Connect with us

Business

Driver fury as parking ticket debt firms record ‘disproportionately high’ 63% profits

Published

on

Driver fury as parking ticket debt firms record ‘disproportionately high’ 63% profits


Companies that charge drivers fees for recovering parking ticket debts are operating with an average profit margin of more than 60 per cent, a Government document has disclosed.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) stated that this figure indicates a “market failure”, while the AA branded the margins “disproportionately high”.

Debt recovery agencies are employed by parking operators to pursue payment for unpaid tickets, often adding up to £70 in additional fees per ticket for drivers.

These charges were set to be banned when the then-Conservative government introduced a code of practice in February 2022, but this was withdrawn four months later after a legal challenge by parking companies.

The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) said the profit figures showed a market failure (PA)

A new consultation document setting out the current Labour Government’s proposed code stated the £70 cap is “likely to be higher than can be reasonably justified” but it is “seeking further evidence”.

It added that recovery agencies have “an average profit margin of approximately 63 per cent”.

This is “comparable to highly innovative companies” despite the businesses involved providing “standard services such as payment plan provision”, according to the document.

It continued: “We therefore do not consider them to be providing significantly innovative services, and as such the high profits may be indicative of these firms having too much control over the market, thereby indicating that there is a market failure.”

Parking operators can take drivers to court if they continue to resist paying for tickets.

The MHCLG said debt recovery agencies would break even with fees of approximately £26 per ticket, if the proportion of those paying was stable.

Jack Cousens, head of roads policy at the AA, said: “The 63 per cent profit margin feels disproportionately high for the services provided.

“This only highlights the need to curb the sector and ensure balance for all.

“There remains an overzealous cohort among some private parking operators where they hand over cases to debt recovery firms for seemingly innocuous charges.”

He added that the ban on debt recovery fees in the original consultation was “the right position” and claimed the latest version “falls short of the mark”.

Steve Gooding, director of motoring research charity the RAC Foundation, said: “The profit margins revealed by the Government help explain why there are now more than 180 private parking firms buying vehicle keeper records from the DVLA so they can send demands to drivers – it’s a huge and profitable business.

“The private parking industry’s failure over time to be more open about its activities is part of the problem and its ongoing reluctance to open its books to official scrutiny shows why ministers must follow through with plans to bring transparency and independence to this sector.”

Recent analysis by the PA news agency and the RAC Foundation found 4.3 million tickets were issued by private companies to UK drivers between April and June.

That was a 24 per cent increase compared with the same period last year.

A BPA spokesman said it “strongly disputes the Government’s profit calculations” and called on it to “publish the methodology behind these figures”.

He continued: “The numbers presented are misleading and fail to reflect the reality of the debt resolution sector.”

He insisted the purpose of debt recovery fees is “not to generate profit but to act as a fair and effective deterrent against deliberate non-payment”.

An MHCLG spokesperson said: “This Government inherited a private parking market that lacks transparency and protection for motorists.

“We share their frustration, which is why our private parking code of practice will drive up standards in the industry and hold parking operators to account.

“We consulted on the current cap on debt recovery fees and will publish our response as soon as possible.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Rail fares to be frozen for first time in 30 years

Published

on

Rail fares to be frozen for first time in 30 years



Rail fares are to be frozen for the first time in 30 years, the Government has announced.

Ministers said the move will save millions of rail travellers hundreds of pounds off season tickets, peak and off-peak returns between major cities.

Commuters on the more expensive routes will save more than £300 a year.

The Government said the changes are part of its plans to rebuild a publicly owned Great British Railways that will deliver value for money through bringing rail tickets into the 21st century with tap in tap out and digital ticketing, alongside investing in superfast wifi.

The announcement applies to England and services run by English train operating companies.

Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: “Next week at the Budget I’ll set out the fair choices to deliver on the country’s priorities to cut NHS waiting lists, cut national debt and cut the cost of living.

“That’s why we’re choosing to freeze rail fares for the first time in 30 years, which will ease the pressure on household finances and make travelling to work, school or to visit friends and family that bit easier.”

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said: “We all want to see cheaper rail travel, so we’re freezing fares to help millions of passengers save money.

“Commuters on more expensive routes will save more than £300 per year, meaning they keep more of their hard-earned cash.

“This is part of our wider plans to rebuild Great British Railways the public can be proud of and rely on.”

Ministers said a typical commuter travelling to work three days a week using flexi-season tickets will save £315 a year travelling from Milton Keynes to London, £173 travelling from Woking to London and £57 from Bradford to Leeds.

The freeze will apply to all regulated fares, including seasons, peak returns for commuters and off-peak returns between major cities, benefitting more than a billion passenger journeys said the Government.

The move was warmly welcomed by rail unions and passenger groups.

Mick Whelan, general secretary of the train drivers union Aslef, said: “We are pleased that after 14 years of the Tories pricing people off our railways, this Labour Government is helping people to commute to work and travel for pleasure.

“This is the right decision, at the right time, to help passengers be able to afford to make that journey they need to take, and to help grow our railway in this country, because the railway is Britain’s green alternative – taking cars and lorries off our congested roads and moving people and goods safely around our country in an environmentally-friendly way.”

Alex Robertson, chief executive of passenger watchdog Transport Focus said: “Freezing fares will be extremely welcome news for rail passengers who consistently tell us value for money is their highest priority, alongside trains running on time. It should also make it more attractive for people to use the train more often or for the first time.

“We’ve always recognised there is a difficult balance to strike in how the railway is funded between fares and public subsidy. That makes today’s announcement particularly welcome.”

Eddie Dempsey, general secretary of the Rail, Maritime and Transport union, said: “This freeze is a welcome first step towards better value fares for passengers and shows that Government plans for public ownership of the railways can deliver real tangible benefits for passengers.

“More affordable fares will encourage greater use of public transport, supporting jobs, giving a shot in the arm to local economies and helping to improve the environment.

“As more passengers return to the railway, it is worth remembering that a well-staffed network with ticket office workers on hand to help people find the best and most affordable tickets, is the best way forward for the rail industry.”

TUC general secretary Paul Nowak said: “The disastrous privatisation experiment left regular train travel unaffordable and unreliable for far too many, but this Government is turning the page on the failed era of privatisation by delivering publicly-owned railways which put passengers above profit.

“This rail fare freeze will be a huge relief to working people who have got used to paying through the nose for a shabby service.”

A Rail Delivery Group spokesperson said: “The Government’s decision to freeze fares is good news for customers. Use of the railway continues to grow year on year, helping people travel to work and connect with family, while supporting a more sustainable future. We want our railways to thrive, that’s why we’re committed to working with Government to ensure upcoming railway reforms deliver real benefits for customers.”

The Conservatives welcomed the freeze but said the Government was “late to the platform”.

Shadow transport secretary Richard Holden said: “In Government, the Conservatives kept fares on the right track with below-inflation rises and consistently called for no further hikes to protect hard-working commuters.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Markets reforms: Govt to table Securities Markets Code Bill in Winter session; unified law to merge Sebi, Depositories & trading Acts – The Times of India

Published

on

Markets reforms: Govt to table Securities Markets Code Bill in Winter session; unified law to merge Sebi, Depositories & trading Acts – The Times of India


The government has listed the Securities Markets Code Bill 2025 for introduction in the Winter session of Parliament starting December 1, according to a Lok Sabha bulletin. The unified legislation is aimed at boosting ease of doing business and reducing regulatory friction across India’s financial markets. The Bill proposes merging key securities laws, including the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, the Depositories Act, 1996, and the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956, into a single code. The unified framework was first announced in the Union Budget 2021-22, when Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman proposed consolidating multiple laws governing securities markets — including the Government Securities Act, 2007 — into a rationalised code. Experts said the move could reduce compliance costs and minimise overlaps between rules enacted by Sebi, depositories and the central government. Bringing the Government Securities Act within a unified code could also strengthen credibility of sovereign borrowing and help channel more foreign capital, they noted.





Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Index reshuffle: IndiGo parent to enter Sensex from Dec 22; Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles dropped – The Times of India

Published

on

Index reshuffle: IndiGo parent to enter Sensex from Dec 22; Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles dropped – The Times of India


InterGlobe Aviation, the operator of IndiGo, will be included in the BSE’s 30-stock benchmark index Sensex from December 22, the BSE Index Services said on Saturday.As part of the reconstitution exercise, Tata Motors Passenger Vehicles Ltd will be dropped from the index, the announcement added, PTI reported.The changes will take effect from market open on Monday, December 22, and have been made by BSE Index Services Pvt Ltd (formerly Asia Index Pvt Ltd).In the broader BSE 100 index, IDFC First Bank Ltd will be added, replacing Adani Green Energy Ltd. Within the BSE Sensex 50 index, Max Healthcare Institute Ltd will be included, while IndusInd Bank Ltd will be removed.Further, in the BSE Sensex Next 50 index, IndusInd Bank and IDFC First Bank will replace Max Healthcare Institute and Adani Green Energy.





Source link

Continue Reading

Trending