light but not have to keep their passport in their backpack or pocket.

Best Packing Cubes for Every Kind of Trip  Tested and Reviewed

Courtesy of Dosey

Dosey Pill Compact for $26: This 7- by 3-inch pastel pill compact (it also comes in blue and pink) features a mirror and seven labeled day compartments finished in shiny gold. It’s very Valley of the Dolls, but I found its slim profile to be surprisingly practical to travel with, slipping unobtrusively into even smaller toiletry bags while staying securely closed even during rough handling.

GuruNanda Ready-to-Go Disposable Mini Travel Toothbrushes for $30: Obviously bringing your own toothbrush is the most eco-friendly choice, but this is what my family uses for camping or other trips where we don’t want to risk having to reuse a dirty toothbrush. They’re soft enough for even the most sensitive gums, and the handle side doubles as a toothpick.

Gorilla Grip Luggage Straps for $14 (set of 4): If you tend to travel with your hard-sided checked bag while it’s expanded, you might have noticed the somewhat alarming lack of structure. Both hard sides contain their own strapped-down loads, flopping around while connected only by a thin fabric zipper. I rely on these straps to hold my precariously packed suitcase together when it’s being launched off the scale onto the conveyor belt or thrown around on the tarmac. And as a bonus, the bright color (the company has nine to choose from) makes your bag easy to spot on the baggage claim carousel.

Kusshi Travel Jewelry Organizer for $49 (Medium): I don’t know how I lived so long just throwing jewelry willy-nilly into a toiletry bag; I don’t advise this unless you want to spend your first night on vacation untangling necklaces. For the ultimate in space-saving organization, you can’t top this hanging pocket bag that folds down to be perfectly flat. The medium size features three tiers of soft-lined, PVC-fronted zippered pockets for earrings rings, bracelets, watches, and whatever else you might need, plus a nifty necklace holder with loops and snaps. The large size has the same, but with twice as many sections. When closed, it folds up flat about the size of an iPad.

FAQs

How Does WIRED Test Packing Cubes?

I’ve been testing toiletry bags and adjacent accessories for the past seven months, using them daily in my bathroom and taking them on trips every few months. I choose packing cubes based on luggage brands we like or what seems to be trending or popular; some are samples from the companies themselves, but many I buy myself and expense.

I inspect each cube or set of cubes for features and materials. I test how smoothly the zippers zip open and closed, and how easy it is to use any compression feature. I pack various cubes with bulky sweatshirts and sweatpants to see how many pieces I can fit in the largest cube, and see how they fit in a carry-on bag, backpack, and full-sized suitcase. When I travel, I pack a cube from each set in three suitcases and assess how easy they are to pack or unpack, and note if anything about them bothered my family or me amid the stress and unpredictability of travel.

Image may contain Clothing Fleece Shorts Vest Home Decor Knitwear Sweater Accessories Bag Handbag Cap and Hat

Photograph: Kat Merck

Why Not Just Use a Ziplock Bag?

This is the question I see most from travelers suspicious of using packing cubes. Ziplock bags are inexpensive, and you can see everything inside. Why would one spend $25 or even $100 on a set of packing cubes when a box of 2.5-gallon bags costs $5? It’s a valid question, and one I set out to investigate by packing a couple of slide-lock Hefty bags along with my packing cubes for a weeklong trip. I discovered a few things.

Packing cubes are breathable. This is especially helpful on the way back home when most or all of your laundry is dirty. If your clothes smell like anything—anything at all—you will be hit in the face with that smell after they’ve been sitting in an airtight plastic bag.

Packing cubes are durable. Unlike a plastic bag, packing cubes won’t rip, burst, or develop unexpected holes.

(Some) packing cubes are compressible. Can you fit five days’ worth of pants and shirts in a plastic bag? Probably not. But you definitely can in a compressible packing cube, like some of the options above.

What Are We Testing Next?

Power up with unlimited access to WIRED. Get best-in-class reporting and exclusive subscriber content that’s too important to ignore. Subscribe Today.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

We Found the Best Travel Cameras You’ll Actually Use on Vacation

Published

on

We Found the Best Travel Cameras You’ll Actually Use on Vacation


If I were buying a camera today, this is the body I would get, travel or otherwise. The A7C R is one of the smallest full-frame, interchangeable-lens cameras on the market. This is why it’s our top pick for travelers in our guide to the Best Mirrorless Cameras. The 61-MP sensor offers amazing detail and very good dynamic range (14.7 EV). The super fast autofocus system is among the best you’ll find in mirrorless camera, and there’s great subject tracking as well, making it perfect for shooting fast-moving scenes on the go.

While Sony’s R series cameras are mainly for high resolution still images, the video specs here are solid enough for the casual video user, with support for 4K/60 fps video in full-frame mode (1.2X crop) or oversampled 4K/30 fps video. Both support 10-bit 4:2 color depth, various Log formats, and even 16-bit RAW output to an external recorder.

My main gripe about the A7C R is the same as it was in my initial review. The viewfinder is cramped and low-resolution (2.36 million dots). It’s not a deal breaker for me, but it’s something to keep in mind and good reason to rent a camera before you invest.

The big question with this camera is, which lens do you pair it with for travel? There’s a compelling argument to be made for the Sony FE 24-105-mm f/4 G ($1,398), which gives you everything from wide to portrait with a little bit of extra reach as well. Another great option if you like primes is the Sony 40-mm f2.5 G ($798), which makes for a compact kit, and 40-mm is a surprisingly great focal length for travel in my experience.

★ Alternative: At $2,198, Sony’s A7C II (note, no R) is a bit cheaper. It uses Sony’s smaller 33-MP sensor but is otherwise very close in size and capabilities, with considerably more video chops than the A7C R. If you want to make videos as well as stills, the A7C II is a better choice.



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Eutelsat extends Airbus contract for further low Earth orbit OneWeb satellites | Computer Weekly

Published

on

Eutelsat extends Airbus contract for further low Earth orbit OneWeb satellites | Computer Weekly


As the space communications industry shows no signs of slowing down this year following on from a robust 2025, Airbus Defence and Space has been awarded a contract by operator Eutelsat to build 340 low Earth orbit (LEO) satellites to ensure operational continuity of the OneWeb constellation.

OneWeb formed in 2012 with the aim of addressing the communication needs of hard-to-reach places, stating that its network has a unique capability to serve hard-to-reach communities and provide improved capacity, mobile resilience, backhaul and coverage, including Fixed Wireless Access, in challenging geographic locations.

However, the company’s evolution was a struggle and OneWeb filed for bankruptcy in the US in March 2020 after failing to find private investment. It was rescued by a $500m investment from both the UK government and Bharti Global, and returned to business in December 2020 with a 36-satellite payload, with an aim to implement a constellation of 650 LEO satellites with a network of global gateway stations and a range of user terminals. These were seen as a way to provide an affordable, fast, high-bandwidth and low-latency communications service, connected to internet of things (IoT) devices, and a pathway for mass adoption of 5G services.

In September 2021, OneWeb confirmed the completion of substantial investment by French satellite operator Eutelsat, as part of the latter’s strategy of looking for growth beyond traditional broadcast and broadband applications, with it becoming a shareholder partner. Less than a year later, Eutelsat entered into merger with OneWeb.

Flying in 12 synchronised orbital planes 1,200km above the Earth, OneWeb LEO satellite network currently delivers high-speed, low-latency connectivity on a global basis. Airbus believes that the availability of these latest satellites will assure full operational continuity for customers of the constellation, progressively replacing early batches coming to end of operational life. 

Looking to achieve its objectives, Eutelsat procured a batch of 100 Airbus Space satellites in December 2024, taking the total number of satellites ordered by Eutelsat to 440. These new satellites will be manufactured at Airbus Defence and Space’s Toulouse facility on a newly installed production line, with delivery from the end of 2026. Airbus said this represents a further step for European sovereignty.

The new craft will integrate technology upgrades including advanced digital channelisers, enabling enhanced onboard processing capabilities as well as greater efficiency and flexibility, according to the company. Airbus added that it will incorporate optimised architecture designed to maximise long-term operational performance.

With these latest satellites, Eutelsat will also be evaluating opportunities for new business cases, notably through embarkation capabilities for hosted payloads.

Commenting on the new contract, Eutelsat CEO Jean-François Fallacher said: “We are pleased to rely on our long-standing partner, Airbus, for the procurement of these latest satellites. They ensure service continuity for the growing number of our customers and distribution partners benefiting from the unparalleled performance of our ubiquitous, low-latency LEO capacity, and enable us to pursue our growth path.”

Alain Fauré, head of space systems in Airbus, added: “This latest contract from Eutelsat is an endorsement of our design and manufacturing expertise for LEO satellites. Airbus has been a key partner and supplier to Eutelsat for more than 30 years and this award further cements our important relationship.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Auditing, classifying and building a data sovereignty strategy | Computer Weekly

Published

on

Auditing, classifying and building a data sovereignty strategy | Computer Weekly


Data sovereignty is a hot topic. For commercial and public sector organisations, compliance to ensure personal data is secure is a primary objective. And that means it cannot be subject to foreign laws or interference.

Data sovereignty is also a matter for international relations, where states strive to ensure citizen and organisation data is secure from foreign interference. And, for states, achieving data sovereignty is also a way of protecting and developing national economies.

In this article, we look at data sovereignty, and the key steps CIOs need to take to build their data sovereignty strategy. This centres on auditing, classification and building controls over data location and movement.

What is data sovereignty, and why is it an issue?

At the most general level, data sovereignty is the retention of data within the jurisdiction – usually state boundaries – whose laws govern its use.

Interest in data sovereignty has been building for some time. In one sense, it looks a lot like law catching up with the “wild west” early years of cloud use and popularity. Here, organisations rushed to this new, highly flexible location to process and store data, then later discovered the risks to which they – and their customer data – had become exposed.

More recently, the drive to digital sovereignty stepped up to the level of states. That trend got a big boost during US president Donald Trump’s first term. That saw the country’s introduction of the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data (Cloud) Act, for example, which potentially allows US law enforcement to access data stored by US companies anywhere. Alarm bells started ringing, especially in Europe.

Organisations achieve digital sovereignty in their operations by making data subject to the laws and control of the state they operate in, or from. But we are far from achieving that, when, for example, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud Platform (GCP) have around 70% of the European cloud market, and many European state organisations are completely or overwhelmingly dependent on US hyperscalers for cloud services.

What are the concerns about data sovereignty, and what do CIOs plan to do?

Surveys regularly find IT decision-makers are concerned about data sovereignty. A Gartner survey conducted among 241 IT decision-makers globally found the majority (75%) of those outside the US plan to have a digital sovereignty strategy in place by 2030. Meanwhile, 53% said concerns over geopolitics would restrict future use of global cloud providers, and 61% said such worries would increase their use of regional or local cloud providers.

Complexity – and the potential for contradictory regulations and increased costs – is also a major concern, says Simon Robinson, principal analyst for storage and data infrastructure at Omdia.

“Our research found 74% of organisations say sovereign clouds have become more important over the last two years,” he says.

“However, it is a complex and fast-moving area. The regulatory and compliance environment is evolving rapidly. But the challenge for global organisations is that some regulations may actually conflict, potentially forcing them to contemplate whether they might break one law or regulation to satisfy another.”

Robinson adds: “At the very least it pushes up costs, may lead to inconsistent data policies around retention, and could slow down the adoption of advanced technologies, such as AI [artificial intelligence].”

So, while risks around stored data being in datacentres in a foreign country, on foreign infrastructure and subject to that country’s laws are a major worry, resolving that situation can bring its own issues too.

What is a data sovereignty audit, and why is it so important?

Core to an organisation’s responses to an unknown or uncontrolled data sovereignty situation is an audit of its data. This is the first step towards ensuring data is kept and processed within the appropriate state boundaries.

That will likely take the form of identification of the risks around different classes of data, according to Jon Collins, vice-president of engagement and field chief technology officer at GigaOm.

“Not all data is created equal, and not all parts of the architecture are created equal,” he says. “The first step is to classify what you’ve got. Identify whether it needs to fall within the scope of sovereignty, understand what kind of data it is, and consider how it might be impacted in terms of privacy, localisation and compliance.”

Key parts of a digital sovereignty strategy include mapping digital assets and data flows throughout their lifecycle and the laws to which they are subject at all stages. Then classify the data to assess risk levels for each class.

This can include geo-tagging, and should be part of an ongoing process, says Bettina Tratz-Ryan, vice-president and analyst at Gartner. “Automated discovery tools help identify and tag sensitive data, whether in physical storage or incidental locations like shared drives and folders,” she adds.

“Regular audits and compliance checks are non-negotiable and require strong governance policies and periodic manual reviews.”

How to minimise exposure to data storage risks

A data storage strategy that addresses data sovereignty builds on the classification of data in the data audit to limit what data can go where.

As part of the classification process, data will be subject to a policy that manifests in metadata tagging that indicates its sensitivity and tolerance for movement.

“Organisations should adopt a data governance as code approach, automating compliance through infrastructure as code techniques for consistent enforcement and rapid remediation,” says Tratz-Ryan.

That means sensitive data should be stored locally or in regional datacentres to meet residency requirements, with the cloud used for scalability under strict, region-specific compliance requirements.

“Continuous monitoring, encryption and geo-fencing are essential, and governance must be built in, not bolted on,” adds Tratz-Ryan.

Such approaches address the difficulties that potentially arise with data in transit. With the ability to monitor compliance and auditability built in via classification and tagging, critical workloads can be more easily segregated from less sensitive data at rest and in transit. 

“Strict governance over location and movement is the cornerstone of risk mitigation,” says Tratz-Ryan.

Challenges in maintaining knowledge and control

There are many challenges to data sovereignty auditing. Data moves, and it moves across borders. We might believe we have nailed down data in our infrastructure, while data finds other backdoor routes across frontiers. Meanwhile, proprietary systems present huge challenges to audits and tagging, and staff create shadow IT, use emails, attach files, and so on.

In short, data movement in an organisation can be very complex indeed. It is potentially simple to audit and control the vast bulk of our data, but the problems come with incidental cases of data movement, says Tratz-Ryan.

“In globally connected organisations, sovereignty risks will occur even if data is stored in local servers. Remote access, backups, and software-as-a-service integrations can create cross-border exposure, triggering compliance challenges under laws like the US Cloud Act. Also, governance can be bypassed by incidental data movement via virtual private networks, personal devices, or email,” she says.

“And, for example, an automotive manufacturer may store design files on-premise in one location, but metadata and backups can flow through global product lifecycle management systems, creating sovereignty exposure.

“Incidental data movement, such as emails, shared drives and collaboration tools, often push data into unsanctioned cloud folders, outside sovereign governance. Shadow IT compounds the problem when employees use external apps without IT oversight, creating blind spots.”

GigaOm’s Collins believes that for most, the key elements needed to incorporate data sovereignty compliance are already present in their organisation.

“It’s practical to consider it within your broader governance, risk and compliance framework,” he says. “The advantage is, as a larger organisation, you already have practices, processes and people in place for audit, reporting and oversight. Sovereignty requirements can be incorporated into those mechanisms.”

Collins says we should not assume all data needs to meet sovereignty rules, and that in many cases, it’s not possible to do so.

“For example, it’s not realistic to make email a fully sovereign, locally contained application because it’s inherently distributed,” says Collins. “But you can prevent sovereign data from being transmitted by email. That’s where data loss prevention and data protection policies come in, to make sure data from certain repositories, or of certain classifications, is not emailed out.”

Similarly with cloud. Rather than try to make all cloud folders sovereign, we should instead decide what data can and cannot be stored there. And if data needs to be stored locally, then it goes to a local on-premise or domestic cloud service or availability zone.

“The core debate is deciding whether a particular dataset is sovereign,” says Collins. “If you operate in a given country and you hold customer data about people in that country, then that data stays in that country. That gives you a clear list of what cannot go into cloud folders, be sent by email, or managed by a system that can’t guarantee localisation. Once you frame it that way, the whole thing becomes much more straightforward.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending