Connect with us

Business

Lite fares: Air India may unbundle meals on domestic and short international flights; lounge access for business flyers – The Times of India

Published

on

Lite fares: Air India may unbundle meals on domestic and short international flights; lounge access for business flyers – The Times of India


New Delhi: Desperate times call for desperate measures. Full service Air India is planning to make meals optional on its domestic and short international (under two hour) flights. Once this “unbundling” rolls out in the next month or two, passengers opting out of meals could have upwards of Rs 250 shaved off their ticket price. While this move, say people in the know, is “on the anvil,” the airline is looking at several other unprecedented measures to fly through the severe cost-revenue turbulence caused by the unending West Asia war.

Air India meal

Air India meal

While not opting for meals could lead to slightly cheaper economy tickets, AI is looking at unbundling lounge access for business class passengers because those opting out of this, could get their tickets cheaper. On an average, lounge operators charge Rs 1,100-1,400 per user at metro airports and Rs 600-700 at non metros. The average spend is about Rs 1,000 per lounge. Many business class flyers are frequent travellers who just make it to airports in time for their flight and do not head to the lounge. If unbundled, this could be a saving in their ticket cost. Banks have been reducing lounge access for credit card users for the same reason to cut their costs.“From Day One, Air India has had meals bundled in its ticket price. Now the way aviation turbine fuel (ATF) price is rising and the rupee crashing since Feb 28, ticket prices are going up. India is a price-sensitive market and raising fares beyond a point leads to a fall in traffic with many opting to travel by train or road. This has led to the rethinking to unbundle meals on some flights. Other steps are also being considered,” said people in the know. Several airlines globally have over the past few years unbundled their onboard offerings. Many international full service airlines offer a basic meal in economy while giving the option of buying gourmet meals at an additional cost. Ditto for alcoholic beverages, with cheaper beer and wines being given at no extra cost while the others being charged for. “For passengers, the distinction between full service and low cost airlines is blurring very fast,” said an industry old-timer.Almost all narrow body aircraft being delivered to AI group will be sent to AI Express fleet for lower cost and more revenue as these single class planes have more seats and don’t offer lounge access and free meals. To increase revenue, the group is looking at having ads behind the boarding cards of Air India Express flights — AI boarding cards have the same already. The Iran war has impacted airlines globally and AI is no exception. The Tata group airline has lost about Rs 24,000 crore last fiscal; has sought funds from promoters Tata Sons and Singapore Airlines; is the worst impacted Indian carrier by airspace closures to the west that have made its Europe, UK and North America nonstops much longer and is looking for a new CEO.



Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Business

Ford raises 2026 guidance as $1.3 billion tariff refund assists in offsetting higher costs

Published

on

Ford raises 2026 guidance as .3 billion tariff refund assists in offsetting higher costs


Ford signage at the New York International Auto Show in New York City on April 2, 2026.

Danielle DeVries | CNBC

DETROIT – Ford Motor raised its 2026 guidance on Wednesday after beating Wall Street’s first-quarter expectations and reporting a $1.3 billion tariff refund benefit after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that some of President Donald Trump’s tariffs were illegal.

Ford stock rose more than 6% in after-hours trading.

Here’s how the company performed in the first quarter compared with average estimates compiled by LSEG:

  • Earnings per share: 66 cents adjusted vs. 19 cents expected
  • Automotive revenue: $39.82 billion vs. $38.82 billion expected

The first-quarter results significantly outperformed Ford’s performance from a year earlier, despite a 4% decline in wholesale units during the time period. Its overall revenue increased 6% to $43.3 billion and its adjusted earnings before interest and taxes more than tripled from $1 billion to $3.5 billion. Net income jumped to $2.5 billion, or 63 cents a share, up from $500 million, or 12 cents a share, a year earlier.

Automakers commonly exclude “special items” or one-time charges from their adjusted financial results to provide investors with a clearer picture of their core, ongoing business operations. Excluding special items but including the tariff reimbursement, Ford earned 66 cents a share.

The company’s updated full-year 2026 guidance includes adjusted EBIT of $8.5 billion to $10.5 billion, up from $8 billion to $10 billion. It maintained adjusted free cash flow of between $5 billion and $6 billion and capital expenditures of $9.5 billion to $10.5 billion.

Ford noted the guidance does not include potential impacts of a sustained conflict in the Middle East or a significant downturn in the U.S. economy. 

Ford CFO Sherry House said the earnings increase was not strictly because of the tariff reimbursement. The company has not received that refund yet but said it is helping to offset an expected $1 billion incremental increase in commodity costs, specifically aluminum, for the year.

“The rest of the beat came from strong product mix in net pricing and growth in software and physical services,” House said during a media call Wednesday.”Even with the one-time tier of benefit, the underlying business came in around $2.2 billion ahead of expectations.” 

Ford already expected an additional $1 billion in increased commodity costs amid higher prices and as it sources aluminum from different suppliers following fires that have affected production at a key Novelis aluminum plant last year in New York. The automaker has said the supplier isn’t expected to be operational again until between May and September.

House said the company decided to book the tariff refund during the first quarter because that’s when the Supreme Court’s decision was made. Trump last week told CNBC that he would gratefully “remember” U.S. companies that do not seek refunds for the tariffs.

House said the company did not raise its automotive free cash flow guidance along with the earnings outlook due to uncertainty about the tariff refund process and timing.

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act tariff benefit was largely expected by Wall Street analysts, but the exact amount Ford would receive was unknown. It is part of $160 billion in potential refunds expected to be returned to companies after the levies were ruled illegal in February by the Supreme Court in a 6-3 decision. 

From a business unit basis, Ford’s traditional “Blue” operations led the way for the company with $1.9 billion in earnings during the quarter, followed by its “Pro” commercial business earnings at about $1.7 billion.

Ford’s “Model e” electric vehicle business narrowed its losses from $849 million a year ago to $777 million during the first quarter of this year. That smaller loss corresponded with a 70% decline in year-over-year EV sales for the first quarter.

Ford’s results come a day after crosstown rival General Motors raised its 2026 guidance and significantly beat Wall Street’s first-quarter earnings expectations. GM reported a roughly $500 million benefit from the U.S. Supreme Court IEEPA decision.

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Mercedes-Benz among firms to challenge car finance compensation scheme

Published

on

Mercedes-Benz among firms to challenge car finance compensation scheme



Mercedes-Benz and two other lenders are set to challenge the financial watchdog’s compensation scheme for motorists mis-sold car loans.

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) faces a legal battle over its redress programme, as a consumer group has also lodged an appeal.

This development follows days after several of the UK’s biggest lenders opted not to pursue similar challenges.

A spokeswoman for Mercedes-Benz said: “Given that this is subject to ongoing legal proceedings, we cannot comment further.”

The German carmaker is exposed to the car finance mis-selling saga through its financial services arm.

The FCA also confirmed that two other lenders were appealing. It did not name the firms but reports have said that Volkswagen Financial Services was one of the companies involved, according to Sky News.

A spokeswoman for the FCA said: “We have received challenges from three lenders in addition to the challenge from Consumer Voice, represented by Courmacs Legal.

“We are considering our approach and will set out more later this week.”

Earlier this week, it appeared that the watchdog had a clearer path to proceed with the compensation plans after the main industry body joined major lenders in backing out of any legal challenge.

The Finance and Leasing Association (FLA) said it had “concerns” about the programme but that it was choosing not to raise a challenge, while Santander, Barclays and Lloyds had also decided to accept the scheme as it is.

The FCA estimates that payouts are due on 12.1 million mis-sold car finance deals from an array of lenders, expected to result in compensation totalling around £7.5 billion.

The deadline for companies to lodge legal challenges to the watchdog’s scheme passed on Monday.

While the lenders are likely to be resisting the billions of pounds of compensation that they are required to pay, the FCA is also being challenged on the other side of the coin by a group representing consumers.

Consumer Voice has applied to the Upper Tribunal for a review of the scheme over concerns that it could leave millions of consumers out of pocket by several hundred pounds per claim.

The consumer group said it supports the need for an industry-wide scheme but argued that it should “fairly reflect” the harm drivers have suffered, with “properly calculated compensatory interest”.



Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Paramount CEO David Ellison wants to release 30 films annually. History and Hollywood say it’s unrealistic

Published

on

Paramount CEO David Ellison wants to release 30 films annually. History and Hollywood say it’s unrealistic


CEO of Paramount Skydance David Ellison speaks on stage during the Paramount Pictures presentation at CinemaCon at The Colosseum at Caesars Palace on April 16, 2026 in Las Vegas, Nevada.

Valerie Macon | AFP | Getty Images

Paramount CEO David Ellison is trying to do something that no other studio has done in the modern age of cinema — release 30 films annually.

Ellison once again promised this theatrical feat in front of thousands of exhibitors at CinemaCon earlier this month. Applause erupted from the crowd after he made the pronouncement.

But privately, movie theater operators have expressed concerns and skepticism about the proposed future slate of films. While a massive string of releases would help cinemas, companies doubt he will be able to follow through on the promise.

His 30-film plan would hinge on Paramount receiving regulatory approval for its proposed merger with Warner Bros. Discovery, which the latter company’s shareholders approved last week. Ellison noted that each studio would produce 15 films a year.

However, Ellison has not provided many details about those 30 releases, and it’s not clear how he would hit the ambitious goal. Representatives for Paramount did not reply to CNBC’s request for comment.

It’s unclear if all of the films would have wide releases (meaning they eventually play in at least 1,500 theaters, though the typical benchmark is 2,000). It’s also not certain whether the company will count films it distributes but doesn’t produce as part of this figure, or how many of those proposed titles will be considered tentpole blockbusters.

Movie theater operators and industry experts are skeptical that Paramount would be able to sustain a 30-film slate after the initial merger. After all, part of the consolidation process is eliminating redundancies, which inevitably leads to layoffs as well as cost-cutting measures that often result in fewer productions.

“When it comes to traditional brand-new wide release films, 30 movies a year is a lofty plan given that most distributors are releasing on average anywhere from 10 to 15 wide releases each year,” said Paul Dergarabedian, head of market trends at Comscore.

In fact, in the last 25 years, no studio has released 30 films in a single year. The combination of 20th Century Fox and Searchlight came close in 2006 when the studios had 25 wide releases, according to data from Comscore.

The data also show that when studios have merged in the past, the result has been fewer theatrical releases, not more.

Prior to acquiring 21st Century Fox and its studio assets, Disney was averaging 12 films a year dating back to 2000. Meanwhile, the combined efforts of 20th Century Fox and Searchlight averaged 16 films during that same time. Not including 2020, in which theatrical releases were impacted by pandemic-related cinema closures, Disney has averaged around 13 films a year following the 2019 merger.

The line chart shows the annual film releases by Disney and 20th Century between 2000 and 2019 ahead of the two companies’ eventual merger.

“I don’t remember any instance with consolidation where one plus one equals two,” Eric Handler, managing director and senior research analyst at Roth Capital Partners, told CNBC.

Additionally, a combined Paramount and Warner Bros. slate would face some logistical issues in placing 30 films on a 52-week calendar, as well as competition for coveted premium large format theaters.

The wider Hollywood cohort has also balked at the merger, citing similar concerns about job losses and reduced productions. More than 4,000 A-listers, including Robert De Niro, David Fincher, Pedro Pascal and Florence Pugh have signed an open letter opposing the combination of the two companies.

At least one theater operator, however, is supportive of the merger. AMC CEO Adam Aron came out in favor of Paramount’s acquisition of Warner Bros. during CinemaCon earlier this month.

“Of particular importance are David’s public commitments to expand film distribution by Paramount and Warner to at least 30 movies per year, and his vocal embrace of a 45-day exclusive theatrical window,” he wrote in a statement.

“I am confident that David Ellison is sincere as to his intentions, and truly believe that he in fact will wind up delivering on these commitments,” he added.

‘Empty seats and vacant screens’

However, Ellison’s target would not only be higher than any recent precedent — it would be significantly more.

“Historically, the max you’re seeing out of the studio is sort of 20 a year,” said Doug Creutz, senior research analyst at TD Cowen.

He noted that studios like Disney, Universal and Warner Bros. have the funds to make 30 films annually, but they don’t not only because is it not profitable to do so, but also because few studios have enough quality IP or original stories to put out in a year.

“If you had 30 good ideas, then I’d say do it, but you won’t,” he said. “Most studios don’t have 20 good ideas.”

“I think that the reality of it is that they’ll realize that, they probably realize it already, but they’re saying 30 because you’re trying to get the deal approved,” Creutz added. “I would say my guess is that there isn’t a year where Warner plus Paramount release 30 films unless the slates are already set pre-merger.”

This sentiment was repeated by industry analysts, movie theater owners and even rival studios during private conversations CNBC had at CinemaCon earlier this month. More so, there was an overwhelming sense of tension between studios and cinema operators, particularly when it came to the number of theatrical titles being offered up.

Theater companies would welcome more quality releases, but there has been a shortage of them following the Covid pandemic.

“I tell people that the only thing that exhibition has are empty seats and vacant screens until the studios step up and give us something to play,” one veteran movie theater executive, who requested anonymity to speak candidly, told CNBC. “We have no other alternative.”

The executive noted that re-released films, live sports and concert screenings “don’t pay the bills,” and even concession sales aren’t driving the same kind of revenue that they used to.

“We can’t survive without movies,” they said.

Movie theaters have struggled in the wake of the pandemic because of a lack of titles. Production was slowed due to Covid-related shutdowns and exacerbated when both the writers and actors guilds went on strike just a few years later. At the same time, streaming has become more prominent and studios are producing fewer titles for theatrical release.

Fewer films has led to lower domestic box office hauls. Prior to the pandemic, annual ticket sales routinely topped $11 billion in the U.S. and Canada, but in the years after, the combined efforts of the studios have yet to surpass $10 billion.

This year could break that trend, as the slate of films is significantly larger. However, if a merger does take place, the expectation is that the release schedule will once again shrink.

“We know what’s going to happen,” the veteran theater executive said. “We know that when Paramount eats Warner, it’s going to be exactly like Disney-Fox. There is no difference.”

Other theater operators echoed these sentiments when speaking anonymously to CNBC. They, too, questioned how the gaps in the slate would be filled if Paramount can’t deliver on its 30-film plan.

Amazon MGM has already stepped up to the plate in recent years and has promised at least 15 theatrical releases per year starting in 2027. The studio is on pace to have 13 releases in 2026. One of its recent films, “Project Hail Mary,” which arrived in theaters in March, has set box office records for the studio and delivered audiences to theaters.

However, Amazon’s 15-film annual addition to the overall slate was already replacing the films lost from the Disney-Fox merger. It wouldn’t be enough to also account for any losses in titles from a merger between Paramount and Warner Bros.

“It’s not great for exhibition,” the cinema veteran said. “It’s a lose-lose proposition.”

Choose CNBC as your preferred source on Google and never miss a moment from the most trusted name in business news.



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending