Connect with us

Business

GST rationalisation impact: Higher RBI dividend expected to offset revenue shortfall; CareEdge flags tax pressure – The Times of India

Published

on

GST rationalisation impact: Higher RBI dividend expected to offset revenue shortfall; CareEdge flags tax pressure – The Times of India


Strong RBI dividend to help stabilise finances

The recent rationalisation of Goods and Services Tax (GST) rates is likely to create a net revenue loss of around 0.1 per cent of GDP in the current financial year. However, this shortfall may be compensated by the higher dividend payout from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), according to a report by CareEdge Ratings.The report, cited by ANI, highlighted that tax revenue growth has already slowed this year. With nominal GDP growth projected to be lower in FY26, achieving the full-year tax collection targets could become more difficult. The effect of the income tax relief announced in the last Budget, along with the revised GST structure, will need to be closely watched in the coming months.

India’s Digital ID, GST Reform Win Global Recognition From IMF Chief Kristalina Georgieva

CareEdge noted, “The net revenue shortfall from GST rationalisation is expected to be offset by the higher dividend transfer received from the RBI.”Despite the support from non-tax revenue, the report cautioned that weaker tax inflows could limit the government’s spending capacity in the latter half of the fiscal year. This could become more pronounced if the Centre continues to focus on its fiscal consolidation goal, which involves gradually lowering the fiscal deficit over time.When the GST rationalisation decision was announced, the GST Council had estimated the fiscal implication at about Rs 48,000 crore, or around 0.15 per cent of GDP based on FY24 consumption levels. The Council had also expected that stronger consumption could help recover part of this impact through improved GST receipts.A separate analysis by the State Bank of India (SBI), reported by ANI, projected that the central government’s revenue loss due to the GST rate cuts will be about Rs 3,700 crore in FY26. SBI noted that robust growth and increased consumer demand have helped soften the overall impact.SBI pointed out that while the initial estimated loss from GST rate changes was Rs 93,000 crore, additional GST collections led to the net loss narrowing to Rs 48,000 crore.During the first half of the current fiscal year, a slowdown in tax receipts was partly cushioned by strong non-tax revenue, particularly the higher dividend from the RBI. Meanwhile, the reduction in personal income tax rates announced in the Budget has contributed to slower income tax collections this year.While the complete fiscal impact of the GST rationalisation will become clearer over time, analysts suggest that the government may still be able to maintain fiscal balance. The combination of higher non-tax revenue and potential gains from stronger consumption-led GST inflows could help offset the pressure from moderating tax collections.





Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Just Eat and Autotrader among five firms under investigation over online reviews

Published

on

Just Eat and Autotrader among five firms under investigation over online reviews



Food delivery giant Just Eat, funeral firm Dignity and motor platform Autotrader are among five firms under investigation by the UK’s competition watchdog as part of its crackdown on fake and misleading online reviews.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) said it had launched probes against the companies – also including customer review and feedback firm Feefo and Pasta Evangelists – to see whether consumer laws have been broken.

Since April last year, companies have been banned from certain tactics around online reviews under law, such as fake posts, paid-for reviews that are not clearly marked as incentivised, as well as for hiding negative feedback.

Sarah Cardell, chief executive of the CMA, said: “Fake reviews strike at the heart of consumer trust – with many of us worrying about misleading content when looking at reviews online.

“With household budgets under pressure, people need to know they’re getting genuine information – not reviews or star ratings that have been manipulated to push them towards the wrong choice.

“We’ve given businesses the time to get things right. Now we’re deploying our new powers to tackle some of the most harmful practices head on.”

The CMA said it was looking into whether Just Eat’s ratings system had inflated some restaurant and grocer star ratings, giving a misleading picture of quality.

For Autotrader and Feefo, the CMA is investigating whether a number of one-star reviews – moderated by Feefo, which handles reviews for the new and used car site – were hidden on the platform and did not count towards the star ratings.

Dignity is under investigation by the CMA into whether it asked staff to write positive reviews about the firm’s crematoria services.

And artisan fresh pasta chain Pasta Evangelists is being probed over allegations it offered customers discounts for leaving five-star reviews on delivery apps without this being disclosed.

If the CMA finds the firms have broken the law, it can order them to change their practices and fine them up to 10% of their annual global sales.

An Autotrader spokesperson said: “We endeavour always to operate as a responsible and compliant business and will co-operate fully with the CMA’s investigation.”

It comes after the CMA recently secured commitments from Google and Amazon to beef up their systems to identify and remove fake reviews.

Amazon last June agreed to put in place “robust processes” to quickly detect and remove fake reviews alongside sanctions for rogue sellers and businesses after an investigation by the CMA to curb the customer hazard.

The tech giant said it would sanction businesses that boost their star ratings via bogus reviews or catalogue abuse, including bans from selling on the website, while users could also be banned for posting fake reviews.

Consumer group Which? welcomed the investigations and said the CMA must “get tough” on firms found to be breaking the law with reviews.

Sue Davies, head of consumer rights policy at Which?, said: “Investigations are a welcome first step, but enforcement will be key – the regulator must be prepared to get tough, use its powers and issue serious fines if these companies aren’t playing by the rules.”

The CMA said it swept more than 100 review publishers as part of the clampdown and sent advisory letters to 54 firms to improve their compliance with the law, with 90% having made changes in response and 75% telling the watchdog they better understood the rules.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Australia fuel crisis: Panic buying prompts PM to reassure nation over fuel supply

Published

on

Australia fuel crisis: Panic buying prompts PM to reassure nation over fuel supply



Anthony Albanese says nation’s supply remains “secure” amid reports of panic buying and shortages.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial

Published

on

Meta and YouTube found liable in social media addiction trial



A woman has been awarded $6m in a verdict that could have implications for hundreds of other cases in the US.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending