Reopening the Strait of Hormuz is “the best thing to do” to prevent interest rates rising, Bank of England governor Andrew Bailey has said.

In an interview on Thursday evening after the Bank’s Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) voted unanimously to leave the rate unchanged at 3.75%, Mr Bailey said any further cuts are “not on the horizon” as he hinted at possible hikes.

It is the first time that all members have voted the same way since September 2021.

Iran effectively closed the vital oil and gas shipping route after the US and Israel attacked the country, which has pushed up global prices.

Mr Bailey said the war in the Middle East is hitting petrol pumps now, will likely increase household energy costs in summer, and put pressure on food prices.

He told LBC’s Andrew Marr: “The duration of this problem is crucial.

“I would also say very clearly that the best way to solve this situation is not through monetary policy. It is through sorting out at the source of what’s going on.

“Frankly, reopening the Strait of Hormuz is the best thing to do. Get the energy market back on its normal footing, as it were.”

Asked if he has a message for US President Donald Trump, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and “whoever’s in charge in Tehran”, Mr Bailey said: “The best thing we can do actually for the world economy… is to sort out the problem in terms of reopening the energy supply lines, because that is in the best interest of people in the world.”

UK military planners have joined the US Central Command to help formulate proposals for opening the Strait.

The MPC now expects Consumer Prices Index inflation to be around 3% in the second quarter of 2026, up from the 2.1% that had been forecast in February, with a potential rise in inflation up to 3.5% in the third quarter.

Mr Bailey was asked if he foresees, in the final two years of his term, the ambition to reduce inflation to at or below 2% being fulfilled.

He told the programme: “If you’d asked me this question three weeks ago, I was very optimistic on this.”

The governor added: “We are fully committed to the inflation target, and our job, frankly, is to deal with the shocks as they come along.

“I have to do that. I don’t wish them. I wish they were not happening, but they are and we will have to deal with them.”

He said the impact of the war will likely feed through into a higher Ofgem energy price cap from July.

It was put to Mr Bailey that the Middle East crisis comes at a time when the UK economy has already “not been growing strongly”.

He responded: “It is a very difficult time to have this happen, but frankly, any time would be pretty difficult to have this happen.

“This is a major shock to energy prices, and we have to deal with it.”

He said the “sustainable rate of growth” in the UK needs to be raised which could come from investment from pensions and artificial intelligence.

“I’m not starry-eyed about it, but it is probably the most likely area that we’re going to raise the growth rate of the economy and that’s important”, he said of AI.

The MPC signalled that if the conflict persists and has a bigger impact on UK prices, it would need to take a “more restrictive policy stance”, which indicates higher interest rates to control inflation.

The governor added: “The longer it goes on… I’m afraid to say, but it is rather an obvious point, the effect will be larger.”

He said that is why it is “imperative” that “everything is done that can be done to alleviate this effect”, adding: “That is the critical thing.”

Is an Armageddon scenario about to play out? Europe and Asia are facing a nightmare scenario with the escalating crisis in the Middle East now increasingly impacting key energy infrastructure. The latest shockwave for the market has come in the form of a big hit to Qatar’s Ras Laffan complex on Thursday morning by Iran.LNG or liquefied natural gas facilities rank among the most intricate and large-scale industrial structures ever built, and Ras Laffan stands as the biggest of them, converting Qatar’s vast gas reserves into super-cooled fuel for global transport—until the Iranian missile strikes disrupted operations.This has led to markets across Europe and Asia confronting a new energy shock. Under normal conditions, roughly one-fifth of the world’s LNG supply originates from Ras Laffan, which is a sprawling industrial hub developed over three decades at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars and covering an area nearly three times that of Paris.To understand the scale of LNG operations at the facility, sample this: Ras Laffan operates 14 liquefaction trains that process gas into 77 million tonnes of LNG annually, sufficient to meet Japan’s entire yearly demand or exceed the combined needs of the UK and Italy!

Armageddon scenario plays out for Europe, Asia

The immediate impact of the latest strikes was evident across global energy markets. Brent crude prices briefly surged by over 10 percent, crossing the $119-per-barrel mark before easing from those highs.

In Europe, gas prices spiked as much as 35 per cent and later stabilised at around 70 euros per megawatt hour, still reflecting a gain of about 28 per cent. This rise is expected to feed through to electricity costs, as power prices in the region are largely linked to gas rates.Analysts at EnergyScan told AFP, “We are not yet in the worst-case scenario we described in our last monthly report, but we are getting closer.”European gas prices have more than doubled since the US-Israel-Iran conflict began, as traders assessed the implications of a prolonged disruption to Qatar’s LNG exports. “I woke up this morning and thought, ‘No, please no,’”Anne-Sophie Corbeau, former head of gas analysis at BP and now with Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy, told the Financial Times. “This has always been my nightmare scenario, my Armageddon scenario, the one I didn’t want to happen,” the report quoted the expert saying.Two gas traders said they were still trying to absorb the scale of the incident after Iran carried out a two-stage attack, launching ballistic missiles at the facility late Wednesday and again in the early hours of Thursday. “This is unprecedented,” one of them said.QatarEnergy, the state-owned operator of Ras Laffan, told Reuters that damage to two LNG units—developed in partnership with ExxonMobil—could take between three and five years to repair. The disruption is expected to result in annual revenue losses of $20 billion and force the cancellation of long-term supply agreements with Italy, Belgium, Korea and China.The disruption has effectively removed about 17 per cent of Qatar’s overall gas output for the foreseeable future. Prior to the strike, market participants believed LNG shipments from Ras Laffan would quickly resume once tensions in the Middle East subsided and the Strait of Hormuz became secure for tanker movement. Although prices had climbed last week, they had steadied at levels well below those recorded during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022.That outlook has now been overturned!

Years of repair to drive up prices

One trader told Financial Times that European gas prices are likely to remain elevated “through 2027,” while the region could struggle to replenish storage levels over the summer as Asian buyers turn to US LNG to offset the shortfall. Asia was already dealing with constrained supply and rationing following disruptions from the Gulf. Europe, increasingly dependent on LNG after Russia curtailed pipeline exports during its war with Ukraine, now faces intensified competition with countries such as Japan and South Korea for limited LNG cargo availability.

Laurent Segalen, a clean energy investment banker, was quoted as saying: “It is apocalypse now. The coming months for gas importers are going to be a bloodbath.” The infrastructure required to cool gas into LNG is highly complex and cannot be replaced quickly. Repairs will involve a meticulous process that can only begin once Qatar is assured that the site is secure and personnel can return without the threat of further attacks.Tom Marzec-Manser, an LNG specialist at energy consultancy Wood Mackenzie, said it is already clear that a return to normal output levels in Qatar will not happen quickly, regardless of how soon the conflict ends. “What we can conclude immediately is that regardless of when the conflict now ends, a resumption of normal production from Qatar is not going to happen in a matter of weeks,” he told FT.The expert noted that earlier projections had suggested production at Ras Laffan could resume within about 40 days, but that timeline is no longer realistic. He also indicated that Qatar’s ambitious expansion plans for the facility, which include adding six new liquefaction units over this year and next, are now likely to face delays. “There is an element of uncertainty, but we know now this is a months-long reduction in supply,” he added.Although some LNG projects in the United States are expected to come online soon, Corbeau said replacing Qatari supply is far from straightforward and involves significant political challenges. She pointed out that some policymakers have already begun advocating for easing restrictions on Russian gas imports.At the same time, several countries have started reverting to coal-based power generation, while industrial operations in parts of Southeast Asia are being forced to scale back or suspend production due to limited energy availability. “The world of energy is going to fracture between the haves and the have-nots,” said Segalen.