Connect with us

Business

Bioethanol plant deems lack of Government support an ‘act of economic self-harm’

Published

on

Bioethanol plant deems lack of Government support an ‘act of economic self-harm’



The UK’s largest bioethanol plant has described a Government decision not to offer direct funding to the industry as “a flagrant act of economic self-harm” which will force it to close.

Vivergo Fuels, near Hull, warned earlier this year that it was in imminent danger of closure as crisis talks continued with the Government.

This followed the end of the 19% tariff on American bioethanol imports as part of the recent UK-US trade deal.

On Friday, the Government said: “This Government will always take decisions in the national interest.

“That’s why we negotiated a landmark deal with the US which protected hundreds of thousands of jobs in sectors like auto and aerospace.

“We have worked closely with the companies since June to understand the financial challenges they have faced over the past decade, and have taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces.

“We recognise this is a difficult time for the workers and their families and we will work with trade unions, local partners and the companies to support them through this process.

“We also continue to work up proposals that ensure the resilience of our CO2 supply in the long-term in consultation with the sector.”

Ben Hackett, managing director of Vivergo Fuels, said: “The Government’s failure to back Vivergo has forced us to cease operations and move to closure immediately.

“This is a flagrant act of economic self-harm that will have far-reaching consequences.

“This is a massive blow to Hull and the Humber.

“We have fought from day one to support our workers and we are truly sorry that this is not the outcome any of us wanted.

“This decision by ministers will have a huge impact on our region and the thousands of livelihoods in the supply chain that rely on Vivergo, from farmers to hauliers and engineers.”

Mr Hackett said the industry has faced “unfair regulations” for years that favoured overseas producers, and the recent US-UK trade deal pushed the sector “to the point of collapse”.

He said: “We did everything we possibly could to avoid closure, but in the end it was the Government that decided the British bioethanol sector was something that could be traded away with little regard for the impact it would have on ordinary hard-working people.

“We did not go down without a fight and I hope that the noise we generated over the past three months will make the Government think twice before it decides to sign away whole industries as part of future trade negotiations.”

A spokesman for Associated British Foods, which owns Vivergo, said: “It is deeply regrettable that the Government has chosen not to support a key national asset.

“We have been left with no choice but to announce the closure of Vivergo and we have informed our people.

“We have been fighting for months to keep this plant open.

“We initiated and led talks with Government in good faith. We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the Government’s own green industrial strategy.”

The spokesman said the Government had “thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber and a sovereign capability in clean fuels that had the chance to lead the world”.

The bioethanol industry, which also includes the Ensus plant on Teesside, has argued the trade deal, coupled with regulatory constraints, has made it impossible to compete with heavily subsidised American products.

Vivergo said the Hull plant, which employs about 160 people, can produce up to 420 million litres of bioethanol from wheat sourced from thousands of UK farms.

It has described bioethanol production as “a key national strategic asset” which helps reduce emissions from petrol and is expected to be a key component in sustainable aircraft fuel in the future.

The firm recently signed a £1.25 billion memorandum of understanding with Meld Energy to anchor a “world-class” sustainable aviation fuel facility at the site.

But Meld Energy said earlier this month uncertainly over the bioethanol industry was putting this plan in jeopardy.

The Vivergo plant is also the UK’s largest single production site for animal feed, and the company says it indirectly supports about 4,000 jobs in the Humber and Lincolnshire region.

Vivergo has said it buys more than a million tonnes of British wheat each year from more than 4,000 farms, and has purchased from 12,000 individual farms over the past decade.

But it took its last wheat shipment earlier this month.

The farmers’ union described the imminent closure of the Vivergo plant as a “huge blow”.

NFU combinable crops board chairman Jamie Burrows said: “Not only is it terrible news for those hundreds of workers who will lose their jobs but also for the thousands of people whose livelihoods depend on this supply chain – that includes local farmers who have lost a vital market for their product.”

The Ensus plant in Teesside differs from the Vivergo operation because it also produces CO2 as part of the process.

Ensus, which is owned by CropEnergies, part of the German firm Sudzucker, is the UK’s only large scale manufacturer of CO2, which is used in a wide range of sectors, including in drinks and the nuclear industry.

Grant Pearson, chairman of Ensus UK, said on Friday: “I met with Sarah Jones, the minister for business, today, to receive the Government’s response to our request for financial support and the policy changes required to ensure that the Ensus facilities can continue to operate.

“The minister confirmed that they value both our contribution to the UK economy, the jobs we provide and support in the north east of England and in particular our production of biogenic CO2 which is a product of critical national importance.

“They are therefore looking at options to secure an ongoing supply of CO2 from the Ensus facility.

“This is positive news, however it is likely to take time to agree upon and finalise and therefore urgent discussions will be taking place to provide a level of assurance to the Sudzucker and CropEnergies’ boards that there is a very high level of confidence that an acceptable long-term arrangement can be reached.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

India supplies 40% of US smartphone imports, replaces China: Report – The Times of India

Published

on

India supplies 40% of US smartphone imports, replaces China: Report – The Times of India


India is rapidly strengthening its position in global electronics trade, now supplying about 40 per cent of the smartphones imported by the United States that were previously sourced from China.According to a recent report by McKinsey & Company, cited by ANI, the United States has been actively diversifying its import sources and has replaced about two-thirds of the goods it previously sourced from China, valued at more than $80 billion. India and ASEAN economies have played a significant role in this shift.“India, for example, increased smartphone exports to the United States to levels equal to roughly 40 per cent of what China had supplied,” the report stated.India’s rise in smartphone exports has been particularly notable, with shipments to the US increasing sharply despite the long geographical distance of around 13,000 kilometers. This reflects the country’s growing role in global electronics manufacturing and supply chains.The report also highlighted that ASEAN economies replaced about two-thirds of US laptop imports that had earlier come from China, pointing to a broader shift in manufacturing bases across Asia.It noted that global trade remained resilient in 2025 despite concerns of a slowdown. Both US imports and Chinese exports reached new highs during the year, while overall global trade grew faster than the global economy.Among emerging economies, India stood out for expanding trade across regions. However, while overall exports remained largely unchanged, smartphones were a key exception and drove export growth.The report said the shift in trade patterns is being driven by domestic priorities and geopolitical realignments. Advanced economies and China are increasingly reorienting trade away from geopolitically distant partners, while emerging economies like India continue to expand trade across markets.It also pointed to changes in other regions. ASEAN strengthened its position as a manufacturing hub by importing more inputs from China and exporting finished goods to the United States. Brazil increased commodity exports to China, replacing goods that China had earlier sourced from the US.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Crude oil prices plunge over 10% as Iran reopens Strait of Hormuz, stocks rally – The Times of India

Published

on

Crude oil prices plunge over 10% as Iran reopens Strait of Hormuz, stocks rally – The Times of India


.

Crude oil prices plunged more than 10% on Friday after US President Donald Trump and Iran announced that the Strait of Hormuz is fully open again for oil tankers carrying crude from the Persian Gulf to customers worldwide, easing fears of supply disruptions.The sharp drop in oil prices lifted global markets, with US stocks rallying strongly. The S&P 500 rose 1% as it moved toward a third straight week of gains, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average jumped 722 points, or 1.5%, and the Nasdaq composite added 1.1% in morning trading.

Watch

Global Oil Crisis Loading? Iran Stuns Trump With Fresh Curbs | World In Shock

The price decline came immediately after Iran’s foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, said on X that the passage for all commercial vessels through the strait “is declared completely open” and would remain so for the duration of the current ceasefire period in Lebanon. US crude fell 10.2% to $81.88 per barrel, while Brent crude dropped 10.3% to $89.09. Despite the fall, prices remain above their pre-war levels, indicating lingering caution in markets.Optimism has been building on Wall Street in recent weeks, with stocks rising 12% since late March on hopes that the United States and Iran can avoid a worst-case economic outcome despite ongoing conflict. The reopening of the Strait of Hormuz is seen as the clearest sign yet of easing tensions, although the situation remains uncertain. President Donald Trump said in a speech late Thursday that the war “should be ending pretty soon.Shortly after Iran’s announcement, Trump said on his social media platform that the US Navy’s blockade of Iran remains “in full force” until both sides reach an agreement. He added that negotiations “should go very quickly in that most of the points are already negotiated,” emphasizing the statement in all capital letters.Companies with high fuel costs led the market gains as oil prices fell. United Airlines rose 9.8%, while Norwegian Cruise Line and Royal Caribbean Group both climbed 9.3%.A solid start to the earnings season also supported investor sentiment. State Street gained 2.9%, and Fifth Third Bancorp rose 1.4% after reporting stronger-than-expected quarterly results.Not all companies benefited from the rally. Netflix fell 9.2% despite posting higher profits, as it did not increase its full-year revenue forecast. The company also said cofounder and chairman Reed Hastings will step down from its board in June when his term expires.European markets also moved higher following the development, with France’s CAC 40 rising 2% and Germany’s DAX gaining 2.2%.Asian markets, which had closed before the announcement, ended lower. Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell 1.8%, and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng dropped 0.9%.In the bond market, Treasury yields declined as lower oil prices reduced pressure on inflation. The yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.24% from 4.32% late Thursday.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Netflix was long ‘a builder not a buyer.’ Is that era over?

Published

on

Netflix was long ‘a builder not a buyer.’ Is that era over?


The Netflix logo is pictured at the company’s offices on Vine in Los Angeles, Dec. 5, 2025.

Patrick T. Fallon | AFP | Getty Images

For years, Netflix top brass would tell investors they were builders not buyers. Now, that sentiment toward growth may be changing.

On Thursday Netflix reported its quarterly earnings. Typically, Netflix’s earnings calls are focused on metrics like engagement, content spending, price hikes and membership. While those factors were still present on Thursday’s call, analysts were also questioning Netflix’s merger and acquisition aspirations following the Warner Bros. Discovery sale process.

Late last year, Netflix emerged as a bidder for WBD, surprising many in the industry and market. Even more stunning was an announcement in December that Netflix had reached a deal to acquire WBD’s film studio and streaming assets in a $72 billion deal.

While the transaction initially raised eyebrows, it’s now opened the door to questions from media onlookers and insiders about whether the company needs to pursue other deals as streaming becomes more competitive.

Netflix co-CEO Ted Sarandos said Thursday that questions also arose both internally and externally about the company’s ability to do such a megadeal.

“What we did learn, though, was that our teams were more than up to the task,” said Sarandos. “We’ve learned so much about deal execution, about early integration.”

Netflix had said its reasoning was simple for the pivot toward a big acquisition. Despite being the largest streaming service by far when it comes to subscribers — 325 million paid global members reported in January — it wanted to deepen its bench of franchises and intellectual property, and get more squarely in the movie studio business.

Paramount Skydance ultimately upended the deal in February with a superior bid, and Netflix walked away (collecting its $2.8 billion breakup fee in short order).

“But mostly, we really built our M&A muscle,” Sarandos said. “And the most important benefit of this entire exercise, though, was that we tested our investment discipline.”

‘M&A muscle’

Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos arrives at the White House in Washington, Feb. 26, 2026.

Andrew Leyden | Getty Images

Sarandos’ newfound openness to M&A has left some wondering whether the streaming giant could be on the lookout for new targets.

After all, its library of intellectual property and its relationship to the movie studio business are still right where they were before it took on the WBD deal.

Although Wall Street was clearly not a fan of Netflix’s proposed acquisition of WBD — shares fell 15% between the announcement of the deal and the day it fell apart, and have since risen about 26% — the media landscape will be undeniably different if Paramount’s takeover is approved.

Paramount is seeking to buy the entirety of WBD’s business — cable TV networks, film studio, streaming and all. That would create a behemoth of a competitor for Netflix and its media peers on various fronts.

“The way the WBD cards fell matters a lot. A probable combination of Paramount+ and HBO Max changes the streaming landscape in ways Netflix hasn’t really had to contend with before,” said Mike Proulx, vice president and research director at Forrester, prior to Netflix’s earnings release.

“I just want to remind you that we said this from the beginning that the WB deal was a nice to have, not a need to have. We are very confident in the core business,” Sarandos said Thursday. He added that Netflix viewed its biggest risk going into the deal process as losing focus on its core business.

“As you can see from our Q1 results, we did not lose focus,” he said.

Still, Netflix’s earnings report, and particularly its forward-looking guidance, seemed to disappoint investors.

The company’s stock dropped roughly 10% in extended trading after the streamer maintained full-year guidance despite a first-quarter revenue beat and the termination of the WBD deal.

Stock Chart IconStock chart icon

Netflix stock sinks after Q1 earnings report.

“The bigger surprise this quarter was the unchanged full-year margin guidance despite walking away from the Warner Bros. deal and related M&A costs,” said analyst Robert Fishman of MoffettNathanson in a research note Friday.

Netflix, for its part, didn’t spend too much time on M&A during the earnings call, instead focusing on its more familiar talking points like user engagement, a growing advertising business, and spending on content that holds onto members (and helps justify price hikes).

The return to Netflix’s typical narrative appeared to be welcome.

“Post WBD, the company could return to its relentless focus on growing revenue and profits by leveraging its global subscriber scale,” said Fishman in Friday’s note. He added that Netflix management “emphasized the success of its recent price increases and noted that retention was strong,” as well as that it remains on track to double ad revenue this year.

Still, Proulx of Forrester said in a note after the earnings call that while Netflix was back to being “squarely focused on executing its tried‑and‑true playbook,” questions still remained.

“None of that changes the reality that the streaming market is more competitive than it was a year ago,” Proulx said. “Pricing power has to be earned quarter by quarter, and holding engagement as prices rise remains the central challenge across the streaming market. Netflix is betting that steady execution on its core business wins in a more crowded, consolidating market.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending